More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Farihah Zaman

GET UPDATES FROM Farihah Zaman
 

Twilight: Breaking Dawn, Or, How Even Marital Sex Is a Punishable Offence

Posted: 11/22/11 05:04 PM ET

2011-11-21-Breakingdawnposter.jpg

SPOILER ALERT:

I could never get into the whole Twilight thing, and not because I'm impervious to the charms of youth-oriented fantasy and sci-fi. Harry Potter? Magical. Hunger Games? I'm ravenous for more. Twilight? A glorified dime store novel with low stakes (pun intended), murky morals, and unfortunate implications when it comes to gender politics. This may not be a particularly original take on the material but an accurate one; Bella and Edward's relationship is framed as epic romance but is at worst offensive and condescending to women, and at best ickily co-dependent. It is a 12-year-old girl's uncomplicated idea of romance, and while wish fulfillment literature is not a crime, the author of the books and the screenwriter and directors of the films haven't done the work of unpacking the more incendiary aspects of the story.

In the latest installment, the hundred-something year-old Edward (Robert Pattinson) marries his teenage girlfriend (Kristen Stewart) and whisks her away to a private island in Brazil, where he finally agrees to boink her in a highly anticipated and thoroughly disappointing sex scene. I mean sure, he breaks the bed with his "passion," but both players seem oddly sedate, with expressions more perplexed than enraptured and nary a hair out of place. After only one session of love-making and afraid of further hurting the bruised, still-human Bella, Edward withholds, prompting a ridiculous and, for Bella, humiliating montage in which she exudes sexual frustration while playing chess on the beach and awkwardly trying to entice him with lingerie. He finally gives in, but his fears are validated when Bella finds she is pregnant with a fast-growing, blood-sucking fetus, the birth of which could have terrible, unforeseen consequences, if she even survives long enough to deliver, that is.

Stephanie Meyers claims that the Twilight series is not a pretext for some Mormon parable, but Breaking Dawn continues her terrifying march against female sexuality. In the first three books if Stella, a bashful tomboy-ish virgin, has sex with Edward, she risks being killed by his blood-lust; depicted in the films with much panting and the occasional kiss, followed by Edward ruefully flinging the girl away for her own good. In the fourth book, married Bella is finally able to have sex (a curious coincidence), but the poor milquetoast has to deal with the consequences in the form of their hybrid spawn, which slowly eats her alive from within. A severe punishment indeed.

Twilight: Breaking Dawn is about the horrors of marriage and childbirth more than those of being a mewling vegetarian vampire, and throughout the series, Meyers makes a woman's life seem like a torturous trial at nearly every stage, from the pain of mediocrity and pulsing hormones in the earlier books to the persistent specter of death hanging over perfectly common life choices in the later ones. No wonder a girl needs the protection of an agonized vampire and a rage-filled werewolf (not to mention a singular blandness) in order to make it out alive. As a 20-something woman who recently married and struggles with the idea of having children, I found watching the latest chapter to be honestly frightening and engaging in a womb-aching, worst-fears-come-true sort of way, one that references pregnancy as a classic body-horror mainstay. However, despite stumbling onto such a universal gem of a phobia, the story is kept from being meaningful by emotional politics that are confounding and puerile, divorced from the implications of the narrative, a fact the film was unable to mitigate.

I'd hoped that Bill Condon (Dream Girls and Gods and Monsters) might be able to inject some life into this morally questionable but enjoyably salacious material. Thankfully, he does manage to bring some horror back to the toothless vampire series; Bella's birth scene commences with an exaggerated breaking of bones reminiscent of the best of the hallucinations in Black Swan and continues with much bloody snipping and contorted-faced screaming. When Edward injects her with his vamp-juice in order to save her life, we see her writhing in agony in her mind only, before realizing she is physically paralyzed in by morphine.

However, Condon inexplicably offsets the welcome infusion of blood with jarring pop touches; if this is the installment in which Bella is forced to grow up and face the adult consequences of marriage and sex, why is this film drowning in indie pop and weepy emo? Why is sucked-dry pregnant Bella surrounded by vibrant movie color, why does she get magical makeup when she turns into a vampire? Aesthetically, the best Twilight offering is still the first, when Catherine Hardwicke kept the more unassuming, less bloated but, yes, ultimately less ambitious film to a chilly Washington-state palette of grays and harsh whites. There are other missteps, like the hilarious CGI werewolf-conference that made me feel like I was on peyote, or the handling of Jacob falling in love with an infant child, still creepy despite Condon's focus on Renesmee all grown up and trying to distract us with the word "protector."

As far as I can tell this moral of this film is that getting pregnant is like being inhabited by a bottomless pit of a parasite that will eat you alive, and if you happen to survive the birth of this hungry little fucker, you must die just a little bit in order to be reborn into Mother, prepared for the sacrifices ahead. Maybe the director who brought this conceit so vividly to life should start going by Bill Condom.

 

Follow Farihah Zaman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/brandnewfarihah

SPOILER ALERT: I could never get into the whole Twilight thing, and not because I'm impervious to the charms of youth-oriented fantasy and sci-fi. Harry Potter? Magical. Hunger Games? I'm ravenous ...
SPOILER ALERT: I could never get into the whole Twilight thing, and not because I'm impervious to the charms of youth-oriented fantasy and sci-fi. Harry Potter? Magical. Hunger Games? I'm ravenous ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissFrijole
My bite is worse than my bark.
10:20 AM on 11/27/2011
I haven't read any of the books or seen any of the movies, and that's how I would like to keep it! Seems like a major waste of time.
12:02 AM on 11/26/2011
I read the books just because I was curious about all the fuss, and they are a blight on literature. I cannot stand whiny, weak, female characters, and these books are all about them. The series begins because Bella's mom ditches her for a boyfriend so Bella has to move in with her dad. The entire second book was devoted to her pining away for a guy who left her. Great example to young women everywhere. A man who damages your truck so that you can't visit with a male friend is worthy of a restraining order, not your love! The books were terrible, and I still don't understand all the hype. If I want real vampires, I'll stick with Stephen King, who is a real writer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:59 PM on 11/25/2011
I couldn't agree more! Yes, folks--I know it's fiction. It's not even good fiction. I only watched the first movie, but I read all 4 of the books. I'm a bit ashamed to say I got sucked (no pun intended) into them, but I was working long night shifts at the time. I thought it was hilarious that Ms. Meyer's commentary on drug use was to point out that Bella had a Coke on a plane & some "unnecessary cold medicine." Caffeine & Benadryl are eeeevil!

But after I stopped laughing and thought about what I'd read, I was absolutely disgusted by the way Bella was portrayed. She had no personality of her own and seemed to wrap her whole identity in her relationship with Edward--even while a "true love" was literally staring her in the face. Yes, to some extent it was an accurate representation of teenage love, but the rest of the books continue along the same line. Bland Ms. Bella eventually marries and becomes a vampire and--what?--suddenly she is the *protector* of everyone around her? She's shown absolutely no strength through 4 books and sex, pregnancy, & death turn her into a "real woman"? Is that the take-away message?
01:08 PM on 11/25/2011
Great article. Distracting typo here: "In the first three books if Stella, a bashful tomboy-ish virgin, has sex with Edward, she risks being killed by his blood-lust; depicted in the films with much panting and the occasional kiss, followed by Edward ruefully flinging the girl away..."

I think you meant Bella, not Stella.
Cheers!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lifeofthemind
02:53 PM on 11/27/2011
This author seems a little overzealous with puns. I took that to be a play on Stella, from A Streetcar Named Desire, with similar themes. Even if I'm right, it's still distracting and annoying.
09:49 PM on 11/24/2011
The part I find offensive in the book is that a female vampire stops every bodily regenerative function, but somehow the male vampires still produce sperm? Or maybe that's just the prejudice of the MORE-MAN religion.
photo
tutibugjl
*Rolls Eyes Over Dramatically*
06:13 PM on 11/24/2011
You either liked it, or you didn't... THE END. Why are we putting so much into this?? smh
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
04:18 PM on 11/24/2011
For Pete's sake, it's fiction. Why does it have to have some moral underpinning? Get a grip...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:51 PM on 11/25/2011
Because, though it's fiction, it is still art. (I mean that in the loosest sense of the word). And there is nothing inherently wrong in looking for a deeper meaning and/or metaphor within a story--especially one presented as an epic tale like Twilight or Harry Potter. Such stories are generally intended to be a reflection of some part of society or humanity in general.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaag Tidestalker
Axial Tilt: the Reason for the Season!
12:59 PM on 11/24/2011
What is sadder than the punishment of female sexuality is that, in the novel, Bella pretty much vanishes. The story's perspective switches for the first time from Bella's point of view to that of the pedo--er, werewolf. One would wonder why the author does not wish for anyone to hear Bella's internal thoughts on the subject. Oh wait...she's a vessel, not a real person! She doesn't have thoughts!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:03 PM on 11/25/2011
Bella really didn't seem to have many thoughts!

As for Jacob, I never really took the imprinting storyline as being pedophilic in anyway. I read it just as if a child had imprinting on a parent. Up to that point, imprinting had always been addressed as a way of finding your true mate, but it's not unreasonable to think it could also happen the way it did with Jacob & Renesmee. Frankly, I was glad to see more time given to Jacob & his story. He actually showed some true strength and sacrifice in his willingness to love and protect his friend even though he disagreed with every single choice she had made. And when she had a child, he loved that child unconditionally despite who her parents were.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Film Shark
I love cinema.
03:50 PM on 11/23/2011
Who ever said falling in love with a vampire was going to be easy? I give Bella credit for holding out this long for Edward. The scene in the bathroom in which she nervously gets ready for her big night is funny. It shows that Kristen Stewart has a comic range. She could probably cross over to romantic comedy if she wanted to down the road.

Observing the all-female audience in the theatre (consisting of mainly moms and tweens), they loved the film. Women moviegoers should be proud; it is rare that a film targeted to the female demographic ever does this well at the box office. What did the Spice Girls used to say?, "Girl Power."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ESerafina42
Abandoned by wolves, raised by Republicans.
01:24 PM on 11/24/2011
Personally, I'm embarrassed for my gender, that this sort of tripe is what it takes.
12:26 PM on 11/23/2011
Let's see...all the teens who had sex in the Friday the 13th movies ended up dying in horrible ways and the good girl usually got away at the end. So are the people who make slasher flicks trying to push a "sex is bad" agenda?

These movies appeal to young girls. From what I remember, young girls run on pure emotion, and that's the target audience for these movies. The older women who are into it, I think, are reminded of the yearnings and desires of their youth, which they have likely lost with age (just like men).

For our next forway into pop culture, let's take a look at Pixar's Monster's Inc. Is it a coincidence that all the main monsters are adult males and that the little human child that leads them to a better world is a girl? I think not!!!!!
10:57 AM on 11/23/2011
I think this is a bit over-dramatic. And I think the author of this article is reading too much into the Twilight books. It's a poorly written novel about vampires. I don't think Stephanie Meyer was trying to push any hidden agenda with Mormon undertones. (Frankly, I don't think her writing has the depth necessary to pull it off). And if Zaman is going to claim she was, she should do her research. As the other commentator says, Mormons center a lot of their teachings on family life and the joy of children. Pregnancy is viewed as beautiful and sacred, not as a traumatizing experience they are attempting to discourage. In addition, men are encouraged to treat women with respect and equality. It's ridiculous to claim that Stephanie Meyer was attempting to convey that you will be "punished" for having marital sex! She had a horrible pregnancy because she married a vampire and had a half-vampire baby. And I actually know several Mormons who have their own problems with this book and its spin on sex and pregnancy, so you can't exactly call it Mormon sympathetic.
Again, this book did not reflect Mormon principles or beliefs. But even if Meyer had chosen to do that, so what? There are many literary works that reflect religious preferences and beliefs.She would have just as much a right to write a book about her religious beliefs as this author does to write this anti-Mormon article.
relevancematters
You're so full of what's right, you can't see what
10:11 AM on 11/23/2011
I read the books as a favor to my 28 year-old daughter, who was quite taken with them, and right away I was struck by lack of attention the author gave to the considerably complicated idea of giving up your soul for love--particularly in light of the fact that she herself, as part of the marketing package, was openly Mormon, and the book was aimed at 'young adults', which basically means teenagers.

The fourth book was horrifying in too many ways to count; this article does a good job of dissecting what amounts, in the end, to subliminal perversion. Whether or not the supposedly pious Meyers is aware of this or nor is interesting in itself, but I'm inclined to think she got in over her head and didn't even know it.
08:43 AM on 11/23/2011
ROFL.....You think you are so smart. Are you aware this is fiction?
09:37 AM on 11/23/2011
Yes, BAAAAAD fiction.

And how is what you're saying any kind of argument? If it's made-up, it's pure entertainment and there's nothing else to be said about it?

"Sex is naughty" is a creep subtext.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:32 PM on 11/25/2011
It's called suspension of disbelief. Characters need a motivation for their actions if they are to be believable enough to work as entertainment. No director (or writer) goes into a production without thinking of details like lighting, costuming, sets, and ambiance. These are very subtle ways of indicating to your audience what a character is thinking or what is motivating the action in the scene.

There's a reason why directors still use dark colors, low light, and creepy music when they want to create suspense.
08:12 AM on 11/23/2011
Excellent article. agree with all of it.
07:57 AM on 11/23/2011
The fact that in the first book, Bella's life basically ended when she couldn't get a "Boyfriend" she gave up her friends, her relationship with her family, basically her life until her boyfriend came back was disturbing to say the least.

There was NOTHING shown as to why they even fell in love. He liked the way she smelled and she...well there was never a reason why she should like him.

This latest is just a continuation of her war on young girls it would seem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ESerafina42
Abandoned by wolves, raised by Republicans.
01:26 PM on 11/24/2011
And he couldn't read her mind. Is that why he wasn't aware there was nothing there?