Fairy tales that end with the proverbial "everyone lived happily ever after" are strictly lightweight, one-note fare. The revival of Once Upon a Mattress off-Broadway at the Abrons Arts Center, is no exception.
The one twist: the popular Jackie Hoffman is Princess Winifred, while John "Lypsinka" Epperson snarls his way through Queen Aggravain with campy vigor in the musical version of "The Princess and the Pea."
Set in 15th-century Europe, a medieval kingdom is ruled by the sneaky Queen and her mute husband King Sextimus (a graceful David Greenspan). Sextimus is doomed to stay silent until a peculiar curse is lifted: "when the mouse devours the hawk."
Ostensibly, the royals are trying to marry off their son, Prince Dauntless (Jason SweetTooth Williams). In reality, the Queen has no interest in seeing her drab boy wed, devising absurd tests to discourage all possible mates.
And if Dauntless stays single, so does the rest of the kingdom.
So Sir Harry (Zak Resnick), besotted by Lady Larken (Jessica Fontana), sets out to the swamp lands to retrieve Winifred, who, however improbably, might save the day. A series of tricks and turns, thanks to a talented dancing Jester (Cory Linger) and Minstrel (Hunter Ryan Herdlicka), coupled with an aggravated case of puppy love, inevitably follow.
Performed on Broadway in 1959, the musical has seen several revivals, on stage and TV. It's a staid Fifties-style work, though Mary Rodgers' score is melodious and Marshall Barer's lyrics enjoyable. The Transport Group's rendition is fairly lively, given its parameters, and Hoffman is a standout. Known as a belter, she can also carry more tender melodies. Lypsinka fans won't be disappointed, either.
Arthur Miller fans who watch A View From The Bridge will be. It's Miller's centenary, so various productions are celebrating him in New York. A recent Death of a Salesman by the Yiddish Rep was a masterstroke. The West End import of Bridge, now on Broadway at the Lyceum, is not.
Though it stars Mark Strong and Nicola Walker, two excellent actors, the austere production misfires. It eliminated not only sets -- no view, no bridge! -- but Miller's specificity. It's like staging "Fiddler on the Roof" without Jews.
The "View" setting is Red Hook, Brooklyn, 1955, a tight-knit Italian-American neighborhood. It addresses the strength of community (absent), post-war immigration and emotional incest. Here, Eddie Carbone (Mark Strong), married to Beatrice (Nicola Walker), is obsessed with his niece Catherine (Phoebe Fox).
While Eddie is keeping her away from life, his wife's Italian cousins, illegally smuggled into the U.S. (Michael Zegen and Russell Tovey), pray for work to save theirs.
Life in America is rough; the newly arrived men will take any dock job they can get. If the authorities discover their illegal status, they'll be deported. Conversely, anyone who betrays such men is a pariah to the community.
These are deep thematic issues -- immigration, family dysfunction, community expectations. The 2009 Broadway version with Scarlett Johansson, Liev Schreiber and Jessica Hecht was personal, powerful and intimate. It captured the characters' claustrophobia and hardscrabble lives, as well as the agonizing vulnerability of men who lose economic or emotional power. At the same time, the looming view from the bridge, the promise of Manhattan, bespoke freedom.
Director Ivo Van Hove conceived this incarnation stripped of sets, time, place and ethnicity. The conception was made universal. But by whitewashing the particulars, both in design and delivery, it shortchanges the play.
It's fine to revamp a classic; British director Edward Hall has been doing that brilliantly with Shakespeare for years. But if a production doesn't stay true to a work's ethos, it undermines the original artistry.
At the end of this A View From the Bridge, the characters are bathed in blood. But the only one drowned is Arthur Miller.
Photos: Carol Rosegg/Mattress; Jan Versweyveld/A View From The Bridge
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.