More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Firas Al-Atraqchi

Firas Al-Atraqchi

GET UPDATES FROM Firas Al-Atraqchi

If Only Bin Laden Had Been Killed 13 Years Ago

Posted: 05/ 2/11 01:01 AM ET

The killing of bin Laden at the hands of U.S. forces is likely to be a cathartic moment for the world -- almost as if a war has come to an end -- but his termination comes much too late.

And the war is not truly over until the real mastermind of the al Qaeda operation -- Ayman al-Zawahiri -- is brought to justice.

Bin Laden -- a figurehead of the ugly face of extremism and an example of how any faith can be perverted to serve political (not religious) goals -- should have been taken out when the CIA became aware of his role in the August 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

He should have been taken out after the October 2000 bombing of the USS Cole off Yemen's coast.

He should have been taken out on September 12, or 13, or 14, 2001.

Instead, bin Laden evaded capture and lived on as a leader of a terrorist organization and embodiment of what the "War on Terror" was all about.

Bin Laden and his murderous hive of followers became the bogeymen that justified the invasion of Afghanistan. The Taliban was tossed out of Kabul and U.S. forces chased al Qaeda throughout the world, but bin Laden lived on and became the haunting example of what could happen unless the U.S. adopted the strategy of preemptive war.

Regrettably, U.S. foreign policy came to be branded by bin Laden.

And so, while bin Laden's recorded statements of defiance were broadcast on Al Jazeera, the Bush administration used his threats against the West to invade Iraq, a country which had nothing to do with 9/11 or with al Qaeda, intelligence has since shown.

I remember something the New York Times' Maureen Dowd said in the buildup to the Iraq War:

"The administration isn't targeting Iraq because of 9/11. It's exploiting 9/11 to target Iraq. This new fight isn't logical -- it's cultural. It is the latest chapter in the culture wars, the conservative dream of restoring America's sense of Manifest Destiny."

Al Qaeda caused the deaths of 3,000 innocent people in the U.S. But bin Laden was also the worst thing that has happened to Muslims and their history; Islam -- a faith that preceded al Qaeda by more than 1,400 years -- came to be defined by this terrorist group in much of post-9/11 Western discourse.

Al Qaeda never had a foothold in Iraq until after the U.S. invasion and occupation; its misbegotten preaching of murder was alien to Iraqi society. But since then, the terrorist group killed Iraqis -- almost as if it were implementing an apocalyptic agenda to wipe the country of its people.

It did not "resist" the U.S. occupation, instead choosing to drive a wedge between Iraqi Shia and Sunni.

Al Qaeda was not a liberating force; it did not speak for Muslims or defend their rights, but has wrought destruction and religious malaise in the Middle East.

As President Obama rightly said, bin Laden was a mass murderer of Muslims and his religion was not Islam.

Tonight, I remember the hundreds of thousands who died in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bali, Spain, the UK, the U.S. and anywhere al Qaeda practiced his rituals of fear.

 

Follow Firas Al-Atraqchi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/firas_atraqchi

The killing of bin Laden at the hands of U.S. forces is likely to be a cathartic moment for the world -- almost as if a war has come to an end -- but his termination comes much too late. And the wa...
The killing of bin Laden at the hands of U.S. forces is likely to be a cathartic moment for the world -- almost as if a war has come to an end -- but his termination comes much too late. And the wa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
07:54 AM on 05/04/2011
Mass murder was not known in Iraq? Shut the front door! Do you happen to recall a guy named Saddam Who's Sane who killed his own citizens in a country essentially by the biggest occupyers in history, the British?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
09:24 AM on 05/04/2011
Nobody said that mass murder was not known in Iraq. But even WITH Saddam Hussein killing his people the RATE at which they were being killed was far lower than it's been since we invaded...
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
02:17 PM on 05/04/2011
I am sorry, early this morning, there was a phrase like that in the blog. Gone now. I did omit the word "designed" by the British
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trying2help
mom doc
08:18 PM on 05/02/2011
The Iraq war had nothing to do with 9/11 just an excuse- or perhaps a paranoid delusion. The outcome- millions and millions of dollars in profits for the oil companies that continue to this day and impoverishment of the lower middle class and working class American taxpayer, creating a plutocracy- a country ruled by wealthy corporations.
I know sounds like a lot of rhetoric or canned speech. True none the less. Just look at gas pump prices.
And - yes- the end of Osama Bin Laden will be a great strike as is not the operational head- he was the figurehead.
Now we need to remove the mastermind- al Zawahiri who is the root of much of this evil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScottV
Missouri Yellow Dog Dem
01:51 PM on 05/02/2011
Bin Laden achieved his stated goal before the US did, which was to bankrupt America and thanks to the GOP's upward wealth distribution plan and their insatiable apatite for the military industrial complex they help him do it.
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
10:53 AM on 05/02/2011
Are you kidding? How about if there was good birth control, he never would have been born. Or abortion as soon as his mother knew. If Only...

Time for the Wayback Machine Mr Peabody
10:40 AM on 05/02/2011
Good article, very appropriate. Thank you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:36 AM on 05/02/2011
Who killed more Muslims? bin Laden or Bush and Obama? Dowd was right. Iraq was a cooked up scheme to show power and distribute $$$$$$$ on no-bid contracts. Rummy and Cheney were at least honest when they said they didn't count the Iraqi dead. They were irrelevant then and now. The game is about the abiliry to exercise power at will. That's all.
08:39 AM on 05/02/2011
The transfer of wealth of this nation to the upper classes, and the tearing down of individual freedom took large leaps while this nation was distracted by Bin Laden and his atrocities. It appears that the US gov't succeeded in doing more damage than he ever could have..
08:27 AM on 05/02/2011
Was there any reason to go after Bin Laden 13 years ago??? The eight years that Our troops were in Iraq was supposedly a reason...Only that Bin Laden was never there...His home was in Afganistan and If the troops were sent there first ,I don't think America would not be in this recession recovery due to the Billions of dollars that went toward a War that was unjust and were thousand of men and women in our armed services lost their lives.
photo
geo999
"Well, who's gonna monitor the monitors?"
09:21 AM on 05/02/2011
Yes, there was mare than ample reason, and opportunity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
10:20 AM on 05/02/2011
Yes, there was reason. The 1993 WTC bombing was an al qeada operation. The 1998 bombings of the embassies in Kenya and Tanania were al qeada operations.

And in fact, in 1999, my ship was ordered out of the Persian Gulf (where we were conducting Maritime Interdictions to ensure the embargo against Iraq was being obeyed...) and told to run silent in the Indian ocean awaiting final orders to fire on his camp in Afghanistan where he would have been killed. The President never gave that final order because a group of Republican lawmakers came to him and said that he couldn't fire because the Saudis had just landed a plane at that camp....
photo
Anybodyseenthepopos
Like you Really give a rats...
12:04 PM on 05/02/2011
Thanks for not leaving out the last sentence!
photo
saint bernard mom
and Newfie Gram ♥spay♥neuter♥adopt♥
01:52 PM on 05/02/2011
I agree. And the US Cole! Plus there were many attacks around the world that were aimed specifically at Americans. And those that were thwarted would have also been horrendous. f&f
 
 
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dennis1943
whatever the voices in my head say.......
08:05 AM on 05/02/2011
So many "ifs" ,"ands" and "buts"...............IF only the human race were truly rational...............
photo
ArtJunky
Belief is mandatory
07:24 AM on 05/02/2011
If only WE hadn't supported him when he was a "freedom fighter" against the Soviet Union.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
08:24 AM on 05/02/2011
Yeah, then the Eastern Bloc wouod still be there, Brezhnev's successor's successor's successor would still be a Communist goon, and both Afghanistan and Pakistan would be communist puppets!!!! Oh the joy
09:45 AM on 05/02/2011
Really...How can you be sure that they wouldn't have been able to handle the situation themselves? Why did we have to train and arm them? Couldn't we have just done it ourselves? I'm not a conspiracy kinda guy but...What if this was the plan the whole time...I mean so may liberties and freedoms have been taken from us citizens since 9/11...We were all inspired by a Presidential hopefull, with all his promises of change...Yet it seems like Bush 3.0 to me. Maybe Obama did want change, now that he's there it may not be as reachable goal as he thought...Maybe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
10:21 AM on 05/02/2011
Not a chance. Afghanistan would likely have never fallen, just like it hadn't fallen in all of the region's history. And the USSR would still have fallen, it was a shell and had been for about 30 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom22602
What the hell is this?
09:58 AM on 05/02/2011
There is no evidence the US gave any aid to Bin Laden.
photo
ArtJunky
Belief is mandatory
09:31 PM on 05/02/2011
Yes there is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:13 AM on 05/02/2011
Well, do you actually know that he wasn't?

I mean, think about it. Killed in a raid, yes, but buried at sea? No corpse. A man who is every bit as ephemeral in his alleged death as he ever was in his alleged life.

I don't want to say, "Mission Accomplished," in what will surely be a cathartic national moment of vengeful celebration, but, alas, the thought cannot fully escape my mind. Indeed, something has always felt "wrong" about this situation and about what we have been told about this man. For 13 years running, the military which has the capability to take out a pirate from a moving dinghy ... "cannot find" one guy? Heh.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
08:25 AM on 05/02/2011
"proof of death" is very important, and I'm pretty sure it'll be provided.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
07:13 AM on 05/02/2011
Yes if only Clinton had took him when he was offered to him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
10:23 AM on 05/02/2011
First, Clinton TRIED to have him killed, and was stymied in his efforts by a group of Republican lawmakers who stopped him due to the Saudis landing a plane at the camp.

Second, BUSH was also offered him by the Taliban in 2001, but refused, choosing instead to invade both Afghanistan AND Iraq!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
02:15 PM on 05/02/2011
LOL
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
11:04 AM on 05/02/2011
If only Bush hadn't called of the troops who had him in their sights in Tora Bora!. If only GOP started to admit they don't give a flip about Americans, only war and oil and rich people.
photo
saint bernard mom
and Newfie Gram ♥spay♥neuter♥adopt♥
02:07 PM on 05/02/2011
From everything I have heard they did not have the manpower to handle taking him. Remember "Black Hawk Down"?  If OBL had taken out a patrol of US troops, it would have been another coup for him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samtee
Shankapotomus.
02:16 PM on 05/02/2011
OMG you have lost your head.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elyriaohio
Stop the Monarchy
06:14 AM on 05/02/2011
If only the FAA had made cockpits in-penetrable back in the Seventies when the pilots requested it.
06:06 AM on 05/02/2011
While I think it is good that Bin Laden is dead, I am concerned what will happen inside Pakistan now. There is a presence of Al Quada there which has been supported and protected. I wonder what havoc they will bring to the area when they fully realize Pakistan's role in Bin Laden capture.
04:21 AM on 05/02/2011
If only America had not built up Bin Laden when he was fighting the Soviets.
Wonder if Americans are aware of the saying..."you reap as you sow"?
I guess Bin Laden and Uncle Sam deserve each other
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
08:28 AM on 05/02/2011
I guess you're wrong. Bin Laden wasn't a leader of anything until well after he left Afghanistan. We didn' t give him any training. We gave them guns and training in antiaircraft bazookas, but that's about it.

Fighting the Soviets was a GOOD thing, remember. Still is.
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
07:40 AM on 05/04/2011
Covertly occupying Afghanistan to fight the Soviets and then dropping had consequences. Just like occupying over 135 countries and supporting tyrants puts us on the wrong side of things has drawbacks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom22602
What the hell is this?
10:01 AM on 05/02/2011
The US did not build up Bin Laden. Their was many different groups fighting in Afghanistan at that time.