On Wednesday, the Senate Environment and Public Works committee takes up the important issue of climate change science and adaptation.
Hopefully, it's a first step toward some real solutions to address record heat, drought, storms and other effects of climate change that we're now all experiencing first-hand.
When it comes to connecting the dots between climate change and extreme weather, the lines are now clear. What's also clear is that we can do something -- a lot of things, actually -- to prevent more of the climate-change related weather disasters we're experiencing.
First, we can reduce carbon dioxide and other polluting emissions that are heating our planet, intensifying our weather disasters and harming our health.
Stronger national and international emissions standards could cut billions of tons of heat-trapping, storm-intensifying carbon dioxide from our atmosphere. Two solutions championed by the Obama administration exemplify what we can do. Raising automobile mileage standards to 54.5 MPG will reduce carbon emissions from new vehicles by half by 2025. Limiting harmful emissions from new power plants will cut carbon pollution even more, helping calm our climate.
But we can do much more. Cleaning up emissions from existing, outdated dirty power plants, ending counterproductive policies like subsidies for oil, gas and coal companies, and stopping climate-altering undertakings like the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, which will only increase our carbon-intensive use of tar sands and court more weather disasters, are important next steps.
State and local governments, meanwhile, can better prepare for the effects of climate change -- whether it's sea level rise or drought or heat-related health problems. Washington, D.C., for instance, is implementing environmentally friendly stormwater control systems that will help reduce flooding and protect water quality in a changing climate -- an example that other cities can follow.
And as individuals, we cannot sit on the sidelines while our planet and our neighbors suffer through climate change and extreme weather. Making the right choices in our homes and in our communities when it comes to where we get our energy will not only help heal our planet, it also will help improve our finances.
We must also hold our lawmakers accountable. Countless surveys show that Americans want and expect Congress to address climate change, to increase clean energy and to protect our health and environment.
Yet our current Congress so far has done the exact opposite, taking an unprecedented number of votes against environmental protections while simultaneously launching politically motivated witch hunts every time a clean energy company stumbles. Our lawmakers should protect our health and welfare, not follow the dictates of lobbyists for big polluters.
Most importantly, we must stop ignoring the problem -- and start ignoring those who
deny the truth. We now know what climate change looks like, and what it causes.
If we couldn't figure it out ourselves from the freak derecho storm that crippled the Washington area; from the devastating wildfires in Colorado; from the hottest January-June in U.S. history or one of the worst U.S. droughts ever, science once again has shown us the connections.
In the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's "State of the Climate in 2011" report, 378 scientists from 48 countries concluded that extreme weather events are connected to human-induced climate change. This human-induced climate change, the NOAA report found, dramatically increased the odds of heat waves in Texas, wide temperature fluctuations in the United Kingdom and devastating storms in Australia and elsewhere around the globe last year.
Only those with ulterior motives and those they can persuade will continue denying that human-caused climate change is beginning to wreak havoc on our planet and on our lives. We should not allow this minority to prevent us from taking the steps we can and must take to help heal our climate.
And we would be wise to act now -- before the next weather disaster strikes.
This post originally appeared on The Hill's Congress blog.
Donald Carr: Drought-Stricken Farmers Pay the Price for Failed Climate Bill
Scott Bittle and Jean Johnson: Power Failure: What Voters Should Ask Obama and Romney on Energy
Bill Chameides: Natural Gas: A Bridge to a Low-Carbon Future or Not?
Douglas LaBier: Green Leadership -- What Is It?
If all Americans didn't eat meat for just one day a week, this would save the same CO2 emissions as 90 million plane tickets from New York to LA or from LA to New York.
90 Million tickets, each year, just by eating no meat for just one day a week!
Meat the Truth: CO2 effect of eating no meat for 1 day a week at http://www.youtube.com./watch?v=bwtgEs1h6Ws
Because the thermometers sure are not helping now!
Next.
I see the cold weather in London for the Olympics and the drought and heat in the midwest and think both labels are wrong.
I see the price of corn rise and I blame, Localized Global Warming (LGW). You cannot argue that certain areas are hotter than ever. And while others are cooer, the localized nature of the global problem cannot be denied!
Maybe we will finally be able to agree on this weather phenomenon!
The main reason people are turning their backs on this is because of the flawed solutions environmentalists have been pushing. Take California for instance. They intend to reduce their emisions to 1990 levels by 2020. At the same time, China went from emisions levels 1/4 that of entire US, to almost double currently. So what difference will California's efforts make? Same difference that the entire EU made by commiting to a simmilar target; NOTHING!!!.
The damage done to the economy as a result of being outcompeted by those who do not bother to care about sustainability is immense. People are not naive, so they don't want their governments to do this on their behalf. Thus they will believe anyone who will tell them that more study is needed (indefinetely)
If we want to get anything done on this issue, we need to adress this dillema first, and then take action.
http://zoltansustainableecon.blogspot.com/2012/07/climate-change-frozen-global-village.html
FITs have proven to REDUCE overall electricity bills wherever they have been properly implemented (including Germany, the world's leader in rooftop solar), while improving property values, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs, and saving lots of energy, water, and open spaces. The OPPOSITE is true of Big Energy industrialization of our wilderness to remonopolize our grid in a renewable era.
Big Enviros are the only reason people think that going green will cost rather than save us all money in the short and long term. Get their (paid) Big Energy cheerleading out of our serious conversation about distributed generation and efficiency upgrades, and we can all win, including economists, conservatives, conservationists, separatists, hippies, soccer moms and even renters through community solar.
Why do you think Germany, a company with barely suited climate, is the largest purchaser of solar panels? It is all the government. And it is unsustainable!
We have so much fossil fuel in North America, including huge stockpiles of natural gas, that those other distractions are useless and costly.
Let's face facts!