iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Frances Beinecke

GET UPDATES FROM Frances Beinecke
 

Official Rio Document Disappoints but People's Commitment to Sustainability Inspires

Posted: 06/23/2012 11:43 pm

When 17-year-old student Brittany Trilford addressed the opening session of the Rio Earth Summit on Wednesday, she urged world leaders to take concrete action to protect the planet.

"I stand here with fire in my heart," she said. "I'm confused and angry at the state of the world, and I want us to work together now to change this. We are here today to solve the problems that we have caused as a collective, to ensure that we have a future."

The official document the leaders signed at the end of the conference three days later failed to live up to Brittany's eloquent charge. It showed an astonishing lack of ambition given the magnitude of the challenges before us.

But the energy pulsing through Brittany's speech reflected the singular success of the summit: the incredible, passionate, and dedicated focus of 50,000 people coming together to restore the planet.

It could be easy to call the Rio Earth Summit a failure, especially based on the official document alone.

But as I said in a New York Times op-ed I wrote with Trip Van Noppen, the lesson from Rio is that people aren't waiting for a document to tell us how to fight climate change or revive the oceans. We are already doing it, and Rio gave a chance to share, celebrate, and expand on those solutions.

In addition to the 50,000 people present in Rio, hundreds of thousands more participated virtually to make their voices heard like never before. Countries, communities and companies worldwide announced hundreds of individual commitments to instigate real change -- regardless of any United Nations document.

A group of development banks, for instance, pledged to give $175 billion to support public transit and bike lands instead of highway construction in the world's biggest urban centers--an initiative that will combat climate change and reduce toxic air pollution that causes cancer and heart disease.

Fourteen nations announced they were joining an international effort to phase out inefficient incandescent light bulbs by 2016. A transition to efficient lighting could result in annual global saving of more than $110 billion and reduce carbon pollution equal to taking more than 120 million cars off the road.

The United States said it would join several other countries to launch an international effort to monitor the growing acidification in the world's oceans brought on by fossil fuel emissions. And 32 groups from government, business, and civil society signed on to NRDC's Global Goal and Commitment to Stop Plastic Pollution in the world's oceans.

These are just some of the real, concrete commitments made in Rio. You can view them all NRDC's new website cloudofcommitments.org. And you can track their progress -- and hold leaders accountable -- in the coming months.

The official document, meanwhile, is not likely to spark many on-the-ground changes. It doesn't call for binding cuts in carbon pollution or set standards for expanding clean energy. It doesn't help achieve an international treaty to protect ocean biodiversity. And it backslides considerably on the need to make reproductive health care accessible to women around the world -- something I found particularly distressing.

The document reminds us that we can't rely only on the slow wheels of bureaucracy and government negotiators to address the urgent problems facing our planet. We must start doing it ourselves, and Rio proved that we are.

This post originally appeared on NRDC's Switchboard blog.

 
FOLLOW GREEN
When 17-year-old student Brittany Trilford addressed the opening session of the Rio Earth Summit on Wednesday, she urged world leaders to take concrete action to protect the planet. "I stand here wi...
When 17-year-old student Brittany Trilford addressed the opening session of the Rio Earth Summit on Wednesday, she urged world leaders to take concrete action to protect the planet. "I stand here wi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
09:10 PM on 06/24/2012
"A group of development banks, for instance, pledged to give $175 billion to support public transit and bike lands instead of highway construction in the world's biggest urban centers--an initiative that will combat climate change and reduce toxic air pollution that causes cancer and heart disease. "

If 5 billion of this money could apply to looking at and assessing the global state of transit and trails, it might lead to more enthusiasm and funding to spread these projects yet more widely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:21 PM on 06/24/2012
This article fails to address the most critical issue of our times. Replacing light bulbs and green buildings aren't going to get the job done. Mankind exists only because of Earth' natural and wild ecosystems, and as one article recently reported on this Green site, we've destroyed 43 percent of Earth's land-based ecosystems for "agriculture and parking lots." Therein is the gravest threat facing mankind.

Ecosystems provide man's natural resources, but they also create man's only life-giving and supporting services, like oxygen, fresh water, the entirety of Earth's biogeochemistry, the natural regulation and moderation of the climate, the natural sequestration of those climate warming gases and many more, life giving cycles, services and systems.

The conservation of Earth's natural, wild landscapes and their plant and animal native biodiversity is the most vital issue of today. To accomplish this, we must address the issue of Zero Population Growth because, nothing is sustainable unless we tackle this issue. Our too much-ness is wiping out every reason we exist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Denalidog
09:26 AM on 06/25/2012
every 50 million years there is a mass extinction event on this planet, and every 100 million years there 's a REALLY BIG ONE. That is the way it has been as far back as the fossil record goes. The only thing that's going to save mankind is to get off this rock and colonize another one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
01:59 PM on 06/25/2012
So, CAUSING a mass extinction by our own actions isn't much of a big deal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
03:02 PM on 06/25/2012
True, but I don't think we will be able to do so for awhile. The difference in the next big spasm is, man did it to himself.
photo
OC Surfer
A second is 30 nanoyears.
03:35 AM on 06/24/2012
Sustainability is guaranteed, in a way, since the laws of nature allow nothing but what is allowed. The notion that humans know exactly what levels to keep everything at or above or below is folly. Nature knows.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
06:53 PM on 06/24/2012
By this reasoning, humankind should pull back from its continued spread across natural systems, and reduce its footprint radically. Otherwise, we are assuming that we know better than nature how to make Earth livable.
photo
OC Surfer
A second is 30 nanoyears.
09:35 PM on 06/24/2012
Not at all. "Humankind" does not have a single mind, and therefore it cannot collectively "pull back from its spread across natural systems." The Arabs will spread or not spread as they want, as will the Africans, Asians, South Americans, Europeans and everybody else.

By the way, what "artificial systems" are in opposition to those "natural" ones you talk of? Some lunar base you know about?