THE BLOG
07/26/2013 10:59 am ET Updated Sep 25, 2013

Bill Clinton For Mayor

2013-07-26-459pxBill_Clinton.jpg

If the qualifications for high position in New York municipal government are a history of sexual peccadillos then why not elect someone with some real credentials, Bill Clinton? Bill Clinton not only has a history of tawdry sexual involvements with Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, but brilliance and political savvy to boot. Of course there is the question of residency, since Clinton lives in Chappaqua. But these would certainly be compensated for by the potential candidate's track record in fulfilling what we might call the Caligula requirement. When we think about the great presidents of the twentieth century, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Ike--they all strayed. But unlike Spitzer and Weiner they were great politicians and thinkers. In a way it's not what Anthony Weiner did-- which by any standards was mild and didn't actually involve any sexual acts. It's what he didn't do in failing to exercise even minor judgment when he allowed himself to employ social networks. Social networks are used when you want to draw attention to an activity. Occupy Wall Street uses Twitter when it wants to organize a demonstration. Do we want a mayor who attracts crowds every time he literally and metaphorically drops his pants? Eliot Spitzer disqualifies himself from the comptroller's position not because of going to prostitutes but because of the outrageous sums he paid for them. Would you elect someone to balance your budget who got taken to the bank by an organization with the hokey name of Emperor's Club VIP? If Bill Clinton were mayor or comptroller he would undoubtedly avoid the Emperor's Club and being a true statesmen at heart, he would only use social networks for political purposes.

{This was originally posted to The Screaming Pope, Francis Levy's blog of rants and reactions to contemporary politics, culture and the arts}