More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Frommer's

Frommer's

Posted: November 19, 2010 12:07 PM

There are cities where cars reign supreme, others where a bicycle or public transportation will suffice, and a select few that remain a paradise for two feet. By design or purely by accident, each of these 10 cities beckons you to wander its boulevards, paths, and parks.

Text by Charis Atlas Heelan. Photos courtesy of Frommers.com, where you can plan trips and connect with other travelers.

 
Have a favorite walking city? Send us your photos!
Find a picture, click the participate button, add a title and upload your picture
Florence, Italy
1 of 11
The Ponte Vecchio was the only one of Florence's medieval bridges left standing by the retreating German army in 1944.

In many parts of Florence, cars either aren't allowed or can't fit. Though the cobblestone streets may not be ideal for breaking in that new pair of Gucci stilettos, you can only really discover the soul of this historical city by foot. As you stroll along the banks of the Arno River and get lost in the narrow streets, don't forget to look up for random frescoes, incredible architecture, and hidden cafes.

Where to Walk: Take in all six of Florence's main bridges by walking along the Centro Historico side of the Arno. Pass the Ponte delle Grazie, Ponte Santa Trinita, Ponte alla Carraia and the famed Ponte Vecchio; walk through the Boboli Gardens and up to Forte Belvedere and Piazzale Michelangelo for breathtaking views; and promenade up the pedestrian zone of Via Calzaiuoli to Piazza Signoria and on through the arched exterior corridors of the Uffizi.
Total comments: 34 | Post a Comment
1 of 11
City
Disagree.
Right on!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

 

Follow Frommer's on Twitter: www.twitter.com/FrommersTravel

There are cities where cars reign supreme, others where a bicycle or public transportation will suffice, and a select few that remain a paradise for two feet. By design or purely by accident, each of ...
There are cities where cars reign supreme, others where a bicycle or public transportation will suffice, and a select few that remain a paradise for two feet. By design or purely by accident, each of ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Lily99
Equality. Dignity. Respect.
10:34 PM on 11/24/2010
True story - I once had an American tourist complain to me about how Edinburgh was badly designed for cars. I tried, and failed, to resist pointing out that it wasn't a very big consideration back in the 13th Century.

Sigh.
04:15 AM on 11/23/2010
Funny how none of these cities are on the most dangerous list. Something about a city that actually functions well for human beings helps to create a city that can balance density and diversity without dangerousness.
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
10:42 AM on 11/22/2010
New York and Paris and Venice are my personal favorites. I've never been to Australia, I wouldn't know. I'd like to nominate Orlando for Least Walkable City but let's not call it the Killer List.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
08:58 PM on 11/21/2010
Even Monterey, California, is small enough so that you don't need a car.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
02:06 PM on 11/21/2010
I have been to Dubrovnik and absolutely agree on it.  I also find London a wonderfull place maybe not so much for walking but wandering in an exploratory mood.  No worry about getting really lost because sooner or later you will run into a tube station and then make your way back.
 
I have never been to Florence but I can say that Italy has places on my most and least walkable cities.  Most walkable was Venice.  Least walkable was Rome.  Crossing most main streets was hair raising there.  In between many of the plazas were pleasant pedestrian places (Trevi Fountain, St. Peters, Plaza Navorona, etc.) but getting from A to B can be tense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momofvegasgirls
My bio is not for sale !
02:03 PM on 11/21/2010
Now that I live in Las Vegas, and not NYC, my waistline is MUCH bigger than it was when I walked everywhere. Walking is great exercise and also helps develop and strengthen the social fabric of those communities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
01:32 PM on 11/21/2010
I lived in the West End of Vancouver for 5 years and I didn't once think about needing a car. I was much fitter then, since moving to the suburbs.

But Vancouver is truly an outdoor enthusiast's city. Tops on my list.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:39 AM on 11/21/2010
Dubrovnik, for sure! What a unique city for walking. No cars in the Old Town.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
01:16 PM on 11/20/2010
Vienna and Budapest are also beautiful, walkable cities. This article made me think of one of the world's most wonderful yet completely unwalkable cities, Bangkok. I learned the hard way: take public transportation—everywhere.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbmetzger
10:36 AM on 11/20/2010
this is not one of them...
Beijing Air Quality "Crazy Bad," Says US Embassy
The pollution in Beijing was so heavy Friday that the US Embassy ran out of conventional adjectives to describe the air quality. While the embassy's website later removed the term "crazy bad," the air pollution remains a health hazard for city resident. http://www.newslook.com/videos/267649-beijing-air-quality-crazy-bad-says-us-embassy?autoplay=true
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valeskas
catlover/book lover democrat
08:39 AM on 11/20/2010
Frankfurt, Germany
photo
KOisGod
To thine own self be true
01:04 AM on 11/20/2010
come on, no San Francisco?
I must say though, Venice is marv.
Oh, WASN'T EVEN ON THE LIST.
06:10 PM on 11/20/2010
Oh, Venice! A dream for pedestrian: no cars, no motos, no bicycles and such a delight to be lost!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
notmzbehavin
08:56 PM on 11/19/2010
I was staying near the American Embassy and walked to the Accademia, the Ponte Vecchio, etc.We never took a taxi or bus.

Sometimes it killed my feet and I was grateful for my tennies. As I was in a group with American college students, there wasn't a chance that I could pass as a native anyway so I was determined to be comfortable.

We actually went to Venice as well, and other than the water taxi's, never took public transport.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
subinense
"We are star stuff" Carl Sagan
07:22 PM on 11/19/2010
Montreal ? Barcelona ?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
04:32 PM on 11/19/2010
Might include Petersburg and Budapest in that. Maybe Bratislava
11:55 AM on 11/20/2010
are you kidding? bratislava? what a joke! Go to vienna instead - an hour and a world away...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
12:38 PM on 11/20/2010
Yeah, Vienna would do well on that list, too
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
08:57 PM on 11/21/2010
I was going to mention St. Pete and Moscow (and maybe also Yekaterinburg). Very few European cities require cars.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
08:07 AM on 11/22/2010
Almost any European city is good for walking. My Chisinau is good. Plenty and plenty of parks, wide sidewalks (though most in disrepair), and very compact.