iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gabriel Daniel Solis

GET UPDATES FROM Gabriel Daniel Solis
 

UT Austin Must Become a Symbol of Racial Justice

Posted: 10/10/2012 3:47 pm

At least four students of color were recently attacked by other students with balloons filled with bleach while walking in West Campus, a student neighborhood near UT Austin. These attacks come at a time when the nation is debating whether UT Austin -- and the United States -- are "post-racial."

Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will heard oral arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, a case that challenges the use of race in the University's admissions policies.

Some proponents of race-conscious admissions argue that these policies are still necessary because of the historical exclusion of people of color from educational opportunities. Indeed, the only other time that a case involving UT Austin came before the U.S. Supreme Court was in 1950, when the University was sued by Heman Sweatt, a black man who was denied admission to the School of Law because of his race.

Meanwhile, opponents argue that UT Austin's race-conscious admissions policies are no longer necessary in our "post-racial" society. But anyone who believes that we live in a "post-racial" society only needs to walk around the campus of UT Austin and the surrounding neighborhoods to know that this is not true.

While I was disgusted like everyone else to hear about the "bleach-bombing" attacks, I was not surprised. I lived in West Campus for several years while I was an undergraduate student at UT and I regularly witnessed white students throw objects or shout racial slurs from high-rise balconies at people of color walking on the sidewalk below. I also regularly participated in protests against racially-themed fraternity parties and on-campus events held on Cinco de Mayo in which fraternity members dressed like Border Patrol agents ran around the campus capturing other fraternity members wearing sarapes, sombreros, and t-shirts that read, "Illegal alien."

The public -- and the Supreme Court -- must understand that these are not isolated incidents, and they are not merely tasteless pranks taken too far. These acts of racial violence -- let's call them what they are -- are symptomatic of a larger history and culture at UT Austin in which implicit and explicit racial hierarchies persist, even as the University strives to be recognized for diversity in its students, faculty, and scholarship.

In this way, UT Austin is a microcosm of the country, where progress on racial equality masks persistent racial hierarchies and racism.

While I was glad to witness the unveiling of the statue of Cesar Chavez in 2007, I was still surrounded by symbols of dominant historical narratives that silence the contributions made by women and people of color throughout the history of the United States. Although the University renamed a dormitory named after a law professor who was also the leader of the Florida Ku Klux Klan, there are still statues of Jefferson Davis (leader of the Confederacy) and Robert E. Lee (chief general of the Confederacy) displayed prominently on the South Mall.

The statue of Martin Luther King, Jr. -- where students recently gathered to discuss Fisher v. Texas and the racially-motivated "bleach-bombings" -- faces toward the east side of Austin, where gentrification, fueled in large part by the dominating presence of the University, continues to displace low-income black and Latino families that have historically lived there but cannot afford soaring house prices, rents and property taxes.

After college, I attended graduate school at the University's Center for Mexican American Studies, one of the first in the nation committed to cultivating scholarship about Mexican American and Chicano people, history, and culture. But I was shocked at the level of hypocrisy when, in 2010, administrators in the College of Liberal Arts proposed substantial budget cuts for African American Studies, Mexican American Studies, Asian American Studies, and Women and Gender Studies, while at the same time proposing a budget increase for the Center for European Studies.

While it is clear that UT Austin is trying to move beyond its history of racism and racial discrimination, the University still must do more. And while we should not dismiss these efforts, we must continue to demand an end to racism and racial violence at and around UT Austin. Increasing police presence in West Campus is not the answer; the struggle for racial equality at UT Austin has been, and will continue to be, achieved by student-led actions with support from faculty and members of the community.

If UT Austin wants to be internationally recognized for genuine diversity in its students, faculty, and scholarship it must do more than defend the constitutionality of its race-conscious admissions policies. The University must listen to the students when they protest proposed policies or budget cuts, and commit to building more equal and mutually beneficial relationships with communities of color that surround the institution.

Put simply, the only way for the University of Texas at Austin to move beyond its racist history is to use it as a mandate to become a symbol of racial justice.

Gabriel Daniel Solis is a Research Associate in the Justice Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. He attended the University of Texas at Austin from 2005 to 2011.

 
FOLLOW COLLEGE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 94
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:24 PM on 11/10/2012
Additionally, I would like to note, as I did in another column, that as an alumnae and parent, I am appauld at the poor publicity the university has allowed, without defense, regarding the Greek Fiesta Party. I personally interviewed friends, both legal and even without papers, from Mexico. I even went across the border and would be happy to share a video interview of what the people really think. Here are the facts. They found the illegal costume distasteful, which was 1 or 2 out of several hundred. They didn't care about border patrol...found it a bit humerous. They were excited...EXCITED to hear that kids were dressing up in traditional attire (as we often see in restaurants, but aren't offended....hmmmmm). The FACT is...that when you combine the ponchos, dresses, sombreros, etc for that gathering you are looking at $12,000 to $15,0000 that was spent to support the people of Mexico. That is what they sell. They want you to buy it so they can feed their families. I asked if the theme of the party or dress was offensive. "NO, WE LIKE IT" was the answer. Mexican Americans that aren't getting that have forgotten their roots. One of the Hispanic sorority girls dressed as a Taco. She gets it. She had fun. She and her family are not hypocrites....Solis on the other hand...
11:26 PM on 11/08/2012
This is a bit of a late response.. but I honestly can't believe this thread and what utter stupidity is being displayed.

First off, to say that Asians and Jews living in "ghettos" do very well on college admissions test.. you are missing the whole point. Why not pick up a copy of The People's History of the United States.... black people were brought here to the United States and Hispanics and Native Americans were killed off in the thousands. What happens to a group of people when this happens and when they are not given rights til only a few decades ago? They grow up in sub-par communities! They grow up with a lower level of education because of the income neighborhoods they live in. They grow up working 10 times harder than another student who came from an affluent family! How is this hard for you to understand? That is very different than someone whose family immigrated to a country! It has nothing to do with culture... that is completely rude and you, sir, are the type of person that helps to bring this great nation backwards!
10:04 PM on 10/28/2012
I don't think UT Austin should become a symbol for anything. They should own up to what they are - a white supremacy school that expects minorities to bow to them.

Here is what you're not understanding Mr. Solis - in Texas, and probably in other states in the US, the public K-12 school system is segregated. You'll have that elementary school in that upper middle class neighborhood in Leander ISD where 90% of the students are white and in the same economic status while on the east side of Round Rock ISD, you'll have that black sheep of the district elementary school that receives less funding than the other ones with 2/3 hispanics and blacks, 1/3 white, and most of them being economically disadvantaged. Your article here is redundant, has a very poor point, and displays ignorance from a typical Texan with his head up his ass. I strongly suggest that when you visit your home state again, go visit an elementary school and during recess, you'll see the hispanic ELL kids playing with each other while the white kids play with each other, etc...

How is some white kid who's gone to school with peers of his race and of his economic status all through K-12 supposed to embrace diversity when they attend UT Austin?

I suggest you focus on your law studies at NYU. Trying to make a point on this topic is not something you are well-suited for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
03:49 PM on 10/16/2012
More African Americans and Hispanics were targeted by water balloons Sudan afternoon on Austin’s famed 6th Street. A water balloon wielding flash mob erupted at the intersection of East Sixth Street and Trinity in downtown Austin. Some 100 flash mobbers got involved, lobbing water balloons from opposing street corners and wielding water guns. You can see aq\n African America fleeing the barrage in the right-hand corner of one of the photos at http://digitaltexan.net/2012/austin-local-news/water-balloons-fly-flash-mob-erupts-6th-street/article3
06:56 PM on 10/15/2012
Isn't it racist to say that we nedd to have a certain percentage of blacks and latinos on campus as it implies that blacks latinos and whites are all the same . On elite campuses we need to have as many people with high SATs as possible regardless of their race , sex or religion . There is no proof that if someone from the ghetto grew up in Befverly Hills they would have gotten high SAT scores.
When you admit a black or latino with lower SAT scores you are cheating a white or Asian out of a place in a prestigious college and that is wrong.
04:03 AM on 10/28/2012
Agree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ezra Black
Long Live New Orleans
08:26 AM on 10/13/2012
Let the minorities leave the university and move on to schools who actually want them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
02:20 PM on 10/13/2012
The University of Texas is actually a very friendly place for minorities. Although the freshman class is 54.5% minority, Texas still gives racial and ethnic preference to minority students. The university also offers in-state tuition to undocumented immigrants provided they graduate from Texas high schools.
05:32 PM on 10/12/2012
The "students of color" need to be specified because whenever pro-affirmative action folk talk about "minorities" they leave out Asian-Americans even though they are the dictionary definition of minority. It's Orwellian language at it's best.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
06:22 PM on 10/12/2012
It gets confusing. As a Latina, Cameron Diaz is a person of color and eligible for affirmative actiom even though she is a blue-eyed blonde like Abigail Fisher. Elizabeth Warren, another blue-eyed blond, counts a person of color because one of her grandmothers had high cheek bones and might have been Cherokee. Al Pacino is not a person of color, although he played Cuban immigrant Tony Montana in "Scarfice." Neither is Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, who played Tony Montan's sister as Gina. They are both Italian Americans andonly look like persons of color. F. Murray Abraham, who was also cast as as Latino in "Scarface," looks Hispanic and was raised in El Paso, Texas, near the Mexican border, but he's an Arab American and not a person of color. Andy Garcia played Vincent Mancini in "Godfather III," but he only looks Italian. He's actually Hispanic and therefore a person of color. Slalma Hayek is part Lebanese and part Spanish, but she is a person of color because she grew up in Mexico. If she had been born in Spain, she still could have been cast as Mexican, as were Penelope Cruz ("All the Pretty Horses") and Javier Barden (No country For Old Men"). Even though Madonma is a blued-eyed Italian American, she was cast in the Hollywood version of Evita, a blond Latina who counts as a person of color. In the movie West Side sotry, Jews played the Irish and Italians played the Puero Ricans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willie Pagan
Pro Abortion, Pro DOMA & Independent
02:36 PM on 10/13/2012
so what exactly did you want to convey with your quite lengthly post??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeasTT
10:59 PM on 10/11/2012
The US Supreme Court has already upheld race based issues as illegal. Check out DeStefano vs Ricci.

You cannot punish someone for their race, nor can you reward them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles40
01:15 PM on 10/11/2012
"If UT Austin wants to be internationally recognized for genuine diversity in its students, faculty, and scholarship it must do more than defend the constitutionality of its race-conscious admissions policies."

I think I would rather be internationally recognized for having the best and brightest. Which is more important?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willie Pagan
Pro Abortion, Pro DOMA & Independent
02:49 PM on 10/13/2012
I ditto that... best and brightest.... the way it should be....
11:51 AM on 10/11/2012
I want to know what is the real motivation for this supreme court case regarding so called reverse discrimination at UT Ausin. My daughter was accepted to UT Austin after high school based on her grades that placed her at the top 5 percent of her graduating class of 405 students, secondly her sat scores were acceptable, extra curricula activities, etc and personal statement, just like any other college she fulfilled all the criteria for acceptance. Has the media checked the percentage of minorities in Austin, the number of hispanics in the state of texas and the number of whites to figure out why certain groups might seem over represented? By the way my daughter happens to be black. Comes from a middle income family but would probably be seen as an affirmative action student. UT has a lot of problems but racism as it is applied in this case is not one of them. I am not so convinced by this lawsuit. There is a hidden agenda here . I smell a rat . As usual the media is biased and not really giving full say to both parties . I heard the ex student in question interview once and I understood immediately why future interviews need to be conducted with her lawyer only.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
12:25 PM on 10/11/2012
Non-Hispanic whites make up 44.8% of the Texas population, but 45.5% of the fresmham class at the Unitversity of Texas, where they are over-represented by 0.7%. Hispanics make up 38.1% of the state population but 23.6% of the freshman class. They are under-represented by 14.5% African Americans make up 12.5%of the state populatuion, but 4% of the freshman class. They are under-represented by 8.5%. Asian Americans make up 4% of the state population but 18% of the freshman class. They are over-represented by 14%. It's obvious that Asian Americans,not white racism, is to blame for the racial embalance at the University of Texas.
04:10 PM on 10/11/2012
What are you saying? It's Asians that are causing this distortion? Have you checked how much of the Asian population are international and not? You'll find that the Asian population is too huge to aggregate into one group. The majority of Asians represented are East Asian - of that, many of International. Southeast Asian Americans, etc. - who historically have similar educational success, etc. as blacks and hispanics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willie Pagan
Pro Abortion, Pro DOMA & Independent
02:51 PM on 10/13/2012
yes... but the Asians are the brightest group and have earned their position in the class... not so with many of the others which get a pass cause of R A C E.
11:50 AM on 10/11/2012
It's imperative to note that all of the responses to these systematic incidents of racism have been led by students, not necessarily the University of Texas at Austin. If anything should because a symbol of racial justice, it's the students, not the university itself.
10:11 AM on 10/11/2012
I am an alum myself who attended UT in the late '70's when there was REAL racism, If there are charges and prooof of "bleach-bombing" of ANY student, not just minority students, they they should be expelled, period. UT Austin must ONLY maintain it's academic excellence.
09:54 AM on 10/11/2012
Everything. EVERYTHING is now measured through racially tinged glasses. Shame.

"A person of color." What does that mean? Not-white. But guess what? White is still a color. So now the author is stating that White people are colorless! I am offended!

Freedom of speech? Not in our new Progressive utopia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
06:29 PM on 10/11/2012
By Gabriel Daniel Solis' definition, Cameron Diaz is a person of color. Cameron Diaz is eligible for affrimative action because she's Hispanic, but Abigail Fisher is not, even though both are blue-eyed blondes. However, some people who might look Hispanic are not people of color. for example Al Pacino played Cuban immigrant Tony Montana in "Scarface," but Pacino is Italian American,so he doesn't qualify as a person of color. It can be tricky.
Yaa
Working mother of five, now happily retired
06:43 PM on 10/11/2012
Our English language is not as exact as it should be.
Neither white nor black are colors, you know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
televisionsets
It's the price you pay for living in a society
09:43 AM on 10/11/2012
I hate how politics make people use stories in an irrational way. 4 students represent .008% of the student population, and the stories are largely unconfirmed/unsubstantiated.

""They did not file reports when the alleged incidents happened. Our chief of police heard about the incidents through the grapevine and sought out the victims," asking them to file reports, Cindy Posey, spokeswoman for campus police, told the Los Angeles Times. The alleged victims did so on Tuesday and Wednesday, she said.

Police, however, have not confirmed that the balloons were filled with bleach, or that the attacks happened, Posey said."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John LaVoy
09:38 AM on 10/11/2012
This is a well reasoned, if not well written, article. Solis is at least addressign the issue raised by Roberts in his SCOTUS questioning. We should not be discussing the end or continuation of AA: we should be discussing what measures we can use to tell when AA is no longer appropriate. How do we know when it should be eliminated entirely?