Politics as Transcendence

Posted February 13, 2008 | 02:35 PM (EST)




Only once in a very long time does politics become more than politics, that is something more than partisan struggle, vote bartering, or arena of ambition. In ordinary times, ordinary political leaders suffice, more or less.

But on rare occasion, old arrangements and conventional wisdom come unstuck. This happens in periods of rapid if not revolutionary change. We find ourselves now in one of those periods. The forces of globalization, information, eroding sovereignties, and transformation of war ensure that traditional leaders and conventional politics can only muddle through at best and fail badly at worst.

But periods of upheaval also offer opportunities, opportunities to change our methods, our ideas, and our leaders. The rare leader capable of transforming threat to opportunity is one who welcomes transformation and sees it as a chance to abandon tradition and convention, to transcend that which is stale, unprofitable, and ineffective.

Periods of transformation require experimentation, innovation, and daring. America is a nation much more conservative than it thinks itself to be. Thus, its default position is to resist a forward leap even while applauding itself for its creativity. Al Capone said it best: "We don't want no trouble." But transformation is trouble in the best sense of the word, trouble that causes us to adapt to new conditions and circumstances and create new ways of governing.

Through some miracle of timing, luck, and good fortune Barack Obama has seized the moment. His mantra of "change" has been largely co-opted by lesser figures. He is in fact an agent of transformation. He is not operating on the same plane as ordinary politicians, and this makes him seem elusive to the conventional press and the traditional politicians. His instinct for the moment and the times is orders of magnitude more powerful than the experience claimed by others. Experience in the old ways is irrelevant experience.

In an age of great transformation, experience of the past is worthless because it is a barrier to the breakthrough gesture, the instant response in crisis, the instinctive bold decision in the face of totally new circumstances.

Some see Barack Obama as the long awaited champion finally come to slay the awful dragon of race. And they are right. Some see him as a new start for the Democratic Party and national politics. And they are right. Some see him as the walking embodiment of internationalism, ready to restore an honorable and respected place for America in the world. And they are right.

I see Barack Obama as a leader for this transcendent moment, the agent of transformation in an age of revolution, as a figure uniquely qualified to open the door to the 21st century and to convert threat to great new opportunity.

Comments for this post are now closed



Comments
579
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)


I think Obama will be great and extremely effective, truthfully, and that he will be stupid if he does not make Hillary his running mate.
Same the other way around, that Hill would be absolutely ignorant not to have Obama as VP if she comes out on top. No matter what anyone says- either scenario could work just fine.
But it needs to be the peoples choice- not a bunch of delegates behind the scenes, because that will destroy so much hard wotk that has been accomplished up to this point.

So they should both stop the negative campaigning and just go at it, and unite to smash the rethugs because they will be ugly to deal with, and it's time to put those fascist dirty bastards out to pasture for good.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 02/17/2008

The theme of transcendence is positively Emersonian. Do we remember the name of the book that Melville wrote with Emerson in mind?

"The Confidence-Man"

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 02/17/2008

It sounds great senator! Now if all of the stifling forces against change can move aside or crush under the pressure, the country may just bounce back from the wreck that it has become after 7 long years of neocon debauchery. Everything from our reputation to our debt is in a shambles.

Republican Ideology want us to continue to focus on fear, gay oppression, choice as murder, tax cuts for the wealthy, big oil, Iraq, Iran, and global warming (the myth). In other words, in this country in the last 7 years we have been acting in the interest of the least number of people as possible.

Is it at all possible for this country to start acting in the best interest of the largest number of its people?

Is it possible for us to focus on education, infrastructure and jobs instead of social issues that have no where near the impact on us?

Is it possible to set our priorities to making our environment the envy of the world while at the same time maintaining innovative cutting edge technologies?

Is it possible to focus our investments in defense and security in a way that utilizes them efficiently and effectively, instead of wasting billions of dollars and lives on ill conceived wars?

We'll see...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 02/17/2008

Well, MarkinEugene, policy is hard--as a former Hill staffer and legislative liaison, getting what you want *always* involves compromise (unless you're willing to skirt the constitution and lie to everyone in a ruthless, machiavellian way). Still, it's possible with the right leader. Here's a quote from the NYT that everyone should read:

Alan Wolfe, the director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Political Life at Boston College, says Mr. Obama is simply " understandably " making an emotional appeal to those yearnings. "Politics is about policy, but it"s also about giving people some kind of sense of participating in a common venture with their fellow citizens," Mr. Wolfe said.

Philosophers call it "civil religion," using the language of religion and elevation to talk about your country. A classic example is Ronald Reagan"s summoning of the "city on a hill." That, Professor Wolfe said, was the parallel Mr. Obama was hinting at when he talked about Reagan as a transformative leader.

This description / prescription is important. Policy differences being equal, the ability to instill a sense of hope, of the possible; the ability to mobilize, lead, and heal become critical at a revolutionary point in a country's history. We are at that point today.

Barack is just a man, not a god, and he's well aware of that. He didn't create any myth, a people (and media) starved for someone, something so different have. Let's hope his innate humility can withstand the pressure....

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 02/17/2008

If anyone is planning to sit back and let Daddy Obama fix the mess he will inherit, you're all in for a big disappointment. Obama's message is designed to crank up the American people to live up to the heritage we have inherited from those that built this country. He is relying on the America "can do" spirit that carved a great nation out of the wilderness. The same American people that rebuilt a massive navy in months after the Pacific Fleet was destroyed at Pearl Harbor and went on to defeat the Axis in WW2. The same people that put men on the moon. We have all been lulled into getting fat, dumb and happy at the price of endangering the future of our kids and grandkids. Someone has to pull us out of the bog but we will need to use our own and collective head, arms and legs to hold on to the rope. Pull hard Obama and we will do our part.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 02/17/2008

Change..........
Could it be that those who scoff at Obama, as offering empty words; deep down, DON"T WANT CHANGE?

Want to keep their convenience foods, and blackberries, & ipods, be able to leave the car running while doing errands really THINK they need that tylenol to avoid a little pain..........

If you truley WANT CHANGE.......YOU can start tomorrow to make it happen. Boycott fast food, high fructose corn syrup in all processed foods.
Don't succumb tothe temptation to get the "latest" electronic gadget, cell phone etc. AND taco chips! The balance is already badly tilted , in favor of growing corn at the expense of growing wheat. Corn is now being used in our cars......... we have ruined 90% of Mexico's corn with contamination from GM corn. If you don't like illegal immigrants taking your jobs, attack it where it begins, don't build a fence!
I lived 2/3rds of my life without eating a taco chip. It was the better 2/3 rds of my life!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 02/17/2008

So Obama is anti-iPod? Hates high fructose corn syrup? And stands against taco chips and GM corn? Yeah, right.

The only thing that's true is that people are projecting their political fantasies onto Obama.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 02/17/2008

Beautifully written Gary - thank you for your wisdom and foresight!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 02/17/2008

May Miss Rice be retired soon to playing Fur Elise on her piano.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 02/17/2008

I guess I need sleep. I thought the headline read "Politics as Transexuals" and was having a hard time reconciling the body of Hart's blog with the headline. Too much Internet!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 02/17/2008

We have fallen for Obama, enraptured by his poetic oratory and the strength of his inspirational ideas and have been caught up in what has been coined the "Obama swoon."

Hillary has attempted to combat his vision, described by as part MLK and part JFK, by reminding anyone who would listen that Obama is inexperienced, and talk is cheap and that what the country really needs is someone with the ability to navigate the politics and to actually get stuff done. Nobody is listening, and it doesn"t matter because the big ideas that Obama offers will redefine our country. He is truly the candidate of change. He has articulated the vision.

"This was a victory for hope.....by showing that we could disagree with each other without being disagreeable...put your cynicism down...by challenging you to stake in your neighbor's dreams and struggles as well as your own..... Democrats and Independents and Republicans are here. You are liberal and moderate and conservative....This has never been my campaign. It has always been yours. The real heroes here are the thousands of you, here...You are the ones who transformed this from a political campaign to a movement for change and I am honored and awed by what you have done...You made a claim on history....to govern in a whole new way, to make change real and lasting and meaningful. to refuse the politics of division and fear.... 'hope for the best and work for it.'..."

Inspired and brilliant. It is, however, actually the words of David Axelrod"s client immediately previous to his campaign work for Obama. It is the acceptance speech of Deval Patrick, black governor of the State of Massachusetts.

We know that Obama is not the experienced candidate. Is it a possibility that what is really behind Obama that has made us all a part of the "swoon' is simply the very effective product of David Axelrod political guru, who validated the message during the successful Governors campaign in Massachusetts, which he managed? Have we all been suckered by illusion?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 02/17/2008

Nothing turns me off more than people who use "we" as code for "you gullible peasants".

The question is have YOU been "caught up in what has been coined 'the Obama swoon'"? Then you're really not in a position to be lecturing anyone.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 02/17/2008

Karl Rove all over again. And that is not the only resemblance between Obama and Bush.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 02/17/2008

For a good article about Rove and Obama, see:

http://www.thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Winter08/2008Election.html

You may have to cut and paste the article, or actually type it into your browser.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 02/17/2008

Short answer: YES

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 02/17/2008

Are you writing his speeches. That's damn good prose Senator

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 02/17/2008

GREAT post.

and this quote: "Experience in the old ways is irrelevant experience. In an age of great transformation, experience of the past is worthless because it is a barrier to the breakthrough gesture, the instant response in crisis, the instinctive bold decision in the face of totally new circumstances."

so true. clearly, you "get it." thanks.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 02/17/2008


I support Obama but let's hope the Clinton/Bush war machine hasn't so compromised the USA before Obama takes office, that there is no possibility of saving a favorable order for the USA.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 02/17/2008

Comparisons are constantly being made between WW2 and our involvement in Iraq.
During the war, when Roosevelt gave his fireside chats he enjoined Americans to open maps and follow along in the discussion. Compare that to G.W. Bush who uses vague phrases such as "the Iraqi people"
and blames everything on AlQaeda, or Iran, or the "Democrat" party.
One wonders at what point the government began to view the public as less participant than potential adversary. Was it sometime during the Vietnam conflict when dialog became propaganda? Was there a watershed moment when Murcoch realized the vast untapped market in exploiting the uneducated masses?
When was it that the RNC realized the potential for Fox news and right wing radio to sell crap and call it cherry pie?
Susan Jacoby in a recent interview said that what this country needs is not so much a commander in chief as an educator in chief. Amen to that.
Whether or not Obama will be that instrument of change only time will tell,
but one thing is for certain; he remains the ONLY candidate who still retains that potential.
We may count on the Republican Party, and status quo politicians in general, to pull out all stops to quash his momentum.
Afterall, their entire system has become dependant on the ignorance of the American people and their ability to incite by moral outrage.
We can count on a very dirty campaign to keep their base angry and stupid because ignorance is the very source of their power.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 02/17/2008


Susan Jacoby truly made some excellent points about the need for ALL legislators & elected officials to work harder to educate their constituencies.

But this administration and the right wing leadership has truly made idiots out of everybody who would even begin to allow a comparable of Iraq to WWII, or any other war, for that example, because the campaign in Iraq is not a war, it is an occupation. Any other war, even Vietnam, had an organized army fighting ours; in Iraq, it is mostly a resistance that is fighting us because we are there.
We have the largest most powerful and destructive military in the history of the planet. We have every moral perogative to get our of Iraq and keep all our enemies at bay and away from our shores with what we have to work with, and keep our hard earned money and treasure to live on for the sake of our nation, not for the sake of greedy corporatione that want to support and profit from our global domination.

We've got to stop giving the criminal right the moral high ground by allowing them to call the invasion and conflict in Iraq a war. It's not, Dammit. It's an occupation/colonization for the sale of domination and resources. This is not what America is all about, and never will be.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 02/17/2008

This is lovely ... thank you. And right on the mark. I remember reading a piece on how a martial artist breaks a brick with his hand. He doesn't "see" his hand hitting the brick and the brick shattering - what he sees instead is his hand safely on the other side of the brick.
Barack Obama isn't suffering from an inability to design detailed plans for change in specific areas ... he understands instead that changing a complex system requires that one find someplace "logical" to begin, and then move forward in cooperation with that system. You don't regrow a prairie by laying sod and then sticking a buffalo on it. All this may sounda bit "purple and beaded" on the surface, but there's a growing body of scientific evidence that supports just the approach he's wise enough to be taking.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 02/16/2008

Suppose a Rookie, Obama, becomes our first Black President...
The "Hopes, Dreams, Expectations" are SO High for him, how does he succeed?
As the First Black President, like women have been saying, one has to be twice as successful, just to be considered even....
He has to deal with a $9 Trillion Dollar Debt... Do we borrow more, to work on Infrastructure, that has gone neglected for years??? How about rebuilding the Military, that Bush has run into the ground??? Another Trillion+ needed???
Taxes... Raise Taxes? Tax Corporations more??? Corporations who then pass the Taxes onto us in higher prices??? Get a Fair Tax passed??? Do a Tax cut???
All the time dealing with a World that does not like us very much anymore... Oh, there's also Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda to deal with... As well as the Iraq Invasion/ Occupation... Attempting to pull Troops out, even as Al Qaeda interferes... Protecting the Iraqi's who have assisted us... Trying to keep the Kurds, Sunnis and Sheeites from all out Civil War, while we're attempting to withdraw... Do we choose sides if one group goes after another? How about if two groups join in temporary alliance?
Withdraw our troops, says real easy... If there is a slaughter, do we interfere, or be blamed if we don't? What of the Iraqi demolished infrastructure??? What about all the refugees that fled all the killing??? What of all our equipment???
And, "Hopes, Dreams, Expectations" in the Form of one Rookie US Senator is supposed to be able to "bring the Country together" and end a corrupt, Corporate financed Political System, with it's two entrenched branches, Democrat and Republican??? And all this to be done by a Rookie Senator? One who already took $275,000.00 for his Campaign, from Excelon, as well as a Campaign Manager who worked for Excelon, after watering down a Bill no longer REQUIRING the State to be Legally Notified if Nuclear Power plants leak...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 02/17/2008

As Deep Throat said in "All the President's Men" (and as Senator Hart says basically): "YOU'RE MISSING THE OVERALL". A change in ATTITUDE is the first requirement, in the same way that FDR handled the Depression and how the allies handled WWII (and, as importantly, post-WWII Europe and Japan). Compassion, communication, and the true involvement of The American People will help immeasurably to think, and do, "outside of the box", which is the Obama Attitude. Of course the post-Bush mess (more aptly, the post-Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush mess) is daunting, but with full cooperation and some sacrifice, these problems CAN be turned around, albeit slowly in some cases, and despite the many hurdles that Exxon, Merck and the Republicans will put in the way - relentlessly. We started this country with a revolution against a bad leader named George, and we sure as hell can do it again.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 02/17/2008

to: knerd... You said: "Stop. Look. Listen." Reply... Measure twice, cut once...

To: Bobbygoode... The Citizens during WW 2 were NOT an instant Gratification Generation... They listened to Radio... They listened to music, not an audio drug called "Music"... They used imagination to flesh out Radio Broadcasts... Sleaze, foul language and bad behavior was NOT part of their World... Many had been through great struggles and hard times... Many did not get to finish High School... They were NOT drop outs... They worked to buy a car... They did not sulk and scream at Mommy and Daddy, because they bought their child the wrong color, brand new car in High School...

I agree a "Positive Attitude" is important... Experience has taught me Positive Beliefs and Behaviors are more important... Hoping to get Rich by winning the Lotto does NOT put money in the Bank... Hard work will not either... Example: Coal Miners work very hard...

As to Obama: Inspiring Speeches will NOT win the Superbowl by a Rookie Quarterback... Firing up the Team is important, but at some point the Team has to "Roll up their sleeves, go to work, Play the Game and get the Job done," so to speak...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 02/18/2008

Barack Obama is community organizing. Observe carefully, listen deeply, offer vision and generalities, inspire hope, enlist connection and participation, lay out specifics and remind everyone that "walking on water wasn't built in a day." That's what he's been doing since Day One.

LarBear, did anyone ever say this was going to be easy? Barack Obama hasn't and doesn't.

Stop. Look. Listen.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 02/17/2008

"Suppose a Rookie, Obama, becomes our first Black President"

--------------

obama has more years of experience being an elected official than hillary does.

so if obama is a rookie, then what does that make her?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 02/17/2008

GoodGuysandBadGuys... You said,"so if obama is a rookie, then what does that make her?"...

How about a let's roll up our sleeves pragmatist, to get the JOB of Cleaning up the Bush Disaster done!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 02/18/2008

Part 2
Throw in Global Warming and preparedness... Dealing with water shortages and floods... Dealing with probable Fires, Tornadoes, Earthquakes, etc... Add to the task, replacing incompetent Loyal Bush appointees... Toss in Criminal Prosecutions... Protecting the Border... Restoring our Constitutional Republic and so called democracy...
Meanwhile, back at the Washington DC Ranch, President "Hopes, Dreams, Expectations" has to deal with a Supreme Court, who's last two Bush Appointees were confirmed, without telling Congress, or the American People, what they believed in... Now, we find out at least one Justice of the Supreme Court believes Torture may NOT be UN-Constitutional...
Seems like the blatant Corruption of the Bush Administration alone, could keep a President and staff very busy... Can we Constitutionally cut the Supreme Court back to 5, then later run it back up to 9??? Oh, I notice if a Justice states the Law the way a persons Bias is, that's the Law, but if different than the Bias, they are creating "New Law"...
For all who believed in Obama inspired "Hopes, Dreams, and Expectations," that's a very full, actually, rather instead, a very overflowing plate to deal with... The Obama's played to Race and played the Race Card... Would mediocre be considered success, or Failure? If Obama is biting off more than he can "chew," is that a crushing blow to our Nation, to "Black People," who have staked so much Hope and Faith in his inspirational speeches??? Would "Black People" (as the Obama's defined and played to), accept response able ness for putting a Rookie US Senator into such a position??? Would this impact "Race and skin color" relations??? Would this Backlash on future "Black People" seeking office??? Does electing a "Black President" support, or diminish Segregation in people's mind? If people with black skin BELIEVE they are "Black People", is that self Segregation? Racial Segregation?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 02/17/2008

part 3
So, probably you think this is all, anti Obama... Not exactly... I think what I said above is more about "We the People" of the USA... Bear with me, please... Anyone who pays attention knows we do NOT live on Healthy Food... Much of our Food is grown on huge Corporate Farms and Ranches... Crops basically grown on unhealthy "dead" soil using Chemical Fertilizers, Herbicides and Pesticides... Then it "processed" by other Corporations... Typically the more food is processed, the cheaper it is and the more chemical additives in it... Organic food, with less, or NO processing is more expensive...
The "Meat Industry' is also huge Corporations... Inspection/ Testing for Mad Cow is a farce... We "test" approximately 1 in 1700 after the meat is in the Market Place... WE process 10 million cows per year... We found 1, or was it 2??? In 2001 Europe found 2,142 out of 8.5 million... "Alzheimer's increases instead... Most chickens are cooped, or caged and fed both Hormones and antibiotics... More and more Fish and Seafood is farmed...
The point... "We the People" eat unhealthily grown and processed food... Then we ask the Medical/ Pharmaceutical Industries to invent tools and pills to make us Healthy... We talk about Health Care, but we support Medical/ Pharmaceutical Industries... We eat mostly acidic foods grown on acidic dead soil... Then ask the Medical/ Pharmaceutical Industries to "magically" make us healthy... They study Medicine and Pharmacy, not Health...
We want an Obama to magically fulfill our "Hopes, Dreams, and Expectations" ... He is advertising/ campaigning, saying I can do this, but essentially "We the People" are supposed to act response able... Emotionally reactive to Obama, yes... Acting response able??? That may be a whole different ball game... Hope is NOT health... Hope does NOT make us well... Hope does NOT Heal the Nation... Like a Nation, Health is created of Beliefs and behavior, NOT "Hopes, Dreams, Expectations"...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 02/17/2008

What it boils down to is: WORDS are NOT ACTION.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 02/18/2008

Part 4
Hillary speaks to rolling up her sleeves, knowing there's so much to do... Offering a pragmatic, I can get the job done... We don't even have to like her... And, I doubt even with OUR sleeves rolled up, "WE" can undo and clean up in a four year Term, the mess we are in and helped to create...
Opponents say Hillary voted to go to War... Police Officers are "authorized" to use "Deadly Force" Nationwide... Authorization and Decision are very different... We put Rookies with seasoned Officer's until we trust their decision making... Obama has indicated he believes in making a unilateral decision to attack other Countries, based on actionable Intelligence... G W Bush believed this too... Some Countries might consider that an act of War...
Most Corporations are about the bottom line $$$$$... Often we send good people to Congress, who then get snared by the Corrupted, Corporate paid for, Two Controlling Political Parties, who in turn are supported by a Corporate MSM... Besides, getting re-elected is about using our Money (Tax Dollars) to influence the voters with "Government Projects"... That does NOT make for a Fiscal lean President and/ or Congress... Our Office Holders have allowed Judges to reward Corporate Office Holders, who run Corporations into Bankruptcy and dump Pension Funds... Allowed Financial Corporate Institutions to charge near 30% interest...
"We the People" shirk our response able-ness as a Government of the People, for the People, by the People... We have come to believe and perceive the Elected and Appointed Office Holders, as "the Government"... Like Union Members perceive their Business Agents, as the Union... We want "Candidates" to magically fulfill our "Hopes, Dreams, and Expectations" ... To become President of our "Government", rather than Presiding Office Holder... We elect Office Holders who preach an anti union message... Yet, We are supposed to be the UNITED States Government... We are divided over being United...
Hillary and Barack are choices, NOT answers!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 02/17/2008

Again . . . authorization and decision are two different things. You are correct. Words are important, but only if they're followed up with action. And in today's case, only if the so-called "journalists" are more careful with their words and how they use them. Restrain themselves from spinning, exaggerating, twisting, manipulating or just plain making things up (lying). It is really very WRONG.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 02/18/2008

A reality check on giddy sufferers from Obama-mania. International organized figure Tony Rezko--Obama's sugar daddy--goes on trial March 3 in Chicago--prosecuted by Patrick Fitzgerald.

If Sen. Obama makes it to the convention it is only because the bad guys on Wall St. and in the media want him to. Then they pull the plug. And Bloomberg/McCain waltz to the White House. Is any Rock-Star worth that?????

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 02/15/2008

Oh, come on. Before perpetuating this non-issue, Check the facts about Rezko here:
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_obama_have_a_real_estate_problem.html