EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Geoffrey Dunn

Geoffrey Dunn

Posted: September 9, 2009 03:25 AM

It's already been pointed out by several others that Sarah Palin has a new ghostwriter on staff and that she is clearly not the auteur of her most recent scribbles on Facebook and most certainly not the primary author of her op-ed yesterday in the Wall Street Journal.

Yes, the latter continues her unyielding obsession with Barack Obama by trying to upstage his healthcare address to the nation today, but it's clearly the work of someone who can write cohesively and thinks in a linear fashion. The piece doesn't even sound like Palin. Tina Fey this isn't. Hopefully Palin's memoirs capture some of her peculiar dexterity with the English language. (A genius like Mark Twain might have pulled it off, but rumor has it that he's not around any more.)

Trying to pass off Palin as a policy wonk on national health care issues is simply going a bit far. This dog simply will not hunt.

How do we know? Because we've seen Sarah's raw writing on Twitter and Facebook and in her emails--the Palin writings that aren't ghost written. The examples are everywhere. Just take a look at some of Palin's infamous "word salads"--as my friends in Alaska call her idiosyncratic manner of slinging phrases together--and it becomes all too clear.

Recall her immortal answers to Katie Couric or her disjointed resignation speech from her backyard in Wasilla. Or the delightfully diagrammed sentence from her interview with ABC News anchor Charles Gibson:

I know that John McCain will do that and I, as his vice president, families we are blessed with that vote of the American people and are elected to serve and are sworn in on January 20, that will be our top priority is to defend the American people.

The examples are endless. For better, and, actually, mostly for worse, Palin put her own peculiar brand on the English language. I like to call it linguistic schizophrenia.

So what is this attempt at rebranding Palin all about? You can lay some good money down that here's what happened: The big boys -- her attorney-agent Robert Barnett and probably her publisher, too, Rupert Murdoch -- had a sit-down with young Sarah and told her she had better pull her mud together. They have a lot riding on the deal. Murdoch has anted up a seven-figure advance for a book written by someone who can't construct two cohesive sentences together. Barnett has staked his considerable reputation on the line. Rest assured that Palin had the law laid down to her. And firmly.

Also note that in the aftermath of Levi Johnston's most recent revelations in Vanity Fair there hasn't been so much as a peep out of Palin or her Alaskan mouthpiece Meg Stapleton, whose political instincts are both infantile and unprofessional. Palin has what's known in sports as rabbit ears. She can't help but respond to everything that's written or said about her. It's a bad impulse when you're in the public eye, and Stapleton simply fed Palin's fetish. Others, including earlier elder male patrons like John Coale and Fred Malek have tried to curb these self-destructive proclivities. She simply did not listen to them.

I bet that she is listening now.

Before Palin's overpriced attorney, Tommy Van Flein sends out another spurious legal threat, I'm going to issue a challenge to him: Put your client in a locked room, give her an hour to write an op-ed piece, and let's examine the words she puts to the computer screen. It's what all of us in this business do every day. Those of us with real intellectual integrity. Those of us who claim our own thoughts and express our own views. Those of us who don't employ ghostwriters to fudge our bylines. We write our own words.

The WSJ piece is yet another Palin lie.

This new version of Sarah Palin is like those lip-sync groups from the '90s that didn't sing their own songs or write their own lyrics. She's the Milli Vanilli of American politics.

All of this reminds me of one overlooked little tidbit in Levi's rather devastating glance into Chez Palin in Wasilla:

[Sarah] was always putting on an act in front of the camera. We all know that she didn't know what to say on TV and that when reading a script she was a phony. I'd be sitting with the family in front of the TV and we'd be disgusted watching her....And there were times when we'd sit there and pretty much laugh at the things she said.

Even a bunch of kids back in Wasilla knew better.


2009-08-29-redshoestiny.jpeg


Award-winning writer and filmmaker Geoffrey Dunn is at work on a book about Sarah Palin and American politics, to be published by Macmillan/St. Martin's next year.

 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 245
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
10:19 AM on 09/22/2009
To Curious1..­..all I ask is that Sar.Palin hold a press conference­, much as any other politician thus accused (of absolute, astounding­, benumbing) ignorance would do, and take on all questions on the issues arising. I challenge you to name one other politician in recent American history, who, expecting to be taken serious by the national (and internatio­nal) press, will neither create, nor allow to be created, any forum, whatsoever­, where they can put all "detractor­s" to shame, simply by answering questions.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
msgirlintn
Magnolia's mom!
12:05 AM on 09/10/2009
I thought the Boss (you know the one that did make it to the White House) called her out not only on death panels but also on the medicare vouchers. She is probably too stupid to realize it though. People keep dissing Levi, but I have my own theory of him. I think all he is saying is true, because I don't think he could make that stuff up. You Betcha!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wherriott2
10:28 PM on 09/09/2009
Very nice post...I enjoyed reading it.
09:22 PM on 09/09/2009
Language essentiall­y involves four processes: receptive, expressive­, integrativ­e and pragmatic. Then you have deductive logic and inductive reasoning.

Her track record on all of the above is clear. While she obviously now has wordsmiths assisting her, it is clear that that they are all cut from the same cloth.

For more informatio­n about why they think like they think, Google “Thinking Errors”. For more informatio­n about why these cognitive distortion­s occur, Google concupisce­nce.

It’s all about lust while disregardi­ng the rights, values, beliefs, and feelings of those that have a different opinion.

Goodnight & peace from Austin.
photo
peterg76
Freelance medical transcriptionist
09:11 PM on 09/09/2009
Sarah Palin is now a private citizen. Please stop reporting on her.
05:28 AM on 09/10/2009
peterg she is supposed to be a private citizen, but HP has her name listed right up there with, and at times, before our President. check it out .
03:15 PM on 09/10/2009
Ooh, wanda665, I did as you suggested, I did. And you know what? I discovered SP writes like a bear with a crayon.
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
02:23 PM on 09/14/2009
We will as soon as she goes "private". In the meantime, while she is a shill for energy and health care lobbyists and shows up to speak on issues she knows little about, she is fair game for criticism. We WISH she would go away, but now that she has discovered $$$ without accountabi­lity, she'll regrettabl­y be around for a while.
08:58 PM on 09/09/2009
I admit that I am still trying to figure out her statement in that runners magazine, "Sweat is my sanity." maybe she was trying to express her feelings about Hannity.
03:00 PM on 09/10/2009
Ha! Ha!

Seriously, GreatTruth­Seeker, you and I both know SP doesn't know the difference between Hannity and Hannah Montana.
05:54 PM on 09/09/2009
Oh no, a politician that doesn't write his/her speeches? alert the press!
06:07 PM on 09/09/2009
Oh, no! A conservati­ve who doesn't comprehend the article? Alert the press!
06:31 PM on 09/09/2009
Fanned! Excellent response:-­)
06:38 PM on 09/09/2009
An Op-Ed is NOT a speech, and when you put your name next to the word "Author" it means that you are claiming to have written it.

Try reading something before commenting on it.
photo
sekigahara
Wait'll he puts on his stereo headphones . . .
05:45 PM on 09/09/2009
What eve happened to "Let Sarah Be Sarah?"
05:35 PM on 09/09/2009
3 words...JO­N FAVREAU (obama speech writer) TELEPROMPT­ER.

What an incredibly ridiculous argument.
06:08 PM on 09/09/2009
3 words...RE­AD THE ARTICLE.

What an incredibly ridiculous post.
04:53 PM on 09/09/2009
I was removed from SP FB page for asking her (suggestin­g it might not be useful to)back off bashing healthcare after I read a long and clearly ghost written article there a few weeks back...Sad­ly I had to become a Fan before I could post and SP and her people don't think I would make a good fan after all. Although for that short amount I was posted I received 5 full on in my face harassing posts and several requests from strangers with extremely opposing ideas to be friends on FB. To those people I wrote that friendship is welcome along with opposing views for discussion if they wished to be grown ups they could reply - not one did. I thought I might have caught a young college student in Florida ready to open her mind but she slammed it shut tighter than ...well you know
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheFabOne
From the Bottom To the Top, The Cream Of The Crop!
04:49 PM on 09/09/2009
Hey, that was uncalled for and I take offense to that.

I actually like Milli Vanilli.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Geoffrey Dunn
05:38 PM on 09/09/2009
Dear FabOne--I should have added the line "no offense intended to Milli Vanilli." But it was such a perfect parallel.

Just sayin'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheFabOne
From the Bottom To the Top, The Cream Of The Crop!
06:03 PM on 09/09/2009
I know, I said it in all sarcasm. No harm, I loved the column!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:31 AM on 09/14/2009
"Milli Vanilli of Politics"
So good i had to type it myself.
04:34 PM on 09/09/2009
You write 'Those of us with real intellectu­al integrity.­" as if it were a complete sentence. It is not. On Palin, of course, I agree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tm68
09:59 PM on 09/09/2009
No, you are right- it's technicall­y a fragment, but in this case I'm sure Dunn was making a stylistic choice. It is actually a powerful statement to say it like that and used in the context it was written, it is plain to see that. To pull it off, you have to have a very strong command of language. He does. Palin doesn't- hence the ghost writers.
10:37 AM on 09/10/2009
The rule in general is that you have to know the rules before you can break them.
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
02:31 PM on 09/14/2009
Get a grip and read a book on style. Fragment sentences are legitimate forms of prose, particular­ly in instances where there is informalit­y and an opportunit­y to present an "oral" style. Do you go through every book you read looking for fragment sentences and then discard them? Sad.

Dunn is using a completely legitimate stylistic tool as do many of us when we are posting. Doesn't mean we can't compose full English sentences the way Sarah Word-Salad Palin can't. The example Dunn presents of Palin's inept oral articulati­on is the offense in this column, not Dunn's fragment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennissinned
Progressive but not a Democrat.
04:24 PM on 09/09/2009
Girl you know it's true!
04:20 PM on 09/09/2009
I just saw this over at Mudflats in one of the comments.

If you replaced Steve Schmidt in this cartoon with Robert Murdoch and had $arah laying on the table instead of Mccain.... the story is the same. ( Great cartoon ! )

http://www­.zinasaund­ers.com/pa­ges/politi­cs/images/­McCain-Fra­nkenstein.­html
03:37 PM on 09/09/2009
I loved your phrase describing Mrs. Palin as "the Milli Vanilli of politics". I do think she will be the new Rupert Murdoch product, currently being re-package­d for her upcoming book tour.

Like kathy001, I doubt the Murdoch team will have compete success, given that McCain's people spared no expense to educate and groom Mrs. Palin into an acceptable candidate. Epic fail there, as I, a former Independen­t with Republican leanings, voted for Obama in November to keep this woman as far away from the WH as humanly possible.

Keep up the good work. I expect your current book to have at least one sequel; we haven't seen the last of her yet.
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
02:35 PM on 09/14/2009
I'm looking forward to Palin's book the tour more than the book, which I never intend to read. (Dan Brown was as low as I have sunk and have regretted it since.)

Despite all the "control" Murdoch's team will exert over whom Palin talks to, one or more of the interviews will blow up IF the interviewe­r can get her off her prescribed sound bytes. Of course, having seen her debating style, Palin will probably tell the interviewe­r she doesn't want to talk about that and change the subject. I'd like to see an interviewe­r get up and terminate the interview if she pulls that s**t.