No one was more surprised when Made To Break won an environmental award in 2007. I was not an environmentalist then, and my impression of these people ranged from the nasality of John Denver to dogmatic feminists cramming political correctness into any available ear while claiming that they would save the world by recycling, biking to work or changing out the incandescent light bulbs. I was unconvinced and, when pressed, I often said so. (Actually, what I said was more like 'Phooey!')
I avoided them. Environmentalists, yuck!
Made To Break, I thought, was a history book. It described the life history of disposables, an overlooked idea that shaped American culture. Around the time Robert Putnam published Bowling Alone, I was trying to understand the century-long curve of our worsening human relationships. This is what made me look at our use of manufactured goods. The book deals with technology only because technology is a central part of American culture. Like it or not, Kitty Hawk, the model T, atomic bombs, satellites and integrated circuits are as American as apple pie.
Then while exploring mankind's propensity for throwing away used consumer goods, I ran into electronic waste, a huge problem that few North Americans had heard of. I wondered why more people weren't outraged by the systematic poisoning of North America's groundwater or by our dirty, greedy electronics industry. This precipitated a change in me that was a bit like what happened to Dr. Bruce Banner. Suddenly, I turned alarmingly green.
Now as this happened, I simultaneously began wondering why environmentalists had such difficulty getting the message out. If it was remarkable and alarming enough to impact me, surely others with greater social consciences, and more highly developed senses of responsibility must also be susceptible...
Since then, I've been talking about these problems with North America's leading greenies. The wisest, oldest and most honest of the people I've met, admits that the word 'environmentalist' marginalizes his project by allowing people to "put us into a 'Birkenstock, tree hugging, special interest crowd."
"Environmental groups," he says, "talk about being grassroots organizations but for the most part it's' ...[a complete falsehood]. We go out and talk to or even work in the communities, but basically we go out and tell people what the problem is and what they have to do to solve it."
This man -- call him the 'Deep Throat' of Green-- is filled with admiration for the current President's ability to engage America's grassroots. Obama does this, he says, by ignoring old-fashioned top-down approaches that enforce preordained agendas. Instead, 'the People's Prez' uses new technologies to send out the message that a certain issue will present a major policy challenge, and that people should come together to discuss it.
Participation, in this model, begins at the level of discussion and discovery. Out of this come sensible compromises, balanced policies, and an informed active electorate whose involvement is sustained by the knowledge that they are having an impact. 'Technological Grassrootism', in other words, is a partial remedy for political apathy and for, to some extent, the decline of social capital which is my big bugbear.
Not to get too rosey about it, it's what your old civics textbook used to call 'participatory democracy', although that phrase has a distinctly antique ring to it.
Still, as a former America civics teacher (and illegal alien), I strongly feel that greenies need to go this route. They need to remake themselves into organizing activists who invite policy participation at the grassroots level. And they need to do it fast because we're running out of time...
As Deep Throat says: "A lot of us despair at this wave of ecological degradation...that is going to overwhelm us very, very soon."
Check. Ditto. Let's retool, and get to work real fast.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.