In his speech tonight, John McCain adopted the brilliant strategy of presenting himself as the candidate of responsible peace:
I disagreed strongly with the Bush administration's mismanagement of the war in Iraq. I called for the change in strategy that is now, at last, succeeding where the previous strategy had failed miserably. I was criticized for doing so by Republicans. I was criticized by Democrats. I was criticized by the press. But I don't answer to them. I answer to you. And I would be ashamed to admit I knew what had to be done in Iraq to spare us from a defeat that would endanger us for years, but I kept quiet because it was too politically hard for me to do. No ambition is more important to me than the security of the country I have defended all my adult life.Senator Obama opposed the new strategy, and, after promising not to, voted to deny funds to the soldiers who have done a brilliant and brave job of carrying it out. Yet in the last year we have seen the success of that plan as violence has fallen to a four year low; Sunni insurgents have joined us in the fight against al Qaeda; the Iraqi Army has taken the lead in places once lost to Sunni and Shia extremists; and the Iraqi Government has begun to make progress toward political reconciliation.
None of this progress would have happened had we not changed course over a year ago. And all of this progress would be lost if Senator Obama had his way and began to withdraw our forces from Iraq without concern for conditions on the ground and the advice of commanders in the field. Americans ought to be concerned about the judgment of a presidential candidate who says he's ready to talk, in person and without conditions, with tyrants from Havana to Pyongyang, but hasn't traveled to Iraq to meet with General Petraeus, and see for himself the progress he threatens to reverse.
I know Americans are tired of this war. I don't oppose a reckless withdrawal from Iraq because I'm indifferent to the suffering war inflicts on too many American families. I hate war. And I know very personally how terrible its costs are. But I know, too, that the course Senator Obama advocates could draw us into a wider war with even greater sacrifices; put peace further out of reach, and Americans back in harm's way.
Brilliant, frightening and 100% Nixon. But successful Nixon. Watch Nixon's (winning) ads from 1968, in which he successfully makes himself out as the candidate of peace and order:
Of course, Nixon was full of it. Far from ending the war in Vietnam, he extended it four unnecessary and fruitless years.
So how do you beat a Nixon?
Be like Kennedy: Don't fear emotion, don't be afraid of going after your opponent for abandoning all the ideals he professes, and don't be afraid to go after John McCain for undermining the security of the United States.
In short, do what Barack Obama did tonight:
Because while John McCain can legitimately tout moments of independence from his party in the past, such independence has not been the hallmark of his presidential campaign.It's not change when John McCain decided to stand with George Bush ninety-five percent of the time, as he did in the Senate last year.
It's not change when he offers four more years of Bush economic policies that have failed to create well-paying jobs, or insure our workers, or help Americans afford the skyrocketing cost of college -- policies that have lowered the real incomes of the average American family, widened the gap between Wall Street and Main Street, and left our children with a mountain of debt.
And it's not change when he promises to continue a policy in Iraq that asks everything of our brave men and women in uniform and nothing of Iraqi politicians -- a policy where all we look for are reasons to stay in Iraq, while we spend billions of dollars a month on a war that isn't making the American people any safer.
I'll say this -- there are many words to describe John McCain's attempt to pass off his embrace of George Bush's policies as bipartisan and new. But change is not one of them.
Change is a foreign policy that doesn't begin and end with a war that should've never been authorized and never been waged. I won't stand here and pretend that there are many good options left in Iraq, but what's not an option is leaving our troops in that country for the next hundred years -- especially at a time when our military is overstretched, our nation is isolated, and nearly every other threat to America is being ignored.
Of course, Obama's essential toughness was only one element of his speech tonight. The other was the hope that he can sincerely offer and John McCain can only try to manufacture:
America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love.
Follow Glenn Hurowitz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/glennhurowitz
And he wants to give lessons!!!
Joe Scarborough
We will not be fooled again.
Obama isn't JFK yet the comparisons are apt. His being the first person of color to be nominated for president is a millennial event. His very presence represents a change in the way Americans see ourselves. He cannot help but bring a fresh perspective to the office. We desperately need a president with a beneficent vision, who is willing to break away from the "permanent campaign" mentality and wage peace around the world. It's not important that he have a stack of position papers ready to go but rather a willingness to be a trailblazer, to innovate, to experiment with new ideas. He must love the company of brilliant thinkers. He must have the courage to fail. In all these aspects he resembles the junior senator from MA.