iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Glenn Sacks
 

Researcher Says Women's Initiation of Domestic Violence Predicts Risk to Women

Posted: 07/06/09 04:10 PM ET

How can we prevent Intimate Partner Violence and injury to women? IPV researcher Deborah Capaldi, Ph.D., a social scientist at the Oregon Social Learning Center, finds that the best way for women to be safe is to not initiate violence against their male partners. According to Dr. Capaldi, "The question of initiation of violence is a crucial one... much IPV is mutual, and initiations -- even that seem minor -- may lead to escalation."

Dr. Capaldi recently presented her work at "From Ideology to Inclusion 2009: New Directions in Domestic Violence Research and Intervention," an IPV conference in Los Angeles June 26-28 which was presented by the California Alliance for Families & Children and co-sponsored by The Family Violence Treatment & Education Association. While studies have consistently found that women initiate as much violence against their male partners as vice versa, two-thirds of domestic violence injuries are suffered by women.

Dr. Capaldi's research examined the different relationship violence scenarios -- violence by him only, violence by her only, violence by both with him initiating, and violence by both with her initiating. Of these, the most likely to result in future injury to women is when she initiates violence against him and he responds, although both mutually aggressive groups were close in danger levels.

Dr. Capaldi notes that in a study of women who were in a battered women's shelter, "67% of the women reported severe violence toward their partner in the past year." Others in the domestic violence field, including Erin Pizzey, founder of the first battered women's shelter in England in the early 1970s, have had similar findings.

According to Dr. Capaldi, "Overall, young couples with unidirectional violence report fewer acts and forms of violence than bidirectional couples."

Dr. Capaldi, who serves on the editorial boards of several academic journals related to family violence, is the Principal Investigator of the National Institute of Health's Oregon Youth Study. The OYS, which began in 1983, is a longitudinal study of the etiology of antisocial behaviors in boys.

The OYS' Couples Study followed the men in the study and their romantic partners from age 18 to 31-33, interacting with each other at seven different points in time during the 13-15 year period. The OYS studied physical aggression and psychological aggression among the men and women, using reports from men and women about their own violence, their reports of their partners' violence, and observed aggression.

As a general rule, men tend to underreport both their violence against their female partners and their female partners' violence against them. By contrast, women tend to over-report both the men's violence against them and their own violence. The couples in the study were also given tasks by the study's monitors, such as planning a party or discussing a problem with their partner, and were filmed and observed by the OYS during those tasks.

As in many studies of IPV, the OYS found that much IPV is bidirectional (meaning both are violent), and in unidirectional abusive relationships, the women were more likely to be abusive than the men.

The study found that a young woman's IPV was just as predictive of her male partner's future IPV as the man's own past IPV. In other words, whereas we often think of men as the only abusers and also as serial abusers, the OYS found that a woman's violence against her man was as predictive of his violence to her as his own history of violence.

Moreover, the study found that men's physical aggression changes significantly when they find a new partner. Instead of a man being either a batterer or not, often it was his female partner's violence or nonviolence which heavily influenced whether he would be violent to her.

Over time, the couples' change in violence -- generally reducing violence as they grow older -- was highly associated, meaning that if one stopped violence, the other did, too.

Dr. Capaldi believes that current IPV programs are putting women in harm's way. She says current batterer treatment programs are "ineffective... likely because they are not based on well-conducted research." She explains:

"Since much IPV is mutual and women as well as men initiate IPV, prevention and treatment approaches should attempt to reduce women's violence as well as men's violence. Such an approach has a much higher chance of increasing women's safety."

Glenn Sacks is the Executive Director of Fathers & Families, the nation's largest family court reform organization. Fathers and Families, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization, improves the lives of children and strengthens society by protecting the child's right to the love and care of both parents after separation or divorce.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:19 PM on 07/07/2009
When I grew up, there was a couple that lived across the street. She was always yelling at him and being very abusive. We all felt really sorry for him. A few years ago, I heard that he beat the crap out of her and was arrested. It's really sad that the domestic violence industry is only devoted to destroying families, spreading misandry and not helping all citizens trapped in abusive relationships and promoting healthy family relationships.
When abusive and violent behavior goes untreated, it perpetuates the cycle of abuse that is taught to children.
02:52 PM on 07/07/2009
There's no question that the research is born out in reality. In my own case, my ex was violent toward me through my entire marriage, and when I divorced her, she responded by filing domestic violence claims against me. Luckily, even with a judge who was notorious for never seeing a DV claim she didn't like, the truth was patently obvious, as if I had responded in kind to the violence my ex used against me, she probably would have ended up hospitalized, just due to our differences in size. But, since I had been taught, from the time I was old enough to crawl, that real men DO NOT hit women, I endured her violence without responding in kind.
09:57 AM on 07/07/2009
Thank you to Glenn, Dr. Capaldi, Ms. Pizzey, and to all who are brave enough to expose the DV double standard. My situation is a little different as it did not involve violence, but rather a malicious ex who has tried to destroy me in any way she can. She hates me more than she loves our child. Sadly, the courts are not prepared to deal with men who are decent, caring, and simply want to be a father. The assumption is that the mother is the better care-giver, and there is very little that will sway the courts from this bias. The children continue to suffer, but perhaps articles and studies like this will help to change that.
09:49 PM on 07/06/2009
Many thanks to Glenn Sacks for reporting, California Alliance for Fathers and Children for sponsoring and Don Dutton, K. Daniel O’Leary, Sandra Smith, Richard Gelles, Erin Pizzey, Murray Strauss and Deborah Capaldi for participating in New Directions in Domestic Violence.

Intelligent discussion on these issues is seriously needed for humane and unbiased treatment of victims and perpetrators of domestic violence.
09:12 PM on 07/06/2009
I was married to an abusive woman for almost 20 years. She was an angry woman who hit me during my sleep, woke me up to deprive me of sleep. I lost at least three pairs of glasses that she ripped off my face and/or were broken by her hands and fists. I defended myself at first and could hold my own in fighting her off. Finally one time in fighting back I left a bruise on her face. After that I started hitting myself instead of hitting her. She spat in my face and initiated verbal and physical abuse on a regular basis. She attempted to do the same to my two daughters but I stood in the line of fire to take the abuse instead of them. It was a sick marriage, very sick, but I stayed in it for my two daughters.
I finally realized that it was so sick and that I could not survive any longer in such a sick marriage with a woman who's violence escalated to the point of threatening to come home to "dead, burnt, stinking bodies", threatened to put a bullet between my eyes and attacking me with a knife.
I'm glad to see this column published. While men may be bigger and ultimately cause more damage in defending themselves, the fact is that women initiate as much domestic violence as men
06:04 PM on 07/06/2009
A male co-worker of mine was grouning as he was pouring his coffee one morning in our little kitchenette. I asked him if he had a rough weekend. He lifted his shirt and I was bug eyed amazed! "What the hell happened did a group of guys beat the crap out of you?", I asked. "No", he said the girlfriend's kick boxing. He had to have had several cracked or broken ribs! Two of my cousins are state troopers and they will tell you, its more the women they fear at a traffic stop taking a swing at them or making false accusations for no good reason! Only to reverse the position of authority!
When I hear over reporting by women, my interpretation and fear is "false reporting", and I don't say anyone is justified in returning a blow. It may be deserved, but its always best to deflect a blow or block, and walk away! What is solved by coming to blows? Nothing! I have regrets of things I have said. And once said, once heard, they can never be taken back, you can't un-ring a bell. If your words pearse a heart, it is damaged forever!
06:03 PM on 07/06/2009
I am impressed that there are discussions of Female Violence on Men. I cringe when I hear of a guy hurting a woman. That's not the way I was raised. I don't like anybody hitting anyone! Women are taking advantage of their "weaker sex" and their new status, support for women at any expense and always give them the benefit of the doubt! Guys should not be automatically guilty! False restraining orders are a daily fact, a divorce TOOL! There should be some measure or standard of proof. The courts then tell the guy, "the only reason you've got this far is that you just never got caught before!" AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY! NO DUE PROCESS!
05:34 PM on 07/06/2009
Glenn wrote: "Dr. Capaldi recently presented her work at 'From Ideology to Inclusion 2009: New Directions in Domestic Violence Research and Intervention,' an IPV conference in Los Angeles June 26-28."

The conference was sponsored by the California Alliance for Families and Children, or CAFC (cafcusa.org). This was the third such conference by the CAFC, put on annually since 2007.
07:44 PM on 07/06/2009
Many thanks to the California Alliance for Families & Children for providing this high-profile platform for Dr Capaldi. Their family law reform advocate, Michael Robinson deserves wide recognition, loud applause and endless support, from all Fathers, for his unsung efforts in Sacramento and nation-wide.
05:34 PM on 07/06/2009
Why is there little sympathy for men in these situations? A better question is: Why is a man called a whiner if he complains about being a victim of a woman for issues such as overspending and undermining his parenting? Despite ideas about equality between the sexes, people have a natural inclination to expect a man to be emotionally strong, take responsibility for what is going on in his home and not allow these situations to go on or put a stop to them if they do happen.
People will say: "He's the man. Why did he let it go on?" Instead of blaming, step up to plate and set the bar high on acceptable behavior in your home. If you laugh off negative behavior like insults, it may degenate into worse. The solution is showing leadership at home and changing the situation.
Elliott Katz
Author of: Being the Strong Man A Woman Wants: Timeless Wisdom On Being A Man
03:52 PM on 07/06/2009
A lot of people who embrace the conventional wisdom about domestic violence will dogmatically claim that recognition of women's violence is tantamount to "blaming the victim." Their conception of domestic violence (DV) is that women are defending themselves when violent, rather than aggressing. Capaldi's study shows the futility of that way of thinking, because it reveals that when a woman's violence declines, so does her victimization from it.

If we cannot seriously address women's violence as a problem of their own perpetration (rather than "self defense"), then we do a disservice to the victims of women's violence, as well as to the women themselves. Imagine a violent woman, lashing out at her partner with closed fists, and being socked in the head as retaliation. Convinced that she is a victim, she flees to a battered women's shelter seeking support and comfort. There she is told by the shelter workers that her victimization from violence has "nothing" to do with her own violent behavior, and that to suggest that she be accountable for her actions is akin to blaming the victim. Thus, she is never challenged about her violence, and instead is challenged on her mating and romantic decisions. Thus her violence never gets addressed as a problem of her own causing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pearlswan
Born in Philly yet my heart's now in Frisco
05:31 PM on 07/06/2009
Good analysis. And, with such bad advice, the woman also learns that she can't trust her own judgment since she keeps picking the same violent partner. The one thing often left out of domestic violence analyses is whether or not there is a power gradient that gives the abuser more power than the abused. I think that most reasonable people who find themselves being abused will be motivated to leave the relationship unless they have no financial resources to do so. Then an abusive environment develops that requires more abuse to sustain. Then you have a cycle of abuse. It takes two to fight but only one partner to abuse. Abuse occurs when one partner has no power to fight back. This distinction ought to be made in each and every case before any "help" is offered or accepted. Like MJ sang: "If you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make that change." Wherever you go, there you are. You can't beat change into anyone, not even yourself. Good luck to all those struggling with IPV relationships. Its a living hell, to be sure.
06:36 PM on 07/06/2009
I think fathers are often compelled to remain in abusive relationships, regardless of their financial resources, because leaving often means not only losing one's children, but leaving them unprotected with a violent and abusive woman. I believe Justin Paulsen cited this as a reason for not leaving Rena Corban sooner- that in spite of her history, local family law attorneys had convinced him that he had no realistic chance of custody. After he eventually did leave, Rena Corban left their young sons broiling in her minivan as she was passed out in her living room, a few feet away. Justin came to pick up his sons and found poor little Liam dead and his brother near death. The refusal of the DV industry to confront abusive women directly leads to such tragedy.