iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gloria Bonilla Santiago

GET UPDATES FROM Gloria Bonilla Santiago
 

New Tenure Laws Make Good Sense

Posted: 08/16/2012 9:42 am

N.J. Gov. Chris Christie's approval this month of new teacher tenure legislation should be applauded -- especially by student from poor backgrounds.

I was once that student -- a poor daughter of migrant farm workers. A history teacher named Mr. DiMarzio changed my life.

Gov. Christie's tenure reform legislation makes it more possible for the next generation of Mr. DiMarzios to reach the most challenging student populations.

Will it work? Wait and see.

It will take one extra year for a teacher to be eligible for tenure, but, as Gov. Christie said: "Good teachers will do very well under this system."

Good teaching talks. Poor teaching walks.

Expecations will be raised -- and teachers will need to rise to the occasion.

In a poor neighborhood, your typical student has more on her mind than school -- and often times the idea of going to college is pre-empted by the notion of simply getting through the day.

There is the constant threat of violence, the possibility of an unstable home life and other issues that students from affluent backgrounds just don't have to deal with.

A good teacher recognizes the challenges and responds by teaching with passion and compassion. Consider the research that shows that a child's learning will be very different at the end of the school year if she has the best teacher in her grade rather than the worst.

After earning tenure, a teacher will continue to have an incentive to teach well -- a teacher can lose tenure protections and face being fired by performing poorly in evaluations.

No teacher is safe -- nor should they be.

Teacher accountability works. The LEAP Academy University Charter School in Camden -- a school I founded -- has been the only union school in the state to offer teachers merit pay, not tenure.

We have achieved 100 percent graduation from our high school -- no dropouts. We have also placed all of our graduates into college -- eight years in a row.

A poor student is just as entitled to an education that prepares them for the demands of college as an affluent student. Gov. Christie's new law makes this possible.

 

Follow Gloria Bonilla Santiago on Twitter: www.twitter.com/GloriaBSantiago

FOLLOW EDUCATION
N.J. Gov. Chris Christie's approval this month of new teacher tenure legislation should be applauded -- especially by student from poor backgrounds. I was once that student -- a poor daughter of migr...
N.J. Gov. Chris Christie's approval this month of new teacher tenure legislation should be applauded -- especially by student from poor backgrounds. I was once that student -- a poor daughter of migr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:37 AM on 08/19/2012
In most states it takes 2-3 years before a teacher is tenured. If administrators were doing their jobs supporting and observing, only great teachers would make it out of the probationary period. A simple shift from "get hired and get tenure" to "get hired and if you prove yourself you might get tenure," can make all the difference. No change in tenure law is needed, just a change in how administrators think about hiring.

Read what Jim Collins has to say about the social sector:
http://www.jimcollins.com/books/g2g-ss.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sawyer116
05:23 PM on 08/18/2012
Tenure isn't the problem. We don't have it in our state. It's the money funneled to the well-to-do area schools that doesn't seem to find it's way to the public schools. It's the fact that a teacher in a public school is having to give the same tests and get the same results from students in the poor schools who (1) don't speak English (2) have severe learning disabilities (3) have severe physical disabilities (4) have severe disciplinary problems (5) have people like you that think passion is the equalizer. Teachers who care have every road block possible put in their way by legislatures who have never entered a public school since their own graduation but legislate results instead of progress, who think for-profit corporations are the answer from heaven and who have an easy target from public teachers who aren't allowed to say what the problem is to reporters, legislators or parents...and no, I'm not a teacher. I'm a volunteer at a public school and I see the teachers the parents and the problems that they face while the newspaper articles show a Michelle Rhee, who got $5M in start-up funds to vilify the hard working, under-appreciated REAL teachers!
12:49 PM on 08/18/2012
The last figures I saw from California were that .03%, that is 3/100ths of one percent, of tenured public school teachers were terminated during their tenure. And the teachers and unions rally protectively around and on behalf of those .03 % during the process. We all know, anyone who has ever been a student knows, that way, way more than .03% of tenured teachers are unqualified to teach. The follow teachers of those who are unqualified to teach know who they are. The fellow teachers would not want their own children in the class of one of those who should not be teaching.

It is time for teachers, and unions, to police their own ranks, and to aid in the process of sending those who who not be teaching to find another occupation. Protect those who are incompetent, abusive, or even just marginal, and you will be lumped together with them in the public view. Indeed, that is exactly what is happening. You protect them, you identify with them, you are them.
06:44 PM on 08/18/2012
Articles like this one continue to show the flaws in the rhetoric regarding tenure. If critics would "get" what due process means then they would understand that tenure also protects the integrity of teaching. In NYC, as I am sure is the same in other systems, principals are drawn to untenured (voiceless) newbies. This allows them to foster an environment of absolute obedience using intimidation. This allows principals to put politics and their personal ambitions above the education of students. When teachers are afraid of losing their jobs at the end of each year, then they are at the whims of principals who are often less qualified than they are. Tenure does allow you to speak out more, but it does not save you from harassment and it certainly doesn't protect your job. Being untenured, though, makes it risky to stand up for your students. And when teachers can't properly teach or protect the children under their care, then our most vulnerable citizens pay the cost.
09:51 AM on 08/19/2012
How do you know that there are more unqualified teachers out there? There are teachers out there who should not be teaching. However, it is the responsibility of the administrators to identify them, help them improve by offereing support, and then terminate them if they are ineffective. No one wants to get rid of the few ineffective teachers more then the many effective ones, but how can this be done while avoiding a witch hunt? No one is perfect, and there is always room for feedback. Tenure protects teachers not from firing for doing a bad job, but firing based on biases, discrimination, and politics as the sole reason.

I recently found this story-http://www.city-journal.org/html/13_1_how_i_joined.html
It is written by a Teach for America alumi, and although I am not a fan of TFA, it details the lack of support faced by a teacher and the struggles he faces (esp. being ill-prepared and undertrained). Should this teacher be fired from his job? How did the biases and politics he faced by the parents and the administration impact his job performance?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:33 AM on 08/17/2012
Your obvious agenda, along with the insulting way you crafted your piece, places you into the "ignore in the future" category.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
05:13 AM on 08/17/2012
No, they don't, Gloria. No personal rancor is intended, but your statement could not be more wrong. There are several whoppers in your obsequious posting; it does make me wonder if you, or a close friend or family member is being paid, directly or indirectly, by companies hoping to profit from the rise of private, for-profit "schools" in New Jersey.

Bad teachers can and do get fired. Every single school year. In every state. "Tenure" is actually "due process"; all it means is that when a teacher is dismissed, there is a process to make sure she wasn't let go because the principal wanted to hire his wife's cousin instead, or because a school board member didn't like who she voted for in the last election, or because she turned down several invitations to an "intimate dinner" with the head of her department.

If you're going to attack the people who teach our children, I suggest you at least keep yourself informed and aware. Hopefully that's not too much to ask.
11:21 PM on 08/16/2012
The author clearly has no idea what she's talking about. If Christie had done something positive for education here, it would be a first. But he didn't.

Let's look at this, because this makes clear that the author doesn't know what she's talking about: "After earning tenure, a teacher will continue to have an incentive to teach well -- a teacher can lose tenure protections and face being fired by performing poorly in evaluations."

A teacher WITH tenure faces being fired for poor performance. Tenure doesn't mean a job for life; it means that a teacher can't be fired as long as the teacher is doing a good job. A teacher who can lose tenure can be fired even with excellent performance. If, for instance, a teacher frequently advocates for what's best for children, in defiance of an incompetent administrator, tenure protects that teacher so long as that teacher is competent. What Christie has apparently proposed is providing a way to fire that teacher. That's not good for students.
09:52 AM on 08/19/2012
That is the future public education unfortunately faces.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:11 PM on 08/16/2012
Post 3 of Multipe

So go ahead! Drink the Charter Kool-Aid and sign up for financial mismanagement, athletic fraud, a lottery system that's not followed if you're the parent of a regular kid, a scary turnover rate of teachers of your children and lowered test scores. Because hey, it's a charter. It must be better, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:10 PM on 08/16/2012
Post 1 of Multiple

This is the same LEAP that lost in court to the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association for:
1. allowed an 11th grade star basketball player to enroll using someone other than his parent as a guardian despite no prior existence of a close tie. And she was the mother of another LEAP basketball player.
2. Allowed the same student to skip from Spot #20 to Spot #1 on the waiting list (how's that lottery work again?)
3. The student was academically ineligible to play.
4. Allowed a 12th grade student, also a star basketball player, to enroll despite no real claim of his alleged guardian to the child and who moved from Spot#9 to Spot #1 on the waiting list.
5. LEAP Basketball had a good season! Although the court found that less than half of them resided in the Camden area LEAP was supposed to serve.
6. LEAP's chief administrator didn't show up to the court hearing.
7. Her replacement in the hearing provided contradictory evidence about waiting list and enrollment procedures.
8. And so on.. Full document here: http://www.state.nj.us/education/legal/commissioner/2007/apr/120-07.pdf

This is the same LEAP that shows the following stats:
2007 Graduation Statistics:
Percent of regular students graduated passed HSPA: 61.9%
State average from 331 schools: 87.9%
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
04:44 PM on 08/16/2012
"We have achieved 100 percent graduation from our high school -- no dropouts"

What are the numbers for students expelled or refused entrance in the first place.
03:00 PM on 08/16/2012
This article is nothing short of propaganda by those who want to destroy the public education system. It plays the blame game and misses the target of what is really needed. Under the so-called guise of "accountability" teachers are blamed for factors that cannot be overcome for every single struggling student. The author, who is not and never has been an educator in public schools, claims that to help the most struggling students, teachers have to teach "passion and compassion. Consider the research that shows that a child's learning will be very different at the end of the school year if she has the best teacher in her grade rather than the worst." This is insulting to myself and the teachers I know and work with-we already do teach with passion and compassion; but the numbers and needs of our most struggling students cannot be met with the decreasing resources available to our schools. Education deformers know this, but would rather attack teachers and their unions, under the guise of accountability, by using these magic bullet cures. Tenure can be reformed and the issues associated addressed, but this CANNOT substitute for the solutions to the very real problems educators, esp. public school educators, deal with in the real world. As a side note, what evidence is there that merit pay systems and a workplace devoid of workers rights is actually an improvement? Most of the credible evidence out there points otherwise (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:22 AM on 08/19/2012
Furthermore, the POINT study from Vanderbilt showed that merit based bonuses did not improve student learning and did very little to improve teacher retention.
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
02:42 PM on 08/16/2012
***After earning tenure, a teacher will continue to have an incentive to teach well -- a teacher can lose tenure protections and face being fired by performing poorly in evaluations.***

In what way do they then have tenure?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
04:43 PM on 08/16/2012
Well, that IS tenure. Tenure is not, nor has it ever been, protection against being fired for doing a lousy job.
11:23 PM on 08/16/2012
That IS tenure. But what the author is describing is taking that away, and allowing teachers to be fired even if they're doing a good job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hbrinn
12:09 AM on 08/17/2012
But unfortunately that's the way most public school tenure laws function.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:56 PM on 08/16/2012
I hate that circular logic they indulge in. The emphasis is on getting rid of instead of hiring and developing. Too many people who know nothing about education making all of the critical decisions. What other industry or profession is subject to such interference from outsiders?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
11:04 PM on 08/16/2012
Well, in all fairness-- increasingly, all of them. Doctors and nurses are told what treatment they may or may not provide by insurance company bureaucrats. Lawyers increasingly find their hands tied by mandatory this and that. And the list of red tape and regulations that people in industry must follow is crazy-making.

If you aren't a banker or someone with the money needed to hire a legislator to write a law for you, then somebody with money will be writing a law to tie your hands and meddle with your workplace. That, unfortunately, has become SOP.
11:52 PM on 08/16/2012
Works well for this charter scam artist-
We offer merit pay no tenure-teachers have never wanted that little bit of money
Education is a right, not a competition
Wonder how much this I was born in a log cabin character is making now for her propoganda?