¡Ay Caramba! Liveblog En Español!

Posted September 9, 2007 | 07:00 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :¡Ay Caramba! Liveblog En Español!   digg: ¡Ay Caramba! Liveblog En Español!   reddit: ¡Ay Caramba! Liveblog En Español!   del.icio.us: ¡Ay Caramba! Liveblog En Español!

Hola! Bienvenudos a HuffPost's Debate Liveblog Series ™ — where we watch the debates and critique the candidates in real tiempo! Tonight's it's the landmark Univision Bilingual Debate — the first of its kind — where the candidates will be addressing Univision's humungous and influential Latino audience in their epic battle be named El Presidente. Oddly, they will not be actually speaking Spanish — nay, they are actually precluded from so doing in the name of fairness and totally sticking it to Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson. Fittingly, tonight's debate will be liveblogged by two non-Spanish speaking Canadians, ETP's Glynnis MacNicol and Rachel Sklar, so let the chips fall where they may (but either way, probably with a little salsa). Yes, that is a sign of things to come. Be warned. And now - vamanos, muchachas! Let's see what these gringos have to say. I sure hope "gringos" isn't a bad word. In the meantime, enjoy this clip from the opening credits.



[N.B. Those seeking actual information on last night's debate can skip to the end, where there are links; we think it's safe to say that what follows is, er, color commentary.]

Rachel (7:00:59 PM): Hola, sista!
Rachel (7:01:21 PM): Bienvenidos a la Foro Presidencial Democratica: Distino 2008!
Glynnis (7:01:37 PM): Si, senorita.
Rachel (7:01:40 PM): Oh God when are they going to start with the subtitles?
Rachel (7:01:42 PM): Oy, there are no subtitles.
Rachel (7:01:44 PM): Why didn't I take another language?
Glynnis (7:02:02 PM): Welcome to the liveblogging version of a badly dubbed kung fu movie!
Rachel (7:03:42 PM): The first one up is Obama. He looks a tad uncomfortable. Oh, big cheers for Hillary - well, that breaks the language barrier!
Glynnis (7:04:26 PM): Just as a point of interest, Joe Biden, who just flew back from Iraq, is not participating because he is in DC preparing for the Petraeus report this week.
Glynnis (7:04:57 PM): Also, the candidates are not allowed to answer in Spanish, even if they happen to speak Spanish, as Dodd and Richardson do.
Rachel (7:05:38 PM): Not allowed to answer in Spanish! But Barack Obama is allowed to be paraded across Oprah like the book of the month!
Rachel (7:05:52 PM): Even so, it's got to help them. Richardson can't claim not to understand the questions here!

2007-09-10-ForoPresidencial.JPGRachel (7:06:16 PM): Wow. Barack Obama's energy does NOT match that of the general Univision vibe.
Glynnis (7:06:20 PM): It is nice to see a woman moderator.
Rachel (7:06:25 PM): I know! My God, is that the first? After how many debates? Katie Couric, get in there!
Rachel (7:06:35 PM): Oh look, John Edwards is an Abogado! "Lawyer" sounds so much less sleazy in Spanish.
Rachel (7:07:18 PM): This may be the least useful debate liveblog we've ever done - and that is saying something.
Glynnis (7:07:24 PM): This liveblog may turn into a political version of Jeopardy wherein Rachel and I (non-Spanish speaking Canadians) guess the question (which is being asked in Spanish) based on the answer.
Rachel (7:07:25 PM): Well, this is a good opportunity to focus on body language, then. Kucinich seems very focused tonight, a little graver, seems to be smiling less. Which is odd considering the forum - the energy in the room is high, and let's face it, EVERYTHING sounds more exciting in Spanish. Obama still looks slightly uncomfortable.
Glynnis (7:09:04 PM): Gravel sounds more sensible in Spanish.
2007-09-10-BarackObamadoesnotlookhappy.JPGRachel (7:07:32 PM): I know! It's bizarre to hear strange voices talking over them. Unfortunately you really can't hear what they're saying. At all.
Glynnis (7:08:43 PM): If we listen closely, maybe we can learn how to say "it's George Bush's fault" is Spanish.
Rachel (7:09:07 PM): ¡He is a devil!
Rachel (7:09:13 PM): (Sorry, was quoting Hugo Chavez)
Rachel (7:09:32 PM): Hillary is unflappable! She looks so happy to be there, in her nice azul suit.
Glynnis (7:09:58 PM): Edwards is honored to be there.
Glynnis (7:10:39 PM): If we listen hard we'll learn how to say "father worked in a textile mill" in Spanish
Rachel (7:11:24 PM): Mental note: Find Spanish-speaking people to do this for the GOP.
Rachel (7:11:29 PM): Now THAT will be a fun one to watch! They'll really be playing to the home crowd.

Glynnis (7:14:03 PM): Richardson is NOT happy that at the Spanish debate, spanish is not permitted.
Glynnis (7:14:41 PM): But this only receives tepid applause.
Rachel (7:09:29 PM): Poor Bill. He doesn't look that excited to be there, either. I am genuinely surprised that they are not responding more to the energy. The audience is REALLY upbeat. I guess there is that lag with the translation. But still. If there was ever a time to let loose, this is probably it.
Glynnis (7:15:28 PM): We're not sure Dennis Kucinich listened to the question before declaring that "our troops need to be brought home now!"
Glynnis (7:15:45 PM): But since we didn't understand the question it's sort of a moot point.
Rachel (7:16:09 PM): I think that's what "tropos" means? Oh, God, Spanish-speaking readers, honestly, we apologize.
Glynnis (7:16:19 PM): Well, we can understand applause - the crowd agrees with him whole heartedly.
Glynnis (7:16:38 PM): Barack is pointing out that he didn't vote for the war. The language may change but the message stays the same.
Glynnis (7:21:01 PM): But the crowd continues to love Hillary.
Rachel (7:21:29 PM): She only gets more poised at that podium. But she's playing to a strength here - she's strong in the Latino community, got the endorsement of LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa back in May, performs well here in general.
But then again, Obama's got the Pena endorsement.

2007-09-10-DoddenCanada.JPGGlynnis (7:23:31 PM): Question for Gravel on Terrorismo Okay, so maybe this language barrier thing is overrated.
Glynnis (7:23:47 PM): Gravel is drowning out the translator.
Rachel (7:26:20 PM): And I was just about to comment how much more serious he seemed in this forum!
Glynnis (7:26:17 PM): Now they are talking about immigration with Obama.
Glynnis (7:26:53 PM): Interesting...it seems that they are not limiting the talk to the Mexican border but including Canadian border talk also.
Rachel (7:26:20 PM): In Spanish, Canada is spelled "Canada"
Glynnis (7:27:07 PM): The minute men in Vermont must be very gratified.
Rachel (7:26:20 PM): As are we!
Glynnis (7:28:25 PM): This question initially got a strong response from the crowd and we wonder if it is because someone is finally noting the US has TWO borders. Something that has scarcely been noted in other debates.
Glynnis (7:28:44 PM): Hillary seems to be addressing the fact that both borders need patrolling.
Glynnis (7:29:03 PM): Notwithstanding the cast of Saturday Night Live.
Rachel (7:26:20 PM): Or Knocked Up.
Glynnis (7:30:32 PM): Or Baywatch.
Glynnis (7:32:04 PM): Pamela Anderson.
Rachel (7:26:20 PM): At one point, officially the most famous Canadian. Unlike Seth Rogen (hence the reference to Knocked Up).
Glynnis (7:32:09 PM): Bryan Adams
Glynnis (7:32:14 PM): Celine Dion
Rachel (7:32:31 PM): Lorne Michaels
Glynnis (7:33:55 PM): Jim Carrey
Glynnis (7:34:09 PM): Rachel McAdams
Rachel (7:34:29 PM): "I love those cupcakes like McAdams loves Gosling!" Ryan Gosling is Canadian. (Related: Congrats to SNL on the Emmy win!).
Glynnis (7:35:29 PM): Just looking for extra hits here...because who are we kidding. This is the kind of dedication to politics that borders on frightening.
Rachel (7:36:20 PM): There's a "borders on frightening" joke here somewhere. Let's save it for the GOP Spanish debate.
Glynnis (7:37:34 PM): Back to this one. Kucinich is answering a question about trade between Mexico and the States.
Rachel (7:37:50 PM): That...borders on frightening. Hahahahahahaha! Liveblogging is fun! Ish.
Glynnis (7:38:17 PM): Based solely on the applause meter, Kucinich and Hillary are running neck and neck. We are fluent in applause!

2007-09-10-imagracion.JPGGlynnis (7:42:36 PM): Dodd is not speaking loud enough for us to make out what he's saying...but we'd like to point out he's shed the red and green Santa combo...
Glynnis (7:42:47 PM): He just said something that made the crowd VERY happy.
Glynnis (7:43:42 PM): Obama is less than inspiring here. Very low energy, and the amount of time it takes for him to listen to the translation in his ear makes his lack of Spanish apparent.
Glynnis (7:43:53 PM): Not that we're ones to point the finger.
Glynnis (7:44:32 PM): Actually, Obama looks unwell. Hmmm.
Rachel (7:44:42 PM): Montezuma's Revenge? Sorry. I'm going to hell. He does look sort of unwell. This is a grueling schedule, and it's only going to get worse. Fred Thompson was probably wise to rest up.
Glynnis (7:45:54 PM): This is just killing Richardson. He is fluent, people. He does not need a translator.
Glynnis (7:49:56 PM): According to my Google translator the question is, "Are undocumented workers necessary?" if that's correct it's a very interesting question and sheds a human light on the subject
Rachel (7:50:09 PM): What's the answer?
Glynnis (7:50:39 PM): I don't know. Did I mention that this is in SPANISH?
Rachel (7:51:02 PM): I know! Where's Newt Gingrich when you need him?

2007-09-10-Hillaryenespanol.JPGGlynnis (7:51:03 PM): What is interesting is that it appears that in this debate every candidate is getting the chance to answer the question.
Glynnis (7:51:43 PM): The hosts are not cherry-picking the candidates per question.
Rachel (7:51:53 PM): No Dodd clock this time!
Glynnis (7:52:29 PM): Whatever Hillary just said got a rave response.
Rachel (7:53:53 PM): See above. This crowd likes her. But all crowds are not created equal.
Glynnis (7:54:26 PM): It must be said that we are fans of the woman moderating this debate. She's in yellow, and she has fantastic cheekbones (we assume she's also incredibly intelligent...well, she sounds intelligent even though we have no idea what she's saying)
Rachel (7:55:53 PM): We are fans of A woman moderating the debate. Hillary is often the only woman around for MILES at these things (unless they cut to Kucinich's wife).
Glynnis (7:56:32 PM): Someone just said Richard Nixon...and Roosevelt. Hmm, Reagan can't be far behind. Good thing...we need a drink!

Glynnis (7:56:36 PM): Tequila!
Glynnis (7:56:44 PM): Hugo Chavez!!
2007-09-10-JuanEdwards.JPGRachel (7:56:59 PM): I was wondering when he'd come up. And Castro. This IS in Miami, after all.
Glynnis (7:57:12 PM): Do the candidates consider Hugo Chavez a dictator?
Glynnis (7:57:36 PM): Edwards appears to be dancing around the question (dancing is a universal language...especially the political kind).
Glynnis (8:00:03 PM): This would be a good time for a yes or no answer.
Rachel (8:01:04 PM): "Si" or...um, "Non?" "Nada?" "Nay?" Wow. We are so not bueno at habloing the Español.
Glynnis (8:01:48 PM): Aha, Fidel Castro. A tour of Spanish-speaking dictators.
Rachel (8:02:09 PM): What does "pasaria" mean?
Glynnis (8:02:49 PM): To hand over, to pass on...in the context of the handover of power, I think.
Glynnis (8:03:02 PM): If there were and applause meter for this debate Hillary would be far and away the winner. We have no idea what she's saying (we assume it's along the lines of "it's GWB's fault") but the crowd loves her!
Rachel (8:03:19 PM): If she could explain what "pasaria" meant, we would too.

Glynnis (8:04:45 PM): I think I should take "conversational Spanish" off my resume.
Rachel (8:05:19 PM): Yes, this has been something of an exercise in futility, but I will say that it's amazing how much interest there has been in having these debates. It's sort of great to have micro-targeting of issues and audiences over this presidential season. Long Tail and all that.
Rachel (8:06:04 PM): Our politics editor Nico Pitney is getting the live feed from Arianna in Miami — she's hearing the English version, and has some good stuff: "Elizabeth Edwards, who's been exchanging looks and hand signals with her husband..." Interesting. Definitely worth a read.

2007-09-10-hostsenespanol.JPGGlynnis (8:15:51 PM): This crowd is loving Hillary.
Rachel (8:16:31 PM): Nico/Arianna report the same from Florida.
Glynnis (8:16:48 PM): They are talking about healthcare...or more likely, the lack thereof.
Glynnis (8:22:00 PM): There is nine minutes left to this debate and our Spanish has not noticeably improved.
Glynnis (8:22:55 PM): However, watching a debate in a language you don't understand definitely lends the candidates and air of mystique. It's easier to assume they are saying something new and interesting, even though this is probably not the case.
Glynnis (8:28:43 PM): Personally, the best part this debate is the host, Maria Elena Salinas. She is owning this.
Glynnis (8:30:07 PM): Her partner, Jorge Ramos, closely resembles Anderson Cooper in twenty years. The fact that we can't understand him makes him that much sexier and more intelligent.
Rachel (8:31:00 PM): Sorry, I was updating and got distracted by the comments. We have comments! Thanks to commenter Mulegino for actually writing in Spanish...alas, we can't understand it.
Rachel (8:31:40 PM): We tend to agree with commenter Richandler: "Wait, so, Richardson cannot use Spanish to a spanish audience. That is BS."

2007-09-10-Kucinichenespanol.JPGGlynnis (8:31:15 PM): 8:30! The candidates are winding up now.
Rachel (8:31:52 PM): In addition to being slow in Spanish, we are slow in real time: We've been doing the occasional pause on the DVR to not understand what people are saying.
Glynnis (8:31:22 PM): Kucinich is excited.
Rachel (8:31:53 PM): I still think that hasn't been the norm - maybe it's the refractory period-like translation time before they answer the question, but the excitement level has just not seemed to match the vibe in the room. Maybe it's the somber translator voices.
Glynnis (8:31:43 PM): Obama looks like someone slipped him a valium before the debate.
Glynnis (8:32:31 PM): Hillary is leaning against the podium. She is owning this debate. We assume, based on very scientific applause meter.
Rachel (8:32:53 PM): Well, not so fast - at some point, we should probably figure out what was actually said.
Glynnis (8:33:01 PM): We think the final question is, "What do you think the major contribution of Hispanics has been?"
Rachel (8:33:13 PM): Oh wow, would I love to see that question posed to the GOP candidates.
Glynnis (8:33:30 PM): ...and Hillary gets the last word. Whatever it was, it was popular.
Glynnis (8:34:12 PM): Probably they just said the English language version of this debate is available on an other channel.
Glynnis (8:34:16 PM): Ay Caramba!

Rachel: Umm... here's an article about what was said. IN ENGLISH. Sheesh.
Glynnis: "The candidates' responses were simultaneously translated into Spanish for broadcast, and English-speaking viewers could watch using the closed caption service on their televisions."
Rachel: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Glynnis: "Univision invited the Republican candidates for a similar forum, but only Arizona Sen. John McCain has accepted."
Rachel: Hmm. Muy interesante. I'm not sure what language that just was, but you probably know that by now. And on that note, we don't have much more to say and you've probably stopped reading it, especially if you're someone who actually understands Spanish. Well, try this one on for size: Adios, amigo! Thanks for sticking with us.

p.s. Props to commenter BobHanssen for this one: "Viva, Juan Edwards!!

Update, Monday: According to this Univision Press Release: "Univision captured the #1 network ranking among all Adults 18-34, not just Hispanics, and outdelivered ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX and CW for the entire first week of Nielsen's single national panel." And here's something from the WSJ on resistance to Obama in Miami's Little Havana. Yeah, we're trying to make up for last night.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
25
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- stlrfan See Profile I'm a Fan of stlrfan

All of our immigrant ancestors felt pride in learning the English language. Why are hispanics so resistant? Did it occur to anybody that anyone who can't speak English is probably not a citizen and can't vote anyway. This was only slightly more annoying than the Walmart ad in Spanish that I got in the mail the other day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 09/10/2007
- CitizenE See Profile I'm a Fan of CitizenE

Until World War 1, there were schools all over the US in which people of German descent, our first non-English speaking immigrant population, here from the 18th century, were conducted in German. The idea that first generation Americans ever spoke English as a first language or in the home is one of the more bogus ideas in American history. Heck, our President who went to Yale doesn't speak English clearly, and he's a Yankee blueblood.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 09/10/2007
- marismar22 See Profile I'm a Fan of marismar22



Gracias CitizenE!

El decir que un inmigrante no habla Ingles porque se resiste a aprenderlo es desde mi punto de vista, muy irresponsable. Es dificil para una persona humilde, quien trabaja 10 o 12 -posiblemente mas- horas diarias para medio solventar a su familia, el encontrar un espacio para aprender el idioma, pese a que saben que si lo dominaran, tendrian muchas mas y mejores oportunidades. Los hijos de estos inmigrantes en cambio, dominan el Ingles, porque no existe tal resitencia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 09/10/2007
- anne1 See Profile I'm a Fan of anne1

Porque el Huffpost no tengan bloggers que entender espanol? Que Lastima!
(Disculpame para no usaba diacriticos)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 09/10/2007
- Rachel Sklar - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Rachel Sklar

Parce-que cette bloggeur only remembered that this debate was happening late this afternoon (and her French is not much better than her Spanish!). It's Sunday night - we figured that two Canadians who couldn't speak the language would bring a certain objectivity to the proceedings, and also we didn't have plans. Wish we'd understood more preguntas, and had a chance to use the word "cumpleanos." Feliz navidad!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 AM on 09/10/2007
- TuffPosh See Profile I'm a Fan of TuffPosh

Some of these candidates' answers are going to be of great service... to the GOP. They might play with far-left, racial power advocates like Salinas but they won't play with 95% of the electorate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 09/09/2007
- smartstuart See Profile I'm a Fan of smartstuart

Just what we DON'T need is a US presidential debate in ANY foreign lanuage! How fooish and patronizing. What foreign country would have one in English to make a few hundred English-speaking folks happy??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 09/09/2007
- shockmagog See Profile I'm a Fan of shockmagog

What country can you possibly name that has received an overwhelming flood of English-speaking immigrants? Your being bi-lingual apparently does not make you an authority on this issue.

Come, now. This has been the only forum that's been in Spanish, and how many have we had so far in English? Thirty-seven, thirty-eight? I lost count. And how many Spanish-speaking Hispanics are citizens of this country?

'Spanish is the second most common language in the United States after English. There are more Spanish speakers in the United States than speakers of French, Hawaiian, and the Native American languages combined. According to the 2000 United States Census, Spanish is spoken most frequently at home by about 28.1 million people aged 5 or over. The United States is home to more than 40 million Hispanics, making it the fifth largest Spanish-speaking community in the world, after Mexico, Colombia, Spain and Argentina. Roughly half of all Spanish speakers in the US also speak English "very well."'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_in_the_United_States#_note-2000_Census.2C_Language_in_the_US

'Hispanic remained the largest minority group, with 44.3 million on July 1, 2006 " 14.8 percent of the total population. Black was the second-largest minority group, totaling 40.2 million in 2006. They were followed by Asian (14.9 million), American Indian and Alaska Native (4.5 million), and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (1 million). The population of non-Hispanic whites who indicated no other race totaled 198.7 million in 2006.'
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/010048.html

I'd say the demographic easily supports a Spanish language forum. Where are the Republicans?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 09/11/2007
- Qbear See Profile I'm a Fan of Qbear

The couldn't speak in showtunes or movie quotes on LOGO's HRC debate EITHER.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 09/09/2007
- Bushwhacked See Profile I'm a Fan of Bushwhacked

I don't understand the primary language now being spoken in many cities in my native country. Great - another way to divide the electorate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 09/09/2007
- Richandler See Profile I'm a Fan of Richandler

Wait, so, Richardson cannot use Spanish to a spanish audience. That is BS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 09/09/2007
- lafrance See Profile I'm a Fan of lafrance

reason Hillary is unflappable - she is an emtionless coldblooded corporate opportunist.
I do hope women will do more than think gender with Hillary and check her record and not having any stand on any issue,like me. Like so many other feminists, I find her disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 09/09/2007
- BobHanssen See Profile I'm a Fan of BobHanssen

Viva, Juan Edwards!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 09/09/2007
- WOLFWARRIOR See Profile I'm a Fan of WOLFWARRIOR

As it's written - No speaking in speaking in tounges unless there is a translator ....

http://world.altavista.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 09/09/2007
- mulegino See Profile I'm a Fan of mulegino

Hey, was this post translated by someone or a software program?
Software programs tend to translate "word by word" as opposed to interpreting. Which is why some of it comes out so garbled.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 09/09/2007
- WOLFWARRIOR See Profile I'm a Fan of WOLFWARRIOR

All the surveys indicate that the candidate who has the greater probablidad to prevail against nobody over the pre-candidates of the GOP is John Edwards; and ademas, with the exception of Kucinich, its politica platform is but the progressive one and tends to favor the working class and the middle-class. Unfortunately, the "DLC" [ Advice of Democratico Leadership, that is a group of Democratas neoliberal and that represents the interests of "corporacracia" ribs of the middle-class and the working class ] this doing all the possible one to relegate to Edwards to the dark, so that the candidate of the party is the Hillary. If that happens, preparanse for another president Republicano, since the town does not even forget the corruption and the escandalos of the first Clinton administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 09/09/2007
- WOLFWARRIOR See Profile I'm a Fan of WOLFWARRIOR

"Hispanic" [ is as much diversity between the Hispanics as between the Nordicos, like between the Asiaticos, etc. ] they deberian to avoid practices it of the "tribalismo" when they select its candidate; that is to say, to think but alla that the Spanish-speaking world, or if the candidate is "Hispanic" or speaks to Espanol [ I hope that the reader excuses to the lack for tildes and accents, etc. since I do not have a numerico keyboard ]. The priority I number in the electorate, I am this Hispanic, Nordico, American Afro, Asiatico, etc. deberia of being to name a candidate who improved the standard of life of all the Americans, and who at the same time is eligible and that he represents a true change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 09/09/2007
- mulegino See Profile I'm a Fan of mulegino

Y aparte, la administracion Clinton milito a favor del TLC [NAFTA], a favor del libre comercio que perjudico tanto a EEUU como a Mexico. Se acuerdan como elogiaron a Carlos Salinas de Gortari cuando este estaba saqueando el arca nacional de Mexico?
Ambos grupos de neo-liberales [Republicanos y los pseudo-Democratas encabezados por Hillary] comparten la misma teoria economica, que consiste en favorecer los intereses de las grandes corporaciones a costillas de la clase media y obrera, fomentar la "privatizacion" [es decir, el robo] de la infraestructura y recursos naturales que por derecho natural pertenecen al pueblo en comun.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 09/09/2007
- shockmagog See Profile I'm a Fan of shockmagog

Bill Clinton was hardly a model Democrat, and NAFTA was a glaring example of what a travesty that agreement has been: It almost totally favored big business at the expense of workers (as you say), as well as the environment, on both sides of the border.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 09/09/2007
- mulegino See Profile I'm a Fan of mulegino

Todos las encuestas indican que el candidato que tenga la mayor probablidad de triunfar en contra de cualquier de los pre-candidatos del GOP es John Edwards; y ademas, con la excepcion de Kucinich, su plataforma politica es la mas progresista y tiende a favorecer la clase obrera y la clase media.
Desgraciadamente, el "DLC" [Consejo de Liderazgo Democratico, que es un grupo de Democratas neo-liberales y que representa los intereses de la "corporacracia" a costillas de la clase media y la clase obrera] esta haciendo todo lo posible para relegar a Edwards a la oscuridad, para que la candidata del partido sea la Hillary. Si eso sucede, preparanse para otro presidente Republicano, puesto que el pueblo aun no se olvide de la corrupcion y los escandalos de la primera administracion Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 09/09/2007
- shockmagog See Profile I'm a Fan of shockmagog

Well, it can be argued that the "corruption" and "scandals" of the first Clinton Administration (except for the obvious "blue dress") were trumped up and inflated by the GOP and their supporters. I agree with you however, about the DLC already deciding on Clinton to the exclusion of Edwards and Kucinich--who are considered friends of the Working Class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 09/09/2007
- mulegino See Profile I'm a Fan of mulegino

Los "Hispanos" [hay tanta diversidad entre los Hispanos como entre los Nordicos, como entre los Asiaticos, etc.] deberian de evitar la practica del "tribalismo" cuando seleccionan su candidato; es decir, pensar mas alla que el mundo Hispanoparlante, o si el candidato sea "Hispano" o hable Espanol [espero que el lector disculpe la falta de tildes y acentos, etc. puesto que no tengo un teclado numerico].
La prioridad numero en el electorado, sea este Hispano, Nordico, Afro Americano, Asiatico, etc. deberia de ser nombrar un candidato que mejorara el nivel de vida de todos los Estadounidenses, y que al mismo tiempo sea eligible y que represente un cambio verdadero.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 09/09/2007
- Crowhaul See Profile I'm a Fan of Crowhaul

No se olvide de que la cosa mas importante, sobre todo, es elegir a un candidato que pueda vencer a los esfuerzos neo-cons. Ya hemos visto el enemigo verdadero...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 09/10/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in