More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gov. Deval Patrick

GET UPDATES FROM Gov. Deval Patrick
 

A Step Closer to Equality

Posted: 07/23/11 11:13 AM ET

Tomorrow, New York will join Massachusetts as one of six states that recognize same-sex couples' right to marry, and our country comes a step closer to ensuring that every person is free to marry whomever they love. When Massachusetts became the first state to affirm marriage equality in 2004, opponents decried the decision, saying it would cause irreparable harm to our society. But in the seven years since, the sky hasn't fallen. In fact, the institution of marriage has been strengthened.

Our state simply affirmed the principle that all citizens come before their government as equals. Same-sex couples in Massachusetts have gained the security of knowing that their families have the same rights and protections as every other family, including health care benefits and hospital visitation rights. We've kept the government out of their personal, intimate decisions -- something citizens across the political spectrum understand and appreciate.

The celebrations that will take place across New York tomorrow are long overdue. Committed couples who have waited a lifetime to marry will do so in the coming days and weeks. But many more elsewhere continue to wait. Our experience in Massachusetts shows that fears about marriage equality are unfounded. We should never allow legalized discrimination against gay and
lesbian couples. With each state that embraces same-sex marriage as a matter of fundamental fairness, we move farther along the path to equality.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:33 AM on 07/28/2011
Proud you are my Govenor, Govenor!
02:35 PM on 07/24/2011
I agree with Governor Patrick; why not allow gay marriage? There is no evidence that gay marriage is harmful to our civilization or country. To the contrary, I believe committed relationships affirmed by marriage have a positive effect. This seems like an issue of personal freedom, to live one's life as one sees fit and then accept the consequences.

It would be refreshing if our progressive friends believed in economic freedom too, rather than numerous redistribution schemes labeled "social justice".
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
01:08 PM on 07/25/2011
If by "economic freedom" you mean that companies get to destroy ecosystems and the environment without recourse, then I think most progressives will have a problem. If by "economic freedom" you mean that the uber-rich continue to prosper while they exploit workers, then I think most progressives will have a problem.
02:09 PM on 07/24/2011
This whole gay marriage brouhaha is a poorly concealed attack on churches. Progressives have wanted to eliminate the tax-exempt status of churches for decades, and legalizing gay marriage is their latest tactic. If gay marriage is legal, then gay couples must be accepted by churches. The ACLU will attack like a pit bull to eliminate the tax deduction for churches. Hide and watch.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
03:29 PM on 07/24/2011
The fear that marriage equality for gays and lesbians is an assault on religion is ill founded. This is only about securing equality under secular law (civil marriage). The First Amendment clearly protects churches from government interference, and in Massachusetts churches that approve do marry same sex couples while those that prohibit these marriages are not forced to perform them. New York's new law goes even further, and it has extensive religious exemptions specifically written into the statute. Finally, many couples (straight & gay) choose to have secular weddings with no religious officiant involved at all.
05:56 PM on 07/24/2011
Civil unions already provide a mechanism for gay unions to have equal rights with straight marriages. The term "marriage" is what is at stake. And, make no mistake about it, if the definition of marriage is changed to include same-sex unions, the events I outlined will occur... maybe not this year, maybe not next, but they WILL occur. It's the same old "in your face" attitude.
I don't care about your sexual preference, just don't bother me about it, and I won't bother you about mine.
06:28 PM on 07/24/2011
I pleasantly disagree with your statement in full. Gay marriage will not cause churches to lose any tax exemption. And if people are religious shouldn't the be accepting all folks into the flock without judgment? I'm just saying. Gay dollars spend just the same as straight dollars and fill church coffers as well.

Churches should have a restructuring of their tax-exempt status. Those that take care of their operations cost, should then have a zero balance at years end and divest the rest of the monies to communities they serve. Many churches enjoy the tax loophole, do not reinvest into the communities, and are sitting on MASSIVE FUNDS.
07:56 AM on 07/24/2011
There goes Deval Patrick again; trying to screw up the system with more of his his goof ball liberal policies.

He is the worst governor we have ever had here in Massachusetts.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
09:17 AM on 07/24/2011
I disagree, he's been a fine governor and I will vote for him again. I think Mitt Romney was much worse.
11:26 AM on 07/24/2011
Deval Patrick and his liberalism are growing old and tired.

The failure to adhere to historical principles, norms and standards is the reason why our country has gone and continues to go downhill.

Deval Patrick is an unprincipled governor.
01:02 PM on 07/24/2011
Governor Patrick and his liberalism have grown old and tired.

It is the failure of Patrick and others like him to adhere to historical standards and principles that is responsible for the state our country is in economically and otherwise. Our country continues to be headed down hill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Royal Payne
02:11 AM on 07/24/2011
You must be proud of yourself ... but let me be Frank with you Barney, you are a chump. Fortunately I do not live in the the Big Mass with all of its advantages.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DuxMom
Wine merchant, parent, artist
09:58 PM on 07/23/2011
Gov. Patrick is doing a good job for us in Mass, and I truly appreciate his message to the many gay people in New York who will legally marry tomorrow. A long and happy marriage to you all. Xoxo
07:26 PM on 07/23/2011
One more step in the deconstruction of marriage.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
09:18 PM on 07/23/2011
The institution of marriage has always evolved to suit the culture.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
10:34 PM on 07/23/2011
I would classify this as a renovation of marriage.
06:04 PM on 07/23/2011
Governor Patrick is right. Love is Love, and commitment by marriage is a personal decision. Opposite sex marriage would not appreciate other people's scorn of everything in their lives. No one is hurt, and Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate in the nation.

You do not have to do anything to ruin their decisions. I recommend looking at their own lives.
05:54 PM on 07/23/2011
Thank you, Governor Patrick. I love living in Mass for many reasons and having you as governor is one of them.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
04:20 PM on 07/23/2011
Hon. Deval Patrick, I am so glad you replaced Mitt Romney as our Governor in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Thank you for your support of gay rights and for your role in defeating the VoteOnMarriage.org constitutional amendment which would have ended legal same sex marriage here. A few months later my husband Lansing Wagner and I married, after having lived together 16 years.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
03:34 PM on 07/23/2011
Or whomever they don't love, but happen to have any other reason to be married to someone of the same sex. Next they will have a right to marry anyone/anything/any number of other entities. The only reason this subject has come up is because of legal privileges of married couples. Otherwise marriage would not be a state issue. I say, eliminate these unconstitutional privileges and marriage will no longer be a concern of the state.
photo
StevenWells
Objects in the avatar are larger than they appear
04:29 PM on 07/23/2011
"...eliminate these unconstitu­tional privileges and marriage will no longer be a concern of the state."

That would be an equitable way of dealing with some aspects of the issue, but it's not gonna happen. So as long as "the state" is involved, the discriminatory aspects have to be eliminated.

As for the "anyone/any­thing/any number of other entities" non-issue, these are just smoke screens, and have been well-rebutted many times, as I'm sure you're aware.
10:32 PM on 07/23/2011
I am aware of no such thing. We have a gov't that believes the commerce clause renders the rest of the Constitution irrelavant. If you rule out discrimination in marriage, then discrimination in marriage is illegal. All of it.
12:29 AM on 07/24/2011
Well rebutted? Hardly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Hope
Occasionally quoted by Mainstream Media
07:46 AM on 07/24/2011
It's funny how these "get government out of marriage" and "end special privileges for marriage" people only started coming out of the woodwork only when gay people wanted to start getting married.

It's the ultimate example of someone wanting to take their ball and go home. They want to destroy the institution of marriage rather than share it with gays. Their belief in their privileged place in society is that strong.

I say again to those against gay marriage: why are you anti-family?
10:29 AM on 07/24/2011
As usual, your attempt to put me, and others, in a box and define my intelect, demonstrates yours. I was opposed to gov't privilege and interference in marriage long before gay marriage was even a hint of an issue. I have no objection to gay marriage, nor any other matrimonial relatiionship. Aside from that, if there is gov't involvement in marriage it definitely does not fall within the pervue of the federal gov't, but resides in the States.
06:38 PM on 07/24/2011
Anyone who doesn't believe in equality has picked the wrong country to continue living in. If the U.S. is going to be the world police when it comes to Civil Rights in other countries, then we must set the example here at home. Two humans loving each other and wanting to commit should not in anyway hamper anyone else and their journey in this world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennisdelia
Injustice anywhere-Threat to justice everywhere!
02:57 PM on 07/23/2011
New York must join Mass. in the federal lawsuit against DOMA to have it affirmed unconstitutional discrimination by the appeals court as it has already been declared in lower court!!
03:37 PM on 07/23/2011
DOMA is constitutional. The Supreme Court might say it isn't, but it is. There is no right to same-sex marriage in the US Constitution, so there is no way that DOMA could be in violation of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunnenj
Einstein, disguised as Robin Hood
03:49 PM on 07/23/2011
Where is marriage mentioned at all in the Constitution??This is about equal protection and equal rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
03:49 PM on 07/23/2011
The Supreme Court might say it isn't, but it is.
**********************************************
They probably will say it's unconstitutional. And your life won't change.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
02:44 PM on 07/23/2011
We love you Governor Patrick!

Foxborough, MA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
01:45 PM on 07/23/2011
The time to get rid of DOMA is way overdue.
03:37 PM on 07/23/2011
DOMA is excellent law and very much needed. Keep it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
Honey Badger Don't Care
03:50 PM on 07/23/2011
Excellent law how? Why do you feel keeping certain citizens second class and others not?
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
04:27 PM on 07/23/2011
I'm so glad I left North Carolina for Massachusetts 22 years ago. Now I have a good job and an even better husband. Maybe in a few years NC will catch up with MA in true equality under the law for gays, lesbians and transgendered folk, but I bet the Tar Heel state will be slow to let go of its prejudices.