More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sec. Tom Vilsack

GET UPDATES FROM Sec. Tom Vilsack
 

Securing Our Future Through Our Children's Health

Posted: 02/23/10 01:18 PM ET

Our country faces many challenges as we look to the future. In his first year in office, President Obama pulled us back from the brink of the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression and worked to lay a new foundation for economic growth. The president identified three key strategies to build that lasting prosperity: innovation, investment, and education. All three strategies require the next generation, our children and grandchildren, to be the healthiest and best educated in our history.

And so the health of our nation -- of our economy, our national security, and our communities -- depends on the health of our children. We will not succeed if of our children aren't learning as they should because they are hungry, and cannot achieve because they aren't healthy.

The rise of childhood obesity has placed the health of an entire generation at risk. This week, I announced the Obama administration's priorities for the re-authorization of the Child Nutrition Act. The president and I are advocating for the rapid passage of a strong re-authorization bill to improve the health and nutrition of our nation's children.

The lack of access to proper nutrition is not only fueling obesity, it is leading to food insecurity and hunger among our children. A recent USDA report showed that in 2008, an estimated 49.1 million people, including 16.7 million children, lived in households that experienced hunger multiple times throughout the year. Meanwhile, school-age children are not eating the recommended level of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products according to a 2009 Institute of Medicine report.

Clearly, we can and must do better.

To achieve our goals, the administration has proposed a historic investment of an additional $10 billion over ten years starting in 2011. This investment will allow us to improve the quality of our School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, increase the number of kids participating, and ensure that schools have the resources they need to make program changes, including training for school food service workers, upgraded kitchen equipment, and additional funding for meal reimbursements for schools that are enhancing nutrition and quality.

Most importantly, this investment will allow additional fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products to be served in our school cafeterias and an additional one million students to be served the healthy diets that will allow them to succeed in school.

But it is not enough to serve healthy and nutritious meals in the lunchroom. Proper school nutrition must be complemented by activities outside of the cafeteria. The decisions parents make to keep their kids healthy are critical in fighting this battle on the home front. We must provide parents with more information on the performance of schools so that they can make choices for their children, and take action to help schools improve.

We must also increase the opportunities for exercise and physical activities through programs like the President's Physical Fitness Challenge. And we are working with more than a dozen professional sport leagues to promote "Fuel Up To Play 60" through sports clinics, appearances, and public service announcements.

To amplify our efforts, USDA is joining with First Lady Michelle Obama in aggressively promoting the Let's Move campaign, which will combat the epidemic of childhood obesity through a comprehensive approach that builds on effective strategies, and mobilizes public and private sector resources. Let's Move will engage every sector impacting the health of children to achieve the national goal of solving the epidemic of childhood obesity in a generation. We will provide schools, families and communities simple tools to help kids be more active, eat better, and get healthy.

But the federal government cannot do it alone. We will need help from partners at all levels including parents, community leaders, educators, food service workers, and others who are positioned to help. That's why, as part of re-authorization, I support the creation of a new program to reward States that move aggressively to eliminate hunger by 2015. Through this program, USDA will provide competitive grants to Governors to implement creative and innovative approaches to eliminating hunger, letting the states act as laboratories for successful strategies.

Our priorities and many more will be debated by Congress in the near future as it considers legislation to modernize these programs. We find ourselves at a unique moment. More and more Americans recognize the importance of eating well and exercising, and are ready to join the effort.

And so we ask that each of you make the commitment and join the president, the First Lady and me. We ask that you work with your schools, your communities, your local government and members of Congress to build a healthier future for America's children. This is an investment in our children, our collective health, and the future of our great Nation. It's a commitment we've made, and one we hope you'll support.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:00 PM on 03/08/2010
Getting the youth of today to change their unhealthy eating styles can greatly help all of us in the long run. I give my kids what they want and train them to eat reasonably at the same time, not forcing them to eat like a health nut. Hopefully this will work in the long run.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:26 AM on 02/24/2010
First, you have to pay the people in order to wean them away from the social programs. Walmart is a good example for lousy pay, intermittent jobs rather than fulltime!
When one looks at the various failings of official regulators throughout the western world, from child protecton to energy, telecoms and health, etc. the number of scandals must surely indicate that there is indeed something rotten at the heart of governments!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:15 AM on 02/24/2010
If the president or so called leaders would be serious about healthcare and savings they would immediately put the option of SINGLE PAYER into law! If they were concerned about our health they would take the advertisements for medicine off the TV, magazines, etc. , limit Monsanto and ADM
with their genetically altered monsterfoods and have a consumer protection agency that does its job!
Frankly, I am sick of lies and we have money for these useless wars but no money for our own people!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
delatierra
Screamingly Liberal Atheist, dammit!
08:10 AM on 02/24/2010
Will Sen. Vilsack, the USDA, and the First Lady protest hard against plan to eliminate free/reduced-priced school breakfast program for low-income students by our new VA Gov. Bob McDonnell? http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local-beat/McDonnells-Deep-Cuts-Send-Shock-Waves-in-Virginia-84686622.html Oh, and he also plans to freeze enrollment for FAMIS program, which gives limited coverage to kids and pregnant women in low-income families earning too much to qualify for Medicaid. http://www.dss.virginia.gov/files/division/bp/medical_assistance/manual_transmittals/manual/m07.pdf That means WORKING parents GROSSING more than $2500 but less than $3675/month for a family of 4. http://www.famis.org/eligibility.cfm?lang=English But hey, we only rank a low "39th on taxes as a percentage of personal income" so the well-off needn't worry about supporting pesky, undeserving freeloaders! (even if they're working their asses off full-time for peanuts.) http://www.transportation.virginia.gov/Docs/Nationwide_maps.pdf So what if kids are too hungry or sickly to do well enough in school to raise above their station, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/22/poverty-starts-in-childho_n_472218.html?ref=fb always need an underclass of peasants desperate enough to do the hard and dirty work, right? When they drop dead from no healthcare as adults, just toss more meat into the grinder! http://mailman.hs.columbia.edu/news/poor-face-greater-health-burden-smokers-or-obese
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
delatierra
Screamingly Liberal Atheist, dammit!
09:01 AM on 02/24/2010
Dangit, I meant "Sec. Vilsack", not "Sen. Vilsack."
07:49 AM on 02/24/2010
Don't have kids if you can't take care of them. There are too many people as it is. I'm tired of paying for all the cute little kiddies!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:25 AM on 02/24/2010
Population control is direly needed and the problem with illegals need to be addressed!
09:47 AM on 02/24/2010
The U.S. population is growing, but not much above replacement rate. Population control, whatever that's supposed to mean, is not "direly needed" here. Of course Americans should have ready access to contraceptives and the information they need to use them correctly, and we need to work on that, but this is not a third-world country with an explosive rate of population growth (yet...).
09:32 AM on 02/24/2010
America's children need us now, but in the future, we will need them. You have a vested interest in their success, like it or not.
06:30 AM on 02/24/2010
Parents feeding and clothing and providing shelter to children is a basic human need......that becomes subverted by the welfare state, which teaches that feeding, clothing, and providing shelter for kids are optional.
The idea, which has become almost conventional wisdom, that poor people are unable to feed their children has become a self fulfilling prophecy, and the Dept of Ag plays a huge role here. There is nothing government can do that solves obesity, youth crime, teen pregnancy, etc. compared to the role of good responsible parenting.
Subvert the role of the parent, allow kids who never knew responsible parents to raise other irresponsible parents, all on government support, and you have the mess we are in now.
09:34 AM on 02/24/2010
Some parents don't have the resources to make the right decisions about diet, etc. They need to be educated. Our government can potentially help these parents and their children.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Philip123
02:22 AM on 02/24/2010
There’s an interesting post over at the Health Journal Club that makes the case that people should just not eat anything that wasn’t a food 100 years ago. Gets rid of the aspartame, bleached GM flour, high fructose corn syrup garbage they try to pass off as food these days. If interested you can read on it here,
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoProblemPablo
01:35 AM on 02/24/2010
What about shifting corn subsidies to something healthy?
01:19 AM on 02/24/2010
what about the GMO food ?
01:00 AM on 02/24/2010
This issue dwarf all.
http://www.willthomasonline.net/willthomasonline/Forget_About_Cell_Phones_Preven.html

We are living in a freaking microwave oven!
09:35 AM on 02/24/2010
Nonsense.
12:14 AM on 02/24/2010
Next generation healthy? OK. Break up Monsanto. Problem solved
06:32 AM on 02/24/2010
I wonder...how do you feed 250 million people on non disease resistant seeds without massive food shortages and starvation?
07:51 AM on 02/24/2010
It's coming...just wait a few years.
09:36 AM on 02/24/2010
A plant doesn't have to be GMO to be disease-resistant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:53 PM on 02/23/2010
When the Secretary will call for and ACHEIVE an end to Ag subsidies for corn, especially IOWA corn, then maybe he will have the credibility to push ahead on these other important issues.

Cheap sugars and inefficient, highly chemical-intensive monoculture is a scourge on American youth. It degrades body and environment.

The wasteful allocation of money to prop-up the farm and chemical lobby is inexcusable.

Let food cost to consume what it costs to produce--without Govt. interferrence. THEN, if you want to subsidize DIRECTLY, the purchase of healthy choices, you have a more stable platform from which to allocate.
07:57 PM on 02/23/2010
I say that we impose progressive taxation on food policy. Not based on your income, but on your BMI.

Those below 20 get subsidies. Those 20-25 pay nothing. 25-30 pay a modest amount, 30-35 pay a significant amount. And 35+ pay an egregious, punitive amount.

How is this any different that the redistribution of wealth in a progressive tax system? Redistribute the food, and there is more than enough for all.
11:07 PM on 02/23/2010
It starts with the QUALITY of food available. Seen any lower income customers shopping at Whole Foods lately? The over-processed, high caloric junk foods consumed by poor children are easier to find and serve in many communities than fresh produce. In many economically depressed urban areas, it's easier to buy a gun than a tomato. Factor in that many households with exhausted mothers working long, hard hours -- often two or more jobs -- find it expedient to serve their families quick, fattening dinners. Food is also an emotional award in many stressed homes. Now consider access to quality health care. Anyone want to walk in the shoes of a time-strapped mother, probably herself not in prime health, who must take her children on public transportation across town to a crowded clinic, filled with sick people, for checkups she can't afford to pay for? Consider the case of young people with crushing college debt, low paying jobs, zero health insurance ... let's celebrate innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit after we've seriously addressed these situations, eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StoryTime
Running on plenty/Oh j'cours toute seule ,)
11:23 PM on 02/23/2010
Truly one of the best comments around!
Fanned fanned and thank you!!!
03:38 AM on 02/24/2010
I could spin you a tale of woe for the stressed out Resident that has spend 30 years in school, has $250,000 in student loans to pay off, and works 80 hours per week in a very highly demanding and high stress environment.

That doesn't stop the government from taking a large chunk of his income away in taxes, because they don't have a physical/emotional/debt hardship entry on the tax forms, do they?

Spare me your hard-luck excuses.
07:49 PM on 02/23/2010
Would you please comment on the amount of price supports the Fed Gov supplies each year? Massive amounts of money for ADM. And,it's disheartening to note the millions given to the Mellenkamp (Indiana) family..
07:40 PM on 02/23/2010
Seeds of our decline have been planted over the last two decadeds and before. These seeds continue to be planted today, while we ignore the results of what was sowed. Half the marriages end in divorce. About 60% of babies are born today to unwed mothers. Half the children drop out of school; and an additional 25% drop out of college before graduation. These are the results after spending billions on school and undergraduate education.

We have to stop the hype and self-glorification. Let's start accepting the facts and speaking the truth. Spin has gotten us no where. America continues to live high on the hog; with expectations that the sky is the limit and we are a rich country. The last three decades should teach us that throwing money at an issue does not solve it. Often it makes the problem worse.