More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Greg Archer

Greg Archer

Posted: December 10, 2009 03:12 PM

Ralph Lauren Boycott Ready to Blow Into the Windy City

What's Your Reaction:

The week may be fading to black but the curtain is just rising on a Ralph Lauren boycott.

In the wake of a cancelled segment last Sunday on CNN, indie filmmaker Darryl Roberts (America the Beautiful), has offered a request to the media giant. He says he is once again willing to discuss on air with a rep from Ralph Lauren why certain media images have been photoshopped, particularly the Fillipa Hamilton image that created a stir earlier this fall. (Not long after Ralph Lauren issued a statement of apology for the matter, Roberts discovered two additional, similar ads.)

What happens if CNN moves forward with the idea and Ralph Lauren's camp refuses to appear? Roberts says he and supporters will peacefully but firmly take to the streets in a boycott slated for 4 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 15 at the Ralph Lauren portal on 750 N. Michigan Ave., in Chicago. About 100-200 people are reported to be attending. Other boycotts are tentatively slated for New York and San Francisco.

A representative from Ralph Lauren said they had not been contacted by CNN regarding Roberts' latest announcement and noted that the company had issued a public apology after the photoshopped image of Hamilton was discovered. It read, in part, "For over 42 years, we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman's body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the calibre of our artwork represents our brand appropriately."

2009-12-09-rsz_ralph_lauren_1.jpg

All this comes after last Sunday's cancelled CNN segment, which, according to Roberts, was to feature him, eating disorders expert Dr. Maria Rago and a rep from Ralph Lauren, which, according to a spokesperson, initially issued a statement in lieu of any on-air appearance.

Roberts says the boycott will be called off only if a rep from Ralph Lauren comes on CNN to discuss the issue with him.

As for that boycott, Roberts is asking that no one purchase any of the new U.S. Winter Olympic Gear that Ralph Lauren designed. "It's our position that he doesn't hold American womanhood values when he disrespects women through offensive advertising the way that he's done," he says.

But what do Roberts and his (hmm ... what's the term?) Patriots for Better Media Images actually crave? He says he told CNN that his conditions are:

1. That Ralph Lauren explain how and why the airbrushing of photos, especially the one featuring Fillipa Hamilton, happened earlier this year. (Basically, what happened in the first place.)

2. That Ralph Lauren apologize on CNN to every woman in the world for their offensive advertising.

3. That Ralph Lauren give a firm commitment that they will never put ads as egregious and photoshopped as the one's that were recently seen.

2009-12-09-rsz_1rsz_ralph_lauren_2.jpg

Roberts and his milieu seem to have their emotional weapons armed and ready to fire in what this HuffPo blogger believes could become a curious grassroots effort that may send an interesting ripple effect throughout some sectors of the advertising industry.

The brouhaha may (or may not) be a business blemish for Ralph Lauren and its ilk but one thing is certain: You can't photoshop something like a boycott away.

Stay tuned ...

2009-12-09-rsz_ralph_lauren_3.jpg

 

Follow Greg Archer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/chroniccharlie

The week may be fading to black but the curtain is just rising on a Ralph Lauren boycott. In the wake of a cancelled segment last Sunday on CNN, indie filmmaker Darryl Roberts (America the Beautiful)...
The week may be fading to black but the curtain is just rising on a Ralph Lauren boycott. In the wake of a cancelled segment last Sunday on CNN, indie filmmaker Darryl Roberts (America the Beautiful)...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:31 AM on 12/16/2009
Okay, so maybe it's not nuclear proliferation. But it is valid to try to create change in the way we all see ourselves and more importantly how the generations to come see themselves as compared to these models. You may think the up and coming teenagers aren't going to realistically try to be like this, but these images get imprinted with these kids, whether they're aware of it or not. My kid (who is 13) looks at these and says "That's ridiculous", but still worries when she gets over 105 lbs (she's 5'2"). We make sure we reinforce at home how great she looks and I've enforced the idea that fashion is art - when you see those models in Vogue, etc. it's an art piece, not something you would wear everyday and so you wouldn't look like that. Another point I'd like to make is that if you actually go to the Ralph Lauren website (and I did) and you look through for a bit, you notice something odd. The "women" sizes all show basically one model - although in some cases, you'll notice, if you look closely that when there is a different model, it's the same one for the "regular" sizes. Up until a couple of weeks ago, it was even the "skinny" model in the supposedly women sizes in some cases. That silver sweater shot by the way? Gone. And there are no women's sizes in the Holiday collection. Just saying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexandre Laudet
06:28 PM on 12/13/2009
Oh come on... All fashion photos are airbrushed, anyone knows the person in the photo does not actually look that way and every ad campaign takes 'artistic license.' I understand the seriousness of eating disorders so I do not mean to trivialize the issue it but boycotting the store is not going to address the issue. It goes much deeper than that. Note on the other hand that when magazine show 'normal' bodies in their pages or on their cover, that's controversial too. We've been trained and I would argue to some extent we expect, to see in magazines and fashion ads, people who look better than we do. Even if there is a boycott 'order' I suspect those who go for it are not part of Ralph Lauren;s Customer base. If people are ready to mobilize, pick a beef: unemployment, credit crisis, housing crisis, health insurance reform, and as the ads say on TV, WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
11:22 PM on 12/10/2009
What a tempest in a teapot. These pics were not even WELL photo-shopped. Any middle-school kid could have done a better job. I think Ralph Lauren's bigger "sin" is that he believes American women are so stupid as to not realize the photos were fakes. What the fashion industry needs is robotic walking hangers - then real girls could get on with the job of becoming real women.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Greg Archer
Writer. Editor. Accomplished Mood Swinger!
07:53 PM on 12/11/2009
robotic walking hangers. yes. and getting on with the job of becoming real women ought to be the focus. we're bombarded with these destructive images. the message is, basically, if you're not thin or "pretty" then you will not be loved/ you're not lovable or accepted. on another note ... nobody yet is really addressing the "perfect" images being sent out into the LGBT community.
10:14 PM on 12/10/2009
Looks again like the only way the fashion corporations listen is when the money stops flowing.

These utterly distorted photos of hideous pre-teen bodies photoshopped onto women's faces instill hopeless standards of beauty that only exists in those photos and in the twisted minds of photo editors gone mad.

Thank you, Greg, for bringing this to our attention.
05:35 PM on 12/10/2009
It won't work. Every year someone gets up in arms about the boney models. The fashion industry still continues to use them.