More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Greg Saunders

Greg Saunders

Posted: December 14, 2009 07:06 PM

How to Save Health Care Reform From Joe Lieberman

What's Your Reaction:

It's been pretty clear that the members of the Democratic leadership in the Senate are a bunch of amoral cowards who are not only afraid to play hardball, but unwilling to at least pretend to play hardball. As the predictable consequence of this weakness, Sen. Reid has let the health care reform debate become an opportunity for "centrist" Democrats to use logically inconsistent assertions about reform (which often go unchallenged) as a pretext to block the Senate from making progress. Joe Lieberman, who Jonathan Chait says "pose[s] the greatest threat to health care reform", has provided the clearest example of this hypocrisy yet in his incoherent flip-flopping on the public option compromise which would allow Americans to buy into Medicare.

Democrats in the Senate still seem to think there's some virtue in being polite to their colleagues who would uphold a status quo that kills tens of thousands of Americans every year, but this needs to end. While I doubt the leadership in the "upper house" would ever deign to lower themselves to hurting Joe Lieberman's feelings in order to save lives, here's what I would do if I were in charge :

1) Joe Lieberman is persona non grata - From this point forward, it should just be assumed that the Democratic caucus has 59 members. I wouldn't suggest taking punitive measures against him (yet), lest the leadership come off as spiteful and alienate some of the votes still in play. Rather, Democrats should just ignore Lieberman completely. Stop inviting him to caucus meetings, don't pay attention to the things he says, and actively engage on-the-fence Senators like Nelson, Collins, and Snowe while making no secret of the fact that the Senate leadership is no longer interested in giving a troll like Lieberman the attention he craves. If asked about Lieberman, Dems should be diplomatic, but treat him as if he were Sen. Graham or McCain. If Joe bashes any aspect of the reform effort, amiably write it off saying something like "Of course Joe would say that. Sen. Lieberman is a good friend, but he's made it clear over the past few months that his vote isn't in play." If Joementum isn't going to negotiate in good faith, stop negotiating.


2) Put reconciliation back on the table - I understand budget reconciliation is a convoluted process which the Democratic leadership is weary of employing, but they underestimate its value as a threat to moderate Senators who are willing to cut a deal. Harry Reid should split the Senate bill into its budget and non-budget related components (per standard reconciliation procedure), include the House version of the public option, and submit the bills to the CBO for scoring. Even if Reid never intends to move forward on reconciliation, a pending CBO score for a reconciliation-ready robust public option should hang like the sword of Damocles over the heads of every centrist Senator. If you don't cut a deal, we'll have a more liberal bill waiting to be passed.

3) The public option is still dead - It's been obvious since the summer that the public option wouldn't make it out of the Senate, so the Democratic leadership needs to work overtime to find a good alternative, even if it means taking a hit from the base. Unfortunately, it looks like allowing people to buy into Medicare is a non-starter, but ditching the public option entirely in exchange for ditching annual/lifetime coverage limits, implementing a hard 95% medical loss ratio, ending the monopoly exemption for insurers, and including Ron Wyden's ideas for opening up the health care exchange (singular, not plural) to every American would accomplish just as much if not more than the already-watered down public options would. The key is to keep focused on the purpose of the bill and not the specifics. If a public option can be traded out for a compromise that will encourage stiff competition and actually control costs, be willing to make a deal.

4) Bring back the "constitutional option" - Once again, like reconciliation, I doubt Harry Reid would ever have the balls to pull something like this off, but it's still worth employing as a tactic to get moderate Senators talking. The Democratic leadership should start trying to get whip counts together to see if they can scrounge up 51 votes for the nuclear option. Moreover, they need to make a serious effort to put the legitimacy of the filibuster in the spotlight. Every Democrat should be prepared to decry the filibuster as a parliamentary trick that has no constitutional basis and start peppering their speech with go-to phrases like "up or down vote", "framer's original intent", and "simple majority" as a way of drawing attention to the fact that Republicans are using a procedural loophole to subvert small-D democracy. If Democrats can get the message across, they can assure the public there's no shame in using a loophole to kill another loophole.

As they say, politics ain't a beanbag, but for too long Democrats in the Senate have chosen the path of least resistance and let the American people be a punching bag in the process. This isn't a game. Harry Reid and the rest of his cohorts need to put down their copies of "Robert's Rules of Order" and pick up Machiavelli's rules for kicking some ass (aka The Prince). They need to stop being congenial and realize that if reform doesn't happen in the next few weeks, it's unlikely to happen for another generation or more. The fate of hundreds of thousands of lives rests on their shoulders.


 
 
 

Follow Greg Saunders on Twitter: www.twitter.com/waltisfrozen

 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:08 AM on 12/19/2009
I am energized by Sen. Frankens "holding Joe to to the rules of Senate ... I think this is one of the "few" times Joe has actually gotten a taste of how "unpleasant" it could become to "report" for duty (not that the HAWK ever served) anyway I digress I'll be researching the Impeachment Process in CT. (as our column writer never quite got there... I propose a recall election be put forward in CT. as soon as possible (something tells me Joe can't survive it......If your From CT and your reading this TAKE ACTION NOW //// Recall JOE if you have a pre existing condition and have been denied coverage RECALL JOE NOW .. IF you are a woman of child bearing age and cant get coverage RECALL JOE NOW ... If you work every day but cant afford insurance or your Deductible .. RECALL JOE NOW (there is a subsidy that's included in the current legislation (that he's holding up)
05:19 AM on 12/17/2009
Really smart ideas, Greg. Thanks for this. I just wish my support, not to mention your intelligence, made a difference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:12 AM on 12/16/2009
Excellent suggestions to rid ourselves of this so-called "Independent" who is nothing but a closet Republican. He couldn't make it as a Democrat so now he is in the back pocket of the GOP - just look who he was promoting in the last presidential election. Now he thinks his grandstanding is going to put him in the good graces of the GOP - all he is doing is showing his disrespect and disregard for the American people. Why doesn't he give up the 75% subsidy we, the taxpayers, pay on his health care insurance? Since he is so against any "government interference" and we, the taxpayers, are the government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeAnn Cammack
born-again liberal
11:39 PM on 12/15/2009
"of us"

I goofed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeAnn Cammack
born-again liberal
11:38 PM on 12/15/2009
We should all email this column's (with due credit given) to all 59. Every single one of use. Multiple times. Jam the inboxes. This should be required reading.

Gah. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory isn't enough. The Dems have to also beat themselves over the head with defeat.
11:24 PM on 12/15/2009
Get rid of the mandates and I'm ready to compromise further.

Otherwise, it's primary challenges for all Democratic incumbents except for Kunich. All the rest sold out (no matter how big their words are, it's the votes that matter). If the challengers don't win, then third-party is the way to go next fall.
11:07 PM on 12/15/2009
Amen Brother !!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalOrgonian
09:47 PM on 12/15/2009
Joe represents the end of the American dream.
11:08 PM on 12/15/2009
Joe represents NOTHING !
08:33 PM on 12/15/2009
I do NOT want to be mandated into buying expensive, crappy insurance.

Without a public option, or an expansion of Medicare where o where are the cost-savings?

The administration should have hired Wendell Potter (Cigna whistleblower)
to draft a loophole-free bill.

Right now the so-called "pre-existing illness" clause is useless because the insurance cartel can just charge those who have a pre-existing condition more money.

In fact, they can continue to over-charge anyone they please...
08:32 PM on 12/15/2009
The Senate needs to just change their own rules to make it that no business can be conducted by the Senate while a bill a Filibuster is conducted. Thus the Filibuster has a cost. The troops need funding, ok, end the Filibuster.
06:08 PM on 12/15/2009
The only people in public political life I have any respect for anymore are Howard Dean and Elizabeth Warren.

Kill the Bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
06:46 PM on 12/15/2009
You forgot Bernie Sanders !
11:10 PM on 12/15/2009
Amen .. again
photo
TurnToTheLeft
It's only called CLASS WARFARE when we fight back
05:40 PM on 12/15/2009
great article
05:38 PM on 12/15/2009
Great ideas. Doubtful the dems or the pres have the cajones to try any of them.
05:06 PM on 12/15/2009
Joe, his numbers are a bit inflated, but the difference between adminstrative costs and overhead is quite a bit especially when talking about a percentage of billions. (I think it hovers around 6-8%) I work for an insurance company managing risk- anyway you slice it the larger the risk pool, the lower the percentage of overhead. Every American in the same health risk pool would be far cheaper for everyone, especially when there are no corporate profits.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
04:45 PM on 12/15/2009
We just went through the worst 8 years in this countries history throw billions of dollars down the war crap hole and no one cared about Republicans spending money on there pet projects. Now there is a chance the leadership can do something for all Americans and they fold like a deck of cards!
11:17 PM on 12/15/2009
Simply because the entire Democratic team, from Obama on down, lack the guts to use the power given by the last election. Then, it better not be a surprise to them, when in 2010 lose their ass and become once again the minority in the House and the Senate.
Does this look like a one term Presidency? I am afraid so !