I see that CNN's Susan Candiotti is getting some criticism for correctly -- factually -- stating what the Tulsa shooters said. It is disgusting what they said. It was both racist and crude.
I know it offends many, but why should the media sugarcoat the grotesque statements and make it look less than it is? When you hear the actual words, as correctly reported by Candiotti, you get it... you get it big time. If you hear a sugarcoated description you might just let it pass by. A warning that it is coming is a good idea but I don't see why we in the media should cover for people who are nasty and crude and I don't see why we should present the news different from what it is.
What do YOU think?
Cross-posted from GretaWire.
How will Donald Trump’s first 100 days impact YOU? Subscribe, choose the community that you most identify with or want to learn more about and we’ll send you the news that matters most once a week throughout Trump’s first 100 days in office. Learn more