More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gretchen Sierra-Zorita

GET UPDATES FROM Gretchen Sierra-Zorita
 

A Republican Primer on Latino Voters

Posted: 12/27/11 06:39 PM ET

With the Iowa primary less than two weeks away, Republican chatter on vice presidential candidates has amped up. Of particular interest to the Republican Party are Hispanic candidates that can attract Latino voters and reverse the damage done by a xenophobic primary season.

Florida's Senator Rubio, New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez and Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval have been mentioned as possibilities, with Rubio receiving the most attention. Yet all three have been faulted by Hispanics for taking anti-immigration positions.

More recently, Governor Luis Fortuño of Puerto Rico has been added to the list of vice presidential contenders. Touted as an effective fiscal and social conservative, he believes that a hostile anti-immigration stance is unreasonable and damaging to the Party.

This form of political name-dropping is disturbing because it indicates how little Republicans leaders know about the fastest-growing voting bloc in the nation. If Republicans are serious about expanding their Latino base in 2012, they need to rid themselves of several misconceptions.

First, Latinos will not vote for a candidate just because he is one of their own. The candidate has to deliver on the issues.

The two issues that matter the most to Hispanics are jobs and immigration. According to a recent Univision News/Latino Decision survey, a candidate's ability to fix the economy and generate jobs is by far the most important factor in deciding for whom to vote. However, 59 percent of the Hispanics surveyed are less likely to support a candidate who makes anti-immigration statements, even if they agree with him on the economy. Moreover, the majority of Latino respondents support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.

So far the Republican Party has not produced an economic blueprint that resonates with the majority of Hispanics and all presidential candidates have managed to make amnesty sound like a dirty word. To win over Hispanic voters, Republicans need to do more than put a Hispanic surname on the ticket.

Second, another common misconception is that Latinos should vote Republican because they share traditional social values. This is not entirely accurate, because Hispanics are not conservative across the board. According to a Latino Decisions survey, Latinos are slightly more conservative than the general public on abortion but are more liberal on same-sex marriage. Moreover, Latinos are church goers but they are not value voters: 53 percent say their religion has no impact on their vote and only 14 percent believe that politics are about moral issues.

Third, enlisting a Hispanic vice president could improve Republican chances of expanding their Latino base but only at the margin. Among the possible candidates, Governor Fortuño stands the better chance of winning over new voters.

There are 4.6 million Puerto Ricans residing in the mainland. For them, immigration reform is a preference but not a priority because Puerto Ricans are born U.S. citizens. They mostly trend Democrat, but they would give the Republican ticket a second look if they saw a Puerto Rican in it.

The 848,000 Puerto Ricans who live in Florida, popularly known as Disneyricans, might be more receptive to a conservative pitch from Governor Fortuño. Disneyricans are considered independents, having voted for Obama in 2008 and for Rubio in 2010. Over 40 percent of them moved from Puerto Rico during the last decade, primarily for economic reasons.

Ironically, as governor of a U.S. territory, Fortuño is the ultimate outsider and unlikely to be nominated. If he were, he may have an edge over Marco Rubio who, as a Latino, mostly appeals to the Cuban Americans who are already part of the Republican base.

Puerto Ricans are the second largest Hispanic voting bloc but they are no match for the Mexican-American community. There are 23 million Mexican American citizens in this country and they are the ones Republicans should be concerned about. After months of immigrant bashing, they will not be easily mollified by political window dressing.

According to the Pew Research Center, 43 percent of Republicans favor tightening the border and enforcing immigration laws and 14 percent favor creating a path to citizenship. However, 41 percent of them believe that both policy approaches should be a priority. This is not an insignificant number, and one which Republicans need to exploit if they are serious about readjusting their overall position on immigration and making some gains among Hispanic voters.

If the Republican Party is determined to make inroads with Latino voters, it has to be willing to engage in a credible immigration reform process. Equally important, it must come to terms with its tolerance of radical views that make minorities feel exceedingly unwelcome -- from Birthers to presidential candidates that talk glibly about electrified border fences and everything in between. The upcoming primaries will tell if it is too late for a turn around. And if it is, Republicans might have just fenced themselves out of the next election.

 
With the Iowa primary less than two weeks away, Republican chatter on vice presidential candidates has amped up. Of particular interest to the Republican Party are Hispanic candidates that can attract...
With the Iowa primary less than two weeks away, Republican chatter on vice presidential candidates has amped up. Of particular interest to the Republican Party are Hispanic candidates that can attract...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:01 AM on 12/30/2011
The Latino - Americans in the Repub. party . are no different than the Black leaders in the Repub. party. While they have been given great opportunity to use their positions to make help make meaningful progress in the Latino communities around the issues of education, poverty, health care etc. they choose to either sit idly by while their party demonizes Latinos and undermine their voting and civil rights, and now that they need the Latino vote to take the White House and Senate they are blowing the trumpet.

Latinos are not stupid and while they have issues with Pres. Obama around the issues of deportations and a lack of political will around the Dream Act there is no doubt that his administration is legally fighting the racist and unconstitutional immigration and voter supression initiatives being pushed by Repubs. around the country. While he is fighting on this front where is Rubio, Martinez, Fortuno, Sandoval and other so- called leaders? Can you hear them ? Deafening silence because they fear the backlash that would come from stepping out of line with the extreme positions of their party.

Afraid that tthey are going to offend their party members by standing up for Latinos who want the same rights and opportunities that enjoy ? The time for them to stand up is now. If Repubs. get their way it will be too late for them to stand up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
02:14 PM on 12/29/2011
Xenophobes? Who is a stranger to our country? Anti-"immigration"? Who are they?

Most Republicans and some Democrats are not willing to sacrifice the rule of law and respect for our immigration laws for an ethnic group who do not have the best interests of this country in mind but an agenda to have their ethnic group here illegally treated special and above our laws. Is that a bad thing?
08:01 PM on 12/29/2011
"Who is a stranger to our country?"

Everybody. Since the pilgrims from the Mayflower...
12:23 AM on 12/30/2011
Bingo!
11:00 AM on 12/29/2011
A literal reading of HR3020 might lead an unsuspecting reader to reach the wrong conclusion. Some have said that "From a statehood perspective, getting what are now foreign corporations to become domestic U.S. companies is a step forward." But this conclusion would reveal a lack of understanding between the "form" and the "substance" of HR3020. I recommend you read HR2030 bill, so you can conclude who will benefit from it.
The 2nd section of the bill HR3020 is the key: Section 2 (a) will allow a "qualified Puerto Rico corporation" to make an election to be treated as a "domestic" corporation. Presumably this is a good step for statehood, but hold your breath until you read section (c): "In the case of a qualified Puerto Rico corporation, gross income shall not include income derived from sources within Puerto Rico". In other words, HR3020 will EXEMPT from federal income taxes ONLY "qualified Puerto Rico" companies. But, no other "domestic corporation" operating in any of the 50 states will enjoy this tax privilege. US Treasury and Congressional tax experts will instantly recognize HR3020 as an attempt to reinstate the Section 936 federal tax exemption that existed for "possessions corporations" before 2006, but this time masked as a change in section 933.This lack of consistent efforts to support bills that advance statehood shows there is a big difference between introducing bills for short-term political gains and bills that are well-thought and effective to achieve a strategic purpose
09:13 AM on 12/29/2011
Rubio need to find a new job, he will not win a second term for senator. Another TEAbagger that needs to go.
photo
freedom1947
sarcasm, cynicism
11:11 PM on 12/29/2011
Susana Martinez is no winner.
08:47 PM on 12/28/2011
When will "Hispanics" figure it out that Rubio is not and does not consider himself to be an "Hispanic" politician. As for Puerto Ricans voting for Rubio, I doubt that very much. Rubio does absolutely nothing for them or any other Hispanic group. He was against Sotomayor and is against Dream Act. Nothing wrong with political positions he wishes to take, however, Republicans are delusional if they think Rubio is the answer to attracting the Hispanic vote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:41 PM on 12/28/2011
The GOP has lost the Latino vote in 2012, they will either vote Democratic or not vote.The GOP is hoping for the later. George W Bush got no more than 44% and that was considered huge.
The last poll I saw, 75% of Latinos have an unfavorable view of the GOP
04:54 PM on 12/28/2011
Republicans Actions when it comes to the Hispanics and Latinos speak louder then words and we are no fools. We will remember in 2012!
02:46 AM on 12/29/2011
What do you mean ??????
12:17 PM on 12/29/2011
Just google Republicans actions against immigrants and Hispanic you will get an eye full. There is too many grievances to list but believe me with every turn The Republicans have managed to Discard a Community that is in the Majority in this Country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quiet Riot
04:50 PM on 12/28/2011
Don't lump all Latinos together. There illegal and legal, huge differences. Heres what illegals and their sympathizers will vote for, anyone who will offer amnesty, anyone who will let them drive without a license or insurance, anyone who will let them go to college for free or half price, anyone who will let them keep speaking spanish, anyone who will let them fly the Mexican flag at all American events, anyone who will let them get free medical care
03:47 PM on 12/28/2011
I disagree with her comments on Puerto Rican Governor Fortuño’s bid as VP under a winning Republican candidate In fact, given the anti-Republican sentiment that Republican xenophobia has elicited from a broad spectrum of the Latino community, especially among the youth, Gov. Fortuño would be the wrong pick for three basic reasons: First, while ethnicity is not the primary factor when people vote it is still important if the “Latino” candidate is from another Latino ethnic sub group. Mexicans would not feel much attachment to an outsider, especially an outsider who is alien to the Mexican American community and who is not in touch with the experiences of Latinos in the mainland. Secondly, Gov. Fortuño’s economic agenda is right there with the Tea Party so his packaging as a “Latino” would not hide the reality of his anti Latino economic policies. Thirdly, opposing candidates from the Democrat Party, would have a battering ram to demolish his standing in the community, all they would need reveal the fissures is point out the civil and human rights violations, identified by the recent Department of Justice’s scathing indictment of the Puerto Rican police department. This 143 page document has particularly disturbing information about the racist treatment of people of Dominican descent in Puerto Rico. All carried out under the authority of Governor Luis Fortuño, as the report states in the use of excessive force, seizures, intimidation, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
02:24 PM on 12/29/2011
Xenophobia is a fear of strangers. What ethnic group is a stranger to our country and isn't a part of our citizen population?
02:08 PM on 12/31/2011
Xenophobia as UC Irvine Anthropologist has amply demonstrated, extends both against citizens and non citizens. During the "repatriation" of the 1930s to the present ones, Latinos who are US citizens have been either arrested, at times deported or harassed. Xenophobia is not very picky about its victims.
03:42 PM on 12/28/2011
Obama deported more people than G.W Bush. So why is he automatically getting the Latino vote?
photo
Gaaltero
Conscious Black Man
02:57 PM on 12/28/2011
Republicans lack substance on issues that matter to minorities. It doesn't matter who they got pushing it.
01:33 PM on 12/28/2011
Writer makes some accurate points about their need to have an economic agenda that would be more palatable to Latinos. However, given the disproportionate power of the extreme right Tea Partiers it is even ludicrous to consider any change. On Puerto Rican Governor Fortuño’s bid as VP under a winning Republican candidate, the anti-Republican sentiment Gov. Fortuño would be the wrong pick for three basic reasons: First, while ethnicity is not the primary factor when people vote it is still important if the “Latino” candidate is from another Latino ethnic sub group. Mexicans would not feel much attachment to an outsider, especially an outsider who is alien to the Mexican American community and who is not in touch with the experiences of Latinos in the mainland. Secondly, Gov. Fortuño’s economic agenda is right there with the Tea Party so his packaging as a “Latino” would not hide the reality of his anti Latino economic policies. Thirdly, opposing candidates from the Democrat Party, would have a battering ram to demolish his standing in the community, all they would need reveal the fissures is point out the civil and human rights violations, identified by the recent Department of Justice’s scathing indictment of the Puerto Rican police department. This 143 page document has particularly disturbing information about the racist treatment of people of Dominican descent in Puerto Rico. All carried out under the authority of Governor Luis Fortuño, as the report states in the use of excessive force, seizures, intimidation, etc.
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
11:45 AM on 12/28/2011
Ms Sierra-Zorita, why do you and others that discuss this issue refuse to use the word illegal? Those you seek to influence have absolutely nothing but open arms for legal immigrants. Similarly, those you wish to influence wish to see our laws respected. Is that so unreasonable?
02:11 PM on 12/31/2011
Because it does not make sense, it's grammatically incorrect and derogatory. If you violate a traffic law, you are not an "illegal traffic law violator" you are someone that violated the law. This term just like "anchor baby' are used to to dehumanize, not to be precise.
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
06:54 PM on 01/01/2012
So what do you suggest VR? How would you characterize those who contravene the law? Would you suggest, in line with Ms Sierra-Zorita's writing, that NO distinction be made?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
09:14 PM on 01/01/2012
According to our laws they are illegal aliens (an alien aka foreigner in our country illegally). So there is nothing grammatically incorrect. Why shouldn't it be deragatory if they violated our immigration laws. Should we offer them milk and cookies instead? How is the term dehumanizing? Humans who break the law are still humans for God's sake.
09:32 AM on 12/28/2011
Please define the anti-immigration position?
09:14 AM on 12/28/2011
The GOP's message machine will capture the Latino vote.

Twenty or thirty years agto there weren't enough Latinos in the country to divide against eachother. Today, there are. The GOP will engage in a version of the Southern Strategy customized for the Latino vote.

The article says jobs and immigration are Latinos' 2 biggest issues. The GOP will order a halt to extremist language on immigration. They will direct their propaganda towards Latinos who follow the "faith, family freedom" line of people like Palin. They will win over those Latinos who, like white Reagan Democrats a generation ago, are pro life, pro law and order, financially OK, and who beleive the illegal community is their enemy, too.

The GOP will convince these "Reagan Democrat" Latinos that we need lower taxes and less regulation on "job creators," that government is an impediment to them and that efforts to control the borders is to their advantage.

The GOP knows well the nature of shifting demographics and they are preparing for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yankeebrown
03:36 PM on 12/28/2011
The issues in Arizona and Alabama will not be forgotten so easily. The has been too much BS this year alone; too much crazy talk. Yes there will be many Latinos that will fall for republican propaganda but I'm willing to bet that Obama is going to get a better response from Latinos on the next election than on the previous one. Republicans, to their detriment, have put a shadow over all Latinos with their stands on illegal immigration, and they will understand how damaging their debates were come election time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
09:16 PM on 01/01/2012
What does being a Hispanic-American voter have to do with illegal aliens?
03:10 AM on 12/29/2011
Please come back to reality. No honest Latino will vote republican if they have one once of fiber. No one like to see your own stereotype vilified like that, doesn't matter if right or wrong. It's divisive, cruel, and frankly populist to the far right wing. I remember Pres. Bush and later Sen. McCain trying to reform our broken immigration system and being relentlessly bombarded by fellow GOps.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
09:18 PM on 01/01/2012
Our immigration system is not broken. It is just that there are more immigrants ( Latinos in particular) that want to come here than we can accomodate in jobs and resources. That is why we have immigration quotas. Are you saying we should just forget our sensible quotas to placate a certain ethnic group?