August 2nd, 2009. The Ghawi and Hannun families of Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem are waking to the sounds of police and trucks and movers. In a few hours, their houses will have become the home to settler families, and they will be kicked out to the street.
Those images are flashing back to me as I think of what could happen in two weeks in Silwan. We've seen those pictures in the past: Palestinian family out, Israeli settlers in. Sometimes the house is legally bought by the settlers; sometimes it is the implementation of the "right of return" to properties that belonged to Jews before 1948 (like in the case of Ghawi and Hannun); and sometimes it is because the Israeli Authorities decided to use the Absentee Property Law in order to take over the Palestinian house and give it to the settlers.
The Sumarin family has been living for decades at the entrance to the Wadi Hilweh neighborhood of Silwan, not far from Al-Aqsa Mosque. Two months ago, the court scheduled their eviction for November 28, 2011 in a ruling handed down in the absence of defense by the Sumarins. Their house is considered by the authorities as a property of an absentee, and therefore, it was transferred to the hands of the Himanuta company which requested the eviction.
In Silwan there is a fight over nationality, history and also religion. For the Palestinians, it is a Palestinian neighborhood, next to Al-Aqsa Mosque where thousands of Palestinians have been living for ages. The settlers are trying to make it into "The City of David," using archaeology and tourism to change the public domain in Silwan. The visitors center of the "City of David" tourism site was built by the settlers next to the house of the Sumarin family. If taken by the settlers, the Sumarin house would give them a large contiguous area at the very entrance to Silwan and dramatically change the character of the neighborhood.
For the last 20 years the Jewish National Fund has been acting to transfer Palestinian property in East Jerusalem to the settlers. Tens of dunams of land and homes housing dozens of Palestinians in Silwan were evacuated by the JNF through various legal proceedings and transferred to settlers. In many cases the JNF does this through its subsidiary Himnuta, whose shares are held by the JNF.
The barter deal in Silwan: absentee land turns into JNF land in order to give it to settlers
In the 1980s and early 1990s, dozens of properties in Silwan were declared absentee properties and sold to the Development Authority. According to the law, the Development Authority and the Israel Land Administration are required to administer their assets equally without discrimination based on nationality. Conversely, the JNF and Himnuta operate according to a JNF memo that provides that its assets be leased or transferred to the possession of Jews only. In order to bypass the requirement of equality, the authorities in the early 1990s used the JNF and Himnuta to transfer property in Silwan to the settlers.
On May 23, 1991, a barter deal was signed between the Development Authority and Himnuta, according to which the Development Authority was to transfer 30 dunams of absentee property in Silwan to Himnuta in exchange for land it owns in the Wadi Ara area. The purpose of the deal, as defined by the director of the land Department in the JNF and Himnuta, was "for those properties to be under Jewish ownership." Later, some of the properties were leased to the Elad settler organization without a tender.
Most of the properties were inhabited by Palestinian families that did not even know that their homes were declared absentee property, sold in a barter deal to Himnuta and leased to settlers. Himnuta began demanding the Palestinian tenants be evicted from their homes through legal actions. Among the properties transferred in this way to Elad are Beit Hamaayan ("the well house"), which serves as a tourist and archaeological excavation site, and Beit Hatzofeh ("the lookout house"), which serves the organization as part of its tourist site and visitors center as well as serving as a settler residence.
"The Klugman Report" -- The machine was stopped, but never killed
Following the election of the Rabin Government in 1992, a special investigation committee, "the Klugman Committee," was assigned to investigate the conduct of the authorities with regards to East Jerusalem properties that were given to the settlers. The committee described how the Ministry of Housing (under Ariel Sharon as a Minister) facilitated and funded the transfer of Palestinian properties in the Old City and Silwan into the hands of settler organizations. One of the methods to take over properties was the use of the Absentee Property Law. Among the Committee's key findings were:
Following the Klugman Report, the machine that was established in order to assist the settlement at the heart of Palestinian neighborhoods in East Jerusalem was stopped. However, some of the procedures that started at the early '90s, continued. To this day, Himnuta continues pursuing legal claims against Palestinian residents based on the barter deal from 1991. At least three families in Silwan are at risk of eviction after years of long and expensive legal proceedings that have not yet ended. The Sumarin family is one of them.
As a Jew, I feel ashamed that Himnuta and the JNF, which are claiming to act in the name of the Jewish people, are continuing to use their organization in order to kick out Palestinian families from their homes, and to bring in Jewish families instead. This is not only politically wrong and dangerous, but also immoral.
The eviction can still be stopped: Himnuta can decide, instead of giving the property to settlers, to give it to the Palestinian family that has lived in it for years. The Israel Police can decide not to assist in the eviction of the family and to prevent it. The police have avoided evicting settlers from Beit Yehonatan in Silwan for more than three years, even though the court has repeatedly ordered to evict them. The attorney general has asserted on different occasions that if the police believe there is a threat to public security it must prevent right holders from realizing their rights at that time.
The only question is whether the authorities will have the political wisdom to prevent the upcoming provocation in Silwan.
Follow Hagit Ofran on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hagitofran
Alan Dershowitz: Israel Has the Right to Attack Iran's Nuclear Reactors Now
Robert Naiman: Can US Support UN Resolution on Israeli Settlements? Yes We Can!
All other arguments and issues aside, this is untrue. If, as you state, Himnuta is obliged by it's bylaws to provide land only to jews, it cannot legally allow the palestinians to remain. If it did this, it would be in violation of it's own bylaws. For those who don't know, when organizational bylaws are registered with the government, those bylaws take on the effect of law, and violating them is grounds for civil and criminal proceedings by the government. This is true in Israel, the US, canada, and throughout the western world. Thus, if Himnuta violated its own bylaws, Himnuta officers would face trial, fines and jailtime. And no one is going to do that for a cause they don't believe in. the flault lies with the government for arranging the land swaps with Himnuta in the first place.
That's true.
Jewish Palestinians, Muslim Palestinains and Christian Palestinians used to live near the Temple Mount.
Until the Jewish Palestinains were dispossessed form their indigenous neighborhoods by Jordanian invaders in 1949. ( See the fate of the Old Jewish Quarter).
Luckily, they have returned in 1967.
So this is NOT actually a problem -- it's the remnants of a past problem that was resolved.
>>>"However, some of the procedures that started at the early '90s, continued. To this day, Himnuta continues pursuing legal claims against Palestinian residents based on the barter deal from 1991."
So this "remnant of a problem" has been under judicial review for 20 years -- and still is. I would say this is proper "due process".
>>>"The attorney general has asserted on different occasions that if the police believe there is a threat to public security it must prevent right holders from realizing their rights at that time."
This seems to be an admission of the fact that the "right" lies with the "Jewish settlers". If so, public security may indeed "must prevent right holders from realizing their rights", but only temporarily. Ultimately this is an issue of property rights, not one of policy.
So Palestinians were squatting in homes that legally belong to Jews.
Or doesn't the same logic apply?
I, along with most Jews, believe the politicized Palestinian leaders have no intention of making peace with Jews. I see in Cairo Muslims are organizing a march to protest the Judaization of Jerusalem, which makes me laugh. The Jews founded and built Jerusalem thousands of years ago, and we are finding that the Torah is an accurate account of ancient Jewish history. The Muslims are conquerors of the Holy Land, first in the 7th century CE and then by the Ottomans in the 1500s. When the Ottomans lost WW I they lost control of the Holy Land, the Jewish state was reestablished, and any additional land the Jews won in battle was won in the same way that Muslims won it.
I believe most Pals would be happy to live in peace with the Jews. I am with Mr. Netanyahu that Jerusalem not be divided. What Muslims forget is this is the Holy Land of Jews and Christians. Muslims have their own holy land in Arabia.