In the midst of a frenzy of partisan accusation and counter-accusation over the debt and economic woes more generally, the civil rights song We Are the Ones We've Been Waiting For is worth recalling. In this month of the dedication of the King Memorial in Washington, the song captures the freedom movement's grassroots wisdom often lost in today's focus on famous leaders. Ending segregation was too big a task for the courts, the Kennedy administration, Congress or eloquent civil rights leaders to accomplish on their own. It took the work of everyone.
Today, once again, the nation's challenges call for a politics of constructive action by the broad citizenry, across divisions. Political leaders who struggle to rise above partisan squabbles offer important examples. Higher education also needs to help lead the way.
Instead, the conventional left and right have turned politics into a spectator sport which the citizenry watches from afar, absolved of responsibility, waiting for a great leader to vanquish our enemies and come to our rescue. Conservative groups like the Tea Party and their allies in Congress demonize the president as a "stealth socialist" leading the nation to European-style statism. The left expresses bitter disappointment in what they see as Obama's failure to mount a frontal challenge to corporate misdeeds, and finger-pointing is ubiquitous. Drew Westen's recent essay in the New York Times, "What Happened to Obama?," is a case in point. For Westen, the flaw in Obama's speeches is that they "virtually always lacked one element: the villain who caused the problem."
Certainly we need our leaders, if they are great ones, to step forward with bold plans, but they also need to challenge the citizenry to engage in the work of democracy rather than to search out the villains. The secret of real American democratic leadership is to revive in our times the civic politics found in both parties, rooted in Abraham Lincoln's formulation of "government of the people, by the people, and for the people." That's what attracted voters to President Obama's campaign, as he argued that "all of us have responsibilities, all of us have to step up to the plate."
In these divided and divisive days in our country, this philosophy of civic agency has inspiring exemplars, historical and contemporary, spanning diverse seats at the political table. To cite another example, Elizabeth Kautz, the Republican mayor of Burnsville, Minnesota, a Twin Cities suburb, has gained national recognition for reviving the concept that government's role is to facilitate the public work of the people. She is the president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors -- the first suburban mayor to achieve such recognition. Throughout her tenure as mayor, since 1994, Kautz has argued, "I can't solve the problems of Burnsville by myself, but I can bring people together to do the work of the community."
Obama made his campaign a medium for just this message. In Springfield, Ill., on Feb. 10, 2007, announcing his campaign, he said, "This campaign has to be about reclaiming the meaning of citizenship, restoring our sense of common purpose." At the top of the campaign web site was the challenge, "I'm asking you not only to believe in my ability to make change; I'm asking you to believe in yours."
Since the election, some administration initiatives have sought to spark bipartisan civic action in this vein. For instance, America's Great Outdoors, based on the premise that the burden of protecting the nation's natural heritage rests largely with citizens and communities, has bought together tribal leaders, sports enthusiasts, community park groups, foresters, business people, educators, local government officials, conservation groups and others to develop grassroots, cross-partisan solutions. In the Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement project of the Department of Education and the American Association of Colleges and Universities, college presidents and government officials are developing plans for revitalized citizenship education.
We believe, in fact, that higher education has a special responsibility to step up to the plate in helping create a different kind of politics, of problem solving rather than blaming. After all, it was the graduates of our prestigious universities -- not evildoers from another planet -- who devised financial instruments like derivatives which (inadvertently) led to financial meltdown and economic crisis. Graduates of our colleges of education have pushed for standardized testing as a way to "leave no child behind," often (inadvertently) draining away the civic mission of schools and severing the connections which once made schools centers of civic life and engines of local economic and social development.
Those of us in higher education will need to overcome powerful trends if we are to take leadership in addressing the dysfunctions of American public life. In recent years, "rankings wars" have led to preoccupation with excellence largely defined as an individual asset, owned by students and faculty alike. Education is marketed as a private good rewarded appropriately with high incomes to the cream of the crop. Scholarship is aimed at disciplinary-based questions. While such questions are appropriate, scholars often speak with a more strained voice to broader audiences.
But the nation's challenges call us to renew our public purpose and democratic mission. Our colleges and universities must relearn skills of collaborative, respectful work with citizens outside our doors. And we believe the broad citizenry will respond.
The voter response to Obama's call for us all to step up to the plate suggested that there is growing awareness no one is coming to the rescue. We all are the ones.
Harry C. Boyte is director of the Center for Democracy and Citizenship at Augsburg College and a Senior Fellow at the University of Minnesota's Humphrey School of Public Affairs. Nancy Cantor is Chancellor of Syracuse University.
Oh,well
Why don't we have a National Recommended Reading List after all of these decades? Is that too difficult a concept for our educators to come up with or is our educational system really designed to control how much children know and maintain a class structured society?
Now we have really cheap computers and plenty of books are free because they are so old they are in the public domain. What can that do to the cost of education?
Coby Kyros 7015
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clGKXHjY548
All Day September by Roger Kuykendall
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/2295/all-day-september
THE YEAR WHEN STARDUST FELL by Raymond F. Jones
http://winstonscifi.blogspot.com/2010/04/synopsis-for-year-when-stardust-fell-by.html
http://www.readcentral.com/book/Raymond-F-Jones/Read-The-Year-When-Stardust-Fell-Online
Eight Keys to Eden by Mark Clifton
http://www.xenodochy.org/ex/abstract/eightkeys.html
http://www.onread.com/book/Eight-Keys-to-Eden-6514/
The Fourth R by George O. Smith
http://www.onread.com/book/The-Fourth-R-17950/
Black Man's Burden by Mack Reynolds
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/4826/black-man-s-burden
We MUST be the ones we are waiting for - if not - there will be NO America left for our children and grandchildren. They will grow up in a feudal cast system and, sadly, a majority of them will be on the bottom rung of the wealth ladder.
Your essay says the adults among 312 million Americans are not singing kumbaya together. This is a true statement. You wish everyone would. I do, too. Now the question is - How do we make that happen beyond the exhortations of essays?
I suggest we begin with the U.S. Congress.
At present, the Constitution does not require the members of Congress to do anything. They do not have to talk with one another, look at one another or be in the same room. If they want to posture and preen for cameras and microphones – dead things – they can.
Imagine the teachers and administrators of colleges and universities acting that way. Don’t feel like agreeing on next year’s budget? Well, okay, that’s fine.
If you and I are serious about fixing “the dysfunctions of American public life” and not just talk about it, then we should actually fix it.
I ask that you use your good offices to promote among your stakeholders and constituents the passage of the Kirkwood Amendment. It empowers the President or any ten Governors of the States to declare Congress deadlocked whereupon the members of Congress are sequestered. To end the sequestration, they are compelled to work with one another to build a majority to pass a bill the president will sign or to override his or her veto. In that process, a lot of other legislation will be pushed through the pipeline.
See: http://americanconversationgroup.blogspot.com/
If it takes the Boomers to rise up again holding a torch of light to the injustices of today's political culture - in the words of John Boehner, "so be it".
Voting and writing and phoning and blogging and twittering do not have the impact that thousands of people united for one cause - the right to have their voices heard - has on the American spirit. I can feel the rumble under my feet and I can hear the sound of a distant drum. The American population is beginning to wake from their complacency and when they do I will march with them - a bit older but much wiser.
I agree that organized, non-violent street action may be necessary and I would participate along with you so long as the movement remained non-violent.
(Actually, I think I would find it thrilling. I missed out on our generation's previous protests. My brother was a hospital corpsman and was killed in Viet Nam. As a college student, I felt subdued about current events.)
What I ask you to think about, however, is what are we protesting for? And, more importantly, by what mechanism are we going to achieve those goals?
Let us say your group is for A, B and C. Another group is for B, C and D. Now what?
No matter how you slice it, these differences get sorted out in Congress. Ultimately laws need to be passed that support our goals as a People.
Right now, Congress is disordered and is not functioning up to the level where we need it to be in a world where we are competing with, for example, the Chinese.
The proposed Kirkwood Amendment is intended to fix Congress - to compel them, if necessary, to pass appropriate legislation that address our needs.
My appeal to you is to organize nonviolent street protests in support of the Kirkwood Amendment as a necessary first step in accomplishing all other goals.
Please see http://americanconversationgroup.blogspot.com/
Thanks,
Dan Jones