I wasn't going to blog about this, but then GalleyCat had his experience on Regan's Sirius radio show, so I thought I should add to the evidentiary mix. The Thursday after Thanksgiving, I was interviewed by Ms. Regan for that show. My motive was clear, if not clouded by doubt about hanging telephonically with the woman who was this close to publishing the O.J. "hypothetical" murder memoir: when you're trying to sell a book, you'll talk to anybody willing to promote it. Especially since many of the more conventional avenues were closed to me: Good Morning America rejected me, for example, as "too highbrow"--apparently somebody had leaked word about my secret consulting with Stephen Hawking.
So, I'm sitting on the bed of our New Orleans home, fixin' to talk to Judith Regan on the phone, and wondering just how long it will take for "it" to come up. She comes on the line, and for the first ten minutes or so, she conducts an absolutely splendid interview, from an author's point of view. Asks good questions, elicits funny stuff about the book, seems interested.
Although....every few minutes, some little wisp of steam escapes that warns of the eruption to come, some little comment about "They're always gunning for successful women in this country"--which has nothing to do with anything we've been talking about. And she does say, at one point, "I suppose you've made fun of me." "Yes, I did one piece about you on my radio show."
Then, suddenly--Mt. Judith erupts: A five-minute (at the least) monologue about people gunning for successful women, "they" get them all eventually, why wasn't there this much ruckus when Katie Couric interviewed O.J. on the tenth anniversary of the murders (isn't Katie successful? I wondered to myself, since Judith was using all the oxygen at that moment), and then--"Harry, you're a journalist"--this based on her reading my earlier post on the O.J. book that linked back to my coverage of the Simpson civil trial--"what would you do if O.J. approached you and wanted to confess?" I demurred on the job description, but when she insisted on an answer, I fell back on the truth: "Judith, every day at the civil trial, O.J. would head straight for where I was sitting, because his pal Star Jones was sitting directly behind me, and I would mentally dig a hole straight to China every day at that point, so I don't think I would be the person to take any confession he might want to offer at this point." Or words to that effect.
But Ms. Regan was not to be brought back to reason, or my book. She kept on the subject of the drive against successful women, until I finally pointed out that nobody seems to be gunning for Oprah. "Not yet," she replied. Frankly, she seemed so at sea for an answer to the question of the shitstorm that had rained down on her, I finally offered one: "I think one reason people may have reacted so angrily and energetically against this project was because it was an opportunity to attack Rupert Murdoch."
"Why would they want to do that?" she asked. She really did.
I decided to be comedically blunt: "Because he's evil."
That really set her off. "You take his money. You're like all the Hollywood hypocrites, you criticize him but you're happy to take his money."
"Judith," I said, trying to get her back into a mood which might allow for mentioning my book again, "a good friend once told me that the only way to really hurt Rupert Murdoch is to take as much of his money as humanly possible."
"That's demented," she replied.
"I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a saint in the media-mogul business these days," I finished up.
For the record, there was no mention or suggestion of Jews or anti-Semitism in any of this half-hour-long conversation, even by her.
Of course, some of the words she did utter will make for fine dining in the "war" that her lawyer Bert Fields says is coming. I suggest a Bordelaise sauce. And, BTW, the aforementioned comic novel stubbornly remains available, and, yes, it does make a splendid Christmas/Chanukkah/Kwanzaa gift.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.