Pres. Obama's unilateral appointments of Matthew Bryza as Ambassador to Azerbaijan and Frank Ricciardone as Ambassador to Turkey must be strongly challenged. He took advantage of an archaic loophole to circumvent the Senate's constitutional mandate during the new year holidays to make these "recess appointments" on December 29.
While Pres. Obama has the legal authority to make such temporary appointments when the Senate is not in session, his unwise decision could have several serious consequences:
-- Undermines the legitimacy and credibility of the new U.S. Ambassadors in the eyes of their host countries due to their appointment without the backing and confirmation of the Senate.
-- Antagonizes two prominent Senators of his own party - Barbara Boxer of California and Robert Menendez of New Jersey - who had placed a "hold" on Bryza's nomination. Having already lost the Republican-controlled House, Obama now desperately needs every single vote in a Senate with a razor thin Democratic majority.
-- Alienates the entire Senate by depriving the Senators of their mandate to confirm ambassadorial nominees.
-- Burns all bridges between himself and Armenian-Americans who were some of his staunchest supporters in the last presidential election, having already broken his pledge on the Armenian Genocide, Nagorno-Karabagh's (Artsakh) self-determination, and foreign aid to Armenia.
Fortunately, Pres. Obama's recess appointments are of a temporary nature and not considered full-term ambassadorships. They are only valid for one year rather than the usual three years. In order for Bryza and Ricciardone to serve as Ambassadors beyond 2011, Obama has to resubmit their names to the Senate and have them properly considered.
Senators has ample time to take all necessary steps to ensure that the President's slap in their face does not go unnoticed and unchallenged. Both ambassadors should be sent back home by the end of this year.
Here are the steps that could be taken to derail Bryza's Senate confirmation:
-- Closely scrutinize Bryza's public statements, press conferences, and interviews in Baku to ensure that he is properly representing the interests of the United States in Azerbaijan rather than Azerbaijan's interests in Washington.
-- Publicize the documents submitted to the European Court of Human Rights by an Azeri journalist who claims that Azerbaijan's former Minister of Economic Development had paid the expenses for Bryza's lavish 2007 wedding in Istanbul. During the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings, Bryza testified under oath that his family had paid for his wedding. Should the European Court find that the government of Azerbaijan had indeed financed Bryza's wedding, he would be indicted for lying under oath, not reporting to the IRS the gifts as income, and violating U.S. government's gift acceptance and disclosure policy.
-- Investigate all his oral and written statements to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last year in order to verify their truthfulness.
-- Search for evidence of conflict of interest related to the employment of his Turkish-born wife, Zeyno Baran, as Director of the Center for Eurasian Policy at the Hudson Institute, a Washington-based think tank that has received funding from ExxonMobil and other energy companies doing business in the Caspian region. The Armenian National Committee of America has accused Bryza of violating federal ethics rules because of his wife's connections to Turkish and Azerbaijani business interests.
-- Contact Senators Boxer and Menendez who had placed a "hold" on Bryza's nomination last year, urging them to block his confirmation once again, when Obama resubmits his name to the Senate. By doing so, the two Senators would be reaffirming their initial conviction that Bryza is not qualified to serve as U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan.
Even though there was no widespread dissatisfaction with Ricciardone's nomination, nevertheless, since Republican Senator Sam Brownback had placed a "hold" on Ricciardone's nomination last year and he is no longer in the Senate, other Senators should take his place and place a hold against his recess appointment.
How will Donald Trump’s first 100 days impact YOU? Subscribe, choose the community that you most identify with or want to learn more about and we’ll send you the news that matters most once a week throughout Trump’s first 100 days in office. Learn more