Hillary Clinton recently came out with a plan to address the growing college affordability crisis in this country. She is to be commended for recognizing that student debt is crippling the financial future of younger generations - and some not so young. Her program would be a considerable improvement on the status quo.
That said, the Clinton plan does not go far enough, as it fails to place the issue of college affordability in the proper context: as a societal, rather than individual, problem.
Clinton's proposal would offer $17.5 billion per year in federal funds for states to reinvest in public higher education. It would consolidate Income-Based Repayment programs, strengthen regulatory oversight of student loans, simplify the loan application process and expand programs to help low-income, first-generation college students.
For those already burdened with student debt, it would allow them to refinance at "today's low interest rates" and eliminate profits for the federal government from the student loan program. It would cap loan payments to 10 percent of income and provide total forgiveness after 20 years.
These are all good things. Significant problems remain, however. Her plan promises "no loan" solutions to student debt, but families would still be required to pay tuition according to a formula that determines how much they can afford.
That's a problem. Many middle-class families today are living paycheck to paycheck and borrowing just to meet routine expenses. This would add another large budget item for already hard-pressed households, and despite the "no loan" label, increase debt burdens as families borrow against their house or on credit cards to pay tuition.
Students would be required to work 10 hours a week, which can be difficult for those carrying a heavy course load, especially if the work isn't related to their studies. Only lower-income students would be able to use their federal, needs-based financial aid to pay for living expenses.
We need to fundamentally reshape the way we think about public higher education. For a number of years, it was virtually free in many parts of this country. We understood the benefits of living in a society where every young person could go to college, regardless of their economic history. It is important that we return to that view.
In that regard, Clinton's "New College Compact" is something of a disappointment. Instead of placing college "within reach" of every qualified American, it should be available to all people, as a public good -- not contingent on individual family sacrifice, or student work requirements.
The Sanders plan, released last May, would make all public colleges and universities tuition-free. It would eliminate the federal "profit" from student debt and allow students to refinance at significantly lower rates. (Under current conditions the undergraduate student loan rate would drop from 4.29 percent to 2.37 percent.)
There would be no payment requirements for middle-class families, and no 10-hour work week to add on to a student's course load. Students would be able to use federal, state and institutional need-based aid to cover room and board, books and living expenses -- all major contributors to student debt. It would triple the size of the federal work-study program, and offer significant relief to current student debt holders.
Other nations have seen the wisdom of tuition-free public higher education, including Germany, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Iceland and Mexico. We understood the same thing in this country for much of the 20th century in states like California and New York.
The Clinton plan is a step in the right direction. But it's not debt free. The Sanders plan offers real solutions to the high costs of college tuition and student debt, and as such, real progress towards the building of a robust democracy.
A version of this post originally appeared on Democracy Daily, the online "news magazine" of the Bernie 2016 campaign.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.