More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Howard Buffett

Howard Buffett

GET UPDATES FROM Howard Buffett
 

How Politics Is Threatening Real Progress in Afghanistan

Posted: 04/ 5/11 09:01 AM ET

Sitting in Washington Dulles airport awaiting to board a flight to Dubai and then on to Afghanistan, I picked up the Washington Post and began reading about the very people I was on my way to visit: the Task Force for Business and Stability Operations led by Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Paul Brinkley. The Task Force, responsible for providing economic normalcy where conflict has eroded people's ability to lead productive and peaceful lives, is hosting me on my second trip to Afghanistan. I am returning, primarily because I was so impressed with Brinkley's operation the first time that our foundation invested in several agricultural projects. Without the Task Force, I would have never made the original trip, and our charitable foundation would not be helping thousands of poor farmers in Afghanistan today.

The Washington Post reports of the dismantling of Brinkley's Task Force, which is clearly an example of politics, turf and jealousy. The Task Force has found an effective approach, producing results, and those in Washington who are threatened by its progress must find a way to defend themselves. In this case, their territorial self-defense is the tearing down of the Task Force, and the undoing of a style that has led to success. The biggest difference I notice when in Afghanistan is the willingness of the Task Force to just do what it takes. While many agency staff will not even venture out of their heavily protected compounds, the Task Force is on the front lines interacting with Afghans every day.

The Task Force is driven by an amazing spirit of people with business backgrounds and the understanding that it requires entrepreneurialism and capitalism to rebuild a country. While humanitarian aid is required at times, true economic development happens on the ground, where individuals are self-empowered to lift themselves from poverty. While it may be tagged as "war zone capitalism", that is exactly what it takes to move a country like Afghanistan forward.

Along similar lines, our foundation's activity has been driven by the belief that people in conflict zones comprise the most disenfranchised populations in the world. In almost all circumstances, these are people who have suffered the loss of life, destroyed homes, and ruined livelihoods at no fault of their own. The disruption in these individuals' lives can last years, and the emotional trauma leaves scars forever. After conflict resolves, entire populations suffer from food insecurity, poor access to water, reduced sanitation, and limited access to education and basic health facilities. I have seen this firsthand because of our foundation's involvement in conflict and post-conflict areas across the globe.

My experiences have taught me that when individuals far removed from an activity believe they understand the situation better than those who live with the consequences, it often leads to failure. Conflict is a nasty business under any circumstance, but it is the flexibility, independence and spontaneity demonstrated by this Task Force that allows it to respond to the constant changes in conditions on the ground. It is this behavior that drives bureaucrats crazy, and it is this risk that career personnel will not take.

It is not surprising that Defense Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen and General Petraeus have all supported Brinkley. These are the individuals who are deeply committed to and responsible for rebuilding Afghanistan and bringing our troops home. They understand that markets are built by economies, not soldiers; that success must come from investments, not bullets.

Brinkley's team is unconventional, but that is what today's world -- and the toughest conflicts -- demand. Leave it to politics to interrupt a success story and dismantle it before the job is completed. Billions of dollars have been spent in Afghanistan. The budget line item for Brinkley's work is minimal but could have the greatest return of all, based on what I have witnessed.

Our soldiers and our taxpayers deserve every chance to get this right, to know that the lives lost and the money spent resulted in freedoms for the Afghan people that reflect our basic democratic principles. Building businesses, increasing agricultural productivity and supporting a growing economy are the weapons needed to keep peace. It is my hope that in Afghanistan, peace does not surrender to conflict because of politicians who are comfortable and safe back home -- politicians who are unwilling to take the risk required to act with the innovation and ingenuity required to rebuild a nation and bring prosperity to one of the most challenging environments in the world.

Howard Buffett is president of the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. The foundation works in numerous conflict and post conflict areas including; Afghanistan, Colombia, Georgia, Ivory Coast, Iraq, Liberia, Sierra Leon, Somalia, Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Buffett's son serves on the Task Force.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:30 PM on 04/10/2011
The head of this Task Force has been investigated for mismanagement and malfeasance and continues to hold a reputation for poor ethics and lack of professionalism, as does the Task Force itself. One reported example of these investigations can be found at the following link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1887114/posts

Time to shut down an organization that is an embarrassment.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Trevor Neilson
Co-Founder, Global Philanthropy Group
11:36 PM on 04/05/2011
A powerful argument from a thoughtful philanthropist.
02:49 PM on 04/10/2011
The head of this Task Force has been investigat­ed for mismanagem­ent and malfeasanc­e and continues to hold a reputation for poor ethics and lack of profession­alism, as does the Task Force itself. One reported example of these investigat­ions can be found at the following link: http://www­.freerepub­lic.com/fo­cus/f-news­/1887114/p­osts

Time to shut down an organizati­on that is an embarrassm­ent. This Task Force does not possess the leadership necessary to effect change. It is populated by underexperienced, unprofessional staff more interested in war zone tourism or "making myself look close to the troops" in anticipation of their future Senate campaign (yes, this has been openly and repeatedly stated by the article's author's son, currently serving on the Task Force) than in effecting real change.
06:09 PM on 04/05/2011
I'm not buying any argument that prolongs a war that during the course of 10 years there is progress in one place and as soon as we move on, that progress degrades.

Given the cauldron that the Middle East is and what we have been witness to in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, to watch it spread through the Middle East should say something to anyone who wishes to draw out an already long war, is blind to a geopolitical reality.

If and when a people in any of the Arab nations, like Iran and Syria wish to be free from the bonds that impoverish them, they will rise on their own and succeed on their own.

The only benefit in war is to Industrial Military GOP complex, it enriches them and impoverishes this nation regarding health, education, the environment and its most vulnerable citizens. You know, all those things the GOP now wishes to strip away from the American people.

This is insanity. Want to do charitable work, fine, start here, feed our poor and hungry, educate the masses, failing to do so is planning to fail. Something, tragically, the GOP does all too well.
02:35 PM on 04/05/2011
Sure would like to know more about the politics.
01:57 PM on 04/05/2011
Consider how difficult it is to get Americans to understand their own self-interests. Americans support offshoring, free trade, NAFTA, tax cuts for billionaires, endless wars, work visas, and amnesty for illegals. All of these hurt American workers but they continue to support them. So if don't even know our self-interest then by what reason do you expect Afghans to be better?!
01:50 PM on 04/05/2011
If you believe in markets then you know that the level of US interference in the Afghan markets (providing security, billions in welfare, and infrastructure spending) is not sustainable and will lead nowhere.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
01:11 PM on 04/05/2011
This is a persuasive argument for street level bureaucrats being given sufficient discretion and resources to experiment and find out what works and what doesn't. Too often in government, however, nothing fails like success and nothing succeeds like failure. The latter tendency is particularly annoying when fixers located thousands of miles away think they can repair a program that cannot work (because the program theory itself is flawed) by throwing more resources at it. Those fixers aren't as smart as they think they are. Whatever happened to American pragmatism?
01:53 PM on 04/05/2011
As long as we can keep borrowing to pay for these experiments then we will keep doing them. The DC elite love these programs because they hop on a plane for Afghanistan and get to play warlord. How fun is that? And we pay for it all...actually our children pay for it.
12:26 PM on 04/05/2011
There is no process in Afghanistan same as Americans don't want Shariah law why are you Imposing Democracy on people who don't want it ? Afghanistan is a bear trap for Uncle Sam no better way to explain it.
02:44 AM on 04/06/2011
Nowhere in this article is democracy mentioned. The purpose of the Task Force is to seek stabilization through economic opportunity. Afghans have already formed their government, that THEY created. Along with their constitution and legislative officials they've voted for in for the past two elections.

This article is on Brinkley's Task Force which is being closed down due to State Department rivalry. When the DoD does a better job at stabilization efforts using normally civilian means, it gets the officials NOT doing their jobs, in an uproar. Last time I saw a State Department rep tasked with mentoring and working with his Afghan counterparts, he had been holed-up in a military compound for months, enjoying the amenities provided by the DoD. That was yesterday, too.

Remember when we tried running Iraq from the Green Zone, in 2003? Brennan did a number by raising unemployment and causing unrest when he closed state-run businesses and fired the military. What did those millions of people do for years? Well for one, we came to the brink of an Iraqi Civil War. The State Department was content with sitting on the closed assets for years waiting for private enterprise bids, in hopes of creating a capitalist democracy. Brinkley's team, in 2006, reopened the state-led businesses in order to get people working, paid, and off the streets. That's right, state-led. Does that sound like democracy to you?
11:36 AM on 04/05/2011
My comment has gotten erased and what did I say that was sooo bad.

Afghanis have to want it. Is there an Afghanistan? Or a british guy in 1947 who drew up the map to make afghanistan, pakistan and india. It will get there, In the meantime we have to stand on the sidelines and watch the bloodbath. I know people will not agree. But I don't want anymore of our "American boys and girls" dying for this war... This is not our fight... I'll cry for those injustices... but it has to be from ground up. not foreign. Just like Egypt. We stayed out for 50 years and it happened. Remember one thing as Gandhi said
"Whenever I despair, I remember that the way of truth and love has always won. There may be tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they may seem invincible, but in the end, they always fail. Think of it: always. "
11:24 AM on 04/05/2011
Afghanis themselves have to want to have peace more than us. They have to make their own compromises... we can't do it from outside in a 1000 years. Today the Americans, NATO, UN is a crutch. it sounds heartless and unfeeling but unless Afghans believe they can rise up to whomever we can not make it happen. Just like Libya and all the rest. We have to be on sidelines and watch the bloodbath. We can't do jack...
10:31 AM on 04/05/2011
politics is threatening every counrty whether at war or not....they have an agenda and that agenda will cost citizens dearly.
10:11 AM on 04/05/2011
And what about Afghani politics? I just read that it was Karzai who made the koran burning public. So it was our so-called partner who stirred up violence and murder to make himself look good. Why are we still giving him and his drug-running brother money?
10:00 AM on 04/05/2011
The foolish pretension of people who think they can devise programs that will transform Afghanistan and help us win the war never cease to amaze me. They obviously haven't studied the similarities between their great plans and the failed efforts of the Soviets. No matter how long we stay in Afghanistan using corrupt quislings we will never conquer or transform that country and people who pretend otherwise are filled with the illusions of imperial arrogance.
03:19 AM on 04/06/2011
So I did this comparison of "great plans" by the US and the Soviets and I didn't come up with similarities...maybe I missed something? The Soviets rarely left the bases they built, instead choosing to travel the countryside by aircraft and shooting any moving target (scare tactic right?). The US has spread its forces amongst the population in order to protect citizens and civilians from acts of violence by extremists. When Afghani people failed to submit to Soviet domination, the Soviets carpeted any pliable land with landmines. The US clears landmines by hundreds of acres a day to give back to farmers for use. They even contract some of the work to locals companies to create jobs and and improve trade. It is reported that the Afghani population dropped by up to 20% during the Soviet invasion. In the past few years (with US assistance), Afghan effective birthrates have multiplied, along with increased educational opportunities (especially for women), higher commerce and trade, along with access to power, clean water, and roads. Is there another plan I'm not seeing? By the way, I've been there for the past year. I'll be sure to give you an update as soon as we start replanting those landmines.
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
09:47 AM on 04/05/2011
I know, that's one of our supposed strategic 'goals' in Afghanistan - to make low-cost loans (of US tax dollars handed over to private banks) available to small farmers who will then develop a boom economy so that Afghans can live just like us (and support the rich with THEIR tax dollars) and form an army the sole function of which will be to keep down any insurgency against our colonizing efforts and threaten to cross the Pakistan border every now and then -
what a pipe dream.
I think the better idea is to get all our troops out of Afghanistan now.
The small farmers of that country already have a booming market in opium, which our military quietly ignores when it doesn't actively support -
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakeupyouall
11:31 AM on 04/05/2011
Just look at the past in most third world countries with conservative dictaorships that money is just pay off money to the party in power.