Why Would Anyone Support A Republican In Nebraska's Democratic Senate Primary?

Posted May 5, 2008 | 02:19 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The first time I ever wrote about Tony Raimondo at DWT was on September 8, 2007. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) had just decided that he wouldn't be seeking re-election to the Senate. "Nearly half a dozen Republicans have been salivating over the prospects of winning the Nebraska Senate seat and one far, far right extremist, Jon Bruning, had already challenged Hagel to a primary duel. Aside from Bruning, other wingnuts promising to jump in after Monday are former Governor Mike Johanns, former Omaha Mayor Hal Daub and businessmen Pat Flynn and Tony Raimondo."

Two of those Republicans are still in the hunt, ex-Gov. Johanns and businessman Tony Raimondo, except Raimando assessed his chances to beat Johanns in a Republican Party primary and decided to declare himself a Democrat. Really. There's also an actual Democrat in the race, Scott Kleeb.

Raimondo was in the news this weekend because he triggered the millionaires amendment on Friday by writing himself a $450,000 check. Many Democrats in Nebraska haven't bought into Raimondo's "conversion" in the first place, and are now uncomfortable that just as he's talking about laying off more Nebraska workers from his business-- not Chinese workers from his business there though-- he's spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to attempt to buy himself a Senate seat.

In Columbus, Neb., orders at Behlen Manufacturing Company for its pre-engineered metal buildings have slowed. So far, the company, which employs 1,100 people, has avoided layoffs, Tony Raimondo, the chairman, said.

Behlen plans to build up inventory and perhaps shift workers into busier areas, like building grain silos, while waiting for better days, he said. But if trends continue, about 50 workers would be vulnerable.

"We're on the bubble," Mr. Raimondo said. "The odds are against us that we will get through the summer without layoffs."


When Nebraska Democrats and working men and women think about Raimondo's much-touted "business experience," the first thing that comes to mind is how, in typically Republican fashion, he took over a company, Behlen, Inc and almost immediately set out to decertify the union, soon followed by exporting good paying Nebraska manufacturing jobs to low-paying China, also in typically Republican fashion.

His own TV ad sounds like it comes right from a GOP playbook -- denigrating "academics" and smart people and extolling the virtues of "businessmen." I'd say most Americans have had enough of that bull under the "CEO-President" and his pals at Enron, WorldCom, Big Pharma, Big Gas and Oil, etc.

I think Raimondo, with all his money and the help of his pal Ben Nelson, the reactionary Democrat who votes more frequently with the GOP than any Senate Democrat-- and even more than Joe Lieberman-- has a chance to beat Kleeb in the primary next week (May 13). But can he beat his fellow Republican, Mike Johanns? Virtually impossible. He will depress the vote of the Democratic base and anger Republicans who don't like a self-serving opportunist and turncoat.

And, being a Republican, albeit one trying to make believe he isn't, Raimondo's positions are neither fish nor foul. Well... they actually are pretty foul. To start, he takes the very Republican position of opposing universal health care (something strongly supported by Kleeb-- and virtually all actual Democrats). His position of taxes for the wealthy are-- word for word-- the same as Bush's and McCain's, and very different from Kleeb's, who favors tax breaks for the middle class and wants to end the give-aways for the wealthiest Americans. Raimondo also takes the Republican position on the occupation-- in effect endless war forever and ever-- as opposed to Kleeb who wants to start drawing down our troop presence and turning responsibility over to the Iraqis. One sounds like a Democrat and one sounds like a Republican; that's because one is a Republican and one is a Democrat. And, as we saw in the Louisiana special election this weekend, Democrats win by showing they are different from Republicans, not by claiming to be just like them.

 

Comments
16
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:


SORRY NEWT! BARACK IS THE CHANGE CANDIDATE!

==========================================================

My Plea to Republicans: It's Time for Real Change to Avoid Real Disaster
by Newt Gingrich (more by this author)
Posted 05/06/2008 ET


The Republican loss in the special election for Louisiana's Sixth Congressional District last Saturday should be a sharp wake up call for Republicans: Either Congressional Republicans are going to chart a bold course of real change or they are going to suffer decisive losses this November.

Saturday's loss was in a district that President Bush carried by 19 percentage points in 2004 and that the Republicans have held since 1975.

This defeat follows on the loss of Speaker Hastert's seat in Illinois. That seat had been held by a Republican for 76 years with the single exception of the 1974 Watergate election when the Democrats held it for one term. That same seat had been carried by President Bush 55-44% in 2004.

A separate New York Times/CBS Poll shows that a full 81 percent of Americans believe the economy is on the wrong track.

The Anti-Obama, Anti-Wright, and Anti-Clinton GOP Model Has Been Tested -- And It Failed
The Republican brand has been so badly damaged that if Republicans try to run an anti-Obama, anti- Reverend Wright, or (if Senator Clinton wins), anti-Clinton campaign, they are simply going to fail.

This model has already been tested with disastrous results.

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 05/06/2008

Why would anyone who makes less than a million a year , believes in the Constitution and American Freedom and thinks that the rule of law is crucial vote republican?
Why would anyone vote republican?
Republicans are the Least conservative people of all.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 05/06/2008

Hillary is a loser, McCain is a loser. Democrats in Congress are losers and now the Democrat electorate are displaying that they are losers, thus Hillary moving ahead in Primary Polls over Obama. Republicans, including McCain are truly repugnant, but they will be victorious over Hillary. Hillary winning the Dems nomination, with the support of Democrat super delegates aka the Nuclear Option, will result in Republicans winning Federal election. The people in the various states whether Nebraska or others can see this unfolding thus Republican support increasing. MSM, Wall Street, Lobbyists, none of these people want Obama. So the Republicans will take the November Presidential election, giving Hillary a trouncing. This is becoming obvious as Primaries continue. Results today will give Hillary more opportunity to derail Obama, and thus Republicans are becoming more certain of victory in the fall, so why support a Dem at this point in Primaries. Nebraskans have figured this out.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 05/06/2008

The dems should keep moving left becuase that is wht the country wants. LOL! Thanks for the laugh.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 05/06/2008

Agreed, we want to move left so that we can continue the Dems vision of a nanny state where personal responsibility is out the window and government supplies us with everything. :)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 05/06/2008

You mean like the Bear Stearns bailout?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 05/06/2008

The DNC should make this guy disappear and send a clear message to other Blue Dogs that the party will be re-claimed by the Liberals.

If the Dems want to win, they have to fight like the Federalists using the same rules and doing anything necessary to take the country back. The Dems need good operatives who (using Nixons' words) will do "anything for the cause".

We've seen the "Moderates" fail consistently for the past ten years, it's time for revolution.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 05/06/2008

I agree. The dems should keep moving to the left! Can't go far enough to the left.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 05/06/2008

Says the person who is a failure at life I am guessing . . . anyone with any talent doesn't want the government taking care of them.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 05/06/2008

Will Kathleen Sebelius campaign for Kleeb? I really thought Kleeb might have a good shot this time around.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 05/05/2008

After all these months it is still amazing that Obama supporters are so unable to write anything honest or factual about Ms. Clinton. She is not a Republican. IN fact, this is a discussion Obama supporters should avoid, he has used GOP talking points on a number of issues and Joe Lieberman is his mentor in the senate.
It is a lie to say Ms. Clinton endorsed McCain, she made a comment concerning his experience, which is not an endorsement.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 05/05/2008

Actually, I think more of McCain's ethics than I do of Clinton's. Obama has repeatedly said we can't make the changes we need to make without bringing a lot of Republicans (they're not all evil, y'all), into the fold.

If Clinton is not a republican, then surely she's not much of a democrat either, except maybe in the Dan Rostenkowski mold... Personally, I think she'd be more comfortable in the monarchist camp, as long as she got to be den mother.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 05/05/2008

"...Actually, I think more of McCain's ethics than I do of Clinton's. Obama has repeatedly said we can't make the changes we need to make without bringing a lot of Republicans (they're not all evil, y'all)..." Yes they are, they still support Bush. If they didn't, rethug legislators would demand investigations, and voter would flood their legislators with demands for said investigations.

Why don't you tell us what rethug policies are worth compromising on. More corruption? Letting CEO thieves walk away with their millions while hourly employees are fired? More deaths in Iraq? Bomb, bomb, bomb; bomb Iran? Selling US infrastructure and vital technologies to other countries? Torture?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 AM on 05/06/2008

probably for the same reasons that some would support a Republican in the national Democratic Party primary. Clinton is a Republican. She runs like one, acts like one, talks like one, votes like one, lies like one, rubs up to corporatists like one and endorses her Republican "rival" over the only real Democrat running.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 05/05/2008

Well, if the republicans cross over for her she will be elected like one.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 05/05/2008

This is actually a reply to Howie's post about Nebraska politics. Howie, do you know anything abour Nebraska's unique brand of politics? I do, I was born and raised there. In fact, there is a very long record of Republicans running as Democrats, and vice versa, because state politics is nonpartisan. The one-house legislature, the Unicameral, is the only state legislature in the nation not organized along party lines, and you can't put your party identification on the ballot! Senator Ed Zorinsky was a Republican as Mayor of Omaha but ran for the US Senate as a Democrat, and won election after election. Former Gov. Mike Johanns was a Democrat in Lincoln who turned Republican just before running for Mayor. Nebraska is different, and Kleeb is likely to lose the primary; if he wins the primary, he will certainly lose to popular Johanns in the general.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 05/05/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 

 
 
Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com