Arianna appeared on "Charlie Rose" on Thursday night, along with presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin and New York Times op-ed columnist Ross Douthat, to assess President Obama's handling of health care reform. While praising Obama for being a "natural born teacher," she was critical of his leadership skills: "He is demonstrating a preference for compromise and reconciliation even before the fight has been fought." She contrasted him with FDR, who rejected compromise with both Republican and Democratic senators who sought to water down Social Security, concluding of Obama: "He's a pied piper but he has not taken a strong stand on health care reform or on Wall Street reform."
Watch an excerpt of the interview below, or scroll to the bottom for the full panel:
Full Panel:
Yvette Kantrow: Why Fortune Loves Charlie Rose
A new profile of Charlie Rose is representative of a trend that seems to be growing: the sort of meta-, multi-platform story that has so many odd conflicts and strange connections that it makes you dizzy.
Arianna appeared on the NPR show "On Point" today, along with Byron York and Jack Beatty, to discuss the fallout from both the left and...
Huff TV: Arianna Debates New Media With AP CEO Tom Curley On "Charlie Rose"
On "Charlie Rose" Wednesday night, Arianna discussed the topic of how journalism will be distributed in the digital age and what new models might emerge....
Well how about health care for all americans NO MATTER WHAT THE COST!!!
Can we please get straight to the point?
What exactly do other countries with universal coverage charge for annual comprehensive health care for individuals?
I have read that Holland charges approximately 100 euros (less that $150) per month.
Let’s find out exactly what it would take to offer that here.
If the price is right, Republicans AND Democrats AND Independents would buy it.
I agree with Arianna that President has shown he has less skill as a leader to get this done. Too much time wasted t with the GOP who will not vote for anything no matter how watered down they get it. President should say o.k. we are going to go back for the Public Option with single payer and sit on the Democrats, blue dogs and half of the gang of 6. Mainly Conrad and Baucus.who should be supporting the Public Option.
We haven't waited 75 years to get everyone covered for everything for nothing.
Expensive? You bet is is. Like all major foreign health care plans, the single payer option will be dreadfully expensive, but dreadfully necessary to control the growth of future expenditures. We cannot have any health reform on the cheap. If it means destroying the health insurance industry, by all means let's do it!!
Only the Republicans offer us a painless and a profitable way to cover health costs.
Their dallying with mythology is their problem. Liberals don't need to indulge in the same myth-making. The case for the single payer plan can be made and should be made now, or we will lose any chance of true reform for another 25 years or more.
If health care premiums double in the next ten years as projected, businesses will stop providing health care coverage. That much is certain. Part of the GM restructuring was eliminating a large part of the benefits packages Unions had. Worse time lay ahead for all of us. We need a public option, a buy in to Medicare. We all need to have our own portable health care through this system.
The desire to stay with an employer based health care system is untenable. No matter where you stand on the issue, employer based health care will be gone in 15 years.
And I hope the President will not take lightly this very sound and complete conclusion coming from one of the best commentator of US politics in my point of view...
Time to be nice is over, Mr. President. Meanwhile, I hope you will fully enjoy your vacation with your family...not too far away from Teddy's spirit... May the beautiful and inspiring Martha's Vineyard and its people bring you some time for a deeper reflexion, away from the noise of the Capital and of the mad crowds.
I'll watch and see, but perhaps in a round about way providence may be getting us more engaged in this debate. Quite frankly, WE did drop the ball, by we I mean progressive citizens and Democrats. The President is out on the field virtually alone, no mass uprising, no politicians with backbone. Perhaps by playing wounded he is showing us the urgency of action that is upon us. Then again maybe he is getting clobbered.