Hey Cruz, Trump and Rubio: The Constitution Says There's One President at a Time. His Name Is Barack Obama

Given that this same party also decided -- on the night he was inaugurated -- that they would seek to prevent Barack Obama from enacting any legislation whatsoever, we can at least say that they are consistent.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
2016 Republican Presidential candidates Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, from left, Donald Trump, president and chief executive of Trump Organization Inc., and Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida, stand on stage at the start of the Republican presidential candidate debate sponsored by CBS News and the Republican National Committee at the Peace Center in Greenville, South Carolina, U.S., on Saturday, Feb. 13, 2016. Donald Trump tops the GOP field with support from 36.3 percent of likely South Carolina Republican primary voters with Ted Cruz at 19.6 percent, according to a poll conducted for the Augusta Chronicle released on Friday. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images
2016 Republican Presidential candidates Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, from left, Donald Trump, president and chief executive of Trump Organization Inc., and Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida, stand on stage at the start of the Republican presidential candidate debate sponsored by CBS News and the Republican National Committee at the Peace Center in Greenville, South Carolina, U.S., on Saturday, Feb. 13, 2016. Donald Trump tops the GOP field with support from 36.3 percent of likely South Carolina Republican primary voters with Ted Cruz at 19.6 percent, according to a poll conducted for the Augusta Chronicle released on Friday. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Ted Cruz, Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio and, if anyone's still interested, Ben Carson all think that Barack Obama should not be allowed to nominate a replacement for recently departed Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Instead, they believe that the "next president" should be the one to do so. This appears to be the collective position of the Republican party. Given that this same party also decided -- on the night he was inaugurated -- that they would seek to prevent Barack Obama from enacting any legislation whatsoever, we can at least say that they are consistent.

Anyway, I was intrigued by the Republican position on Supreme Court nominations, so I decided to take a look at our country's Constitution, to see what it says about the process. Specifically, I wanted to see what duties and responsibilities it assigned to the office that Senators Cruz and Rubio were talking about -- Mr. or Madam Next President. Here's what I found:

The only thing I did find on this matter was in Section 2:

[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law.

Nothing about this Next President guy or gal whatsoever. It seems--according to the Constitution--that we have only one president at a time. That person is Barack Obama. So, sorry, Republicans, he's the one who gets to nominate Justice Scalia's replacement.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot