iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Ian Somerhalder
 

The Extinction List: Who's Up Next in 2012?

Posted: 12/14/11 04:28 PM ET

As most of us already know, 2011 marked the devastating announcement that the Western Black Rhino -- one of Africa's most treasured species -- is now extinct. This new member of Club Extinction begs the question, "who will join the extinction list in 2012?" And, more importantly, "how can we stop this rapidly growing list?"

Elephants, tigers, rhinos, great apes, and marine turtles are all candidates for this gruesome list, but Congress has the power to stop that. The House of Representatives is currently stalling on a bill that would reauthorize funds to protect all of the aforementioned animals, a bill that has received strong bi-partisan support for over 14 years. This should be an easy choice.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Multinational Species Conservation Funds -- known in Congress as "H.R. 50" -- would not only save the few remaining members of these species but is vital for American trade, diplomacy, national security. H.R. 50 would conserve the shrinking wildlife habitats in Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America, reduce wildlife-farmer conflict to improve economic fortunes, and stop pelt and ivory poachers. But the benefits of these efforts go far beyond making sure these animals are around for our grandchildren to see.

Tigers, Asian elephants and other iconic species live in numerous countries that have significant economic and national security implications for the US. Natural resource conservation efforts in these emerging economies -- such as Vietnam, India, and Indonesia -- positively impact the financial sector by creating new jobs, providing a means for upward economic mobility, and preventing illegal goods from flooding the markets. Continued support for these economic gains benefits both U.S. trade and U.S. national security.

Additionally, the animals protected under H.R. 50 often provide the only common ground upon which the U.S. and other governments can relate. Eliminating these conservation funds would endanger the dialog and diplomacy that has been established through agreement over species protection. The US has had rocky relationships with many of these governments so any issue on which they can see eye-to-eye is vitally important for our national security.

National security and wildlife conservation aside, simply the size of these programs makes them poor cost-saving measures. For example, only $1.9 million a year is appropriated for the Asian Elephant Conservation Fund but will preserve the lives of this precious species. And, for every dollar spent by the U.S. government for these conservation funds between 2006 and 2010, the program raised two dollars in matching funds from private or international donors, making this a very sound investment of taxpayer dollars. Even eliminating the program altogether would only save $19 million over the next ten years: a mere drop in the bucket compared to our national debt of $15 trillion.

Furthermore, these savings would only be a one-time venture verses preserving the lives of millions of animals. In June, I traveled to Trinidad and Tobago and saw first-hand how protecting the existence of one species has a domino effect that positively impacts hundreds of other species, including humans. For example, the loss of the marine turtles leads to an explosion in the jellyfish population, which, in turn, kills lower-level food chain small fish like sardines. These fish serve as food for tuna and swordfish, large contributors to the human diet.

Upon my return to the US, I testified before a House Natural Resources Subcommittee, alongside Wildlife Conservation Society Executive Vice President for Conservation and Science Dr. John G. Robinson, to make this exact case to Chairman John Fleming of my home state of Louisiana. I write today to continue this push, and to urge congress to do their part in saving the world's most charismatic and iconic species by reauthorizing the Multinational Species Conservation Funds.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:45 PM on 02/08/2012
thank you Ian, for your consideration and fearlessness to advocate. we need more advocates in this world......I am an RN,,,and I work at advocating in my arena! It is an art that seems to be loosing it's ground, also.

please take care,

sylvie
08:16 PM on 12/16/2011
It is so sad how we have the power to stop this happening, yet we still persist in causing so much devastation to the world we should be protecting. Why do we think we should have any more rights than all the other animals we share the earth with?
We all need to stand together and ensure we can get this bill passed one way or another.
You are inspirational Ian - I think that is why you will make such a difference. People who had never before thought of these issues are now strong believers in the cases you present. You make people realise what is really important and for that we are truly grateful.
Please continue to open our eyes to what life is really about - standing together and trying to make a difference in the world, even if it is against all odds.
11:03 AM on 12/16/2011
Great article Ian. Its very important to protect all lives. And we could bring change only if everyone gives a hand. It is really painful to see all these animals and plants becoming extinct. I have seen the luxuriant biodiversity of India degrading and no help can be expected from the parliament people. Lets work together to make this better place for our other species friend.
04:21 AM on 12/16/2011
gr8 job Ian love your heart and how you are saving the world
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:47 AM on 12/16/2011
I don't understand how anyone can think any "one time expenditure" is going to save dozens of species of large mammals, unless it is a provision to sterilize 90% of the human race. And even that might not be enough. The reality is that there are too many people in the world. It cannot sustain 7 billion people and any other large species of land animals. A few whales might somehow manage to make it to the end of the century, but I doubt if any other large mammals will.

Say goodbye to tigers and lions and bears. Say goodbye to elephants and rhinos and hippos. Farewell gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans, antelope, zebras, and buffalo. And it's not just the wild animals who are in danger, though they will be the first to go. When the end came the Norse Greenlanders ate all their remaining cattle down to the hooves. Then they laid down and died.

What do you think is going to happen when the monsoons fail? When month after month goes by in India and Africa with no rain? The Hindus may not eat their cattle but drought can still kill them. In order to supply the ever-increasing demand for meat men are cutting down the rain forests to graze cattle. When the last of the trees are gone and the soil has washed away and the subsoil is hard as stone, what will grow? Nothing. Then all our domestic animals will die too.
05:41 PM on 12/15/2011
I have posted the ISF link on my personal FB and all of my business pages as well as quite a few of other peoples business pages - FB is a wonderful marketing tool and best of all its free and I think i am right in saying the most used social site. I wish there was more I could do. Good Luck and I was going to say Thank You for the work that you do, but I do believe that you don't think of it as work, as none of us should. ***** So come on people everyone who is reading these comments you can do your bit of spreading the word around the World, if you haven't done so already put the link to ISF on every social site you use, so your own personal FB, your personal Twitter account, maybe you belong to FB groups - post it on there, and if you don't belong to FB groups, maybe you should (hint hint). The more people that are know and are made aware, the more voices there are to be heard! Right I need a cuppa of tea now :-) xxxxx
05:41 PM on 12/15/2011
Continued..I really hope that the Bill gets published so these beautiful animals have the best chance they can get at survival. My final question is do opinions count? This is where my political knowledge now comes to a stop. For arguments sake if 70% of US Citizens signed a petition to pass this Bill and save the wildlife would the government have to be seen to do something? I am guessing not, as if it was as simple as that I am sure it would have been done by now, or is it that simple, but just not enough people actually care or people are ignorant and don't know whats going on. I believe that Education is partly to blame for ignorance but that would be going off on another tangent !!
I hope that your voice and the many thousands of voices that you reach will be heard. This Planet needs people like yourself to educate this generation and the next generation. I applaud your use of fame, popularity and celebrity status - so much better to educate, encourage, enthuse & inspire individuals to protect humanity. What a shame there are not more people out there like yourself, if there was, reaching people particularly with the power of internet would be so much easier. Just think if every actor/actress, pop star, musician, soap star, etc dedicated the amount of time that you do to posts, articles visits etc, the World would be a much richer place :-)
05:38 PM on 12/15/2011
continued.... I live in a Earthquake country, this year the most devastating was in Van. I know that many countries helped, that help is there without a second thought. Why are animals and wildlife treated as second class citizens in our World - if my history lesson memory serves me correctly, they were here before we was, infact whilst typing the story of Noah's Arch springs to mind when the animals were saved from the great flood - mmmm the days before politics I guess!
My other question is what are other governments around the World doing? Its certainly not big on the news in the UK or not that i have seen when I have caught up on the internet, I'm back there for 9 days on Monday so i will watch the news to find out. Its not big here in Turkey, although that is of no surprise, virtually nothing outside of Turkey is reported on the news unless its likely to affect Turkey! This is a Global issue and to be fair not just down to the US, these animals should matter to every single one of us, regardless of age or Nationality.
05:34 PM on 12/15/2011
Being a UK Citizen I am not so familiar with US political terms although I am trying hard to learn. Strangely enough since my move to Turkey in 2009 I have learnt more about the politics of the World from my Turkish friends than I had learnt in a lifetime back in the UK. What I have discovered is pretty much everything has a condition attached to it. Governments don't just 'give' money, 'loan' money or even 'invest' money - there has to be something in it for them. For a government to offer aid of any kind to another country they will want something in return and quite often their demands are greater than the help and usually its for something that the other country doesn't want to give. The wildlife that is in desperate need of help to survive resides in countries that tend to have poor relations with the Western World. My conclusion is that its not about the money its more about the negotiating tools - What does the US government want from these countries? Politics always goes deeper than what the eye can see. And the most damn annoying frustrating thing about it all, is that politics should have nothing to with it what so ever. When a Natural disaster happens every country helps and there have been many in recent years -to my way of thinking whats the difference, isn't extinction a Natural disaster?
04:03 PM on 12/15/2011
It would be much more beneficial to the protection of the biophysical world if well know actors as such did not promote utilitarian, anthropocentric and neoliberal approaches to conservation which only result in additional biodiversity loss and environmental degradation. 'Investment' approaches with their parallel structures seek to commoditise the earth's 'services' and complex social phenomena under the sway of neoliberal economics which only leads to the creation of new frontiers for capitalist expansion and accumulation with detrimental consequences to both the natural world and society. People with public impact, IF they uphold to the protection of the biophysical world, should not take lightly their statements and should seriously contemplate and research on what they are promoting!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gurinder Dhillon
Federal Reserve is as Federal as Federal Express
09:01 AM on 12/15/2011
The Republican party is on the extinction list for 2012.
08:54 AM on 12/15/2011
an incredible article. congratulations Ian if you read this comment. i like it so much and i am totally agree with you. Please carry on doing the work that you are doing for the planet. and please, don't repress your ideas because you've got very good ideas for the planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhnnxn
Won't say it face to face? Don't post it online!
05:46 AM on 12/15/2011
The surest way to prevent a species' extinction has absolutely nothibg to do with passing laws. It has to do with creating tasty recipes.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
11:18 AM on 12/15/2011
And providing sport hunting opportunities for the elite few who belong to the Safari Club like The Bushs', Cheney, Ridge, et al.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhnnxn
Won't say it face to face? Don't post it online!
12:07 PM on 12/15/2011
So what? If the species is in peril it needs to be made profitable in order to assure its survival. I own a beautiful pair of elephant hide boots that were made from elephants culled from the overpopulated herds of them that cause major damage in Africa. The money obtained is used to equip the rangers who protect the herds in reserves. How do you feel about that? I suppose you think that we should just give those folks money for free? If so, how about you start with your own?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
12:35 PM on 12/15/2011
Huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhnnxn
Won't say it face to face? Don't post it online!
01:35 PM on 12/15/2011
Do you anticipate the extinction of cows, chickens, pigs, sheep, ducks or goats any time soon?
04:15 AM on 12/15/2011
wow I love this special man He will save the world one task at a time.
04:15 AM on 12/15/2011
and you know what ? human being don't feel guilty to destroy everything.....!!!
Nice work Ian.