The swing toward Islamism in the Arab Spring is deeply disturbing for liberal Egyptian women who see the country's election captured by religious parties that could strangle women's rights.
First and second-round reports indicate a landslide to the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and the Salafist Nour Party, while the secular Facebook freedom fighters who triggered and personified the uprising were decimated.
These results are consistent with a Pew poll that showed 85 percent of Egyptian Muslims embraced Islam's influence in politics.
Regional elections are hindered by weak civil societies and non-representative electoral systems. The political landscape is also a battleground scarred with the competing ideologies of Arab nationalism, nascent democratic liberalism and Islamism, or political Islam, bolstered by decades of Iranian and petrodollar funding for export of radical ideology.
So far, the Arab Spring has not yielded reforms that promote women's rights. In Egypt, women were not invited to join a committee preparing amendments to the constitution, and many who rallied in Tahrir Square to celebrate International Women's Day in March were subjected by soldiers to humiliating "virginity tests". Recently, an Egyptian court ruled such tests were illegal.
In Tunisia, the most liberal Arab state before the uprising, Islamists protested violently against a ban on enrolments of veiled women in college and also against the "blasphemous" animated film Persepolis, previously shown at a 2008 Tunisian film festival without causing concern.
In October, Libya's National Transition Committee proclaimed its goal to institute discriminatory religious laws, including polygamy. The Islamist Justice and Development Party was recently elected in Morocco, and the main opposition Islamist group in Yemen could take power. Women's rights are also threatened in Afghanistan, where the drawdown of coalition troops could empower the Taliban. Muslim women who believe revolutionary change can reduce or abolish endemic patriarchy should be reminded that most regional uprisings have moved in a retrograde direction and betrayed women's rights.
During Algeria's war of independence from the French (1954-62), women fought together with men in the mountains and were led to believe they could expect full emancipation. However, most men did not support gender equality and many compatriot wives were later divorced in favor of younger, "more presentable" women in the city.
After an Islamist president was put forward in 1978, Islam was made the state religion. The constitution, which upheld equal gender rights, was suspended, and men rewrote inheritance and divorce laws in their own favor. Guardianship laws gave husbands and male relatives control over women and forbade them to travel without a chaperone. Women also became the main victims in the Algerian Civil War, after the Islamic Salvation Front won the first round of elections and the army cancelled the second round to prevent emergence of a theocratic state similar to Iran. In the ensuing civil conflict, about 200,000 lives were lost, the vast majority women and children. Kidnapping and gang rape were common, and unveiled women were deemed military targets.
In Iran, women across the political and religious spectrum joined with men to oust the Shah. The revolutionary government of Ruhollah Khomeini that took power in 1979 promised new freedom, but instead it established clerical rule and discriminatory laws, including religious family law, the mandatory hijab and removal of female judges. Iranian women believed discriminatory laws would be reformed when they elected president Mohammad Khatami in 1997, but they were sorely disappointed.
Although committed to human rights, the present U.S. administration has not assisted Egypt's Christian Orthodox Copts, who have faced ongoing persecution and violence. Islamist militants reportedly incited mobs, killing Copts and destroying churches. Nor has the U.S. supported Muslim women who are campaigning to reform gender discriminatory laws.
In contrast, they appear to favor the powerful Muslim Brotherhood, wishfully assuming the organization has moderated its Islamist ideology, or could possibly act as a bulwark against Iran. The transnational Brotherhood, which has endured persecution and restriction for decades, will tread cautiously, avoiding Islamist rhetoric to allay Western fears.
U.S. President Barack Obama's choices may be limited but his misreading of Islamist intentions could accelerate the religious extremism that is rapidly fading the Arab Spring's bloom.
Originally published in The Australian.
Follow Ida Lichter, M.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/IdaLichter
Daisy Khan and Fazeela Siddiqui: Training Afghani Imams to End Violence Against Women
dictators will fall and democracies will flourish in the middle east and in China. Countries in the west should stop meddling and just give these countries moral support. America role in the past has been to prop dictators and suppress democracy around the world.
instead of worrying about the arab spring, maybe americans should take a hard look at their policies towards Israel, and its devastating affect it has had on the palestinian people.
Ida Lichter, how about writing an article criticizing Israel, and detailing the plight of the palestinian people.
"to the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and the Salafist Nour Party"
shows a certain amount of anti-Islamic hysteria. MB's party has in it's platform embracing modern values and women's rights - why lump them in with the Salafist part? There is only one reason - to whip up more hysteria against anything that has the word "MUSLIM" in it.
jefferson expected that our nation could return to it as often as every few decades.
between the poverty, lack of education, lack of social justice and ongoing ethnic and religious violence that has marked many of the nations of the arab spring, only a fool would expect that perfected democracies were the natural result.
many will lose as much as has been gained.
but what it the alternate option? more nation building in lands where we are unwnated?
propping up another evil dictatorship?
the truth is, if we are just, and sensible, the part we will play will never be more than symbolic, and their democratic birth, if that birth comes at all, will be full of pain.
Jancis M. Andrews