More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ingrid Newkirk

Ingrid Newkirk

Posted: July 30, 2010 06:42 PM

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced that it wants to buy 3,000 dogs from breeders to increase its force of canines who sniff out explosives, cash and drugs. With thousands of homeless dogs who would make excellent candidates for the program languishing in animal shelters across our country, the DHS should follow the lead of the Hearing Ear Dog Program and many police departments and fill its ranks with dogs adopted from shelters and breed rescue groups.

Instead, it plans to pay breeders to produce yet more dogs -- and not just 3,000. As only 20 percent of dogs who are selected for service programs successfully complete the training process, this plan will actually result in another 15,000 dogs who have no hearth rug to lie on and no one to take them to the park.

Breeding more dogs for this program is like dumping more oil into the Gulf -- it will make an existing catastrophe even worse. Our country is facing a massive dog overpopulation crisis, with some 2 to 4 million dogs euthanized each year simply because there aren't enough homes for them. President Obama realized this when he incurred the wrath of every dog lover in the U.S. for considering purchasing a dog. Instead, he adopted Bo.

Statistics show that the "success rate" of service dogs adopted from animal shelters and rescue agencies is the same as that of dogs who are specifically bred for certification jobs. And shelters everywhere have the type of dogs that DHS is seeking: breeds such as Labrador retrievers, golden retrievers and German shepherds and dogs who are outgoing, alert, active and extremely people-friendly. As anyone who has volunteered in an animal shelter or adopted a dog can attest, purposely bred dogs don't corner the market on intelligence, eagerness to please and extreme devotion to their guardians.

Adopting homeless dogs would also save taxpayers thousands of dollars, since adoption fees are far lower than what breeders charge for puppies. The average price that DHS paid for the 322 untrained dogs it purchased between April 2006 and June 2007 was $4,535 per dog -- a cost that the department's inspector general called "reasonable"!

Working for DHS could be a golden opportunity for many homeless dogs, as long as they are trained humanely using positive reinforcement, live at home with their handlers during off-duty hours and are retired with their human guardians. Working at interesting tasks side-by-side with someone they like and who likes them is a far richer and more fulfilling life for dogs than being locked in a crate all day while their guardian is at work, for example.

If DHS can help improve homeland security, save taxpayer money and create an enormous amount of public goodwill by adopting homeless dogs, why not choose that option?

Ingrid E. Newkirk is the president and founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 1536 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036; www.PETA.org. Her latest book is The PETA Practical Guide to Animal Rights.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
09:25 PM on 08/18/2010
It may sound nice to have shelter animals used for homeland security/law enforcement purposes but it doesn't work. Police canines are specially trained from when they are puppies to work in a very stressful environment. It would be negligent for a police department to use any animal in which they don't know it's past; kind of like hiring an officer without checking it's background.

I've only owned dogs I've gotten from rescue groups, but when it comes to utilizing a canine for police work I think you should go to a breeder with proven success. BTW, the column mentioned that police departments have used shelter animals; I work in law enforcement and have NEVER heard of this being done. Which department is it?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ann-Pittsburgh
Life is short. Drink the good wine first.
06:09 PM on 08/14/2010
Dogs rescued from shelters are doing this work already with great success. It would be remarkable if our DHS didn't know already that there is no need to breed dogs for this work and that animal shelters abound with the necessary talent. According to one trainer of a rescued Lab who does search-and-rescue work, Labs are especially suited to scent-oriented work because they're highly energetic, have excellent noses and a great work ethic, and they're "willing to work for treats." If you know and love a Lab, the last attribute won't take you by surprise...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ragtag
09:21 AM on 08/05/2010
Wow, $4,535 per dog!

With a huge pool of pound puppies to choose from, it makes absolutely no sense that the feds would pay a breeder instead of giving some of these puppies a purpose and a shot at a better life.
01:25 PM on 08/04/2010
The solution is truly a no brainer...give shelter dogs first opportunity. This solution can go hand-in-hand with the prisoner/dog training program. Wow! A win-win-win situation!
04:33 PM on 08/02/2010
This makes so much practical sense, it's a wonder it wasn't thought of before. The solution to adopt dogs who desperately want out of the pound works for everyone, across the board: Homeland Security who could surely stand to save money, the soldiers who would benefit from the gratitude and devotion showed them by rescued dogs, and the dogs themselves who would otherwise have had miserable lives confined to cages in a pound or bound for euthenasia. Sometimes there IS a solution that works for all, and surely Newkirk's suggestion is one.
09:35 AM on 08/02/2010
With so many friendly, healthy, and intelligent dogs dying in our country's shelters for lack of homes, there is no reason to breed more dogs for any task. I hope that Homeland Security will save dogs' lives and taxpayers' money by adopting dogs from shelters instead of buying them from breeders!
06:14 PM on 08/01/2010
DISGUSTING.. Thank you Peta for the amazing amount of energy you're putting to the animal cause!
04:20 PM on 08/01/2010
Yes, homeland security should give homeless animals a break. Let them feel a sense of security -likely for the first time in their lives. Also, the shelter animals I have known are grateful animals and are eager to please.
03:09 PM on 08/01/2010
These dogs should definitely be adopted from shelters! It would be less expensive and would save 3,000 lives.
01:32 PM on 08/01/2010
What an absolute win-win situation! The dogs will have a "home" and a purpose. More dogs will not be purposely bred into a world that dumps them in shelters to be killed at a rate of over 2 million a year and taxpayers will be saved over $68 million. In a world that needs some stories with happy endings, this is indeed a solution that the Public and the Government should eagerly adopt

mary de La Valette
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
akrishn3
10:45 PM on 07/31/2010
Do you know a small puppy has a bigger carbon foot print than a mid sized SUV?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cmaciain
10:48 PM on 07/31/2010
That was actually a very flawed study. No, a dog doesn't have a bigger carbon footprint than an SUV.
01:42 AM on 08/01/2010
What's your footprint? Bigger than a puppy's?
09:37 PM on 07/31/2010
Of course this is a good idea, but it is not a fix. The explosion of unwanted pets is in part due to the economy. Breeders keep pumping out new breeds of dogs, and a lot of them go to unreliable owners, or homes that have no business owning a pet. Once the doge becomes to expensive, to big or hard to train they are dumped to whatever agency will take them or just dumped. Our local humane society has 25-30 at any one time and 90% are Pit of Pit Bull mix. They seem like a great idea at the time, but soon thinmgs change. Pets should be "fixed" once old enough. We have a rescued Greyhound and part of the adoption process was to have the dog neutered. Responsible pet owners get a dog for the love and companionship and not just as a stus symbol, or something to impresss others with.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:11 PM on 07/31/2010
I thought of adoption from a rescue -- but adopting is 150.00 minimum. That is absurd. You want a 12 yr old with more physical problems than you can handle and more psychological baggage than you can deal with -- $150.00. Everyone seems to be in it for profit, breeders and rescuers.
01:39 AM on 08/01/2010
You think it's cheaper to buy from a breeder?

And that $150 goes to help keep the shelters afloat. You think the shelters are funded by the animal fairy? Ever worked in a shelter? Give it a shot. That $150 will seem pretty damn cheap, when you see how those dollars are stretched to pay for veterinary care for abused and abandoned animals, rent, salaries, etc.

You think an animal's life isn't worth $150? How much did you spend on your frigging TV?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Suarez
Run for the hills
03:03 PM on 08/02/2010
The $150 fee is for neutering, vacinations and boarding. This is not an unreasonable amount to pay for an animal that will love you unconditionally and will be very thankful you saved its life. Buying from a breeder breeder does not guarantee problems will not occur. And by the way they do not only have 12 year old dogs with issues, animal shelters also have puppies/kittens, as well as animals of all age. Furthermore a dog from a breeder is going to cost way more than $150, and if you think $150 is too much to invest in a lifelong friend, then you should not even own a dog.
08:39 PM on 07/31/2010
She could resign!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ragtag
09:28 AM on 08/05/2010
Who should resign?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Suntio
Amat victoria curam.
04:31 PM on 07/31/2010
I have adopted a white dachshund with black spots from a breed rescue and couldn't be happier. Our new family member is extremely loving, loyal, and funny. We love her!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
akrishn3
10:45 PM on 07/31/2010
what is the carbon foot print?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Suntio
Amat victoria curam.
10:49 PM on 07/31/2010
Less than what it would be at the shelter since we already have the necessary space and pay the utilities.
04:17 PM on 07/31/2010
AGREE 100%
so many dogs and now they would have a job to go to!!!!
However, Napolatano probably won't use common sense.
I'll sign a petition.

Wasn't Bo bought at a breeders and returned because he also wasn't wanted?
Does not just happen to shelter dogs!!!
Have compassion, use shelter dogs!!!
12:11 AM on 08/02/2010
The whole "bo was returned" was a big show. Obviously, Obama couldn't say "no" to Kennedy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Suarez
Run for the hills
03:06 PM on 08/02/2010
Bo was given to the Obama's by Ed Kennedy. Bo is a portugese water dog, and is hypoallergenic. One of the daughters is allergic to dogs, I think. They did not give it back, as a matter of fact I saw a picture recently Bo playing with the girls in the White House.