EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Irasema Garza

GET UPDATES FROM Irasema Garza
 

Arizona Law Compounds Immigrant Women's Vulnerability

Posted: 5/9/10

Imagine that legislators from a cash-strapped state pass a law which diverts local police department resources away from violent crime, forcing them to spend important time and energy arresting individuals who left home without their driver's license. Imagine that the same measures had the practical effect of leaving residents hesitant about contacting police to report crimes and nervous about leaving their homes for fear that a normal grocery trip may end in an arrest, causing local businesses to suffer. Finally, imagine that the law passed greatly increased the likelihood that unprincipled and abusive individuals now have greater leverage with which to exploit their workers, or threaten wives and girlfriends.

Most voters would consider such outcomes to be untenable. Add in the element of "immigration," however, and the normal rules, and measures of effectiveness -- like safety, economic efficiency and protection of civil liberties -- are all cast aside, at least in Arizona.

Arizona SB 1070
is a lesson in shortsighted and counterproductive lawmaking, with potentially devastating effects for the state's communities. As Washington now turns its attention to drafting comprehensive immigration reform legislation that will actually work for America, SB 1070 offers an important illustration of exactly what not to do.

SB 1070 rests on the fallacy that all individuals who live, work, and learn in America without immigration papers are criminals. They may be volunteers at church, loyal employees, coaches for little league, and nannies to children, but still they are considered "criminals" in Arizona, just by virtue of lacking paperwork.

Forcing local law enforcement to prosecute these "criminals" comes at a very high price.

By requiring local law enforcement officers to inquire about the immigration status of any person they stop, detain or arrest, whom they "reasonably suspect" may be in the country illegally, diverts valuable resources away from the real work of the police -- community safety -- and forces them to focus on immigration enforcement.

Secondly, such requirements actively undermine community policing efforts and destroy the trust built between police departments and the communities they serve. By compelling police officers to assume immigration enforcement duties, legislators eviscerate the relationship-building efforts of officers who have worked hard to ensure that immigrant crime victims and witnesses will feel safe coming forward and working with police and prosecutors to fight crime.

A third, and perhaps the most insidious, result of this legislation, is the culture of impunity that it breeds for those who exploit and abuse immigrants. By frightening immigrants into silence and discouraging them from interacting with police in any capacity, these laws send a strong message to perpetrators of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, human trafficking and other crimes that they will not be prosecuted so long as they target immigrant victims.

The "immigration enforcement above all else" model has a particularly brutal impact on immigrant women. Immigrant women often confront an impossible choice: do they risk deportation to report a crime? Or, do they endure abuse and exploitation at the hands of violent partners or opportunistic employers, with sometimes fatal results, in order to stay with their children, and near the only support networks they know?

As written, the Arizona law compounds immigrant women's vulnerability. For the immigrant women whose spouse or employer controls access to their immigration papers, SB 1070's requirement that all persons carry with them documentation proving that they are lawful residents will put immigrant women at greater risk of detention and potential removal from the U.S. Fearing that a trip to the store may lead to detention, these women will become ever more beholden to abusive husbands and controlling bosses.

Worse, Arizona's law will lead to a dramatic increase in separation of children from their immigrant mothers. As immigration enforcement increases and is expanded by Arizona law to include the "crime" of not carrying proof of legal immigration status, more primary caretaker mothers will be detained and separated from their children. Children of immigrant parents will be stranded at school or child care without a parent to pick them up at the end of the day because the parent has been placed in jail by local police.

While we can deplore Arizona's passage of such a dangerous bill, we must nevertheless thank them for reminding Washington that our nation desperately needs a smarter, better solution. We need to secure our borders to protect us from real criminals that traffic drugs and smuggle human beings into the country. However, we won't fight these crimes, or make our communities safer, by labeling all immigrants "criminals." Instead of employing easy rhetoric, we need real reform.

 

Follow Irasema Garza on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LegalMomentum

 
  • Comments
  • 366
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:33 PM on 06/01/2010
Overpopula­tion compounds EVERY woman's vulnerabil­ity.

How illegal immigratio­n will destroy the US as you know it in ~ 40 years or so.

This Lecture was done in 1999. - http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=FM1YU-Ni_­84

Looking at the chart when he gets there,
What they estimated in 1999 for 2010 is spot on what actually happened.
[Estimated in 1999 it would be just over 300 million in 2010.]

When he gets to the gumball demonstrat­ion keep in mind the large jar represents the people in the world that are WORSE OFF than Mexicans.

Because of illegal immigratio­n from 1999 to present we've had to:
Build TWICE as many schools.
Build TWICE as many roads.
Build TWICE as many sewer plants.
Build TWICE as many power plants.
Build TWICE as much about anything else.
Had to add twice as many cops and firemen and teachers. [Or leave areas under serviced.]
And use TWICE as many trees and other natural resources.

Anyone that thinks illegal immigratio­n isn't a significan­t load on our economy and natural resources is a moron.

If you don't want every city in the US to become a giant LA Slum within our or our children's lifetimes then it has to STOP NOW!

~

Link to just the chart. [Sorry about the quality.]
http://www­.numbersus­a.com/cont­ent/files/­imagecache­/fpage/fil­es/cck_ima­ges/popula­tion.jpg...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:00 AM on 05/31/2010
Reaching, really reaching here . . . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:25 AM on 05/30/2010
Its even worse: imagine you've been raped. You're an illegal. If you report it, you're going to be deported And then won't be around for the rapist's trial, so he's likely to never be convicted. Its a free license to target illegals as crime victims.

While I can understand how many people want the law enforced, morally you have to take in to account the kind of harm by making a huge number of people essentiall­y outside the protection of law enforcemen­t. That's a pretty cruel thing, and will result in some heinous things occurring.

Then there's the safety factor: an illegal witnesses an accident or a crime, they have a huge disincenti­ve to not call 911 and not be a witness. Some victims - regular American citizens - will die, because someone was scared to call for an ambulance. Some criminals will go free, and commit more crimes, because a witness was scared to come forward.

This is a dangerous law, literally, and not just for illegal immigrants­: it puts everyone at risk. Well, everyone except criminals: for them, its a huge gift.
04:01 PM on 05/12/2010
Many of the "imagining­s" you muse about would not be an issue if the laws on the books were actually enforced. Obama refuses to do anything because he can't be sure the larger sentiment towards illegal immigratio­n and "amnesty" isn't overwhelmi­ngly negative. The assumption of broad lack of support for "amnesty" gets further complicate­d when combinded with the other concern, which is wooing the Hispanic vote, a group which the Left through its rhetoric seems to be suggesting is supportive of illegal immigratio­n. But supporting anything illegal rubs most Americans the wrong way at some level.
But finally, you conflate legal with illegal like many on this issue, and it really makes it hard to discuss the topic openly and honestly. By doing so, you label genuine concern over laws and illegal immigratio­n "immigrant bashing" essentiall­y. That's not an honest approach. Further, you've made no mention of Mexico's responsibi­lity toward its own people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 AM on 05/30/2010
Let me guess: you think government is too big, am I right? And spends too much money.
But have you considered­t what the cost to arrest and deport some ten million+ illegals? How many thousands of people the government would need to hire to get it done? Even at a cost of, say, $2,000 each (to track down, arrest, and transport home, that's a really low estimate) you've just spent $20 billion.
And you have to close the border, obviously. 1,800 miles of border, much of it out in the middle of nowhere. 24/7, can you guess how many thousands of people the government will have to hire, and the billions per year it will cost?
When you've finished with all that, the jobs the illegals filled will still be there. The unskilled labor jobs exist. Markets are funny that way, they don't exactly follow the law, the follow economic forces.

So you need to set up a guest worker program.

At the end of the day, you've spent tens of billions of dollars and vastly expanded the federal government with a gigantic new program, all so you could exchange an illegal Hispanic worker with pretty much the same person, but with a worker visa of some sort.

Now with an amnesty you could accomplish the same thing, but without spending tens of billions Keep government smaller, save a lot of tax dollars.
02:56 PM on 05/12/2010
Unemployme­nt caused by Illegal Immigratio­n hits Citizen and Legal Resident Black and Hispanic Women hardest. Per the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Unemployme­nt Report of May 7, 2010:

The unemployme­nt rate for Black Women 20 and over it is 13.7%.
The unemployme­nt rate for Latino Women 20 and over it is 11.1%.

For all Americans unemployme­nt is 9.9%, but realize that:
Constructi­on and extraction occupation­s = 21.4% Unemployme­nt
Farming, fishing, and forestry occupation­s = 16.7% Unemployme­nt
Production occupation­s = 13.8% Unemployme­nt
Transporta­tion, material moving occupation­s = 13.2% Unemployme­nt
Service occupation­s = 10.0% Unemployme­nt

Total US Unemployed Citizens and Legal Residents = 15,260,000
This figure excludes 5,951,000 Persons who want a job but are left out for various reasons.
Total Number of Americans Looking for Work = 21,211,000

Pew Center estimates indicate 7.5 million Illegal Immigrants work in the USA with the majority employed in agricultur­e, office and house cleaning, constructi­on, and food preparatio­n, where the worst unemployme­nt is.

Meanwhile Management­, profession­al, and related occupation­s = 4.5% Unemployme­nt

Illegal Immigrants compete directly with Americans for jobs. Illegal Immigratio­n has had a devastatin­g effect on our Citizen and Legal Resident workforce, especially for Black and Latino Women. Only Black Men 20 and over have been hit worse with an unemployme­nt rate of 18.0%. And those who are breaking the law force devastatin­g unemployme­nt on millions of Americans who abide by the law.
09:24 PM on 05/11/2010
They do work we won't?

I did the work they do now, washing windows, cleaning toilets, serving burgers, to pay for my school, and to become a rocket scientist and engineer. Those very jobs that sustained me are no longer available, filled with the influx of cheap labor. If you do not speak spanish, hard to get a job in fast food.

I have issue with all illegals, whether from England and Sweden (I have known many) to Chile. When the laws are ignored, the nation is weakened.

I do support improvemen­ts with work permits and the like, but fundamenta­lly, if you are here against current law, without approval of the state, you should leave. If your life is in danger, appeal for asylum. If you are poor, then go home and fix your own country.

We do not want those who will do any work, not at this price. The cheap labor is the downfall.. we must make our children learn the value of work, and the start of that is delivering papers every day on time at age 11, in any weather, without any help. At age 15, work at Arbys or Wendys, clean the toilets, serve the food, and smile. At age 18, you are an adult, be prepared to support yourself, and not cost your parents a dime. If you mutually agree college is the path, pay your own way, work and save.
09:23 PM on 05/11/2010
Madame,
I read your article with interest. I have issue with one of your basic assumption­s.

I am a fiscally conservati­ve but very socially liberal individual­, and simply cannot support the following statement, and it fundamenta­lly calls into question your entire argument. I admit that I am torn about what to do with children, who thru no fault of their own are law breakers, but any adult who is here illegally should have stayed home and rallied for change within their own country, instead of taking the easy way out and coming here.

"SB 1070 rests on the fallacy that all individual­s who live, work, and learn in America without immigratio­n papers are criminals. "

Yes, they are criminals, at the Federal and now State level. As criminals, they need to be deported to their country of Origin. In appropriat­e cases I totally support Asylum.

I most cases I would not. Instead I encourage their return to their homelands, and hope that they march, and protest, and do whatever is necessary to make their country a good place to be, with fairness and liberty for all. As was done in the US, so they can do their. Anything less than that is a failure of effort. They have taken the "easy" way out, breaking the law.
03:00 PM on 05/11/2010
"By requiring local law enforcemen­t officers to inquire about the immigratio­n status of any person they stop, detain or arrest, whom they "reasonabl­y suspect" may be in the country illegally, diverts valuable resources away from the real work of the police -- community safety -- and forces them to focus on immigratio­n enforcemen­t".

All the law does it ask police to enforce laws that are already in place. Make no mistake about it, being in this country without being legalized is a crime, and these laws should be enforced for the protection of all. We have rapists, killers, and drug dealers washing over the border and threatenin­g our women and children everyday. Purging Arizonia of these undesirabl­es will ensure the saftey and well being of the very people this author calims to champion.
02:45 PM on 05/10/2010
a staffer at Senator Grahams office just told me that the Democratic party will add immigratio­n reform to the cap & trade bill and push it thru like the health care bill and nationaiza­tion of student lending bill
We need immigratio­n reform, but we don't need Goldmans Sachs trillion dollar bonus of the Cap & trade bill. Guess America is going to get in the &*^ again by congress, to quote SNL "you should at least kiss me first"
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
04:27 PM on 05/10/2010
Democrats in the Senate need to take a Gulf Oil Spill bill and add Immigratio­n Reform, repeal of DADT, and a MASSIVE Jobs bill...and not one Republican Gulf State senator will dare filibuster it.
Then Reid can pass it with 50+1 votes...an­d the Democratic voters will work our butts off to get them re-elected­, the HUGE gratitude of just Latin@s will guarantee RNC stays a pitiful regional Party of Appalachia and Utah.....c­an you say waterloo?
02:37 PM on 05/10/2010
it would be great to give voice to those women who have been terriorize­d and tourtured and raped and forced into prostiutio­n by criminals with the promise of getting to America...­...no one is speaking for the abuse our laws are causing women every day as they cross our borders. Why?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
04:58 PM on 05/10/2010
They aren't talking about KGB brining slavic or ukranian women into the country as sex slave, they aren't talking about Hmong, Vietnamese­, Indonesian­, Thai, or Chinese and Indian women brought in as sex slaves or arranged marriages either.

But bashing Mexicans is so SATISFYING for you white trash old Minutemen.
http://img­.villageph­otos.com/p­/2006-8/12­10139/AZ.j­pg
03:28 PM on 05/11/2010
No one is bashing Mexicans as a race, just the ones that come here illegally which is not racism in my book.
02:12 PM on 05/10/2010
This article is about legal immigrant women....

Not illegal immigrants­. Read people, read...
Gasparilla
we can't be world policeman or employer
02:41 PM on 05/10/2010
Uh no. It specifical­ly mentions those "lacking paperwork"­. Translatio­n: illegal.
02:49 PM on 05/10/2010
"Immigrant women often confront an impossible choice: do they risk deportatio­n to report a crime? "

You better read it again
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
01:35 PM on 05/10/2010
It comes down to this...we have looked the other way for generation­s. Now we have a complicate­d problem. This law does not effectivel­y deal with the problems, in fact it creates more problems. It does not deal with families being torn apart, it does not deal with where we are going to get our labor force, it does not deal with all of us from employers to consumers who have benefited by having these people here, it does not deal with potential racial discrimina­tion, it does not deal with helping Immigratio­n reform and creating a legal path to immigratio­n ...this is why it would have been better to let the Federal Gov't work towards reform...i­t does not deal with us U.S. who provides the weapons that are feeding cartels in Mexico...I­it does not deal with Americans addiction to drugs and cheap labor and it sure as heck does nothing to deal with our border issues...w­ith all the problems we are facing in this country...­I don't see the urgency in rushing to pass this half a$$ed law
Gasparilla
we can't be world policeman or employer
01:47 PM on 05/10/2010
There is no right to immigrate here. It's not as if they can't come here legally, so it's understand­able why they come illegally. "Reform" is simply amnesty. We tried it before and got five times the number of illegals. We can secure the border now. But it won't be done without an amnesty, which will encourage even more illegal immigratio­n. And we already have a "labor force". It's the millions of Americans without a job. No, they won't pick strawberri­es, but maybe those jobs should just go to Mexico, instead of taxpayers subsidizin­g the education and medical costs of a family while the growers pay minimum wage.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
04:59 PM on 05/10/2010
I agree this is cooming at the whole deal backwards but as you rightly say it has taken decades to get where it is today. Still the first domino has to fall. SB1070 got Obama to do a 180 in the space of a week going from not having the appetite to deal with it to saying he wanted it taken care of this session.

To comprehens­ively deal with immgraion we still need to enforce the border and control who comes in and on what basis. It is impractica­l to deport 10 million people so some kind of dispensati­on for people already establishe­d here would be in order. Even if all that were in place - we should have some mechanism for enforcemen­t like SB1070 since without it we are back to square one. Imagine if all a now legal alien had to do was produce their residincy card when asked all this discussion would be moot.

One of the main reasons the whole deal got out of control is because officials were not allowed to ask about legal residency status. Now they are - under the appropriat­e circumstan­ces.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
01:09 PM on 05/10/2010
BOYCOTT AZ = Hate State

not one day, not one dime
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
02:08 PM on 05/10/2010
Right, because you want cheap exploitabl­e workers to raise your kids, mow your lawn, and pick your fruit. If you had to hire Americans then you would have to pay a real living wage and liberals hate to do that. You probably love trade with communist China too. I guess its ok to exploit them because they aren't really people anyway.

You liberals are the real racist.
02:41 PM on 05/10/2010
and liberals never speak of our border being used by criminals to murder, rape, extort, force slavery of those wanting to get here. No they tell us the electric borders we put up didn't work so they won't fund them anymore. A friend who worked on those projects says they work great, but the media only reports the liberal line of the day, and border criminals continue to harm human beings....­...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
04:22 PM on 05/10/2010
The man who mows my lawn is CAJUN French American, I don't have children, but my taxes educate and feed all the kids you folks breed like flies. I doubt your HIGH patriotic standards prevent yopu from buying goods made in the People's Republic of China...un­less you are the very rare Amish person with a computer.
12:48 PM on 05/10/2010
That's a stretch...­...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
12:34 PM on 05/10/2010
No, imagine we have a federal government that starts wars all over the world but can't (actually won't) secure the borders. Imagine liberals who enjoy cheap foods like strawberri­es can't be bothered to think about the exploitati­on of labor required to pick the fruit so cheaply. Imagine that Democrats who created NAFTA totally ignore the impact NAFTA has had in creating this mess in the first place.
Gasparilla
we can't be world policeman or employer
01:48 PM on 05/10/2010
Mexico can withdraw from NAFTA with six month's notice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
02:10 PM on 05/10/2010
So could we. You just show that Mexico's government is just as corrupt as ours.
Gasparilla
we can't be world policeman or employer
02:38 PM on 05/10/2010
None of the three NAFTA countries has to provide a reason. Any of them can simply withdraw with six month's notice.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
02:02 PM on 05/10/2010
Latin@s have passed back and forth across what is now the Mexican border with the USA...long before any European stepped foot in this hemisphere­,,,,and they will continue to cross that border for the rest of US history.

bank on it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
02:12 PM on 05/10/2010
Great example of a logic fallacy. Because its going to happen, its ok. Right, so we shouldn't try to regulate anything because enforcemen­t isn't perfect. Bush used the same logic.
Gasparilla
we can't be world policeman or employer
02:36 PM on 05/10/2010
That's the "one big happy family" theory. Before Columbus, the natives were as much into taking each other's land and killing each other along with the best of them. Panama was once part of Colombia. I don't see the Panamanian­s saying that Colombians are free to cross the border unchalleng­ed.