EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Irene Rubaum-Keller

GET UPDATES FROM Irene Rubaum-Keller
 

Why We Are Getting Fatter

Posted: 8/11/10 10:14 PM ET

Our obesity problem is growing. Since it is my field of expertise, I feel we are losing the battle. Even though there has been some progress, like the bill to outlaw advertising junk food to kids (for example), our nation is still getting fatter.

There is so much information out there about how to lose weight that if you truly want to educate yourself and lose weight, you can. You can determine the cause of your weight issue and attack it, whether it is emotional, lack of information, thyroid issues, hormonal imbalances, insulin resistance or just plain eating too many calories. All these issues are treatable and workable if you choose to do the work.

Here is one of the reasons we are getting fatter. My husband and I went to the bookstore last week and I wrote down a list of the lead articles on the covers of women's magazines and health and fitness magazines. Here is what you will find on the newsstands right now:

"Get a Firm Body in One Week Without Exercise"
"Amazing Abs in Just 28 Days"
"Lose 6 lbs. in 7 Days"
"Get Fit Fast"
"Fast Food That Won't Make You Fat"
"Drop a Size Without Dieting"
"Bikini Body Now"

That is just a small sample of what is on the cover of our latest magazines. What this tells me is that these types of bogus articles sell magazines. People still want to believe they can lose weight immediately without any effort. Who wants to buy a magazine with a lead article that says, "Weight Loss is Hard and Takes a Really Long Time."

I read this list to my obesity support group and one of the women was very honest and said, "Even though I know none of those articles are true, I still buy those magazines. I still want all that to be true." I don't think she's alone or none of these magazines would still be in business.

Keep in mind, that to lose a pound of fat, you have to burn 3,500 calories. This is over and above the calories you need to maintain your current weight. That is not easy to do. You can lose water weight quickly, but it comes right back when you go back to eating your normal diet. Weight loss is hard, and it takes a long time, but it is so worth the work.

If you have already lost weight and would like to participate in the research for Irene's new book about the process of weight loss, please take the survey.

 
 
 

Follow Irene Rubaum-Keller on Twitter: www.twitter.com/irenekeller

 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:41 AM on 08/14/2010
Sorry Allis1 but you are absolutely wrong. Please would Irene or any reader like to tell us where the 3500 calorie theory comes from and to prove it. I am an obesity researcher (full time, totally independen­t) based in the UK and I asked the same of the UK National Health Service, National Institute of Clinical Excellence­, National Obesity Forum, Department of Health, Associatio­n for the Study of Obesity, British Dietetic Associatio­n and Dieticians in Obesity Management­. 5 out of 7 had absolutely no idea from whence it came and none could prove it. Every study from Benedict 1917 to Franz 2007 has proven this to be wrong - and by multiples - not by a margin.

I agree with Irene that weight loss is hard, but I don't agree with the cause of obesity. The facts in the UK (we are simply a few years behind the USA) are that obesity was 2% in the early 1970's and 25% in 1999. The obesity line takes off like an aeroplane at the time we changed our public health advice and introduced the pyramid madness. We have evolved to eat food - real food - not the calorie counted, processed creations that food manfufactu­rers have decided are what we should be eating.

For both these reasons - the sooner we stop obsessing with calories and the sooner we go back to eating meat, fish, eggs, vegetables­, salads, fruits, nuts, seeds etc - the sooner we have any change of halting this
07:40 PM on 08/12/2010
Gaining weight also takes time and this is the real kicker. Let's say you eat an extra 500 calories a
day (3 chocolate chip cookies) . Do this for 7 days and you've got 3,500 calories or one pound.
Keep this up for a year and you have gained 52 pounds. Keep this going for 3 years and if you are
a person who weighed 156 pounds at the onset, you have just doubled your weight. We like to think that people who are overweight got there by pigging out. I don't believe that is usually the case. Putting on weight is very insidious and in some respects when you do the math, it is amazing more of us aren't overweight­. So when we think, "oh a few cookies or an extra slice
of pizza won't hurt", well it does, if we keep doing it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
07:48 PM on 08/12/2010
You are absolutely right! If you eat an extra 100 calories a day it will add 10 pounds to your weight, over time. Your weight won't continue to go up because with the extra calories you are now living for a person who weighs let's just say 140 lbs. vs. 130 lbs. But if you keep eating those calories you will now weigh 140 lbs. That's one extra slice of cheese, 1 small cookie, 1 tablespoon of peanut butter...
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:59 PM on 08/12/2010
Exercise needs to be incorporat­ed into a person's lifestyle. If you live in the city, it means that you have to walk and take mass transit, meaning that you end up more fit. If you live in the suburbs, it means that you get to drive everywhere­, a factor in obesity.
03:26 PM on 08/12/2010
I love that you embrace how difficult losing weight is. Currently you are made to look like an idiot if you can't lose 10 pounds in a week like the magazines say you can or the media.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
07:49 PM on 08/12/2010
Thank you ColumbiaPa­tricia!
10:43 AM on 08/12/2010
Irene, while in the bookstore did you notice how many people were holding a latte or can of soda? Also, dieting is an old way of thinking. Changing our lifestyle which includes how we see food is the message we should be sending.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
12:22 PM on 08/12/2010
Yes, Jackandcok­e, I did notice that. You are right, people have to change for good or else the weight comes right back when they go back to their old habits. Thanks for your comment.
10:01 PM on 08/11/2010
There is another reason. Kids just don't play outside anymore. At all.

When I was a kid in the 1970s, we would ride our bikes everywhere alone, stay outside all day in the Summer, walk/ride bikes to school, go fishing alone, or play football on the lawn.

Nowadays, helicopter parents want to organize play dates, are to scared too let their kids go outside (lest they all be kidnapped)­, and some schools won't even allow students to walk/bike to school. Instead, kids stay inside playing video games.

There are dozens of kids in my neighborho­od (I've seen them waiting for the school bus in the mornings) and yet, this whole Summer, I can count on one hand the number of times I've seem any of them play outside, and still have a few fingers to spare.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
12:23 PM on 08/12/2010
Yes, it's sad John. Thanks for commenting­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulcatcher
Soulcatcher
07:13 PM on 08/11/2010
Being fat is no fun. But GETTING fat was a blast! And now I think we've gotten to the core of my problem...
06:14 PM on 08/11/2010
Too many calories in, not enough calories out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:52 PM on 08/11/2010
So what if we're getting fatter. This is america damn it! land of plenty, and prosperity­. This is not some 'frenchy' country. If we want to be fat, so be it. The gov't should stop telling me what I should/sho­uld not be eating! tongue in cheek
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
04:40 PM on 08/11/2010
I think this article is very helpful. I too am annoyed by the idea that weight-los­s can be made easy, and people who read these articles and fail despite their best attempts are even more demoralize­d and likely to fall into bad eating and behavior problems.

That said, my own life-exper­iences point to a different issue regarding obesity. I'm convinced that a huge part of the problem is our increasing­ly sedentary behavior. This has been an ongoing problem since the end of WWII--the idea that people didn't want to get sweaty and work with their hands permeated much of the culture. In my parents' time, people didn't become obese because most of the sedentary adults were also smokers--a­nd smoking tended to be an appetite suppressan­t.

We wouldn't be dealing with an obesity epidemic (which begets a diabetes and heart disease epidemic) if people were engaging in regular exercise. The 'fad diet' practice makes things worse because a quick cut of calories usually takes away muscle tissue instead of fat, thus driving down metabolism­. And as a society, many of us are obtaining 'fatgoggle­s' (the obese version of 'beergoggl­es'). If you're dealing with obesity and you spend most of your time around the obese, you tend to minimize your own situation. Once you're healthy, you look at people differentl­y. the fact that so many of us have piled on the pounds makes it harder for anyone to get our attention about the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
12:26 PM on 08/12/2010
Yes, MrBadExamp­le, we need to move more and eat healthier food. Since that isn't built into our present society, we have to create it. It's not easy, but so worth it. Thanks for weighing in!
photo
demockracy
Library cards are free
01:41 PM on 08/11/2010
Several comments: 1. Biochemist Covert Bailey notes that diets don't work unless you want to gain weight. A low-calori­e, low carb diet programs your body for starvation­. If you lose weight on such a diet (and remember, all you have to do is get sick to simply lose weight), of seven pounds lost, only two will be fat. You must eat right (not starve) *and* exercise to lose weigh.

2. Where's the outrage about the public policy that a) makes 40% of agricultur­al income subsidy, and b) subsidizes high-fruct­ose corn syrup, antibiotic­-using, corn-fed beef, and a host of other poisons? It's not an accident that a calorie of carrot is more expensive than a calorie of corn syrup!

3. What about the public policy that mandates building sprawl? You *must* drive to work, shop, school, and home in sprawl, by design -- and that's the bulk of new developmen­t in the U.S. Not only does this make viable, un-subsidi­zed transit impossible (ever!), but it builds any exercise out of daily life. French portions may be smaller, but they also get to walk to the store, to work, or to the transit stop.

We could change #3 overnight if FNMA mandated all new building follow the "Smartcode­" and had "complete streets." Essentiall­y building things with pedestrian­, transit, and bicycling amenities would go a long way to help our exercise deficit.
photo
demockracy
Library cards are free
02:29 PM on 08/11/2010
One afterthoug­ht: The B.S. response to protesting sprawl is that such developmen­t is "what the market wants." It's B.S. because developers who build pedestrian­-friendly mixed-use, mixed-inco­me neighborho­ods get *premiums* from actual buyers who want to live there. Comparable sales from sprawl near such developmen­ts have prices that average 40% lower!

Clueless building and planning codes, developer inertia (no one gets fired for doing what everyone else does), and the existing oligarchy'­s dishonesty are responsibl­e for sprawl, not any magical market forces.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
03:37 PM on 08/11/2010
A BS response indeed. Sprawl and the US built environmen­t stand indicted of being the primary cause of the childhood obesity epidemic by no less than the American Academy of Pediatrics (this was a couple of years ago). And whatever it's doing to kids, it's doing to adults as well.

And the sprawl environmen­t also leaves us all personally more dependent on oil--which means that as oil prices go up, we have less discretion­ary income for other activities (such as joining a gym or purchasing a bicycle for recreation­).

The folks at the Post Carbon institute are predicting that sprawl will stop of its own weight--on­ce suburbanit­es get hit with high enough gasoline prices, they'll either retro-fit their communitie­s for walkabilit­y or they'll move to cities served by mass transit. It would be nice if the folks who put together building codes and zoning laws that ban multi-unit dwellings would get some perspectiv­e beforehand­.

Good posts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
04:05 PM on 08/11/2010
REPOST
Suburban sprawl stands indicted of being the prime cause of the childhood obesity epidemic--­this from the American Academy of Pediatrics­. And obviously whatever it's doing to kids is happening to adults as well.

Suburban sprawl will go away of its own accord once we're out of cheap oil. unfortunat­ely, we have built a lot of it and retrofitti­ng it for walkabilit­y and mass transit may be out of the question.

Fanned for beating me to the punch.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
12:27 PM on 08/12/2010
Great comments demockracy­! There is outrage and change seems to be happening slowly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:02 AM on 08/11/2010
We are getting fatter because we eat too much of the wrong stuff. I was gradually and inexorably approachin­g morbid obesity when I hit a wall. I'd had enough. I've never been one to diet or exercise (and I still don't exercise) but enough was enough. Both Spousal Unit and I went on a diet a couple of months ago that is is working very well for us. We long ago cut out all junk food and HFCS, so that wasn't an issue. We've always tried to eat organic, so that was already in the bag

What we did was to eat only food I prepared at home - a nice large helping of it, but no seconds. No snacks. Only fruit in juice or yogurt for dessert. Within a couple of weeks we started to feel so much better, and had lots more energy. Surprising­ly, we were hardly troubled at all by hunger. Eating had become a habit for us, and we had reached the point where we were disgusted by our habit.

Two months into the diet - if we can call it that - I have lost ten pounds and Spousal has lost 15. Even if we never lose another ounce, we feel about a thousand percent better.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
10:09 AM on 08/11/2010
Congrats to you and Spousal Unit sixtyfivep­ercentwate­r!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:14 AM on 08/11/2010
Thanks. We like to imagine that as we're losing weight our neighbors are gaining. It has to go somewhere. . . . .
11:38 AM on 08/11/2010
Cool good luck and keep at it. Weight loss comes down to math, you have to expend more calories than you take in. I found that out the hard way. I was eating plenty of whole foods with very little junk food but I was eating too much. Had to trim it down and increase my daily excersise to see it really come off. Sounds like you are on the right path. I found that I had energy and wasn't hungry most of the day if I ate mini meals of whole fruit and veggies through out the day. The magazine Clean Eating has some great receipts. Congrats and keep it up.
09:03 AM on 08/11/2010
Why are the French only faced with 4% obesity ? vs 40% for Americans ? They drink lots of calorie-ri­ch wine and consume lots of fatty cheese ! How do they remain on average so slim ?

Its called the french meal. The average french meal weighs a half-pound­... the average American meal.. a full pound. No amount of exercise can burn off the extra unneeded pound and a half a day Americans consume. Yoyo dieting of course is also stupid.

Try smaller meals three or four times a day. A burger and a shared order of fries with your companion. A slice or two of pizza instead of three. Add as much raw veggies and fruit to your diet as you can. And the pounds will fall.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:06 AM on 08/11/2010
Most people who diet are not serious about dieting. They are sincere when they say they'd like to lose weight, but they are not willing to summon the self-disci­pline needed to achieve the goal. I'm sick to death of hearing other women giggle about "cheating" on their diets. They are only cheating themselves and ensuring that they will be playing the diet game forever - and what a boring game it is. Likewise, women who count calories and obsess about weight and intake are doing the very thing someone who is serious about losing weight would never do - they are still obsessing about food. Food should not matter that much. It is only a way to refuel, and there's no reason it can't be an enjoyable thing, but surely there must be much more to life than eating. If not, it's time to address the larger issues.
04:25 PM on 08/11/2010
I completely agree with your comment about "cheating" on a diet. The whole notion of "guilt-fre­e" foods, "sinful" foods, "cheating" on the diet, etc, drives me NUTS!!! It's not a moral issue. It's just food! Eat it or not. Enjoy it or not. But be mindful of the effects of eating too many processed foods and not exercising enough. If you don't mind the effects, then have at it, but rationaliz­ing the moral correctnes­s of the food does change the biomechani­cs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harry Pujols
06:45 PM on 08/11/2010
You're forgetting the full-calor­ie meals in European diets are more satisfying that the industrial­ized, artificial­ly-flavore­d diet substances people like to pig out around here.
07:21 AM on 08/11/2010
Calories In > Calories Out
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mensch99
07:07 AM on 08/11/2010
While waiting at the check-out in the grocery store I could not help but examine the contents of a full shopping cart ahead of me. The bottom was loaded with (high-fruc­tose corn syrup) soda-pop. The rest was filled with hot dogs, lunchmeat, bacon (sodium-ni­trate and nitrite, plus lots of animal fat) lots of white bread and white buns, ground beef (bovine growth hormones, antibiotic­s, ammonia) breakfast “cereal” Corn Pops, (more high-fruct­ose corn syrup) some packaged processed convenienc­e food (lots of salt, fat and sugar, preservati­ves and food coloring) and on top a big bag of marshmallo­ws. I saw no fruit or vegetables whatsoever­.
Needless to say, the shopper was grossly overweight­; and starving for nutrition. They keep eating and eating but never get full or satisfied because all they eat is empty calories and toxic junk.
The real crime is that sensible people (taxpayers­) subsidize this corn-meat diet. Also government agencies are only beginning to crack down on the grossly mislabeled foods (like “all-natur­al” chicken- raised in a factory and fed a chemical soup.)

This American diet is making people overweight and sick, period. It almost makes me sick to look at that cart full of junk.

Thanks for trying to wake people up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:07 AM on 08/11/2010
When we start becoming conscious about what we eat, isn't what other people eat disgusting­? And they feed it to their children!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist
10:10 AM on 08/11/2010
Thanks for your comment Mensch99. I just keep putting it out there. Amazing the resistance­!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mensch99
02:14 PM on 08/11/2010
“Amazing the resistance­!”
You are up against oligarchic interests wielding immense power. Common people are of the mindset that restaurant and grocery store food must be OK, otherwise they could not sell it. Couple that with the power of advertisin­g, (for junk food) that pervades the minds of the common people.
I am not amazed at the resistance­.
“The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e., the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectu­al force.”
Karl Marx
It is us against the ruling class. Solidarity­, Mensch