NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
J.A. Konrath

GET UPDATES FROM J.A. Konrath
 

eBooks And The Ease Of Self-Publishing

Posted: 10/16/10 11:29 AM ET

October 19th is the release date for "Draculas," a horror novel that I wrote with Blake Crouch, Jeff Strand, and F. Paul Wilson. How four guys were able to collaborate on a single narrative is an interesting story, but not as interesting as the way "Draculas" is being released.

Though together we have over sixty years of experience in the print industry and have worked with dozens of publishers, we've decided to make "Draculas" a Kindle exclusive. Not only that, but we're publishing it ourselves.

The choice to circumvent Big New York Publishing was easy. We all have print deals, and probably could have sold this project to a major publishing house, but the reasons to go the indie route instead of the traditional one were numerous.

First was an issue of time. We wanted "Draculas" to launch before Halloween, but we'd only finished writing and editing the novel in September. There was no possible way a major publisher could go from first draft to live within three weeks. But we did.

With Amazon's assistance, we were able to put up a pre-order page and a free teaser last month, though we'd only written the first few chapters by that point. Like a traditionally published book, this allowed us to build buzz and accrue some advance sales.

Based on some of my experiments on Kindle, we're pricing "Draculas" at $2.99--something no Big Publisher has done for a new release (except for AmazonEncore, who is releasing my thriller novel "Shaken" next week at that price point.) We're also releasing it without DRM (digital rights management), which is another thing no publisher will allow (except for AmazonEncore.)

"Draculas" will be exclusive on Kindle for a year, as a favor to Amazon since they've been so helpful. But those with other brands of ereaders will be able to buy "Draculas" from Amazon and convert it to the format of their choice with free ebook software like Calibre or Stanza. We have instructions for doing this on our website, www.draculasthebook.com. We also plan on doing a print release later in the year, using Amazon's CreateSpace.

Since professionalism is essential, we hired a cover artist and an ebook formatter. A publisher providing these services takes 52.5% of an ebook's cover price, and the retailer gets 30% through the agency model. That leaves only 17.5% for the author. By absorbing these sunk costs ourselves, we're able to earn the full 70% royalties and not have to share them with anyone. Though we're splitting the profits four ways, we're each earning only slightly less per copy sold (51 cents each) than we would on one of our own paperback books (64 cents each), and still only charging the reader $2.99.

Of course, a publisher provides more services than cover art and formatting. For one thing, they edit. But among the four of us we've written over eighty novels, and we were able to edit each other and do our own copyediting with relative ease. What we missed, our beta readers caught.

Publishers also do promotion and marketing, though I haven't seen much of this for ebooks. Drawing on our fan bases, we sent out 260 advance reading copies of "Draculas." Come October 19, if only half of them come through for us, we'll launch our ebook with over a hundred reviews on Amazon.com, Goodreads.com, and dozens of blogs. We're also doing some niche advertising, and our combined newsletters reach over twenty thousand readers.

"Draculas" includes many bonus extras, which could only be done with a digital version. The more pages a paper book has, the more it costs to print and deliver. Ebooks have no such restrictions. So besides the 80,000 word novel, readers who buy "Draculas" will also get another 80,000 words of supplemental features, including interviews, deleted scenes, alternate endings, short stories, excerpts, and an exclusive, behind-the-scenes look at the writing of "Draculas" delivered through a collection of over seven hundred emails between the writers while we were brainstorming and writing the book.

Putting this project together was an exercise in speed and simplicity. We did the majority of the writing and the marketing within an eight week timeframe, while we were each working on other projects. By releasing it ourselves, we were able to maintain full control over the entire process, set our own price, eliminate DRM (which readers hate) and earn four times the royalty rate we would have through a publisher. By going ebook-only, we could add a bunch of fun supplements for no extra cost, while also releasing it super-fast.

Is this the future of publishing? Are publishers still needed in an ebook world when authors can do it on their own?

We'll see. We own all the rights to "Draculas," so any subsidiary rights are 100% ours to exploit. My agent has already sold audio rights to thirteen of my self-published books, and film rights to one of them, and the burgeoning foreign and translation markets for ebooks will no doubt become lucrative as the market expands worldwide.

Because we self-published "Draculas," we control the rights. Not just for now, but forever.

Forever is a very long time. Authors need to decide if they want to keep forever to themselves, or share forever with a publisher who takes over half the cover price.

 
 
 
October 19th is the release date for "Draculas," a horror novel that I wrote with Blake Crouch, Jeff Strand, and F. Paul Wilson. How four guys were able to collaborate on a single narrative is an inte...
October 19th is the release date for "Draculas," a horror novel that I wrote with Blake Crouch, Jeff Strand, and F. Paul Wilson. How four guys were able to collaborate on a single narrative is an inte...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 179
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:33 PM on 10/21/2010
Draculas is currently #52 on the Top 100 Kindle Paid Bestseller List.
03:12 PM on 10/21/2010
IThere's no reason to justify either self-publishing or the fact that Kindle can't reach every reader. Until fairly recently, self-publishing was an accepted way for an author to get his books before the public, but it became less viable when mass-production improved to better serve the world's readership. Kindle has changed that. Now Barnes & Noble, Smashwords and others are doing more of the same because they reach readers in a way that's profitable enough to keep them in business.
I really don't care that some people believe ebooks or whatever aren't good enough for them. All books have some limitations on their audience. If you won't buy a Kindle, you can download FREE software to read on your computer. If reading on devices gives you headaches, I can't help you. Some readers- including me- get headaches reading paper books. And if you can't read English, you can't read my books. I have no foreign language editions.
I didn't go POD or other paper edition when I re-issued my backlist because they're not affordable. But I've sold enough copies to provide a nice supplement to my income, better than I ever got with a traditional publisher. And that's all the justification I need.
That's all the justification any author needs. We're reaching more people every day. We don't need to sell to people who would never like our books just because of the format. Derision has become meaningless.
04:32 PM on 10/21/2010
But MAYBE people would like to read your book if it were in available in something other than an ebook format? It's just possible that you might be cutting out enough readers that it matters if you go ebook only. No one I saw is saying you have to go paper only. I didn't say that either. What I said is ebook only will lose me. I have money, but evidently, some authors don't think my money is good enough to bother with...
03:47 PM on 10/22/2010
Perhaps. No matter how you cut it, not everyone will read, or like, my books. The one thing everyone in publishing knows is that today's decision is nothing more than that. But we still have to make decisions. For the last ten years, I have been exactly where you are advocating I go now, and I've always studied my market carefully. My audience lies with ebook readers, and there is a difference. I like them and they like me. And like any businessperson, I don't need to be investing in a losing proposition.
01:18 PM on 10/20/2010
By release ebook only, you are cutting out those people who might read your book if it were available as a paperback, but aren't willing to, for a variety of reasons, deal with an ebook reader...
For instance, I will never buy a Kindle because of Amazon's ability to summarily erase everything that is downloaded to it. And I will never pay for a Kindle book to download to my Android because their Kindle app presumably allows them to do the same thing.
And even if I were to do something like buy an iPad or other tablet computer, I'm part of an audience that is unlikely to use it much for books anyway, because reading books from a computer screen invariably gives me a headache. I don't have to deal with that when reading a hardcover or paperback. But POD books are generally pretty shoddy construction, so I'm not very willing to spend money on them either. And neither is my local library.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
02:29 PM on 10/20/2010
My reasons for not getting a Kindle can be traced back to when a paperback fell out of my carryon somewhere on the flight home from LA years ago. Since it was a recent printing, it only cost $8 to replace as opposed to the $200 or so the Kindle would cost plus whatever it takes to rebuild the library within it.
03:48 PM on 10/20/2010
The wi-fi-only kindle is down to $139, and it wouldn't cost you anything to "rebuild" the library. If you loose your kindle, you can re-download all your books to your new kindle from Amazon.

Also, a surprising number of kindles are found and returned to their owner. Amazon can make a lost kindle no longer able to download books from Amazon, so it is less valuable to a thief.
03:52 PM on 10/20/2010
Yes, Amazon made a major PR mistake by ONCE removing a book from people's kindles. The person who posted the book for sale on Amazon didn't have the rights to sell it, and Amazon thought at the time that this was the best way to rectify the situation - remove the book and refund the price to the buyers. Amazon then admitted their mistake, gave the buyers a $30 gift card (in addition to refunding the purchase price), and promised to never do such a thing again.

But in any case, if you still don't want a kindle, fine. Konrath says they will eventually put it out in paper (an interesting twist - up until recently, the ebook version was often delayed, now the paper version is delayed...)
04:26 PM on 10/21/2010
The ability exists. It doesn't matter that they say the won't use it again. As long as it exists, there will come a time when they are tempted and succumb to that temptation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Comeplayinmyreality
enter at your own risk
02:55 PM on 10/19/2010
I loved the short story "Serial", it was my first ebook and I just got "Draculas" cant wait to read it. Are you planning on self publishing more ebooks in the future?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 10/19/2010
I am slightly surprised that this is happening with books only AFTER it's happened with music.
07:00 AM on 10/19/2010
No love for the big publishers here...if you can publish it yourself and after producing a work (a well edited work) that sells, reap the profits fully!
01:13 AM on 10/23/2010
Eaxactly.If you are going to do all the heavy lifting might as well reap the full benefits!

www.youtube.com/robchristopherwriter
12:47 AM on 10/19/2010
Sounds like the way to go for some writers. Although, I am not into the techno-book craze, I see it as another medium that can coexist with traditional books.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pam Herman
03:11 PM on 10/18/2010
While I'm happy the writer is selling books, this entire column reads like an advertisement for Amazon.
12:46 AM on 10/19/2010
Amazon is helping me to make a great deal of money--even more than I made as a traditionally published author. And the people I've encountered at Amazon are some of the brightest, most enthusiastic folks I've ever had the pleasure of working with.

They haven't paid me to say this, so this isn't an advertisement. But it is certainly an endorsement of the job they're doing to help authors reach more readers and make more money than they could through the traditional route.

The Kindle is a terrific device. I own many terrific devices that I endorse. An iPhone. An Asus Eee PC. An Xbox 360. But none of those have helped me earn over $100,000 by the year's end like Kindle has.

This column should serve as an eye-opener to writers, and to readers, about the future of this industry. If I wasn't making money, and didn't love the device, I wouldn't publish on it.

That's not advertising. It's capitalism, common sense, and am eagerness to share what I've managed to figure out.
07:02 AM on 10/19/2010
Best of luck to ya!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tonya Plank
Award-winning author, blogger, lawyer
11:35 AM on 10/19/2010
Perfectly stated, Mr. Konrath. It's actually rather shocking to me that so many people don't seem to realize what Amazon has done for indie authors. In some of the early comments on this post, people seemed to think that some who'd commented here for the first time on Huffington Post actually worked for Amazon, and not that they were motivated to comment because they were your fans or because they'd had self-publishing success through Amazon too.

This should be an eye-opener.
02:58 PM on 10/18/2010
I'm all for self-publishing... authors have been doing it for hundreds of years. All it takes is some marketing sense.

My apprehension comes from the devices used for e-books (Kindles, iPads, etc). They're made by essentially slave labor. Workers live inside the factories where they work 12 hour shifts, 6 days a week. Several workers for Foxconn, the manufacturer, have committed suicide over the past few months.

How can the literary world simply ignore that? How can a reader upoload "The Jungle" on his or her Kindle and not see the horrific irony?

Authors should hold themselves to higher standards.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tonya Plank
Award-winning author, blogger, lawyer
11:07 AM on 10/19/2010
But don't paper books destroy the environment?
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
01:55 PM on 10/19/2010
You can use recycled paper for hardcopy, and that's even before we get into the collectible/heirloom factor of first editions: I've got an original copy of LOST HORIZON, the first paperback. Also, you forget the E-waste problem, given how heavy metals go into the construction of circuit boards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
52novels
04:16 PM on 10/19/2010
I dunno. How can someone using a computer to lament the labor used in assembling an ereader device not see that irony?

http://nyti.ms/d0gM3l

"Today, companies on Taiwan produce 80 percent of computer motherboards, 72 percent of notebook computers and 68 percent of L.C.D. monitors. And most of the assembly takes place in China."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KalNJ
02:25 PM on 10/18/2010
As an avid reader I think self publishing is great. However, we are still in "labor pains" of this new technology where it's difficult to distinguish between a legitimate eBook and just a bunch of words strung together and packaged.

I think that self publishing with freelance editors just might be a match made in heaven (nothing is more distracting to me as a reader than mistakes in a finished product).

http://www.ManOfLaBook.com
12:15 PM on 10/18/2010
I'm experimenting. I've got a completed manuscript that I'm trying to get agented and published. I'm working on a second manuscript which I intend to self-publish and promote online through my blog, kindle and print-on-demand.

I would love nothing more than to be a full-time writer. I still suspect that the traditional publishing route is the strongest way to do this. But I'm willing to give new methods the benefit of the doubt.
01:24 PM on 10/18/2010
The traditional publishing route is a dying model. The odds of one getting published that way are getting slimmer and slimmer. I would advise you to try both.

E-books could be your savior.
10:51 PM on 10/18/2010
No, it is a changing model. Ask folks like sci fi author Joe Scalzi and writer Zoe Margolis who turned works they did on the web into real success- because they were picked up by major publishing houses.

I have no interest in reading the turgid gushings of wannabee un-edited writers in print or on the web. Odds have always been low for getting published by a major house - as it should be. It's the difference between High school football and the NFL. The better talent gets the jersey, the support, and the money.

If you just want folks to read your work, then cool, ebooks are the way to go. If you want to become a writer, then get an editor at least and work with a small house first.
12:03 PM on 10/18/2010
This new frontier of publishing is amazing. See what OR Books is doing for an example of how traditional publishers (as gatekeepers of quality and innovative writing) can remain relevant. My own company is trying to navigate these waters...publishing a niche subject with a dedicated direct-to-consumer channel is a big help, but it's still a completely new business model. Publishers and editors who embrace this change will be at the forefront and can still remain in the mix.
I encounter a lot of people in this field who fear the self-published model will leave talented writers struggling to gain an audience in a sea of mediocre slop from every knucklehead who thinks he's Stephen King. But I think it's just the opposite. The community evaluation model of iTunes, Amazon, and the like, allows the best reviewed, most helpful products to rise to the top. It's the community as gatekeeper rather than the publisher. Authors who connect with their audience, consult editors for feedback, treat writing as craft, build a following, and work hard at self-promotion will find this to be an exciting proposition. As an editor, I feel like my career and my purpose may be changing, but it's not going away.
01:23 AM on 10/23/2010
I agree with your statement. If you treat it like a business and not a dumping ground for as you say, and I'll quote, "every knucklehead who thinks he's Stephen King." Then it will pay off. It takes time to build a career. Even if you were traditionally pubbed you still had to compete with the known authors as you climbed your way to success.

www.youtube.com/robchristopherwriter
10:50 AM on 10/18/2010
As a book editor, I'm going to pay close attention to this book's publication: the finances, its reach, its marketing, the appeal of the extras. Really, I don't see why more established writers don't go this route, especially if an upfront advance isn't important to pay their bills. Certainly this would be a viable model for short stories and novellas, which have fewer and fewer markets, and which could eventually be bundled into a collection offering a second payday. I think even poetry could work at some level; it's not like those authors get advances, and too often the UPs that publish poetry price the books too high to buy.

I don't have a Kindle and have no desire for one, but I'm tempted to buy the book and see if I can convert it for use on my Palm T/X, which serves as my reader.
08:55 AM on 10/18/2010
There's a typo on the very first page of the first chapter (nurses), Mr Konrath. Also on the first page, how does Mr Moorecook know that the FedEx delivery man's name is Robert with no introduction or mention of a name badge? With four pros editing, it's surprising that there appear to be two mistakes and also clumsy wording in the last paragraph of this page alone. NM
11:06 AM on 10/18/2010
The free sample is an uncorrected proof, Neil. Hence the disclaimer on the first page. All advanced reading copies have errors. These were fixed in the final version.
03:02 PM on 10/18/2010
Ah. I see. Thanks, JA. I do, though, read many ARCs, and few have so many problems on page one. I really do think you should have brought in a fifth (non-co-author) editorial eye on this venture because the taster reads like raw copy. Your approach and ideal, though, is without a doubt a remedy for an old pain. Good luck with *Draculas* and very best wishes. Neil
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Rozgonyi
Writer and traveler
08:21 AM on 10/18/2010
As a traditionally published US fiction writer, I have been increasingly frustrated by the commercialization of many if not most brick and mortar presses. I'd consider doing something electronically for my next novel.
01:25 PM on 10/18/2010
Yes, ebooks will save literature, not destroy it. And you could always do both. Electronic and paper...
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
01:41 PM on 10/18/2010
How exactly will a format that's dependent on obtaining several hundred dollars' worth of electronic equipment requiring an uninterrupted supply of power to read in the first place going to "save" literature?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:08 PM on 10/18/2010
Code it yourself in valid HTML before going on to the ebooks. Most of them are just web pages built in a nonstandard format anyway.