I'm in Copenhagen where Indian Minister of State for Environment & Forests Jairam Ramesh just gave a speech where he said: "We come to Copenhagen as a dealmaker, not a deal breaker." No, I didn't mistake the dates of the international global warming summit to be held in Copenhagen this December. I'm in Copenhagen a bit early for a climate change event put on by Project Syndicate (and which NRDC helped sponsor) where Minister Ramesh gave a speech to editors from media outlets in over 110 countries. I also spoke at a breakfast discussion on the state of international global warming policy.
As my colleagues have pointed out (here and here), there has been a noticeable shift in how India approaches international efforts to address global warming pollution. This shift was definitely noticeable in the speech he gave in Copenhagen. And he outlined some of the concrete actions that India would undertake and how those would fit within the international agreement.
So what did he say and what does it all mean for getting a strong international agreement?
Reasons why India must take action. Minister Ramesh highlighted at least three reasons that India needs to take action on global warming pollution:
- Changes in the Indian monsoon are expected as a result of climate change which will have a very significant impact on India (as you can see from this article)
- Melting of the Himalayan glaciers will have very large impacts on agriculture, water supply, and economic development for a large portion of the Asian population including India (as was pointed out in this recent article).
- Increasing mean sea level could affect a large portion of the Indian population since India has 3,541 miles of coastland -- over three times the coastline of the State of Florida (as this post highlights).
This is one of the underlying currents that seem to often get missed in the debate about what developing countries will do to address global warming. As Minister Ramesh said (these aren't direct quotes as I was writing fast): the lack of agreement in Copenhagen will impact us in the developing world more than those in the developed countries, and this is true for India (as you can see from the four impacts above which would have significant ramifications on India).
"Nationally Accountable Mitigation Outcomes". Minister Ramesh spelled out a slightly new perspective on the debate about Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) which is a key part of the international debate about developing country emissions reductions (as I discussed here). He said that India would undertake a "Nationally Accountable Mitigation Outcome". Here is what he meant by this new concept: we will undertake domestic actions in our national law and we will be held accountable, first and foremost, by our domestic political process and our people.
He elaborated that India would take action to reduce global warming pollution and that as a part of a global agreement they would be willing to report their emissions and actions every 2 years (through an expanded and improved National Communications process). And he said they would be willing to use those National Communications to begin a dialogue with the world on their actions as they would be available publicly.
There are important differences between what Minister Ramesh outlined and what the US put on the table in Bangkok for how they proposed countries should "open up their books and defend them" (as I discussed here). But the differences aren't actually as large as you might believe given the recent debate in Bangkok. So stay tuned as I believe there is an opening for an agreement on this front.India will take actions in domestic law to address global warming. Minister Ramesh outlined six actions that are in very stages of being developed into Indian law:
- Mandatory fuel efficiency standards by 2011;
- Mandatory building codes by 2012;
- Increasing forest cover so that the equivalent of 10% of India's annual emissions are sequestered in their forests;
- Further 10% energy efficiency improvement by 2020 (my colleague discussed some of the steps that they have outlined towards that objective);
- Increase the proportion of India's electricity from wind, solar, and small hydro to 20% in 2020 (from the current level of 8%); and
- Make 50% of their new coal plants "clean coal" (he didn't specify how much of or if any of this would be from carbon capture and storage, which is hopefully going to be a part of this strategy).
If India does add concrete specifics to those goals and is willing to stand behind them in a meaningful way, then India might just be helpful in getting a strong deal in Copenhagen. A deal that helps India and the world achieve a future development which also addresses global warming.
This post originally appeared on NRDC's Switchboard blog.
Follow Jake Schmidt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jschmidtnrdc