Today, New York Times columnist Tom Friedman points out that President Obama is wasting the crisis British Petroleum has unleashed with its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico which should serve as an opportunity to get America focused on our energy, security and environmental problems that stem from our over-consumption of oil. I agree that the crisis in the Gulf presents an opportunity for the president to harness American will to address the fact that we buy too much oil from a region that causes us too many problems and it is hurting our environment. We need to think big about how to stop this loop and this is the time to do so.
However, I disagree with Mr. Friedman that the opportunity for boldness is lost. Instead, I would argue that the crisis has yet to hit home for most Americans. While we news junkies watch oil gush into the Gulf and hear the painful stories of fishermen unable to pursue their livelihood while miles long slicks ooze across the water, the impact of the problem is still a bit remote for most citizens. Sadly, the visible destruction caused by this crisis is coming.
Americans tend to react to the heart-wrenching sight of people or wildlife in desperate need. Soon the impact of this crisis will be hard to ignore and people will demand a way to help. More birds will wash up onto shore covered in gunk and dead fish will float to the top. The Florida Keys may be inundated with pools of muck and some beaches may become unswimmable. That is the moment when this crisis will reach the apogee that will create the public outcry for action that the president can harness for more bold proposals.
The bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 and the USS Cole in 2000 were not enough to spur American outrage about terrorism, but the loss of 3,000 lives on American soil on September 11th sent us into hyper-drive. When the BP disaster in the Gulf hits the shore, I expect it may have much the same effect.
The good news is that President Obama understands the challenges presented by our overreliance on foreign oil and has been thinking about how to deal with it. In April of 2009, one of the major pillars of his New Foundation speech was to institute a carbon tax and "harness the renewable energy that can create millions of new jobs and new industries."
He went on:
But we can no longer delay putting a framework for a clean energy economy in place. If businesses and entrepreneurs know today that we are closing this carbon pollution loophole, they will start investing in clean energy now. And pretty soon, we'll see more companies constructing solar panels, and workers building wind turbines, and car companies manufacturing fuel-efficient cars. Investors will put some money into a new energy technology, and a small business will open to start selling it. That's how we can grow this economy, enhance our security, and protect our planet at the same time.
Using the crisis is important to jump start the conversation and maybe it will ensure we get a carbon tax passed. Also it is worth remembering that the president we have is keenly intent on dealing with problems deliberately and over the long term. As he said last April "When a crisis hits, there's all too often a lurch from shock to trance, with everyone responding to the tempest of the moment until the furor has died away and the media coverage has moved on, instead of confronting the major challenges that will shape our future in a sustained and focused way."
Though the big thinkers like Tom Friedman are ready to move now, he might be just a bit early. The oil is coming and so is the outrage. Hopefully a bold plan will follow from the White House.
Follow Jamal Simmons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jamalsimmons
I submit that the long-term plan should at least roughly coincide with the Pickens plan, if not adopt it outright. We can produce this natural gas domestically from a number of different sources, including coal mines that are idle. Natural gas, CNG, has already been experimented with as a vehicle fuel. GM is working on their production line to turn out CNG vehicles for the public. Now all that's needed is a CNG island at the filling station. Let's save the oil for some rainy day when we absolutely have nothing else.
All the president can do is address that it's a catastrophe and he's on top of it- as much as anyone can be.
I haven't heard ANY public officials with plans on what to do in the event of a hurricane, and contingency plans for oil coming inland. That scares me, because it's the same way things always happen - they react to problems rather than planning ahead. The president CAN do something - he needs to order that there be an independent party managing this thing so that the public and those working on this spill have accurate and complete information.
All that BP has done is lie. It's time for the truth. Haul them in front of Congress until we get the truth, and jail them if they lie. Those are things that can be done, and SHOULD be done so that we are prepared. Lying and obfuscating the facts is just ensuring that this gets worse and prevents BP from being accountable.
I worry about the hurricanes bringing oil with them as well. We should be writing to our state legislators and to our federal representatives to get some clarification and planning underway. This is crazy.
But a good policy should have been discussed earlier. How do you balance extinction from oil with extinction from no oil?
I'm sure that Obama can give a good speech and everything will be just fine.
Now that the oil catastrophe may spill into the Atlantic, a scientist suggests: "constructing a long, floating boom between Key West and Cuba, in an eastward-pointing, V-shaped weir, the natural current flow can be enlisted to funnel the petroleum to the nearest refinery.
Other booms can be constructed to direct petroleum farther out in the Gulf toward the Straits of Florida for collection. The booms can be maintained by a flotilla of fishing craft and pleasure craft."
This is an emergency that needs to be addressed by strong leadership, as in wartime.
After Pearl Harbor was attacked, within months FORD's Willow Run plant completed a bomber every 59 minutes.
Fortunately, what is needed now to fight the oil cataclysm and climate change is much simpler technology. However, gutsy, effective action is required, without delay!
To learn about revolutionary alternatives, see Moving Beyond Oil, and to read the complete comments of this scientist, see Worst Case Scenario, both at: http://www.aesopinstitute.org
He also states: "The petroleum film will ...(cause) water temperature to rise accelerat(ing) Arctic Ocean melting. Mammals such as polar bears will probably not survive.
We may be watching (a) tipping point. This severe environmental catastrophe may turn into humanity’s greatest challenge."
The release of Methane from a tipping point may end millions of human lives, if not life on earth, in very few years.
Mr. President, demonstrate that this challenge will be met in time!
If John Atcheson is correct, and you can read all his articles at www.commondreams.org we may be very close to, if not into, a tipping point regarding Methane.
If we are lucky, and still have a few years to sharply reduce the use of fossil fuels, the scientist I quoted believes a thin layer of oil on the surface in the Atlantic could accelerate Arctic warming and move us into that tapping point.
This is not an ordinary oil spill...it is huge and may trigger that threat.
The costs are likely to be far lower than might be imagined.
And an end to human life on this planet is an unacceptable price for a failure to act!
Please define "a while" and "eventually".