Two weeks ago, there was a stunning admission contained in a National Intelligence Estimate about Iran. NIE's represent the composite view of all 16 American spy agencies' they are not the views of rogue agents or analysts but comprehensive collective views of opinion.
As such, when they make a declaration, it is usually absolutely correct.
This is how the New York Times reported the findings:
WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 -- A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains frozen, contradicting judgment two years ago that Tehran was working relentlessly toward building a nuclear bomb.
The subsequent fall-out from the report, and the fact that the current administration was either willfully ignoring the details within the report, or had never bothered to read it was shocking.
Pundits and bloggers everywhere demanded accountability on behalf of the administration - how is it possible they screamed in bigger and bigger type with more and more words like &*&_& in the headlines.
One of the most distasteful, and frankly useless, political traits the pot calling the kettle black.
So at the risk of offending all of my friends with Senator Clinton's and Edward's campaigns, let's got back to fall of 2002 when the Iraq War vote was pending.
As I have written before, I like to claim that the Iraq War vote was 6-94 . What do I mean?
Well, just as the Iranian NIE prevented the rush to war, there was a classified NIE on Iraq that say under lock and key for Senators only to read prior to the vote.
Like the Iranian NIE, the Iraq NIE was the view of all 16 spy agencies though, rumor has it, there was some disagreement among the agencies that was contained in the report.
What was in it? Well, the vast majority of that NIE is still classified, so allow me to quote one of the six Senators who did actually read the report, Senator Bob Graham of Florida.
Senator Graham read the report and went to the Senate Floor where he stated:
"Friends, I encourage you to read the classified intelligence reports which are much sharper than what is available in declassified form.... We are going to be increasing the threat level against the people of the United States. Blood is going to be on your hands."
Only Six Senators read the report - SIX.
Here's what the rest claim.
I was briefed on what was in the NIE by my staff, my advisors, my dog.
Because no staffer was allowed to see the classified NIE, principals only.
Clearly, like the Iranian NIE, the Iraq NIE painted a different picture than what was being spun by The White House.
Perhaps the NIE contained information that, if the majority of Senators had actually read, they would have voted against the war. As simple as that.
They would have done their duty. Not even their duty to be honest, but their job at its most basic level.
So here's the moment where Democrats should consider accountability as they look towards 2008.
Neither Senator Clinton nor Senator Edwards bothered to walk downstairs at the US Senate, sign in and read the classified NIE before they voted for the war.
I could, to be honest, forgive them for voting for the war if they had read the intelligence, but as we demand accountability from everyone else, shouldn't we demand it from our own representatives?
Prior to voting for the Iraq War, did you read the NIE on Iraq?
It's a yes or no question.
Sadly, both John Edwards and Hillary Clinton have to answer 'no.'
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.