- BIG NEWS:
- Barack Obama
- |
- Sarah Palin
- |
- Future Fuel
- |
- AIG
- |
On one Sunday morning news program after another, the NSA data collection efforts were dismissed on the grounds that the government only knows who calls who, not what was said. No one on any of the shows I watched tried to explain why anyone should care if the government has detailed historical records of who calls whom, covering millions of Americans.
Let me try:
People call journalists or Congressional offices, often to criticize what the government is doing, or to criticize what other powerful parties are doing, including big corporations (or others) with close ties to the White House. People call physiatrists, debt counselors, lovers, sex workers, divorce lawyers, bookies, head hunters, close friends, professional collaborators, and others.
We know that Dick Cheney is a curious guy when he senses hostility. We know HUD Alphonso Jackson doesn't like to give government contracts to people who don't like the president. We know the federal government doesn't like people who leak the wrong stuff to the wrong people. (Who is calling certain USA Today reporters, for example?)
Can you imagine how interesting it would be to have this type of information on one of your enemies? To know exactly whom they call, and who calls them, and exactly when, going back at least five years? Can you imagine how interesting someone might find these same items, about you?
We also know there is almost no end to the White House lying about what the government is actually doing on this front.
So how is this information about who calls whom being used? Whom can you ask? Whom would you trust to tell you?
Do reporters care that all of their calls are likely tracked by the government?
Can the democrats in the Congress actually explain to the public why the government collection of this type of information is a recipe for abuses?
If this is acceptable for Bush, do the republicans think it won't be done by a Democrat in the White House?
Josh Marshall looks further at this issue.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/federal_source_.html
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/fbi_acknowledge.html
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008470.php
The original USA Today article.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration built an...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
After a three-night stay in Moscow, the Obamas touched down in Rome on Wednesday so Papa President...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I was sorry to watch, live on CNN, Edward R. Murrow and Emmy Award-winning broadcaster and...
The following post...
It was with interest that I read Dr. Soram Khalsa's post on The Huffington Post...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
OH NOES! What happened on Fox and Friends today, people?
As our own Jason Linkins pointed out, Letterman is one of the few comedians...
I'm liveblogging the latest Iran election fallout. Email me with any news or thoughts, or follow me...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Oscar G. Mayer, retired chairman of the Wisconsin-based meat processing company that bears his name,...
It's summer, the time for weddings! A few of my friends are getting married this summer and fall, so lately...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
I get many letters like this from readers...