More

James S. Marks

James S. Marks

Posted April 23, 2009 | 02:03 PM (EST)

Why Your Zip Code May Be More Important to Your Health Than Your Genetic Code


How you see a problem drives how you create the solution.

We are not a healthy country. And while health reform focuses on coverage, cost, access and care, this is simply triage to a system that fails to ask the question "Why aren't we healthier in the first place?" Our health reform debate is focusing on where health ends (with medical care) and not on where our health begins (where we live, learn, work and play).

This month, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America released a report about all of those other things. This report comes out of a bi-partisan commission created to look at the factors that affect Americans' health in our homes, our work environments, and our communities. In wonky terms, we call these factors "social determinants of health." In plain English, the Commission's purpose was to look for ways beyond medical care that could improve our health.

What do we mean by "beyond medical care?" There is a ton of evidence that shows where and how people live, learn, work and play has a tremendous impact on our health. And while this link may seem intuitive to most, the extent of the relationship is not reflected in either the way we consider our own health or the way we go about creating solutions to make us a healthier nation as a whole.

Let us consider just a few facts:

• Evidence now suggests that medical care accounts for only 10 to 15 percent of preventable early deaths.

• Some Americans will die 20 years earlier than others who live just a few miles away because of differences in education, income, race, ethnicity and where and how they live.

• College graduates can expect to live five years longer than those who do not complete high school.

• Middle-income people can expect to live shorter lives than higher income people, even if they are insured.

• And people who are poor are three times more like to suffer physical limitations from a chronic illness.

In other words, as it relates to our health, our zip code may be more important than our genetic code, our school files may be more telling than our medical files, the time spent in our office at work may be more relevant than the time spent at our doctor's office and the places we play may be more crucial than those where we get treated.

Even when we do consider these social factors, we too often place an unfair burden on personal responsibility and ignore the obstacles that stand in the way for some to make healthier choices. Consider that Detroit, an area of 139 square miles and over 900,000 citizens has just five grocery stores. An apple a day may help keep the doctor away but that assumes you can find an apple in your neighborhood.

As we begin to explore new ways to improve this country's health, we should look for inspiration from innovative programs around the country that are finding sensible, sustainable solutions at the intersection of health and daily life.

Take for example a program like Bonnie CLAC (Car Loans and Counseling), which is built on the premise that how you get around affects your ability to live a healthier lifestyle. Reliable transportation can mean the difference between keeping and losing your job, being able to take your kids to the doctor and make it to a grocery store that sells healthier food. Bonnie CLAC is helping the working poor purchase fuel-efficient cars at great prices and low interest rates, while providing them with crucial financial counseling. This counseling not only helps them make the payments but also show how changes, like quitting smoking, can help their financial bottom line and be good for their health. If only our banks had taken a similarly responsible approach to home lending, we could have avoided the sub-prime mess that has had a devastating domino effect in creating more Americans who are vulnerable to financial difficulties and subsequent poor health.

As we consider health reform in 2009, let's think about the neighborhoods and towns in which we all live, and ask ourselves: What are the barriers standing in the way to better health and how can health reform change the places we spend our lives to make them healthier places in which to live?

Take a look around you and ask yourself "where does health really start?" Is it in the hospital or the home? Is it with insurance company or your employer? Is it with an ambulance driver or an urban planner?

Only when we answer these questions honestly and see our health problems more clearly in this broader context, will we begin the real work to create and invest in solutions that help us all live as long and as healthy as we can.


Dr. James Marks is currently the Senior Vice-President, Director of the Health Group at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and is former Assistant Surgeon General, Director of the Centers for Disease Control's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.

How you see a problem drives how you create the solution. We are not a healthy country. And while health reform focuses on coverage, cost, access and care, this is simply triage to a system that fai...
How you see a problem drives how you create the solution. We are not a healthy country. And while health reform focuses on coverage, cost, access and care, this is simply triage to a system that fai...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:21 PM on 04/27/2009
Dr. Marks writes: "What are the barriers to health...and where does health really start? Only when we answer these questions honestly and see health in this broader context, will we begin the real work..." Yes, and that "real work" must be ongoing, participative, and fully inclusive.
The Commission's report is a wonderful milepost, filled with evidence and stories of hope. Also wonderful is an open question: Will anyone listen? (This was actually overheard as a candid aside between Commissioners at one of RWJF’s public hearings.) We might add, Why or why not? These invite a deeper inquiry that must unfold if we are to begin the real work of profound, sustainable change.
As we inquire after the societal, structural and contextual conditions that lead to poor health, we must also consider what ways of thinking and acting and being led to these conditions in the first place. As Churchill said, “We shape our buildings, then our buildings shape us.”
The good news is that coming together to consider questions that matter is intrinsically healthy. In coming together we re-connect with what is most important. We create inclusive environments where every voice can be heard. And we begin to see that the exterior conditions in which we live and work are manifestations of our collective interior conditions, and that means we can change them together.
We are exploring this approach now in a growing number of communities (www.communitiesofhealth.org), and we welcome participation by all.
11:12 AM on 04/27/2009
For too long, caretaking of our nation's health has been relegated to the health care and public health systems. While vital, Dr Marks points out that many factors that inflence health are outside of these sectors. If we value good health--for our individual and collective well-being and also for our economy's well-being (just look at healh care costs borne by employers!) we also need to be health conscious--and I don't mean going to the gym and eating nutritious food! Why aren't more kids more physically active in school? Why aren't there stairs leading to the second floor at the mall? Why are all the grocery coupons for processed food? If we look around our communities with open eyes there are ways we can promote healthier behaviors--while awareness and knowledge are important, valuing health is a motivator. Then over the longer term, what has happended to education in this country? It is amazing that only around half of our kids are graduating from high school. Without even a high school education what are the changes they will get a well-paying job with health insurance, live in a neighborhood with parks and sidewalks, be near a full-serivce grocery store. If we can't ensure that our kids have a basic eduation are we dooming them to a sicker life? With ever-higher health care costs? Just what is it that we are saying is more important than heatlh and a basic education in this country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phoenixbc
My biographer is still working on my micro-bio.
05:30 PM on 04/25/2009
Dr. Marks and the RWJF have focused on the seemingly forgotten element of health care economics: the human factor. It is easy for pundits and politicos to argue dollar amounts and whether a comprehensive national program will adversely affect insurance companies, but their attention never seems to stay on the human cost of the broken system we have here in the U.S..

Detroit, which Dr. Marks references, has been on the Health & Human Services list of Medically Underserved Areas since 1994, and each year the measured factors decline further. A child raised in Detroit has a greater chance of dying from lack of access to care than in most other areas of the country, including remote rural areas. Many other urban areas show similar statistics. Unfortunately, the statistics are argued as though they represent nothing more than a spreadsheet total.

The human cost of failing to address these issues has caught up with us. Our health as a nation is comparatively worse than that of persons in Europe. It can be seen in the trail of crippled lives from elementary schools to the prisons where urban residents are a disproportionate sector of that population. Outdated laws in many states prevent the establishment of health care facilities in areas where they are most needed. Some states prevent competition between health insurers, which results in higher premiums. Bravo, to Dr. Marks and to RWJF for endorsing policies that do more than simply add to the bottom line of a balance sheet.
04:43 PM on 04/24/2009
Recently I sat in on a Bonnie CLAC Financial Fitness class covering food economics and had a chance to speak with five Bonnie CLAC clients. Of the five I spoke with, two people had stopped smoking as a result of confronting the monthly cigarette costs identified in the ongoing budgeting exercises. They realized that the cost of cigarettes alone came close to covering the cost of a new, low-interest car loan. And in the food economics class everyone was learning how to find savings in their grocery cart and kitchen while eating more healthy, nutritious food. Financial and health education coupled with access to reliable, affordable transportation is clearly a path to better health outcomes in rural (and urban) areas.
03:25 PM on 04/24/2009
Community health nursing is a font of information and wise insights about people's lives and their barriers to good health.
These nurses can tell you that by the 8th grade, kids in poor neighborhoods have decided that they have a future or that they have no future. The ones who feel that their lives will be nasty, brutish, and short don't take care of themselves -- not only that, they often actively sabotage their own health with tobacco, junk food, alcohol, sex, drugs, and violence.
Let's focus the lens on childhood as we think about ZIP codes and health. Let's get in and get working as soon as we can, however we can. All kids count.
10:19 AM on 04/24/2009
The post by James S Marks, so well and impressively summarized in the title, focus on a point of the highest importance: the social determinants of health, a theme discussed in huffingtonpost a few days ago (I again recommend the book by Michael Marmot and Richard G Wilkinson: Social determinants of health, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, 2006). And I agree with everything said. But I think we may go a little bit further: the reason of rich people being healthier has no direct connection with their money, nor with assurance (as already stated in the post), nor with health care quality (although all these may apply in specific cases). It has a lot to do with knowledge and attitude. That 's why education is so important, as is social organization at all levels (family, school, work, neighborhood, community at large). You are healthier if you are recognized by the others, if you belong to a social net, if you are not considered and do not consider yourself the last of the rank, and also as much as you give (much more than as you receive).
How you see your life and yourself drives how healthy you are.
06:59 AM on 04/25/2009
As Dr. Marks points out, where you live and the need reliable transportation does have an enormous effect on accessing health care and leading a healthier, productive lifestyle. Nearly 40% of all rural residents in the US live in areas with no public transportation and another 28% live in areas with limited levels of service, according to research cited by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Rural Initiative.

In rural New England we see our clients struggling to reach needed health care, grocery shopping and job opportunities because they lack reliable, affordable transportation. Our program serves as a catalyst for lasting financial and health well-being changes in their lives.

For those who want to learn more about Bonnie CLAC, please check out our new Promise Story video:
http://www.rwjf.org/vulnerablepopulations/product.jsp?id=41548
- Terri Steingrebe, CEO Bonnie CLAC
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 PM on 04/23/2009
Really important point of view, and one we rarely hear. Thanks.
04:41 PM on 04/23/2009
Love the Bonnie CLAC program. What a great example of where our system ought to be putting more resources. The question is two fold for me. First, how do we put more financial resources towards the places where health begins? Second, how do we scale up those solutions so they become accessible to millions of Americans?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
James S. Marks
05:15 PM on 04/24/2009
Rgoulet,

Thanks for your post and your excellent questions. I think the first step toward increasing the financial resources towards the places where health begins is helping both the private and public sector see the value and importance for doing so. Everyday, we are learning more about the economic and societal value of early intervention and prevention programs. Too often, we end up “paying later” to repair our health instead of investing earlier to make good health easier and to have it last as long as possible. For our part, at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, we purposely look to find programs, like Bonnie Clac, which are working upstream to build the pathways to better health that should have been there in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
James S. Marks
05:16 PM on 04/24/2009
Your second question is a little more complicated. The question of scale is one that comes up often in assessing potential programs. We see our role in philanthropy as two fold. On one hand we seek to find and invest in programs that do have the potential for growth and spread and try to help them build management capacity, infrastructure and relationships to support that growth, like venture capitalists do with new companies. But it is not practical for any foundation to underwrite the national expansion for many programs and certainly we can’t sustain them at a large scale for very long. I do, however, think there is a role for us to play in making sure that the ideas behind the best of our programs can spread. This question of diffusion vs. scale is critical. We like to think that we invest in programs where the ideas can live beyond our grants to influence the field as a whole. Some might get picked up by government, occasionally by the private sector, and some might be more organic with many groups using the idea in new and creative ways. There was an interesting piece written on this on change.org last week, that I would recommend reading. Hope this helps and thanks again for your post.