iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jamie Bechtel

GET UPDATES FROM Jamie Bechtel
 

Will Orangutans Become Extinct Before the Conservation Community Gets Its Game on?

Posted: 11/09/11 10:51 AM ET

There is nothing cuter than a baby orangutan with its tussle of red hair bedecking a mostly bald head and big brown inquisitive eyes sparkling with wisdom, curiosity, and soulfulness. Visiting orangutans in the wilds of Borneo or Sumatra tops my bucket list and it is clear I am running out of time to translate that dream into reality. A report detailing orangutan interactions with humans in Indonesia was released last week and is making international news. The report shows that nearly 700 orangutans were slaughtered by local villagers in Kalimantan, the Indonesian portion of Borneo. While the findings of the research are terribly sad, they are not terribly shocking. Similarly, the conservation community's response to the survey is predictable: a call for the opening of more conservation areas and stricter punishment of orangutan killers.

This call to action is standard operating procedure for thousands of conservation workers and millions, if not billions, of conservation dollars. As a conservation expert, I am all too familiar with the battle cry of the protected area. The concept is simple: we need to set up a network of safe havens for the world's most vulnerable species. In other words, keep animals safe by keeping people out. However, this solution is seriously flawed and doomed to failure for several reasons. In many cases, individuals existing on the brink of survival will resort to desperate measures to feed their families. Under such dire circumstances, the borders of a protected area are rarely a meaningful deterrent. As Suci Utami Atmoko, a field coordinator in Indonesia notes, hunger was the main reason for killing and eating the orangutans. 'Some residents were desperate and had no other choice but to kill them after spending three days hunting for food,'. As a conservationist, I find it inconceivable that I would, under any circumstances, kill an orangutan. As a mother, I find it not only possible but extremely plausible that I would do whatever it takes to feed my children after watching them suffer from hunger for days on end. I am not alone in this regard; in the case highlighted here, a full 70% of the villagers questioned knew the orangutans were a protected or endangered species when they killed them.

It is easy to point a finger at villagers whose homes adjoin orangutan habitat. It is much, much harder to conceive of the fact that we are equally, if not more so to blame for the likely demise of these precious primates. The impacts of hunting orangutan for bushmeat are a distant second to the significantly more intractable problem of deforestation. Deforestation on the island of Borneo is driven primarily by the timber trade and the expansion of palm oil plantations. The timber makes it way to places like China where furniture is constructed and then shipped to the U.S. to fill our homes with affordable furnishings. The palm oil is purchased by companies such as Kraft, General Mills, and Cargill for use in our foods, cosmetics, and as biofuel. Because we are fundamentally uninterested in paying more for sustainable sourced products or protesting the poor labor and production practices of international corporations, these companies will continue their detrimental practices unchallenged and high value forest habitat in places like Indonesia will continue to be destroyed for our benefit.

I am not trying to play a blame game here. I am trying to point out that until the conservation community responds to the very real crisis of species extinction with significantly more effective solutions, a lot of time and money will be wasted. Conservation must be about more than establishing protected areas and imprisoning poachers, it must be about feeding children, providing medicine, reducing the ravages of HIV/AIDS and improving access to education. It must be about job creation. It must be about educating consumers, informing trade policies, and incorporating resource use into poverty reduction strategies. As long as our main tactical approach forces people to choose between feeding their children and protecting endangered species, the conservation community will lose every fight, every time. There are smarter, more holistic solutions that can and should be deployed. There are solutions that recognize human survival is, and must be, more highly valued than the survival of any other species. I am fully aware that our long-term survival depends on those same species. But then again, I have the luxury of thinking long-term because the food, water and health needs of my family have been met today and will, in all likelihood, be met again tomorrow. There are several billion people out there that do not have that same luxury.

 

Follow Jamie Bechtel on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Jamie_NEWCourse

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carolebeverly
05:28 PM on 11/11/2011
Globalization is a huge part of the problem. Why are villagers starving? Could it be because they have been kicked off the land they used to tend because that land has now been appropriated by the Indonesian elites or foreign companies? It wasn't so long ago that there was plenty of land for both orangutans and humans. The problem is theft, corruption, and, yes, deforestation, which has caused massive environmental damage locally, not to mention a massive increase in greenhouse gas emissions. This is a huge problem and conservation organizations need to focus on the cause: corrupt trade policies, which were adopted solely to provide corporate profit. We have our own natural resources in the U.S. and have never needed resources from Indonesian forests. De-forestation of these forests in one of the great environmental crimes of the past 30 years.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jamie Bechtel
12:22 PM on 11/28/2011
agree. there are a few great organizations working on just that. i would point you to environmental investigation agency as one of our favorites. http://www.eia-global.org/ they do some pretty amazing work including work in Indonesia.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jamie Bechtel
12:24 PM on 11/28/2011
agree. and there are some great organizations working on those issues. i would like to point you to one of our favorite groups - environmental investigation agency. doing hard work in tough places including Indonesia. http://www.eia-global.org/
01:27 PM on 11/10/2011
Yes. I can give you 7 billion reasons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:01 AM on 11/10/2011
This article points to severe and ecologically damaging perceptions by modern man, who erroneously believes he is in the cat bird seat of all life on the Earth. How did the native peoples of the Earth survive, quite magnificently without the worldview, perceptions and life style of the modern man, who only knows how to rape the Earth? Therein is the problem.

We transported and insisted upon establishing our thinking on our horrendously flawed worldview upon much of the world, that was incapable of comprehending our thinking and worldview. Thus, we have even destroyed, their parcel of the planet, with our lifestyle. The most successful lifestyle has always been, small scale hunting and gathering, not modern man's flawed perceptions of the natural Earth. How can they and our life sustaining Earth succeed based upon our own Earth killing and planet destroying philosophy and planet killing worldview?

We are so arrogant, we cannot perceive the forest for all the garbage dumps, dead, concrete jungles, oil spills and vast extinctions of the veritable strands in the web of all life, like the orangutan, our brothers, our scriptures in the bible of a life giving and sustaining Earth. What befalls the Earth befalls man; what befalls the orangutans, befalls all of life, including man. All the rest is moldering garbage for the ripe fields of American thinking.
07:48 AM on 11/10/2011
I've had the pleasure of working with some of the great apes,and they are indeed special and require our stewardship, as does the rest of our world.
But please. That flight of ideas comes across, speaking of arrogant, VERY arrogant.
Are you sitting on some sort of hill top, lecturing the dull masses who just can't process your superior thoughts ?
What the heck do you, is it out of academia or the media ? I'd be very surprised.
So , get a shovel, donate your time and money and sweat if you want to help.
So spare us the lecture and stop boring us to death with college child, vegan cliches', many of which have even been proven wrong. Doug
04:51 PM on 11/09/2011
Traditional approaches to conservation (such as establishing reserves and enforcing laws) are necessary, but they need to be supplemented by community-based approaches such as the TACARE methodology pioneered by the Jane Goodall Institute. As Jane herself has said, "How could we possibly focus on protecting the chimpanzees if the people are suffering and struggling, and their children are dying from malnutrition and lack of medicine?"