More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jane Boursaw

Jane Boursaw

Posted: December 6, 2010 05:35 PM

I just saw The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest, the third film based on author Stieg Larsson's excellent Dragon Tattoo trilogy. It's a great example of the story, the acting, and the filmmaking coming together in perfect harmony to create one of the best trilogies in cinematic history. There's never a wasted moment in these films, never a scene that isn't pivotal to the story.

But I didn't see the movie in New York or Los Angeles. I saw it in my hometown, Traverse City, Michigan, at our downtown State Theatre, newly restored by the Traverse City Film Festival. The theater was packed, as it was when I saw the first two films. In fact, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo was the highest-grossing film to play at the State Theatre this year. Keep in mind that this is a two-and-a-half hour Swedish film with subtitles, a complicated story structure, and no well-known stars. At least, they weren't well-known when the film was released.

I asked film festival founder Michael Moore why people in a small town in the Midwest are flocking in droves to see this movie.

"The conventional wisdom is that independent films -- you know, the more difficult films, the documentaries and foreign movies -- don't play well out here," he said, adding that people are always drawn to well-made films, especially in times of economic strife.

"In past eras, these are the times when the movies have really spoken to peoples' souls, have inspired them, have comforted them, have given them an escape, have produced new ideas," said Moore. "The films that came out during the Great Depression and the Vietnam War era were really bold and brave films."

I'll add that the Dragon Tattoo films resonate with people on a personal level for a variety of reasons. Noomi Rapace plays the part of Lisbeth Salander with both a fierceness and a stoic reserve that makes her completely believable. So believable, in fact, that if you didn't know better, you'd think she was playing herself.

One of my favorite scenes from the trilogy occurs near the end of Hornet's Nest. On her way to the trial, Lisbeth emerges into the prison hallway decked out in gothic garb, nose rings, heavy eyeliner, and a massive mohawk the likes of which I haven't seen since the 1980s. Here's a character who at the beginning of the story is merely a weird, funky girl who'd had some bad things happen to her. By the end of the third film, however, she's my hero. Not only is justice served on her abusers, but this tiny powerhouse of a girl helps to topple a massive tower of corruption and evil. It was all I could do not to jump out of my red velvet theatre seat and cheer wildly at the site of her platform boots clumping down that hallway.

That brings me to the next reason why I believe these films are so popular right now. In the real world, you don't have to look far to find corruption. It's lurking everywhere, especially in governmental systems around the globe. But how often is justice truly served? How often do these people get what's coming to them? And if it ever happens, how often does the public get to see it?

In Larsson's trilogy, justice is served and the entire world knows about it, thanks to the combined efforts and courage of many people, including journalist Mikael Blomkvist, played so winningly by Michael Nyqvist. As a journalist myself, I can attest to the fact that things rarely ever fall into place to produce the desired result. There are too many editors stirring the pot, too many corporate suits issuing orders about what and what not to publish, and too many advertisers afraid to take a risk on anything that deviates from the plain vanilla content that permeates the publishing industry. Blomkvist solves that problem by creating his own magazine. Is that what journalists have to do? Create our own publication in order to write the important stories?

I also love how the trilogy ends. Larsson and the filmmakers could have taken the easy way out and delivered a John Grisham-type ending with Lisbeth and Mikael sipping exotic drinks under a palm tree on a Caribbean beach. But no, this story ends with each of them uttering an awkward "see you around" as she closes her apartment door and he goes about his business. That's probably how it would go down in real life, although I do wonder what happens after the movie ends. Do they ever cross paths again? Are they friends? How did their shared experience impact their future?

Maybe we'll find out in the American version, which has me a little worried. When I first heard about the remake, I was quick to trash it. Why remake a film that's superb in its original form? Are Americans too stupid to read subtitles? Do we need well-known actors to plunk down our $9 and see a film? Clearly, that's not the case, as evidenced by the crowd who saw the Dragon Tattoo films in Traverse City, Michigan.

But the caliber of producers, filmmakers and actors has me singing a different tune on the remake. Ole Sondberg is executive producer, a title he held on the Swedish films, as well as the excellent BBC series Wallander. Having him on the project might help to retain the edgy ambience of the Swedish films. The director is David Fincher, who also helmed The Social Network, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and Zodiac, one of my favorite films from 2007. Fincher also successfully directed Alien3, the third film in an established series with a loyal fan base.

Rooney Mara has been cast as Lisbeth Salander, and I appreciate the fact that she's not yet a household name, but she already has a following from her roles in The Social Network and A Nightmare on Elm Street. Likewise, Daniel Craig, with his ability to play both rough-edged and resilient, is a good choice for Mikael Blomkvist. Other players at this writing include Robin Wright (Erika Berger), Christopher Plummer (Henrik Vanger), Stellan Skarsgard (Martin Vanger) and Joely Richardson (Anita Vanger). I have no qualms about any of these actors.

Steven Zaillian is scribing the American screenplay. Based on his credits, I have to believe that he won't produce a script that bows down to the Hollywood clichés screaming out to this project. His screenplay for Schindler's List won an Oscar and a Golden Globe, and he's been nominated for and won a slew of other awards for his work through the years, including Searching for Bobby Fischer, American Gangster, and Gangs of New York. Let's just hope the Hollywood Machine allows all of these people to create a film worthy of the original films.

There's also a six-part Swedish miniseries, Millennium, which includes all of the main players from the films. My next task is getting my hands on that. Anyone seen it?

I would love to hear your thoughts on these films. Do you find the Dragon Tattoo movies compelling? And if so, why?

 

Follow Jane Boursaw on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jboursaw

 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:47 PM on 12/27/2010
I think your review is very well written, but I have to disagree with the general valuation of the books. I just finished (and didn't really care if I finished it or not) The Girl Who Played With Fire. Hated it. My feelings were best expressed in another HuffPo article, http://www.themillions.com/2010/09/stieg-larsson-swedish-narcissus.html The book is 75% exposition and explanation. Ho Hum! Plus I didn't care a whit for any of the characters, including Miss Quirky-strains-credibility.
02:36 AM on 12/09/2010
I haven't read these books yet OR seen the movies. But your review makes me think I need to add these to my ever-increasing stack of must-read books. Oh, and then I'll add the movies to my Netflix queue (books first, always!).
08:31 PM on 12/08/2010
You know, I really want to read the book before I see the movie, but you're making it so hard to wait!
02:17 PM on 12/08/2010
I have read all 3 books and seen the first 2 movies while trying to find a venue to see the thrid (I was able to watch the movies through NEtflix). The movies are tremedously well crafted and acted and if one has read the books one will have no issue with the subtitles as really there is not a lot of dialogue verbally as there is in expression and movement-but when there is watchout. I am looking forwrd to the Americanized version mainly due to the cast but I am sure it will still be toned down compared to the Swedish just because of general standards -though there is nothing gratitous in the swedish versions its just the actions are more explicit whereas in american versions it is usually inferred to. Which is not always bad as i wouldn not let my teenager watch the movie.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lifeofthemind
10:58 AM on 12/08/2010
Great piece. I enjoyed all three movies, but the first one the most. A gripping cold case and serial killer drama is a lot more interesting on the surface than procedural courtroom stuff. I was very into the characters by the third film, so I also really enjoyed those. It was brave of the filmmakers to stick to the book and tell the actual story rather than make up flashy mystery stories to cash in on the first movie. Goes with the territory of the film industry outside of Hollywood, I guess.

*spoiler*
I do wish they had left in the Grisham-style sipping exotic drinks ending from the book, though. I love anything similar to the Count of Monte Cristo where the person overcomes their injustice to have a chance to enjoy fabulous wealth. It was also pretty cool how Lisbeth set up her financials and lawyer situation.
12:18 AM on 12/08/2010
I haven't seen ANY of these films. I want to read the books first. Then maybe I'll brave them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greymom
04:29 PM on 12/07/2010
I have listened to all three books on audio. They are indeed compelling in that format as well.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
04:06 PM on 12/07/2010
The first film was terrific.
The second one was watchable
The final was almost dull: one of the best screen heroine's of recent years reduced to an extremely passive character. Overlong court scenes with no real surprises.
03:51 PM on 12/07/2010
I've already seen the first movie -- and your review has convinced me I need to see the next two.
02:23 PM on 12/07/2010
Haven't seen any of these movies yet. I tried reading the first book and somehow couldn't get into it. Maybe I'd have better luck with the movies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fudgefase
Boldly going nowhere...
02:01 PM on 12/07/2010
I read the books. I enjoyed the first one but grew increasingly annoyed with, what was to me, a glaring hole in the plot that once spotted, couldn't be overlooked and just grew bigger and bigger as the books progressed. Time and again Lisbet's computer skills and network of contacts are shown to be incredible - money no real object and hacking relatively simple for people with her skills. So why, oh why, didn't she ever go into the court records and change her 'sentence', writing herself a letter of self-'custody' while she was at it? The records would have been ordinary civil service access - surely a breeze for such an ace hacker. And once her files had been changed, the security forces would have had no hold on her - and that's without her even creating a new identity for herself (and she used several throughout the books) and just completely disappearing! It just made no sense! For me that was the undoing of the books.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veronica
05:00 PM on 12/07/2010
So you read the books and still managed not to pick up on the fact that even more than escaping her "sentence," Lisbeth wanted to make the people that wronged her pay for what they'd done? Really? She could have stayed in the Caymans, but she chose not to. That doesn't qualify as a "plot hole." And you don't think Peter Teleborian would have still been a thorn in her side had she changed those records? Palmgren and later Bjurman were supposed to forget she existed? And she ultimately needed people to understand what had been done to her, not to forget about it. People like you, who nitpick the living crap out of everything, always miss the forest for the trees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fudgefase
Boldly going nowhere...
10:03 AM on 12/09/2010
It's not a nitpick - it's a gaping hole in the plot. Yes, easier to get revenge on those who'd wronged her when she was a free agent and no longer at their mercy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fudgefase
Boldly going nowhere...
10:06 AM on 12/09/2010
Yes, I read the books. First one good. Second one, not so much. Third one, boring.
photo
saami
Cranky old lady
12:44 PM on 12/07/2010
Oh please not an American version of the trilogy! I can imagine them talking like the Swedish Chef, bork! bork! The books were a page turning terrific read and the characters are truly Swedish. The Swedish films equal the books in intensity and the characters are wonderfully portrayed. Walk away Hollywood.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lifeofthemind
10:59 AM on 12/08/2010
Agreed. I hate that they will be speaking English with attempted Swedish accents. Just laughably wrong. I also have an irrational hatred of David Fincher's style. No chance I'll be seeing the remake.
09:18 PM on 12/08/2010
Why in the world would you think the film-makers are going to have the actors speak in Swedish accents?
12:25 AM on 12/07/2010
I do love these movies and hope to see more of Noomi Rapace in other roles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veronica
02:03 AM on 12/07/2010
Well, get ready for the Sherlock Holmes sequel, then! Noomi Rapace is the next big thing.
11:53 PM on 12/06/2010
I am so behind. I haven't even read the books, let alone seen the movies. Your review is terrific. Nice to get all the backstory, and refreshing to see a reviewer who admits she has changed her mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
typeface geek
11:51 AM on 12/07/2010
READ THE BOOKS. AT ONCE. RIGHT NOW.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
picard922
Read directions first.
11:07 PM on 12/06/2010
I was surprised and delighted with these films, if one can be delighted with intensity, violence and graphic sex. I'm sorry to hear that they will be "Americanized." The Swedish versions are so somber, beautifully cast and well played, they resonate with edgy nuance. I fear that remaking them for an American audience will result in ill effect. Like a Saab made by General Motors. Not an improvement.