I continue to be fascinated by the controversy and commentaries connected to the National Day of Prayer 2010! What is most striking is the more extreme the view, the less knowledge there is about the designated "adversary." After renewing his criticism of Islam, Franklin Graham recently said, "No elephant with 100 arms can do anything for me. None of Hinduism's 9,000 gods is going to lead me to salvation." I wonder how many Hindus would agree with him -- only because his comments are so far off base when it comes to the heart of Hindu religious beliefs. Graham is also quoted as saying, "We are fooling ourselves if we think we can have some big kumbaya service and all hold hands and it's going to get better in this world. It's not going to get better." He's right, you know: it's not going to get better as long as we are complicit with perpetuating ignorance, as long as we think the only way to justify our own beliefs is to undermine those of others. If we refuse to educate ourselves, if we refuse to expand our horizons, it can't get better because we aren't contributing to making it any better.
As the director of Fellowship in Prayer, I belong to an interfaith clergy group. At our meeting today, we shared prayers for our nation, for our world. The prayers, rooted in our distinct religious traditions, nuanced our common hope for peace and justice, and for fullness of life for everyone. It was eminently clear that Quaker silence seeks the same end as the prayerful words taken from the Episcopalian Book of Common Prayer, the Rabbi's Hebrew blessing, the meditation of our Buddhist friends, or the call to prayer issued by the Muslim chaplain at the university. Now, if you happen to get riled up at the very mention of prayer, just be aware that we may have very different notions of what prayer is, even before we consider what it does or doesn't do.
Divisive rhetoric, whether coming from Graham or any one of us, is naïve. It oversimplifies things. And we sell ourselves short to settle for it. An alternative narrative can be shaped through genuine dialogue and interreligious and/or intercultural partnerships. Fellowship in Prayer, together with the Interfaith Dialog Center -- founded by Turkish-Americans to promote respect among diverse faiths and cultures -- is hosting an Interfaith Dialogue on Women of the Covenant on this Day of Prayer. Three women -- Jewish, Muslim and Christian -- Rabbi Nancy Fuchs-Kreimer, Dr. Ingrid Mattson and Dr. Westina Matthews, who trace their religious heritage to Abraham, will speak on their unique experiences of faith and how spiritual practice influences the ways they are in and about the world. We've no plans to sing Kumbaya, but we do plan to talk to each other, openly and honestly, and to listen and question and think and act based on mutual respect and appreciation. There is the distinct possibility that we will be changed for the better in some way from this interaction, and it could have a ripple effect on our nation and the world. The poet Edwin Markham wrote,
They drew a line that shut me out,
Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout!
But love and I had the wit to win
We drew a circle and brought them in.
I think we could all benefit from drawing an ever widening circle. We might be surprised at how enriched we become in the process. If you are interested in engaging further in interfaith circles, please visit www.fellowshipinprayer.org and join us on the campus of Princeton University June 24 to 27 for a wonderful conference on how spiritual practice within and across religious traditions is empowerment for social change.
Clay Farris Naff: Rather Than a National Day of Prayer, How About a Humility Day?
Whether these ideologies ever represented anything more than compelling myths is impossible to know. What we do know that is many men and women of good will continue to find their study and practice useful – and that aggressive attempts to proselytize for or against ideas tends to lead to unfortunate human outcomes.
For me, as a student of human history and comparative religion, the conclusion is clear. It's those things that men and women of good will can readily agree on, regardless of whether they believe in a deity or not, that are most likely to prove useful to the perpetuation of the species. Hence, I can agree with the value of drawing the circle, and ideally, an ever wider and wider circle. And it’s the perpetuation of the species that men and woman of good will must be interested in.
It's possible to be a `fundamentalist athiest', who believes fervently that there is no god. But while such a view is consistent with the evidence, it is not much more rational than being a `deist', and picking out a specific imaginary best friend (or friends) in the sky.
I suggest that even the most vocal `evangelical atheists' would typically become deists if any evidence of a deity came to light.
My ol' Pop had MS. Dozens & dozens of folks prayed for him. He still died in agony.
Yep. Nothin' fails like prayer. And if ya think OTHERWISE -- well, pray me right into your religion. I'll let ya know when it happens, I promise.
... talk to himself?
... look out the window and daydream?
... fantasize about kinky sex? or could THAT be a religious experience?