Congress should act immediately to abolish credit default swaps on the United States, because these derivatives will foment distortions in global currencies and gold. Failure to act now will only mean the U.S. will be forced to act after these "financial weapons of mass destruction" levy heavy casualties. These obligations now settle in euros, but the end game is to settle them in gold. This is so ripe for speculative manipulation that you might as well cover the U.S. map with a bull's-eye.
Credit default swaps are not insurance. If you buy fire insurance on your home, you must own the house. If you buy credit protection on the United States, however, you do not need to own U.S. Treasury bonds. If your protection gains value after you buy it -- not because the U.S. defaults, but because of market mood changes -- you can resell that protection and make a profit.
Lower credit risk means a lower price for protection. Zero implies zero risk. The higher the basis points, the higher the implied risk. When U.S. credit default swaps were first introduced, the price of protection was around two basis points. According to Bloomberg, the price for five-year protection was around 38 basis points (per annum) on Friday. But the price in the over-the-counter market -- where this stuff actually trades -- was almost double or around 75 basis points.
Since most traders in U.S. credit default swaps don't think the U.S. will default any time soon, why are they trading U.S. credit default swaps? They are speculating on price movements the way a day trader buys and sells stocks to speculate on stock price movements.
Volume in U.S. credit default swaps is relatively small, but it can explode rapidly, just as volume expanded rapidly for credit default swaps on mortgage debt in 2006 and 2007.
Speculators Want U.S. CDS Payoffs in Gold
Remember AIG? When prices moved against AIG on its credit default swap contracts, AIG owed cash (collateral) to its trading partners. AIG paid billions of dollars and owed billions more when U.S. taxpayers bailed it out in September 2008.
U.S. credit default swaps currently trade in euros. After all, if the U.S. defaults, who will want payment in devalued U.S. dollars? The euro recently weakened relative to the dollar, and market participants are calling for contracts that require payment in gold. If they get their way, speculators on the winning side of a price move will demand collateral paid in gold.
The market can create an unlimited number of these contracts very rapidly. The U.S. wouldn't have to ever default to trigger a major disruption in the gold market. Spreads (or prices) on the credit default swaps could simply move based on "news," and demand for gold would soar.
If this speculation drives up the price of gold, and the available gold supply becomes limited, are you willing to post your children as collateral? I am pushing the point so that we put a stop to this before it is too late.
Global Disaster in the Making
More than a year has passed since former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson went to Congress in September 2008 to plead for special powers and TARP money to bail out U.S. financial institutions. Yet there has been no meaningful financial reform.*
The European Union has its own challenges. German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently called for limits on credit derivatives on Greece, since the European Union is concerned about misuse of credit derivatives for speculation. Chancellor Merkel did not go far enough.
World leaders shouldn't merely ask for limits on sovereign credit derivatives. They should demand a ban on all sovereign credit default swaps.
See also: "Washington Must Ban U.S. Credit Derivatives: Games and Gold" (Part 2)
*This video explains how cheap money, wide-spread bad (often predatory) lending, phony securities, credit derivatives, and Wall Street banks' massive over-borrowing led to our current financial crisis. Yet there is still no meaningful reform. Explanation of credit derivatives begins at 8:00.
many people still don't understand this. Market makers and participan
Banks too big to fail, morph into banks too big to govern, and we wonder why, as we huddle around our desktop campfires waiting for the next OPEC stimulatio
Monopoly control over legal tender has a long, mean spirited, history. A system that places malignant cells of usury along side the enlightene
Democracy tries to give all a level playing field. With time, usury by its’ nature, must dominate or die. It uses the algebraic concept of exponentia
Exponentia
As we speak skin cells are being correlated into functional neurons. Hammurabi economics needs to be completely replaced with behavioral economics. Surely we can colaborate to come up with something with good behavioral design elements.
- Compound interest grows exponentia
Allows rich people to sit back and "live on the interest". Explains why private debt is now $47 trillion (3X GDP) and has grown each and every year since WWII. Without every increasing debt, there would have been no growth at all, particular
So at some point, debts grow so large (public, private and financial) they can no longer be serviced unless there is some method to inflate the prices (e.g. value) of things like housing and further leveraging the debt "overhead" against the inflated asset (hello derivative
Ya, Americans are still waiting for the anointed one to do something constructi
http://see
a tangent on the topic but well worth reading.
Another great article.
How would you link your grave concern over credit default swaps with what Simon Johnson is writing about here at HP and at Baseline Scenario that the banks are now "too big to save"?
In other words, me not being an economist, what risk are these speculator
I'm sharing it with everyone I know and respect so they can have an opportunit
You're a goddess...
Americans need someone who understand
Is it any wonder that we're inundated with "Sell your old gold and jewellery for top prices!" ads on TV.
There is certainly a huge demand for gold in unsettling times.
Between the 2 of them, they could really incite major correction
Hopefully, Obama sees all this and knows that changes that will overcome this huge behemoth will take time and will need a leader who is placing "sleeper" policies that can fly under the radar so that victory against these criminals can be assured. ... A very difficult and serious challenge. Like Ms Tavakoli says under no uncertain terms, "if you don't think this will happen again, that's just utter daydreamin
.
Look back just after WWII ended, the USA gave money to Europe to rebuild under Congerssio
1) To enable banks to profit from the coming collapse of the fiat money system
2) To provide a mechanism for this collapse to be managed
Now in the previous collapse of the US housing market, Goldman Sachs' CDS bets were held by AIG and ultimately had to be covered by the US taxpayer (or Chinese lender). This was because AIG didn't have the "assets" to cover their CDS exposure.
My question is which financial entities are out there currently writing CDS contracts for countries sovereign debt defaults. There is no way they will be able to cover that liability and as in AIG taxpayer bailout...
A CDS is only worth something if the counterpar
We are witnessing financial warfare and the weapons in this war are
1) banks
2) financial press
3) think tanks
4) credit rating agencies
5) fiat printing presses
I personally think that Europe should bail Greece out, because there is no point in financial discipline in a fiat system where default is not defined as quantitati
Just print the money like US and UK till Asia says enough is enough...
Imagine what would happen to all these credit derivative
I say, "fundament
Think it through and you will see what I mean. "I'm here to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge." Now, I'm back here to sell you a promise that, if the other guy can't pay for the Brooklyn Bridge (you see, I sold it simultaneo
Flim.
Flam.
This is -precisely
The expressed desire to obtain payment in gold bars is simply an expression of the growing realizatio
Another idea, however, is having the law treat CDS as insurance products. That will chase a lot of the speculativ