More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Janet Weinberg

GET UPDATES FROM Janet Weinberg
 

Who's Minding the Kids?!

Posted: 11/23/11 04:50 PM ET

Recently I mentioned to a few people that we no longer have babies being born with HIV in New York. Yes, this is true. Routine screening for newborns born with HIV began in New York in 1997, and in 2010 there were a total of three babies born with HIV. It is estimated that New York's great advances in this area have saved at least 749 infants from HIV, representing a savings of about $215 million dollars. This is a terrific advance in HIV prevention.

Parents work to protect their children. They hover over them as they take their first steps, provide safe and caring homes, and anxiously await their return home from that infamous first day of school. They then anxiously send their children off to their first dance and then again on their first dates.

There is a major incongruence though.

In 2009 there was an estimated 21-percent increase in HIV incidence for people aged 13 to 29 years. Young men who have sex with men were the only group to experience a significant increase in incidence in this age range. Most affected are young men of color. And yes, I know many jump to the conclusion that this increase is due to promiscuity, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clearly states, "The reasons for this increase among young, black MSM are not clear." They go onto say that there are several issues that seem to be driving this train, and they include:

  • Lack of awareness of their infection
  • Stigma of HIV and homosexuality, thus limiting access to services
  • Limited access to healthcare, HIV testing, and treatment
  • Increased likelihood of having older sexual partners (who are more likely to be HIV-infected), compared to MSM of other racial/ethnic groups
  • Higher rates of some sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among young black men, which can facilitate HIV transmission
  • Underestimating personal risk for HIV

As we worry about how to protect our children, we seem to lose track of the fact that they grow up to be sexually engaged youth. For eight years, we did not offer any options except abstinence-only sex education in the public schools. When the Obama administration went into office, two federal funding streams for abstinence-only education programs were eliminated.

We are finally beginning to make some progress toward the prevention of STDs and HIV. In August, for the first time in nearly 20 years, New York City public middle and high schools will be mandated to incorporate sex education as part of the public school curriculum.

Just recently, the recommendation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Immunization Practices stated that boys should be routinely vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV) at age 11 or 12. This would reduce the risk of genital warts and certain cancers, including anal cancer. Gardasil had previously only been approved to help prevent genital warts and certain cancers for girls and women.

On Oct. 31, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that pediatricians offer routine HIV testing for all adolescents, beginning at ages 16 to 18.

As parents, teachers, medical and community service providers, the time is now to increase protection for our children and youth from all of life's trials and tribulations. We must "mind" our kids, teens and even young adults -- their lives and our future depend on it.

 
Recently I mentioned to a few people that we no longer have babies being born with HIV in New York. Yes, this is true. Routine screening for newborns born with HIV began in New York in 1997, and in 2...
Recently I mentioned to a few people that we no longer have babies being born with HIV in New York. Yes, this is true. Routine screening for newborns born with HIV began in New York in 1997, and in 2...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:34 PM on 11/28/2011
"For eight years, we did not offer any options except abstinence-only sex education in the public schools."
This is a blatantly false statement and the author should have done a better job of research. Comprehensive sex ed in public schools flourished in the eight years before Obama with a 12 to 1 dollar disparity favoring comprehensive sex ed over abstinence funding. Today the disparity is 16 to 1. Even the Guttmacher Institute reported that abstinence was taught in only one third of the schools in the time period referenced. I cannot believe the ease with which misinformation is reported as fact on this site!
Another point is the cause of HIV in MSM -ludicrous analysis of the CDC findings! If black MSM have more STDs making them more susceptible to HIV transmission, how did they get those increased numbers of STDs? You may think it is politically incorrect to call it "promiscuity" but somehow they are more infected and that is not because of race but behavior. And as for the "progress" in addressing STDs, we now have lower teen birth rates but soaring rates of STDs - hmmm seems that "protection" against pregnancy is not protecting against STDs. I am stunned at the lack of critical thinking in this very shallow article!
09:22 PM on 11/26/2011
I don't want a school to discuss anything of a sexual nature with my daughters. That is my job. As for the CDC with their introduction of new vaccines for teenagers, they can keep them. I won't pump my kids full of toxins that could permanently harm them. But we have to keep the drug companies in the black, so the CDC will do all they can to promote useless vaccines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mindy Czech
Cindy's wife for life.
10:26 PM on 11/26/2011
Meaning what, that you want to be able to tell them that birth control methods do nothing but fail and that they need to stay celibate until they are married? So you can try and keep them as ignorant about sex as possible and not know how to protect themselves if and when they do decide to have sex? Because when people are so adamant that they don't want schools teaching their kids about sex, that is usually what they mean.

And that vaccine can prevent the most common strains of HPV and cancer. Nearly every vaccine that has ever existed has had a handful of subjects who had a bad reaction to it. MMR, the Polio vaccine, pretty much all of them. That does not make them bad drugs or bad vaccines. And no, Gardisil does not cause mental retardation. Even if your daughters stayed chaste until marriage, their husband could have had sex with someone else before them, whether they knew of this or not, and they could still get HPV.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
01:11 AM on 11/25/2011
It is entirely possible, and should be standard, to educate students about sexuality and sex while still stressing chastity as the safest alternative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mindy Czech
Cindy's wife for life.
11:31 AM on 11/25/2011
I would say that masturbation would be the safest alternative, because full chastity just won't cut it. I cannot stand how these people think that if we only teach abstinence and do nothing but stress the failure rate of birth control, we will end up with many more pregnant and STD ridden young people. I mean, the health teacher said that while condoms have an okay success rate while used properly, it is nearly impossible to ever use condoms properly, so I may as well not use one at all, right? When I took health my sophomore year back in 2001, all the teacher did was stress how much any form of birth control, even when you use two or three methods, fails. That you should only have sex with one partner ever, and that should be your spouse and it should start on your wedding night. This was at a public charter school too, not a religious one.

People need to be armed with the info that will protect them. Teens will have sex regardless, so they need to be educated on how to make that sex safe, from both pregnancy and disease. Otherwise, you are failing your children and your students.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mindy Czech
Cindy's wife for life.
11:54 AM on 11/25/2011
Eek, I meant that I cannot stand how people think that if we only teach abstinence and birth control failure rates, that teens will just not have sex. They don't realize that the opposite is true, and that all it does is make a lot of teens have sex without any kind of birth control or barrier method to protect them from disease and pregnancy. The same kids would probably be having sex anyway, so give them the tools they need to protect themselves and folks would be better off.