iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jared Bernstein

Jared Bernstein

Posted: March 6, 2010 10:20 AM

Recovery Act in Action, #2: The Scaffolding is Up!

What's Your Reaction:

This episode of Recovery Act in Action takes place in San Francisco, where the Recovery Act is bringing private capital off the sidelines and putting construction workers back to work on a major renovation project, all while helping seniors stay in their homes.

The scene is San Francisco's Tenderloin District, where construction crews are at work rehabbing two buildings, thanks to an infusion from the Recovery Act that brought private capital in from the sidelines. The $21 million project was delayed for years by frozen credit markets, but construction started this week and newly hired crews are already at work renovating both buildings.

The project is the work of Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation, which bought the buildings in 2007 and has been trying to renovate them ever since. I spoke to Don Falk, the director of the TNDC, who told me--quite proudly, I thought--that hammers are now actively hitting nails: "I walked by this morning and scaffolding is up!"

It was a lesser-known piece of the Recovery Act that made these renovations possible. You see, TNDC got a tax credit for this project back in 2007 to help finance investment in low-income housing. Usually, TNDC would then turn around and sell that tax credit to a private investor to get the capital they need for the project.

That's never been a problem for TNDC, a solidly credit-worthy group. But when the credit market froze up during the financial crisis, Don told me that he could find no private investors to come in on the project and TNDC couldn't raise the needed funds. No funds, no rehab, no jobs.

But then the Recovery Act came along with a program that allowed the TNDC to convert these credits into an upfront grant that gave them the cash they needed to start construction. Moreover, once the Recovery Act dollars were in place, a bunch of private lenders liked what they saw, and provided the other half of the financing for the project. So now instead of tax credits sitting idle while construction workers are out of a job, the Recovery Act has put brought together public and private investment to put folks back to work renovating these buildings.

Don told me straight up: "We were saved by the stimulus program."

So if you happen to walk by Turk St. or Eddy St. down in the Tenderloin and see a bunch of hardhats at work keeping seniors well-housed, that's the Recovery Act in action.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
03:59 PM on 03/07/2010
Jared; Cut the Bovine Scatology...if Obama and you cared about the American people and workers and infrastructure you'd have committed a lot more than barely a miserly 4% you totally ignored the Brookings Institute's great work on Infrastructure...for Larry Summers jobless recovery non recovery cash up the banks and to hell with the people....

We're gonna build for other nations and our Infrastructure is coming apart...

What are the official distributor of Crumbs is that your Dept., the Department of Crumb Distribution attached to the Vice President's office...?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azsin
i need a wife
04:33 PM on 03/07/2010
originaly supposed to be more
but to get past that damn filabuster
need to add more tax cuts
so less money for infrastucture!
photo
SparkyDash
Still a BFD
02:26 AM on 03/08/2010
Have you been drinking?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Watt
Not ready for 2012
03:22 PM on 03/07/2010
Great, two buildings on Turk st. You guys really think big.

Meanwhile in the Bay Area every fourth house sits vacant and more people are being evicted every day. Your administration has done exactly nothing to help people stay in their homes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN60
I Hope You'll Dance
08:45 AM on 03/07/2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/opinion/07friedman.html?ref=opinion

Good read on two innovators that will help put people to work and help the emmission problems.
12:39 AM on 03/07/2010
Soooo...let's seeeeee...Government takes tax money from Person A. Skims off at least 15-20% for it's own bureaucracy. Then passes along the remaining amount to Person B who will, in this case, rehab a building. Person B wastes an additional 10% because it's 'government funding' and we all know that means it has all sorts of additional useless elements and accomodations built right in.

The remaining 70% is spent without any regard as to 'real world' needs of the local housing market. Key targeted special interests are served. 'Shovel ready' jobs last 6 to 8 months...maybe a year. And the taxpayer pays back the entire amount through higher taxes plus interest so some construction workers can be kept busy for a few months.

Dumb.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ResearchtheFacts
Alert, awake & paying attention to the details.
12:16 AM on 03/07/2010
Two buildings...That should put hundreds and millions of americans back to work.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PatrickJ08
03:20 PM on 03/07/2010
The genius that you are, I'm sure you realize that two buildings doesn't encompass the entire stimulus.

Heck, crazy righties weren't even happy about 1/3 of the stimulus being tax cuts.

TAX CUTS!!!!
Righty-Gasm!
12:31 AM on 03/08/2010
The point is to show, the Stimulus money has put people back to work as designed. San Francisco is not the only city that received stimulus funds.
10:47 PM on 03/06/2010
Let's see, the economists are telling us that the commercial real estate is still in a bubble that is about to burst. Why would any bank want to give a business a loan where the market is about to crash?

Whoever gave this loan is either taking a big risk or is being backed by the Federal Government. Basically it looks like the People are going to bend over again for this one.
09:39 PM on 03/06/2010
Seems that when public funds are not available, private lenders come to the rescue.
11:49 PM on 03/06/2010
Your comment doesn't fit with the story very well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wattnot
I'm a Lumberjack and He's OK.
12:25 AM on 03/07/2010
Can you hear the guns Fernando? Or are the White Charger's hooves making too much noise for you?
Private lenders and rescue can parse in the same sentence only in conjunction with the word "themselves".
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PatrickJ08
06:29 PM on 03/06/2010
How many times does it need to be said that unemployment is the last thing to recover?
Is that a hard concept to understand?
07:47 PM on 03/06/2010
And what has recovered so far?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PatrickJ08
11:22 PM on 03/06/2010
If you had invested in the market before the 08 crash, you've likely recovered half of what was lost.

And the stimulus will have brought 3 million+ jobs by the time its finished.
photo
SparkyDash
Still a BFD
08:44 PM on 03/06/2010
It does seem to take a lot of repeating of facts, details and history doesn't it? And still many will not hear because they simply choose not to listen ;-)
10:58 PM on 03/06/2010
The facts are that we still have a long way to go. http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/studies/recession_perspective/index.cfm

If ObamaCare gets passed some how, economists have stated that the economy will slow down even more or stall in to a double dip recession. Also Obama and the Dems have spent so much money that we might go bankrupt. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/05/AR2010030502974.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:05 PM on 03/06/2010
The government gives a business money and they spend it. That creates economic activity. What a surprise!

Just a few questions. Where did that money come from? If it was taken from other taxpayers doesn't that just mean economic activity was destroyed somewhere else? If it was borrowed, doesn't it have to be paid back some day from taxes? Won't that just destroy economic activity in the future? If it was printed, won't that just cause inflation and make everybody worse off?
11:52 PM on 03/06/2010
It was printed. Like all our money, debt is just a number on a page, it doesn't mean anything, what really matters is confidence in the economy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:17 PM on 03/07/2010
Wow. If only the Government had worked that out earlier. Then we could have had all the spending we liked without any taxes at all.

Why is there all of the controversy over health care reform? Everybody could have their own persona doctor travelling with them 24 hours a day with a mobile surgery - the cost could be paid just by putting another number on a page that didn't mean everything!

I hope you are not in a position of any responsibility.
05:31 PM on 03/06/2010
Perhaps you missed the news:


More than 15,000 San Francisco city workers across all departments will receive layoff notices Friday

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/03/02/BA471C9UVR.DTL#ixzz0hRF1WyZM


That stimulus sure is working great.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LizM
My micro-bio is too long for this space.
05:45 PM on 03/06/2010
You may have missed the news, yourself. We are still in the process of recovering from a very serious financial crisis. We still have a very long way to go insofar as resolving all of the underlying issues and coming out on the other side.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:59 PM on 03/06/2010
The "underlying issues" in SF are too much Govt promised, not enough revenue available, too many people on the Govt. payroll, not enough real workers to support them.
photo
TheRLeePost
A 'blue' Southerner
10:16 PM on 03/06/2010
I imagine the budget of SanFran took some big jumps since 2002, when property values starting surging from the mortgage bubble. Most all of the municipalities and school boards pulled in windfall revenue from property taxes and instead of keeping their budgets in line with inflation, and investing the extra, they exploded their expenditures and now find themselves on the downhill side of the property value bubble. They aren't telling you the whole story, you have to look for it.

Here in Atlanta, the city's schools' budget went up 31% from 2005 to 2009, while the enrollment went down 6%. The stimulus bill has awarded $54 million to this poor distressed school board.

For American families, many of whom are undergoing financial distress, Congress has handed each and every household in this country a bill of $1,000 JUST for the education portion of this bill. GO LOOK AT THE NUMBERS. LOOK AT THE SCHOOL BOARD BUDGETS. If you have a brain, it should infuriate you!

This article is really the first instance of me seeing people who were first and worst hit by the housing collapse, those workers in the residential construction industry, getting any relief via the stimulus money. Those transportation projects in the 'stimulus' bill are for government contractors who were doing just fine with normal levels of government outlays. They aren't buying capital equipment and hiring full crews for those extra projects, it's just windfall work for them.

-RLee
http://therleepost.blogspot.com
05:27 PM on 03/06/2010
hard working americans who have lost jobs through no fault of their own and who want to work in many cases have no income because unemployment benefits have expired (not talking about the recent bunning issue about the one month reprieve). there are many falling off the final tiers and I ask that you relay to the President that these folks need benefit tiers extended through 2010.

i feel bad for these people and unemployment benefits are their main safety net.

thank you Mr. Bernstein.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
incognito-ergo-sum
ProgLibFemHumanist. Thanks tax payers for paying
05:20 PM on 03/06/2010
Monday morning my husband realized he was out of medicine. He called VA, they got the meds to him in the United Stated Postal Services kind hands by 12:00.

Two government agencies working together doing a bang up job. I am da mn sick and tired of government bashers, who for the most part do not even think of all the things the government does for them. But let their be a little pot hole in the road and wait for them to bi tch about it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
06:31 PM on 03/06/2010
I have heard so many ter--ror stories about the VA. However my experience is that as a disabled veteran I will get my medical needs met. If it is something I need, but not right now--the wait is quite lengthy. BUT if I need immediate surgery, I will be treated within hours. Plus the VAMC partners with teaching hospitals, so the care you are getting will not even be out in the mainstream for another 6-8 months. I don't know why we cannot have a healthcare system structured in a manner like the VAMC is.
11:49 AM on 03/07/2010
Too bad that not ALL Americans get medical treatment. Only if you work, or worked, for the government are you given special status (i.e. medical treatment).

I just wonder who pays for all the salaries of all the government employees and military personnel?

Oh, yeah: ALL of Americans are subsidizing and paying their salaries and benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PatrickJ08
04:26 PM on 03/06/2010
Lots of trolls on stimulus articles.
photo
SparkyDash
Still a BFD
08:46 PM on 03/06/2010
Fear that Obama is obviously not going to fail brings them out in droves.
04:04 PM on 03/07/2010
I read some of this ignorant trash, ask myself "Where do I start with this one?" And usually just let it slide. Reagan rethuglicans and teabaggers are not here to learn.
iridium53
Semper Fi
03:49 PM on 03/06/2010
This is very confusing.

The development of this project was delayed because it lacked the $21m in private financing it needed to proceed, right?

So, now, Recovery funds provided half the money for this investment in low-cost housing?

And, the owners of the property still own the property?
Is this an outright transfer of half the money to the owners of the property?
Some private investors are making out on the government's handout?

I'm missing, from the information in this article, how giving money to private investors is a good deal. It seems rather like giving money to bankers.

Wouldn't some bridge or road or rail construction benefit a lot more people than this?
04:06 PM on 03/07/2010
You could ask the people who will live in the buildings that. Living under a bridge is a bit of a stress.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:43 PM on 03/06/2010
Government should put Americans first. Corporations do not put Americans first; they put profits first and Americans in the poor house. I have no problem with profit and commerce when it comes to optional consumer items like TV's or cars. I would not seek to nationalize those industries. However, I would also recognize that our government has signed on to abusive, treasonous trade treaties like the WTO that have gutted the US job market. You pointed out the financial disaster facing Medicare but you failed to respond to the point I made about letting Medicare negotiate drug prices. You failed to respond to the fundamental fairness of the point I made about returning the investment made with our tax dollars to the American people instead of letting research grants be nothing more than corporate welfare. You failed to respond to the abuses of corporate cash and lobbyist loot inside the halls of the people's government.

If you're really concerned about high taxes and deficits, how about calling for deep cuts in the trillion dollar a year military-industrial complex? How about shutting down some of the more than 760 US military bases overseas and ending both wars? And what exactly is your plan to make American education competitive with the rest of the world?

Do you have an elderly parent living on Social Security? Would you throw them out in the streets or let them starve or go without medical care so that you can hoard more of your paycheck?