iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jared Braiterman

Jared Braiterman

Posted: December 2, 2009 12:17 PM

Biodiversity Remakes Tokyo

What's Your Reaction?

The Copenhagen UN Climate Change Conference addresses unparalleled environmental crisis and the need to transform our relationship with nature. Many people assume that nature has no place in the city. On the contrary, cities are central sites for a sustainable, post-industrial era that supports population growth and a high quality of life. Biodiversity and urban forests can thrive with concrete and people.

2009-12-03-pansies_sidewalk_suginami_t.jpg

Ordinary gardeners and environmental visionaries in Tokyo, the world's largest metropolis, are improving urban life for human and environmental benefit. While mainstream environmentalists work to save distant forests, urban innovators are creating new shared places that connect city residents to the environment and each other. Successful strategies include maximizing limited resources, engaging urban dwellers, and sharing daily life with plants and wildlife.

Tokyo's size, density, lack of open space, and past policy failures paradoxically make it a model for rebuilding mature cities and designing hundreds of new cities. Along with climate change, the world faces unprecedented urbanization, reaching 60% of the world population or 5 billion people by 2030. African and Asian urban populations will double between 2000 and 2030.

To make cities sustainable and attractive, limited resources must be used for maximum benefit. Tokyo already offers vibrant and safe street life with relatively small private spaces. Because of usage fees and public investment, more daily trips are made by transit, walking and bicycling than automobile. And large numbers of often elderly residents tend gardens spilling out from homes into streets. With minimal horizontal area between homes, Tokyo residents are experts in blurring public and private spaces, and growing vertical gardens in even the narrowest openings.

2009-12-03-shu_tgg_illustration4a_t500.jpg

Japan's love for miniaturization is aligned well with dense urban living. Kobayashi Kenji revitalizes bonsai by appealing to young city people's desire to connect with nature. Traditional bonsai trees that are over one hundred years old are a pastime of corporations and wealthy elderly men. Kobayashi employs more humble plant material and invites city dwellers to treat plants as members of the family, like pets. Daily care for plants connects city dwellers with nature, seasonal change, and growth.

A rice paddy in the middle of Ginza captivated Tokyo residents this year by bringing a cherished cultural activity into the heart of the city. On a vacant lot between demolition and construction, Iimura Kazuki's Ginza Farm created an open community place frequented by shop clerks, construction workers, office staff, children, and neighbors. Two ducks weeded the field, contributed fertilizer, and educated the public about natural farming. Adapting rice farming to Tokyo's ambient light and warmer nights required installing a tall black curtain to "help the rice sleep."

The Ginza Bee Project also creates space in the city for another stressed rural practice. Colony collapse disorder worldwide is linked to agricultural pesticides. Strangely, cities now provide a healthier habitat for bees than the countryside. Ginza's bees increase Japan's honey production and raise awareness about the relationships between bees and food, people and the environment. These 300,000 honeybees inspired companies and individuals to become urban beekeepers.

"I am not interested in greening," Yamada Yoriyuki, an environmental leader at Japanese construction giant Kajima, surprised me. Instead of applying green to existing projects, Yamada emphasizes the value of biodiversity and culture for new urbanism, with special attention to bees, falcons and the Japanese Pygmy Woodpecker. Kajima and a new corporate alliance, the Japanese Business Initiative for Biodiversity, explore new ways to connect development with habitat creation.

Another urban visionary is Professor Suzuki Makoto at the Tokyo University of Agriculture who is building a firefly habitat at a middle school with students, teachers and the local community. Fireflies have a magical appeal to children and adults, and are a natural gauge of the healthiness of urban environments. Fireflies require clean running water, near total darkness at night, and plants that feed and shelter them.

All of these urban ecology projects evoke the Japanese idea of satoyama, a balance between people and nature forged over two thousand years of rice farming. Unlike wilderness untouched by human activity, satoyama is a cultural landscape resulting from concentric rings of village, rice fields and surrounding forests. As Japanese increasingly abandon the countryside, bringing the average age of farmers to 60, reforestation has become a 21st century threat to the nation's biodiversity. Meadows and sunlight recede in rural areas, while the ideal of a balance between people and nature migrates to the city.

Creating an urban forest in Tokyo faces many challenges, including uncovering Edo-era rivers and canals buried in concrete and freeway overpasses. Dramatically reducing surface pavement will revive the soil, exponentially increase plant mass and urban wildlife, and reduce stormwater flooding and Tokyo Bay pollution. Even the most overbuilt city contains underused spaces, including roofs, walls and streets. All that is missing is for governments and corporations to connect with residents' passions and potential for action.

Urban ecology intertwines the health of soil, plants, animals and people. Biodiversity provides a natural connection between immediately improving our quality of life and addressing grave public policy issues such as climate change, energy independence, national security, food safety, crime reduction, air quality, and public health. Tokyo's lessons for sustainable cities range from the importance of culture in creating meaningful public places, to the role of biodiversity to remake even the densest metropolis.

 

Follow Jared Braiterman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JBraiterman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tostada
Pen name of author George Polley
05:37 PM on 12/12/2009
Living in Sapporo, Japan, and being interested in biodiverse living environments, I find Dr. Braiterman's article an interesting read. I would like to hear more from him on this subject.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jared Braiterman
10:32 AM on 12/18/2009
Thank you, Tostada, for your comments. I am hoping to write regularly here at Huffington Post. You can also find shorter posts on my research blog: www.tokyogreenspace.wordpress.com

Reader comments are most appreciated!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tostada
Pen name of author George Polley
11:33 AM on 12/18/2009
I'm familiar with your blog, having visited it several times. "Tostada" is a pen name I use with my blog, www.tostadaspeaks.blogspot.com. My given name is George Polley, and I live in Sapporo. I ran across your blog while doing some research for an article about green activities & green spirit in Japan that I am working on for a publication in the UK.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:53 AM on 12/03/2009
Don't mean to be a stick in the mud but planting non-native flowers in sidewalk cracks has nothing to do with an intact ecosystem and biodiversity. Cities are for people and whatever creatures that can survive in our presence. They create their own ecosystems. Call them city ecosystems. People may not like rats, pigeons, and cockroaches, but there isn't much they can do about them. That's one of the necessary conditions of an ecosystem--life that can thrive in the presence of other life.

Attempts to create artificially biodiverse ecosystems in cities never endure. I have nothing against pretty flower gardens and parks but they are as artificial as the city itself.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jared Braiterman
08:42 PM on 12/03/2009
Biodiversivist, thank you for your comment. I agree with you that "cities are for people and the creatures that can survive in our presence." Where I disagree with you is your idea that humans cannot welcome more plants and wildlife into our city lives, including non-native foods, ornamentals, honey bees, worms, falcons, woodpeckers, and the like.

My point is that our choice about how we live is not defined by the opposites of concrete or wilderness. Urban forests, like agriculture or domestic animals, are a balance between people and nature. In Japan, the rural environment is called "satoyama," and Japan's biodiversity rests on thousands of years of rice farming. As people migrate from country to city, it is interesting to see Tokyo visionaries bringing this idea of human-nature balance, or satoyama, to urban life.

Clearly the industrial age has thrown Earth's environment out of balance, and there are urgent steps we can take as city dwellers to contribute to cleaning the air and water where we live. A person who tends a flower in a tiny crack in a city street is showing respect for nature and for their neighbors. This ethos of care is essential to making cities livable. Even the smallest actions have consequences. Unfortunately, many city planners and environmentalists do not recognize the untapped human resource of city dwellers who are already working to improve their immediate environment and everyday lives.

I am afraid this reply is already lengthy. What do other readers think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tostada
Pen name of author George Polley
06:04 PM on 12/12/2009
I agree with you 100%, and I look forward to reading more about what you have to say on the subject, I recently read your article in The Japan Times, and liked it, which is how I ended up here, as I also subscribe to Huffington Post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tostada
Pen name of author George Polley
05:34 PM on 12/12/2009
So, your solution is....? I hear a complaint about cities being "artificial", but not a shred of proof. If they are, what is your proof that "artificially biodiverse ecosystems in cities never endure"? For your information, biodiverse ecosystems in rural areas don't endure, either, if people pay no attention to them. So you have no case.