Jane Norton has been telling reporters she cut her own budget when she headed the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
In an article Wednesday, The Denver Post set the record straight on Norton's CDPHE budget history, though some important information was left out. Lucky for you, I will provide it in this blog entry
Wednesday's Post story states that the general-fund portion of the CDPHE budget increased during Norton's first three years at the Dartment, and then it decreased in the last year, during a recession, from about $32 million to $16.2 million.
In an impressive bit of reporting, The Post quotes former state Sen. Dave Owen, a Republican who sat on the Joint Budget Committee when Norton headed CDPHE, as saying that Norton didn't cut the general-fund budget at the time. He says Gov. Bill Owens or the budget committee forced the cut on Norton.
But The Post rightfully points out that this hasn't stopped Norton from claiming, repeatedly, that she cut the general-fund budget significantly.
But even if you, as a reporter, think budget-maven Owen got it wrong, and you accept that Norton actually cut her general-fund budget during one of the four years she headed CDPHE, you still have to deal with the fact that, under Norton, the overall CDPHE budget rose.
In Wednesday's article, The Post should have stated more clearly, like reporters at 9News and Fox 31 did previously, that in addition to the general-fund part of the CDPHE budget, there are also two other portions: federal allocations and cash funds.
The Post reported, correctly, that federal allocations rose by $15 million under Norton. So it's clear from The Post piece that Norton did not cut the federal-allocations portion of her budget at all.
But The Post did not report that the "cash funds" portion of the CDPHE budget, which includes fees and fines, also rose under Norton from $56 million to $86 million.
So, if you count all three portions of the CDPHE budget (general fund, federal allocations, and cash funds), you find the overall CDPHE budget actually grew under Norton, as Fox 31 reported, starting at $226.5 million when Norton took over and finishing at $269.5 when she left.
It's the overall CDPHE budget numbers, which rose by over $40 million under Norton, that reporters should use to assess Norton's claim that she cut the CDPHE budget when she headed the agency.
Norton has argued that she only had control of the general-fund portion of the CDPHE budget.
But reporters shouldn't allow Norton to point to the general-fund portion of her budget, which Owen told The Post Norton didn't want to cut at the time anyway, and claim she has a record of budget cutting at CDPHE.
Norton had four years to find a way to cut the other parts of the CDPHE, the "cash" and "federal" portions. She didn't do it. She has claimed that she had no power to do this, but before believing her, a reporter, like a Tea Party activist, would want to see proof that she tried and failed to reject federal funds, and grants for example, or to fight for the reduction in revenue from fees and fines, revenue that she apparently did not complain about spending, as Department head.
I mean, no one recalls Norton complaining, like some governors have done regarding stimulus funding, that she was forced to spend the cash her department got from the feds. Ditto with the fines and fees. She didn't object to spending the money, as far as we know.
Clearly, a reasonable person can look at the facts about the CDPHE budget in different ways. 9News concluded that a Department head like Norton cannot claim to cut her budget, reporting that Norton's claim to have trimmed the CDPHE budget "isn't true" because she didn't have the power to do so. But in the end, the fairest way to cut through the clutter is to look at the bottom line.
If Norton continues to claim that she trimmed the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's budget, or its general fund, reporters should inform us, simply, that under Norton the overall CDPHE budget actually increased. No dispute there.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.