Political pundits moan that video cameras on the campaign trail stifle candidates from saying much of anything, for fear a gaffe will ruin them.
That happened to George Allen. At a campaign stop in 2006, the former Senator (R-VA) was caught on tape repeatedly referring to a young man of Indian descent--who was volunteering for Allen's rival Jim Webb--as "macaca." Webb won. Allen's videotaped "macaca moment" may have cost Allen his seat.
But most people would agree that political campaign shouldn't be won or lost with the single slip of a tongue.
I'm not saying Allen's "gaffe" wasn't serious. It was--the term is a racial slur. Still, with video cameras rolling at events large and small, from the beginning of a campaign to the end, we should take candidates' gaffes with a grain of salt.
However, the ubiquitous video cameras on the campaign trail do more than catch gaffes.
They also show how politicians change their messages in front of different audiences.
That's particularly important, nowadays.
Fewer journalists are assigned to trail political candidates, which makes it harder for us to hear how they're fine tuning their stump speech and talking points as their campaigns progress.
This past electoral season here in Colorado, GOP Senate candidate Ken Buck was caught early in his campaign on videotape making statements that arguably later led to his narrow loss to incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet.
But Buck's video-taped statements weren't slips of the tongue. They weren't "macaca moments." They were policy positions that appealed to conservative voters in the GOP primary.
Republican primary voters were deciding between Buck and his Republican rival Jane Norton. Norton was viewed as more of an establishment Republican, while Buck was embraced by Tea Party groups.
With backing from the GOP's far right wing, including social conservatives, Buck narrowly defeated Norton.
But after Buck won the Republican Party primary, videos of Buck's right-wing statements came back to haunt him.
They were used both by national groups and state campaigns in TV ads that painted Buck as "too extreme" for Colorado.
In assessing his Senate bid after his loss, Buck told the Denver Post that Democratic trackers recorded video of him at 600 public appearances and took his words out of context.
A review of his statements, however, shows that videotapes of Buck, shot by both his supporters and opponents, mostly illuminated straight-forward policy positions that voters in the general election, as opposed to conservatives in the GOP primary, found disagreeable.
Buck's problems weren't his gaffes but his policies, which may never have come to light had they not been recorded on the campaign trail.
Video clips showed Buck telling various conservative audiences that Social Security is a "horrible policy," the Veterans Administration should be privatized, and the Department of Education abolished. He also questioned the federal separation of church and state and the federal student loan program.
One clip aired repeatedly in TV ads showed Buck emphatically telling a Tea Party group during the primary: "I am pro-life, and I'll answer the next question. I do not believe in the exceptions of rape or incest."
So campaign videos, at least in Colorado's U.S. Senate race, helped bring to light Buck's policy positions.
That's a role that journalists used to play in covering a campaign. With their ranks depleted, more of that role is left to individuals, holding small video cameras near candidates in church basements or back-yard picnics.
I'd rather see professional journalists doing this. But at least we've got cameras on the candidates--even if some of them are operated by paid political operatives.
This op-ed was distributed by the Other Words syndicate.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.